Columbus, Georgia

Georgia's First Consolidated Government

Post Office Box 1340
Columbus, Georgia, 31902-1340
(706) 653-4013
fax (706) 653-4016

Council Members

MINUTES

COUNCIL OF COLUMBUS, GEORGIA

WORK SESSION

SEPTEMBER 29, 2009



The regular monthly Work Session of the Council of Columbus, Georgia was

called to order at 9:00 A.M, Tuesday, September 29, 2009, on the Plaza Level of

the Government Center, Columbus, Georgia. Honorable W. J. Wetherington, Mayor,

presiding.



*** *** ***



PRESENT: Present other than Mayor Wetherington and Mayor Pro Tem Evelyn Turner

Pugh were: Councilors R. Gary Allen, Wayne Anthony, Mike Baker, Jerry ?Pops?

Barnes, Berry H. Henderson, Julius H. Hunter, Jr., Charles E. McDaniel, Jr. and

Evelyn Woodson. City Manager Isaiah Hugley, City Attorney Clifton Fay, Clerk of

Council Tiny B. Washington and Deputy Clerk of Council Sandra Davis were also

present.

------------------------------------*** ***

***----------------------------------

ABSENT: No one was absent.

------------------------------------*** ***

***----------------------------------



INVOCATION: Led by Councilor Wayne Anthony.

------------------------------------*** ***

***----------------------------------



PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Led by students from the Growing Room Academy.

------------------------------------*** ***

***----------------------------------

CONSENT AGENDA:



THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION WAS SUBMITTED AND EXPLAINED BY CITY ATTORNEY FAY

AND APPROVED BY THE COUNCIL:___________________________________________________



A Resolution (340-09) ? Denying Special Exception Use to erect a

telecommunication tower for wireless communications service on property located

at 8200 Stevens Lane.



City Attorney Fay said there is evidence in the record both for and

against the petition. He said the court reporter is present again this morning

to take down the vote and said it?s ready for Council?s action.



Councilor McDaniel said he don?t know if he should abstain from voting on

this matter or not, but said that his cardiologist is a member of that firm who

has objections to this request; and he also has a Medtronic defiblator and a

pacemaker. He said he doesn?t have any financial interest. City Attorney Fay

said he is not disqualified from voting on this matter just because he has an

implant.



Councilor Davis said he would like to make a motion to adopt the

resolution denying the request for a special exception as written by the City

Attorney. Seconded by Councilor Henderson and carried unanimously by those ten

members of Council present for this meeting.

THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION WAS ALSO SUBMITTED AND EXPLAINED BY CITY MANAGER

HUGLEY AND APPROVED BY THE COUNCIL:_______________________________



A Resolution (341-09) ? Authorizing the submission of an application and

if approved accept a Grant for $75,000 from the U. S. Department of Justice,

Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention for the Muscogee County

Marshal's Office, Junior Marshal Program.



Mayor Pro Tem Turner Pugh made a motion to adopt the resolution. Seconded

by Councilor McDaniel and carried unanimously by those ten members of Council

present for this meeting.



*** *** ***



THE FOLLOWING NEW ZONING PETITION RECOMMENDED FOR CONDITIONAL APPROVAL BY

BOTH THE PLANNING ADVISORY COMMISSION AND THE PLANNING DIVISION

WAS SUBMITTED AND AN ORDINANCE AND PUBLIC HEARING WAS CALLED FOR BY MAYOR PRO

TEM TURNER PUGH:______



Petition submitted by J. Barrington Vaught to rezone 35.095 acres of

property located at 3201 Macon Road from NC (Neighborhood Commercial) to GC

(General Commercial) zoning district. (21-CA-09-Vaught)

---------------------------------*** ***

***-------------------------------------

GREATER COLUMBUS FAIR:



Mr. Dale Hester, Director of the Civic Center came forward and said the

Greater Columbus fair starts on tonight and said he would like to encourage

everyone to come out and enjoy the fair. He said he has Mr. Jeff Blommest,

owner of the fair.



Mr. Hester said Mr. Blommest?s son, who is a navy seal, and who has been

in Afghanistan many times is coming home today and said he has served our

country very well.



Mr. Blommest said they look forward to coming back to Columbus every year

and said he would ask that you spread the word that they will be here through

Sunday.



City Manager Hugley said we look forward to a great week of the fair and

encouraged all of citizens in the region to come out and enjoy the fair.

Councilor Woodson said she would also like to remind everyone that tonight is

$1.00 night for everyone to get into the fair.



*** *** ***



ZONING PETITION:



Regarding the zoning petition, as outlined above, Mayor Pro Tem Turner

Pugh said she called for the ordinance and public hearing on the proposed

petition to rezone property on Macon Road, but said that doesn?t mean that she

supports that petition. She said she is probably not going to support the

request, but she just don?t want anyone to think just because she called for

it, she is going to support it.



*** *** ***



COMMUNITY MEETING IN DISTRICT 2:



Councilor Davis said he would like to share with the Council information

about a community meeting that took place in his Council District on last

night. He said there were about 300- 400 people who showed up at this meeting

on last night and they were concerned about crime, as we all are.



He said he wants to thank the Mayor, Police Chief Ricky Boren and the

Columbus Police Department and others who attended that meeting. He said they

really wanted the assurance to know that the City was looking at their concerns

and keeping it on the top of the list as a priority and making sure that the

citizens? best interest is at hand. He said it was a good meeting and they were

able to share their concerns, as well as there were some great suggestions and

ideas, but it is a step in being proactive with respect to crime. He said the

bottom line is that you can?t rely on one department or one group of people to

solve all the problems that we face as a society, and that we all need to work

together. He said he think that last night?s meeting showed that there are

opportunities that we can all work together to make an impact when it comes to

crime.



