Columbus, Georgia

Georgia's First Consolidated Government

Post Office Box 1340
Columbus, Georgia, 31902-1340
(706) 653-4013
fax (706) 653-4016

Council Members



The Columbus Consolidated Government

Planning Department

Post Office Box 1340 Columbus, Georgia 31902-1340

Telephone (706) 653-4116

Fax (706) 653-4120

Website: www.columbusga.org/planning



STAFF REPORT

REZN-5-13-2118

Applicant: Tracie Sumbler



Owner: Mary Gardner Walker and Deanna Davis



Location 1347 and 1353 23rd Street



Acreage: 0.284 acre



Current Zoning Classification: RMF1 (Residential Multi-Family 1)



Proposed Zoning Classification: NC (Neighborhood Commercial)



Current Use of Property: Vacant / Real Estate Office



Proposed Use of Property: Restaurant, General & Take-Out



Council District: District 8 (McDaniel)



Planning Advisory Commission's Recommendation: Conditional Approval based on the fact that the

request is compatible with existing land uses. The recommended conditions are:

1) Neon signs shall be prohibited and 2) the property shall be used for a

general restaurant and take-out restaurant only.



Planning Departments Recommendation: Conditional Approval based on the fact that the request is

compatible with existing land uses and the structure is an existing commercial

building. The recommended conditions are the same as those recommended by the

Planning Advisory Commission with one amendment to Condition #2 and two

additional conditions: 2) the property shall be used as a restaurant (general

and/or take-out) or office only, 3) the number of required parking spaces shall

be reduced from 25 spaces to 20 spaces, and 4) a Type C, Option 2 buffer shall

be required for the portions of the properties abutting an RMF1 zoning

district. Said buffer shall be reduced from 10 feet of plantings to 0 feet of

plantings. A wood fence or masonry wall shall be required.



Fort Benning's Rcommendation: N/A



DRI Rcommendation: N/A



General Land Use: Inconsistent

Planning Area D

Land Use Designation:

Single Family Residential



Environmental Impacts: The property does not lie within the floodway and floodplain

area. The developer will need an approved drainage plan prior to issuance of a

Site Development permit, if a permit is required.



City Services: Property is served by all city services.



Traffic Impact: This rezoning request does not anticipate generating a negative impact

on the transportation network.



Surrounding Zoning: North ? RMF1 (Residential Multi-Family 1)

South ? RMF1 (Residential Multifamily 1)

East ? RMF1 (Residential Multi-Family 1)

West ? RMF1 (Residential Multifamily 1)



Reasonableness of Request The request is compatible with existing land uses.



School Impact N/A



Buffer Requiremnts

The site shall include a Category C buffer along all property lines bordered by

the RMF2 zoning districts. The 3 options under Category C are:

1) 20 feet with a certain amount of canopy trees, under story trees, and shrubs

/ ornamental grasses per 100 linear feet.

2) 10 feet with a certain amount of shrubs / ornamental grasses per 100 linear

feet and a wood fence or masonry wall.

3) 30 feet undisturbed natural buffer.



Attitude of Property Owners: Forty-four (44) property owners within 300 feet of the

subject properties were notified of the rezoning request. The Planning

Department received comments at PAC regarding this case. No one opposed the

case.



Additional Information: This proposed project is located within the East Highland

Redevelopment area.



The applicant is proposing to use the existing 1,869 SF building for a take-

out/general restaurant use. They will provide a total of 20 parking spaces,

including 2 handicapped accessible spaces.



The applicant is requesting to add the following conditions: 1) Allow for a

reduction in the number of parking spaces from 25 to 20 (change from 1 space

per

75 SF to 1 space per 94 SF) and 2) Allow for a reduction on the Type C, option

2 buffer from 10 feet to 0 feet required along all properties bordered by RMF1

zoning district.



The reason for this request is that in order to incorporate most of the parking

required, there won?t be room to incorporate the buffer required. Although, the

applicant is planning to add either a wood fence or masonry wall as required

under Section 4.5.6 of the UDO.



Attachments: Aerial Land Use Map

Future Land-Use Map

Concept Plan

Traffic Analysis

Building photo

Attachments


Back to List