Mayor Wetherington said he would like to thank Chief Boren and his staff

as they did a great job on last night explaining what has to take place in

order for those citizens to form a neighborhood watch program in their

community. He said our police officials did a great job and those citizens who

were present at the meeting on last night interacted with our officers and were

very respectful. He said they just want to make sure, like all the other

neighborhoods that they live in a safe neighborhood and our police officers are

doing anything that they can to make that happen.

---------------------------------*** ***

***-------------------------------------

WORK SESSION:



OFFICE OF CRIME PREVENTION:



Mayor Wetherington said he would call upon Ms. Judy Thomas and Mr. John

Redmond to make the presentation on the establishment of the Office of Crime

Prevention. He said he, Mr. Thomas and Mr. Redmond have interacted with members

of the Council and heard what you have had to say about crime prevention and

said we are ready to make a proposal that we hope you can live with.



Ms. Judy Thomas, Executive Assistant to the Mayor said since we last made

a report to this Council said she and Internal Auditor John Redmond met with a

variety of people to come up with the report that they have submitted to you on

today. She said the report is the work of her and John Redmond. She said they

met with a number of Council members, talked with some of the original members

of the Mayor?s Commission on Crime Prevention, talked with staff as they put

this report together for you. She said she has talked with several of the

Council members since you received the report and she knows that there are

still some minor things that they need to deal with and hopefully on today, as

a result of this report and presentation to you, they will have those things

worked out.



Ms. Thomas then went into details and presented an hour?s presentation

with respect to the establishment of the Office of Crime Prevention. She went

into much detail, outlining the following information:



Mission



To provide leadership on effective and cost-efficient ways to prevent crime

To reduce crime by identifying truly outstanding crime prevention programs

Meet a high scientific standard of effectiveness

Innovative initiatives that help stop crime before it starts



Goals



To enhance and improve services offered by various departments, agencies toward

reducing crime

To directly impact mission of preventing crime

To streamline, coordinate crime prevention efforts

To ensure high level of accountability to citizens of Columbus who passed the

Local Option Sales Tax July 2008



The Office of Crime Prevention Board



Seven members, including chairperson

Appointed by the Mayor, confirmed by Council



Makeup of the Board:



Four at-large seats

Chairperson of the Public Safety Advisory Commission

Representative of educational community

Muscogee County School District

Columbus Technical College

Columbus State University



Representative of law enforcement agencies

Muscogee County Sheriff?s Office

Muscogee County Marshal?s Office

Columbus Police Department



Ms. Thomas said at the request of one of the Council members, on yesterday

she spoke with these three representatives of our law enforcement agencies and

they were in unanimous agreement that this is a position that they would like

to see established on this board. She said she also spoke with each one of them

if their agency is not the agency that has a person sitting on the board this

time around, how did they feel about having a liaison from their office work

with the board and the director; and said that is something that they would be

interested in doing. She said that is not a requirement that they have put into

the report, but said it is certainly something that they will be looking at.



Term of Office



Three years; eligible for one additional consecutive 3-year term



Exceptions



Law enforcement representative ? one year

Chair of PSA ? duration of term as Chairperson

Initial appointment ? terms established by lot



Ms. Thomas said they are recommending that the Chairperson would serve a

3-year term and the other three at-large positions, they would draw their names

out of a hat and one person would have a three-year term, one a two-year term,

and the final one would have a one-year term to get us in a rotation mode and

then they would be eligible for an additional appointment for an additional

3-year term.



Duties of the Board



Recommend to Council process, method for awarding service agreements for

delivery of crime prevention programs

Review and select for recommendation to Council service agreements that meet

the standards, criteria for funding



Criteria for Selection of Vendors



Includes those elements that help fulfill the mission of the Office

Criteria revised from time to time

Initial funding confined to agencies within the City or other governmental

agencies.

Must include specific components which identify outstanding crime prevention

programs

Must meet a high scientific standard of proven effectiveness

Must be innovative initiatives that help stop crime before it starts

May fall anywhere along the services continuum from early prevention to

aftercare programs for offenders

May target more than one issue, age group and population

Duration may be multi-year programs, but none shall receive funding for more

than two years without reapplication



Areas of Emphasis



Programs should address:

Recreation

Education

Employment

Drug prevention and intervention

Community policing



Service Agreements Include



Completed application form

Full description of proposed program

Budget showing proposed use of the funds

Agency?s current fiscal year budget showing all other funding received by the

agency including all grants, endowments, and all other funding from all sources

Goals of the program and timeline for meeting those goals

Method by which agency and City will measure attainment of program goals

Agreement to allow authorized representatives of City access to financial

records as they pertain to service agreement program

Any other element as authorized by the Board or the Columbus Council



Director of the Office of Crime Prevention



Position under direction of and part of Mayor?s Office

Operating budget part of Mayor?s Office budget

Budget shown as a separate section in the Columbus Consolidated Government?s

Fiscal Year Budget to be approved by the Columbus Council during regular annual

budget deliberations



Ms. Thomas said they did have a suggestion by one of the persons that they

talked with that there should be some kind of restriction on the amount of

money in this budget item that could be spent for the administration part of

this (operation part) and what percentage for the service agreement. However,

we didn?t include that in this report. She said in talking with the Human

Resources Director and the Finance Director, it was their thought to us that

the operating portion of this budget would not be an awful lot. She said you

are talking about the salary of the Director, as well as office supplies. She

said it would not be a lot of money. She said they did not propose to you a

split on the percentages. She said until they get things up and running, they

are not sure of what they are talking about; however, according to

conversations that she has had with the Internal Auditor we are certainly

talking about less than ten percentage of the administrative side.



Director of the Office of Crime Prevention Continued



Oversee City controlled funds used to support crime prevention activities

Build relationships with community organizations, businesses, and law

enforcement to aggressively promote the Office of Crime Prevention and its

mission



Work with various agencies as appropriate







Major Duties



?Develop and design procedure to be used by groups seeking service agreements

between agencies and the City for crime prevention programs



Procedure to include methods to measure program success and to provide

accountability of the programs that use City controlled funds



?Plan and coordinate crime prevention programs and activities in association

with law enforcement agencies, other governmental agencies, community

businesses and non-profit organizations



?Seek and evaluate crime prevention programs from other jurisdictions and

implement as appropriate



?Identify, apply for and administer grant programs relating to crime prevention

to further goals of Office of Crime Prevention



?Develop and oversee operating budget of Office of Crime Prevention



?Serve as liaison to Board of Office of Crime Prevention



In concluding her presentation, Ms. Thomas said that the Director of the

Office of Crime Prevention would have no jurisdiction over any law enforcement

agency in the City of Columbus. She said the Mission in a nutshell is that this

is Crime prevention, not law enforcement.



Councilor Henderson said he would like to congratulate the Mayor and his

staff who worked on this report. He said they showed tremendous patience in

trying to solicit input from the Council members. He said most of it looks

fantastic, but there is one point that he wants to make for clarification.



He said with respect to the operation and creation of the office of the

Director of Crime Prevention, he thinks we need to clarify in the resolution

that creates this office that it will be funded through the Local Option Sales

Tax. He said it would not be an additional burden on the general fund for

operations. He said he still knows that there are some issues with regards to

the position of the director and he would request that this be brought forward

in the form of a resolution. He said he would like to see it brought in

multiple resolutions, so that at least the office will pass; whether or not the

director?s position is approved.



Ms. Thomas said it is their recommendation to the Council that at the

October 13th Council meeting they would have the first reading on several

ordinances that is needed to put this in place. She said one of them would be

an ordinance creating the position of a Director of Crime Prevention, as well

as an ordinance creating the Crime Prevention Board. She said they are working

with the City Attorney?s office to determine if there are other ordinances that

need to be brought to the Council for their consideration. She said they

anticipate the first reading would be on October 13th and the second reading

October 27th.



After the conclusion of the presentation, Ms. Thomas and Mayor

Wetherington then responded to questions and concerns of the members of the

Council. The questions and concerns of the Council members are outlined below.



Mayor Pro Tem Turner Pugh said with respect to the makeup of the Crime

Prevention Board having seven members said at one time we had talked about

possibly having a representative from each of the eight Council districts and

then asked Ms. Thomas if they discussed this component.



Ms. Thomas said they did discuss that and said part of the reason for them

recommending a seven member board is that it is their feeling that a seven

member board is sufficient to do the kind of things that this board is going to

be doing because when you get much beyond that it gets unwieldy; therefore, it

is their recommendation to have a seven member board.



Mayor Pro Tem Turner Pugh said we went through a lot to get the sales tax

passed and said it was a commitment to the entire community and said she wants

to make sure that the entire community is represented on this board. She said

she knows that the Mayor appoints the board, but by the same token she thinks

everyone needs to be represented.



Mayor Wetherington said he is going to try to do that as best as he can,

but said he thinks that if you get too big of a board, it will be more

difficult to work through. Mayor Pro Tem Turner Pugh said she doesn?t think

that an 11-member board is too big. She said she feels like each Council

District should be represented.



Councilor Anthony said he had four additional questions regarding the

report. 1) He said he would like to follow up with Mayor Pro Tem Turner Pugh?s

request to have more members on the board in terms of greater representation

from the community. 2) He said he need to have clarification on what agencies

might receive funding and asked if they were excluding not for profit

organizations?



Ms. Thomas said their recommendation is initially that funding be made to

agencies within the City government and perhaps the school district or other

governmental agencies. She said this would allow them to get this piece in

place and get the corks worked out before they go out into the non-profit. She

said ultimately they see that this could go to other organizations, non-profits

and etc.



Councilor Anthony said he has been a champion for this and has seen many

of the presentations by the non-profit organizations in our communities that

are doing such great work and could do more if they had the resources. He said

so many people had that as an understanding as we moved into this and said he

would like the staff to come back and take a look at that again. He said not

just to make it exclusive to City government.



He said in going back to the two-year funding, said what if they did one

year but it is a renewable program, and they have to justify beyond that one

year.



Ms. Thomas said when she talked about the program might cover a two-year

span, we think that there are some crime prevention programs out there where

you can?t accomplish what you want to accomplish in a single year and said for

some of those they would be willing to take a look at a two-year program;

however, there are some programs that you can measure in one-year increments

and said those would be one year and would be renewable. She said those

two-year span would be for those programs that the service provider says that

we need a little longer to meet their goals. She said none of the programs

would be more than two-years without coming back to the Council for

reauthorization.



Mayor Wetherington said in order to kick this program off; we were going to

look at Parks & Recreation, Juvenile Drug Court, Adult Drug Court and some of

the other organizations. He said in no way are they going to exclude

organizations that has a good track record in looking at whether or not they

receive money or not.



Councilor Woodson expressed her concerns regarding the small groups that

are not large organizations, but primarily home-based groups that are doing

things within the community, but don?t have enough money to take their programs

or mentors to another level. She said when she looks at the Crime Prevention

Program she is looking at those small groups. She said she is hopeful that we

don?t exclude any of those small groups like CAD (Columbus Against Drugs) and

others.



Ms. Thomas said one of the things that they envision the director of the

Crime Prevention Office doing is working with groups like CAD to assist them in

their planning and funding, etc. She said they are well aware of those programs

and will be available to assist them that don?t have a funding base.



Councilor Woodson said she is happy with the program and she doesn?t have

a problem with hiring a director. She said she agrees with Mayor Pro Tem Turner

Pugh that the board should be larger; possibly have a sub-committee.



Councilor Hunter said he favors having a strong Director of the Crime

Prevention Office. He said this Director will have major duties and because of

that we do need to have a strong director if our goals are going to be

effective and there are efficient ways to prevent crime. He said if we have a

strong director some of the other things would become miniscule.



With respect to the terms of office, Mayor Pro Tem Turner Pugh said she

knows that they are recommending a one-year term for law enforcement

representatives, but said she thinks that it is going to take them at least one

year to get going really good and said maybe we need to look at that being a

two-year seat.



Ms. Thomas said this person could be reappointed for a second year and

said one of the reasons they said a one-year term was to allow for the

involvement more often of all of the agencies and said in her discussion with

the heads of these law enforcement agencies, each one of them said they would

have someone as a liaison to the board and to the office so that while there

may be only one person on the board as a voting member we anticipate that there

will be representatives from the other two law enforcement agencies actively

involved, but not as a voting member.



Mayor Pro Tem Turner Pugh said she is not talking about the entire

duration of the board, but said just the first couple of years.



Mayor Wetherington said we certainly could take a look at that.



Councilor Davis then expressed his views regarding this report and also

thanked the Mayor and his staff for their patience with him. He said initially

there were a lot of things that he was concerned about and even today there may

be some things that he is not comfortable with, but there are some things that

he likes about this program. He said if it is going to be a positive in a

community and we have a good way to evaluate this program to show that it?s

making a difference, he thinks any time you could do that; it?s good to give it

an opportunity. He said he was very vocal on this matter initially and thought

it was very important that we had a better understanding of the direction that

we were going and said the Mayor was kind enough to step back and take a

breather on this matter.



He said what he was sensing out in the community initially was that

everybody had a different perception of crime prevention and what this program

was about. He said what you have been able to accomplish here now is to narrow

the focus and the goal and what this program and crime prevention is going to

be about and because of that people have a better understanding today about

crime prevention.



Councilor Davis said with respect to Mayor Pro Tem Turner Pugh?s concerns

as far as the makeup of the board, he wasn?t dead set on how to form that, but

said whatever we do, there is a necessity that fairness and balance be on this

board. He said he likes the concept of the larger board and the members being

represented with each District Councilor having an opportunity to nominate

someone and said he thinks there is some balance there and it?s fair from that

standpoint. He said he is okay if the Mayor wants a smaller board or if it is

the consensus of the Council.



Councilor McDaniel said he thinks that the entire community has a

misconception of this Committee and what this program is supposed to do because

everyone he has talked to have said that we don?t need any more law enforcement

committee and said we just need to let the police, sheriff and marshal handle

it. He said it should be emphasized that this is a crime prevention tool and

not a law enforcement tool. He said it really needs to be emphasized with the

media.



Mayor Wetherington said there is some misconception about what this

position is as there are some who thinks that this is another safety director?s

position. He said he think that he has been patient and have made the case, as

well as have tried to inform the public of what this position is all about and

said this is something that we promised the citizens of this community that we

were going to propose a crime prevention director to work on crime prevention

programs and said in his opinion, this is going to be a great program if it is

administered right. He said he want to try to get it off on the right foot and

go forward with it. He said selecting the Crime Prevention Director to head up

this office is going to be so important so that he/she can work with the

different organizations and fund those that you think needs to be funded.



Councilor McDaniel said one thing that concerned him about this is that he

has had a lot of threats from people that says any Council member who votes for

this Commission they are going to vote against them when they are up for

re-election. He said we have to do what?s right and said he has tried to

explain to people that this is not a law enforcement office, but it is crime

prevention. He said we are trying to prevent crime.



Ms. Thomas said if there are people who have questions about the program

that we are proposing, they can give them a call and they would be glad to walk

through it with them or answer whatever questions they might have.



Councilor Barnes said he thinks this is going to be a tremendous program

and he echoes what Councilor Hunter has stated is pivotal in that the

Director?s position is extremely crucial. He said he thinks that when we do

mull all this through, we are going to mull through all the glitches or

problems that some people may have with the program. He said he agrees with

Councilor Woodson that there are a number of grassroots programs that have been

out there for years; with drug fighters being one, but said there are a number

of others that have been handicapped due to a lack of funding, but have stayed

the course over the years. He said he feels like Mayor Pro Tem Turner Pugh in

that because this was put out to the entire community that we do need to have

more district representation, because everyone bought into this by virtue of

the sales tax passing.



After more than an hour of discussion on this subject with several members

of the Council expressing their views and Ms. Thomas and Mayor Wetherington

responding to questions and concerns of the Council, this presentation was

concluded.



Councilor Anthony said he thinks that it would be helpful if we publicize

the five major areas of emphasis, which includes recreation, education,

employment, drug prevention/intervention and community policing. He said

community policing is one of the elements at the bottom; however, there are

four other major elements that this program has to address to have expertise in

and if the community understood how broad and sweeping this emphasis would be

they probably might have a better understanding of the nature of the Director,

who must be able to direct programs in each of these areas.



*** *** ***



Bond Project List and Financing Recommendations



City Manager Hugley said you have been talking about the Local Option

Sales Tax and the crime prevention component, as you went out to the voters and

said he think this would be a good time to go ahead and bring forward the

projects for bond financing, because this was a part of the local option sales

tax discussion as well. He said when we went out for the local option sales

tax, we defined infrastructure in the presentation that went around to the

various locations and said it included things like buildings and facilities; we

specifically mentioned the ice rink, natatorium, city service center, parking

garage, as part of the infrastructure definition. He said the question that was

asked of the people, if they would agree to use local option sales tax dollars

to completely fund those projects that didn?t have enough money to move forward

and in each of those sessions, the percentage and responders said yes, to us.



He said as we present to you, the project lists for bond financing for

your discussion and approval, a resolution will be forth coming at the October

13th meeting and we are hopeful that you would approve the resolution so that

our finance department can move forward and work with the other parties to

package the final list and get it approve so that we can have bonds issued to

us in January 2010 in order that we can move forward with the projects that are

going to be presentrd to you on today.



City Manager Hugley said that as these projects are presented to you on

today and if you approve the resolution on October 13th to move forward with

the bond packet, the debt service that we will incur as a result of getting the

bond money, the debt service payments would not cause an increase in any

property taxes or any taxes otherwise. He said the debt service payments would

not be a burden on the general fund just as the crime prevention would not be a

burden on the general fund. He said the 30% funding for roads and

infrastructure projects as that revenue is collected through the sales tax;

that would be used to pay the debt service that would be required for getting

this money through the bond issuance.



Councilor Woodson said she is going to have to leave the meeting early

this morning as she has a project at her job that she has to attend to, but

prior to leaving she has some requests that she would like for the staff to

look into for her. She said she would like for the staff to come back at a

later date and give an update on the East Highlands list. She said she

understands that a list was submitted a few weeks ago from the East Highland

residents of items that need to be addressed.



City Manager Hugley said he has not personally seen that list, but said

he will check into it.



*** *** ***



CHAMBER OF COMMERCE:



Councilor Woodson said she would like to request a resolution for the

Chamber of Commerce. She said it is her understanding that the Chamber was

recognized and did receive an award for their work in getting NCR to locate

here in our city. She said she did ask Mike Gaymon to come back to the Council

at a later date so that the public can see when we take risks in doing things

to bring new jobs to Columbus what happens. She said it is important for the

citizens to be kept update on what?s going on,



*** *** ***

Bond Project List and Financing Recommendations



Finance Director Pam Hodge then came forward and said there are three

different components of her presentation, which relates to the bond package,

which includes the update on the Local Option Sales Tax, L.O.S.T. Plan

Allocation and revenue projects, Project List (which will be presented by

Deputy City Manager Arrington and then she will wrap it up with the Debt

Service/Financing Recommendations for this bond issue.



Ms. Hodge said this is an updated local option sales tax revenue

projection based on estimates that we are receiving current collection

estimates. She then highlighted the following information outlined below:



She said in 2010, we are projecting $28.8 million; which is what was

adopted in the operating budget for FY-10. She said this is an average of $2.4

million per month and for July 2009 we actually collected $2.6 million. She

said for an average we are expecting to collect $28.8 million, some of which

will be set aside for the rollback requirements. The $14.7 million is for the

70% for public safety, and $6.3 million for the 30% infrastructure. She said

this projection is taken out over the years to 2016.



City Manager Hugley said when we went out for this local option sales tax,

we projected based on the trends lending into the local option sales tax. He

said we projected that we would collect $36 million with this one percent local

option sales tax; but obviously the economy went bad and sales tax collection

is still down and therefore, we have adjusted these numbers to reflect actual

collections today. He said these are conservative estimates going forward in

future years, as we have projected $36 million for 2009, but we have adjusted

the numbers based on current collections, but even out as far as the year 2016,

we are still projecting around $30 million, which is $6 million less than what

we projected and what we should have been on target to receive in 2009.



Director of Finance Hodge said we also wanted to use conservative numbers

to show that the debt service requirement by these bonds will not be impacted

and will actually be much better off if the economy does turn back around and

we do collect more revenue; but said the current revenue collection that we are

seeing today can support the debt service on these bonds.



She said in looking at the 70% for Public Safety, by year, they have

projected out the public safety personnel, operating and capital, crime

prevention program, as well as the debt service requirement on the 70% public

safety allocation. She said they are showing it in phases, and will show the

financing recommendation to have these bonds issued in two phases. She said the

first phase debt service requirement would be in 2011 and then both phases

would be required in 2013.



Ms. Hodge said in 2013 on the public safety personnel there is a large

increase from $9.9 million to $15.3 million, which will be during the time when

we anticipate the jail to be staffed and all of the positions that was

recommended in the local option sales tax to be allocated.

She said that will also be the time when the rollback requirement will be

completed and we are looking at a full year worth of debt service and

personnel.



Ms. Hodge said on the 30% roads and infrastructure, it has been broken out

into the pay as you go projects and debt service on three different areas,

which includes roads, storm waters and facilities. She said the debt service

will be in two phases, with Phase One being completed by 2012 and Phase Two

will take place in 2013; therefore, the full service debt service requirement

will be required in 2013.



Deputy City Manager David Arrington then came forward to present the

projects list. He said as Director of Finance Hodge has indicated, we are

looking at the year 2013 as the fiscal year for us to make our projections

based on the projected revenues and expenditures. He said when we look at the

70% allocation for public safety this is the first year that we project that we

will have all the public safety officers hired to staff the jail, and the 100

police officers. He said we also have the operating and capital, as well as the

crime prevention budget, which is subject to the Council?s approval each fiscal

year. He said there is also the bond financing for the two capital projects for

public safety. He said the only fixed amount in this allocation is the bond

financing. He said the other allocations; operating, capital and crime

prevention are subject to the revenue, which is generated that particular

fiscal year. He said the personnel are semi-fixed in that once we hire the

personnel they are on board and we incur those expenses. He said the public

safety allocation is heavily weighted towards personnel because the main

objective of the local option sales tax was to put additional police officers

on the street and then to expand the jail.



Deputy City Manager Arrington said when we look at roads and

infrastructure, the 30% allocation from the local option sales tax bond

financing will amount to approximately $6.895,000 for roads, facilities and

storm-water rehabilitation projects, which will be a fixed amount as we move

forward. He said as we receive additional revenues or as the economy improves

and we have additional dollars, those dollars would be spread out over the pay

as you go items. He said their initial projections for the pay as you go items,

which includes resurfacing, building maintenance, technology, storm-water

rehabilitation, and bridge maintenance, we had a lot more money allocated

toward each of these items; especially resurfacing, which is a high priority

item for us. He said of those dollars remaining, we allocated 50% of the pay as

you go items towards resurfacing. He said we would like to do more, which their

initial goal was to have close to $3 million.



He said the fixed amount for bond financing is $6.896 million dollars and

the additional funding would go towards the pay as you items.



He then went into details outlining the specific projects, as listed below:



Public Safety Bond Projects- $33,000,000

Fire Station Construction

Jail Expansion

* 911 Center Expansion & Additional Console

*800 MHz ? High Performance Data Upgrade



* These projects will be funded with general fund, fund balance in FY-09. Fund

balance to be reimbursed with L.O.S.T. funds on an annual allocation basis.



Road Bond Projects - $31,100,000

Moon Road Phase II (Wilbur to Whittlesey)

Forrest Road Phase I (Floyd to Schatulga)

Forrest Road Bridges (2)

Forrest Road Phase II (Macon to Palomino)

Whitesville Road/Double Churches

Panhandle Road

Fort Benning Road/Brennan Road

Fort Benning Road Streetscapes



Infrastructure Bond Projects - $67,400,000

Flood Abatement ? 6th Avenue Phases II-V

City Service Center

Natatorium

CSC Parking Garage

Ice Rink

Recycling and Sustainability Center

Cooper Creek Tennis Court Expansion

-----------------------------------*** ***

***-----------------------------------

NOTE: Councilor Allen left at this point in the proceedings, with the

time being 10:35 a.m.

-----------------------------------*** ***

***-----------------------------------



Councilor McDaniel said he has asked Deputy City Manager Arrington about

the possibility of putting the Mayor?s Office, as well as the City Manager?s

Office out at the City Service Center and then asked if that is included in

this project. City Manager Hugley said that they are going to be looking at

that. He said when we bring back the layout design of who is going to move you

will see that and decide whether it stays in or come out.



Mayor Pro Tem Turner Pugh said she didn?t know we were going to move the

Council Chambers out to the City Service Center. City Manager Hugley said part

of what we had talked about before is that the Council Chambers will be

included in the City Service Center, along with some of the other offices. He

said we will bring it back to the Council and you will make the final decision.



Deputy City Manager Arrington pointed out that the City Manager felt that

it was important that we mention some of the projects that are not included in

this bond issue because we were limited in how large of a bond packet that we

could put together because of the economy, as well as the revenue that we had

forecast could cover our bond debt. He then outlined those projects that are

not funded, as outlined below.



Projects Not Funded

Name:

Amount:

Old Camp Landfill Closure $4.8 million

19th Street Flood Abatement $20

million

Additional Flood Abatement YTB Determined TDB

Watershed Maintenance $500,000/yr

Resurfacing ? approx. 35 miles/yr $4 million/yr

Local Share of DOT Road Projects TDB

Stormwater Pipe Repair/Rehab $3 million/yr

Oxbow Meadows Marina $10 million

Technoogy Upgrades-Court Case Management, $14 million

Pension, Tax Appraisal & Collection, Police,

Record Management etc.



City Manager Hugley said he told Deputy City Manager Arrington to put the

Oxbow Meadows Marina on the list to show that it is acknowledged and

recognized; however, it is not funded. He said as we go through this process,

the Council will decide what stays on the list, what comes off and what will be

added.



Councilor McDaniel said we have exhausted every method of raising funds

for someone to build a Marina and give it to the City. He said the only way

that it is going to be built is possibly with a bond issue and said then we can

lease it. He said it would be a tremendous tourist asset to our community and

said we really need to do that.



-----------------------------------*** ***

***-----------------------------------

NOTE: Councilor Allen left at this point in the proceedings, with the

time being 10:35 a.m.

-----------------------------------*** ***

***-----------------------------------



Deputy City Manager Arrington continuing on with his presentation on those

projects currently not funded said if there are any of these projects that the

Council would elect to include in the proposed bond package, then they would

have to go back and take a look at the impact that it would have on the overall

revenue stream and then bring back that impact for a decision at a later time.



Deputy City Manager Arrington, as well as City Manager Hugley then

responded to questions of Mayor Pro Tem Turner Pugh with respect to the amount

of funding that is included in the bond packet for resurfacing.



Deputy City Manager Arrington pointed out that the allocation for the

other pay as you go items under the 30% roads and infrastructure are close to

what they had originally projected for them. He said as additional revenue is

generated through the economy improving, that additional money would be

allocated towards resurfacing, as it is a high priority for us as well.



City Manager Hugley said as our sales tax collection increases, we could

put more money towards resurfacing because it is not a bond project. He said we

could accomplish what you desire when the collection starts to increase.



Councilor Henderson said he agrees and said he thinks its important to

note to gain $1 million worth of resurfacing money the revenue has to increase

by $3 million because we are using 30% towards infrastructure.

He then asked that he be provided with projected operating costs for the

facilities that we are looking at constructing out of the bond projects.



City Manager Hugley said that we are working on that. He said Deputy City

Manager Goodwin provided him with a list of facilities operating cost, which

includes the Citizens Service Center. He said he is not ready to give this list

to the Council right now, but said it?s forthcoming.



Director of Finance Pam Hodge said for the list of projects that Deputy

City Manager Arrington outlined above, the following, as listed below are the

financing recommendations, which will be done in two phases.



Debt Service Financing Recommendations

Phase I - $91,500,000

Public Safety - $2,000,000

Fire / EMS Station



Infrastructure Projects- $89,500,00

Road Projects

Flood Abatement

Recycling/Composting Center

City Service Center

CSC Parking Garage

Natatorium

Ice Rink



Ms. Hodge said these projects would be included in Phase One bonds that

they would like to issue in January 2010.



BOND PROJECT LIST

Phase II - $40,000,000

Public Safety - $31,000,000

Jail Expansion

Infrastructure - $9,000,000

Road Projects

Cooper Creek Tennis Center Expansion



She said the reason for the Phase II projects is that these projects are

not ready to go now, but they will be ready to go within the next one to two

years. She said the total debt service that will be required once both phases

of the bonds are issued would be $2,310,000 for Public Safety and $6,895,000

for Infrastructure. She said these debt service projections are an estimate at

this point; however, when we go out for bonds, the actual debt service will be

determined at that point. She said we are currently using the market rate plus

50 bases point for their estimates and said that these are conservative debt

service estimates and do anticipate them to come in a little lower than what we

are projecting.



Ms. Hodge said in order for us to issue the bonds by January 2010 and to

meet the timeline that has been outlined to the Council, we will be coming back

to the Council on October 13th with a resolution that will authorize the

Columbus Building Authority to issue the bonds and for us to proceed forward.



After the conclusion of Ms. Hodge?s presentation, City Manager Hugley said

with that being said, we would like to bring back to the Council as stated by

Ms. Hodge at the October 13th Council meeting the resolution which would allow

them to move forward with this list of projects for the bond financing in the

amount of $131, 500,000; which will be in two phases as stated by Ms. Hodge.



Councilor Anthony said on the revenue projections, asked if those numbers

included growth from BRAC, Kia or the National Infantry Museum increased

revenue, to which Ms. Hodge said that is just based on the current collections

we are experiencing today.



City Manager Hugley then asked if there were any other questions on this

presentation before moving forward with the next subject matter.



Mayor Wetherington said this is a very aggressive agenda and said we are

taking a step, in what he thinks the citizens of this city wants us to do. He

said he don?t believe that there is another city in the country that has passed

a permanent sales tax in a down economy with a L.O.S.T. and then passing the

S.P.L.O.S.T.; two taxes that were passed within a year. He said our citizens

stepped forward and they said yes. He said this is a very aggressive proposal

that we are asking you to support, but it is something that the citizens have

spoken about and is something that we need. He said we are going to continue to

travel that path of doing things for the citizens of this city. He said he

wants to say thanks to the citizens, as well as the Council in this matter.



Councilor Anthony said he would like to ask that we continue our efforts

in transparency making sure that everybody knows how we are spending the

previous S.P.L.O.S.T. money, as it has been a while since we have presented

that to the public.



*** *** ***



Regional Economic Development Projects:



Deputy City Manager Arrington said about three years ago the City Manager

brought to the Council a recommendation for us to move ahead with hiring a

consultant to update our comprehensive plan. He said the comp plan being that

primary policy tool that we use for land use decisions, development issues and

community development. He said at the same time we also discussed with the

Council the idea of working with the Valley Partnership Joint Development

Authority on perusing federal grant funds through the Office of Economic

Adjustment to assist the region and us in preparing for the impact of BRAC. He

said through the hard work of Gary Jones and his staff, specifically Larry

Crane and his grant writing ability, the region was awarded through the Valley

Partnership funds for two planning grants; a joint land use study and a

regionally growth management plan. He said these two documents compliment our

comprehensive plan and said the document just distributed to the Council by

Will Johnson shows how the three documents work together, as there are areas

that our comprehensive plan did not study; but either the joint land use study

or regional growth management plan did.



He said our comprehensive plan looks at issues within our city limits, and

the other two documents look at specific elements from a regional basis and how

things that happen outside Columbus impacts us and how things that we do inside

of Columbus impacts us outside; with all of it focusing towards Fort Benning

and the impact that the growth has on our community.



Mr. Arrington then called forward Mr. Mike Gaymon, President/CEO of the

Chamber of Commerce to introduce Mr. Gary Jones and his regional growth

management team.



Mr. Mike Gaymon of the Chamber of Commerce said Mr. Gary Jones is the

Senior Executive VP of Military Affairs at the Chamber of Commerce and said

that we are very blessed to have him leading the military affairs efforts.



Prior to Mr. Jones coming forward to make a presentation, Mr. Gaymon

made some brief comments regarding Columbus? growth industries and gave some

statistics of that growth, which includes the following:



Fort Benning, Defense Industry

11,403 New Jobs

$ 3.5 Billion Capital Investment



Aflac, Information Technology Industry

2,000 New Jobs

$100 Million Capital Investment



Kia, Automotive Suppliers Industry

3,000 New Jobs

$1.2 Billion Capital Investment



NCR Manufacturing Industry

872 New Jobs

$27 Million Capital Investment



Mr. Mike Gaymon said thanks to the Council?s support and leadership for

what you have done to help us recruit NCR, which has already hired 100

employees and are ahead of schedule. He said what Councilor Woodson had

mentioned earlier in the meeting is that for the second year in a row, our

Valley Partnership Chamber staff has received the Deal of the Year Award at the

Georgia Economic Development Association?s Annual Meeting and the NCR Project

got the Deal of the Year.



He then highlighted the Fort Benning Growth estimate numbers; which he

said these are the numbers that was first put forward regarding BRAC and said

that they have not changed. He said Mr. Jones will provide you with some

additional numbers, but said these are the numbers that Ft. Benning and

Washington has; and these are the numbers that we have consistently talked

about with respect to the impact of the growth of Ft. Benning in our area. He

said we are talking about a city, the size of Rome, Georgia being put into our

region, 28,000 people coming to our city over the next several years. He said

the impact is going to be significant.



Mr. Gaymon said they have had over 400 volunteers involved with this

Regional Growth Management Plan, which includes the city staff who has been

side by side with all the consultants and other people working to make sure

that we are paralleing what the city?s growth management plan is about. He said

we don?t have two separate documents, they are all in concert together and said

this study was done to the support of the Federal Government, for the ten

counties of which Muscogee County is one at no direct cost to you. He said

this document parallels what you have already done and they are consistently

compatible with one another.



He then called Mr. Gary Jones to come forward and go through the other

aspect of the regional growth management plan.



Mr. Gary Jones, of the Chamber of Commerce said when they focus on the

Base Realignment Enclosure Plan they focus on the 10-county area because it

cannot be a local effort when dealing with a magnitude of 11,000 jobs and

growth of 28,000 plus people, you have to approach it from the entire region;

which includes three counties in Alabama and seven in Georgia. He said as

indicated by Mr. Gaymon we have created a plan for each of those individual

counties, as well as an oversight regional plan.



Mr. Jones then spent approximately twenty minutes or more highlighting

several charts providing information on the following areas:



Fort Benning Construction 2009 Through 2016:



$3,500,000,000 (Approaching $4 Billion)



Fort Benning Regional Current Salary Impact:



Monthly $110,000,000 = Annually $1,320,000,000



Fort Benning Regional Current Contracts:



Impact Monthly $250,000,000 = Annually $3,000,000,000



Fort Benning BRAC Complete, Future Salary And Contract Impact

Increase:___________________________________________________



Monthly $25/$35,000,000 = Annually $420,000,000



Regionally When Fort Benning BRAC Complete, Regional Future Annual

Sales:_______________________________________________



Estimated Increase = $986,367,000



Regionally When Fort Benning BRAC Complete, Regional Future Annual

Salary/Income: _____________________________________



Estimated Increase = $246,296,000





When Fort Benning BRAC Complete Annual Regional Economic

Impact:______________________________________________________



$5,972,000,000 (+/-)





Mr. Jones said that whenever Fort Benning has an issue, then we have an

issue; however, we have a staff that is focused on Fort Benning and said they

couldn?t accomplish that without the great support of the City staff. He said

City Manager Hugley specifically chaired the Public Transportation aspect of

the regional growth management plan, as well as Deputy City Manager Arrington

and Finance Director Hodge chairing a committee. He said it was truly a team

effort as they went forward.



He then showed some photos of the current construction that is taking

place at Fort Benning, which includes the Fort Benning Highway & Community

Cluster Development, Clark Realty Capital, Fort Benning Project, Infantry Basic

Training Construction at Sand Hill, Armor School Construction at Harmony

Church, New Hospital - Site Opportunity, ($597 million total impact).



Mr. Jones said when they created the Regional Growth Management Plan; they

standardized the way to look at counties within a 10-county area.

He said regardless of whatever county you go to, the plan will be laid out the

exact same. He said if anyone wants to look at the plan, they can go to the

following website and pull up that plan: ww.fortbenningandthevalley.com



He said from this website, you can bring up videos, fax, as well as

individual plans. He said there has been over 10,000 hits on that site, with

over 32,000 pages have been read by people who are looking to bring businesses

here to our city, as well as people who want to relocate here.



Mr. Jones pointed out that there is a video that has been created that is

being used actually by the Economic Development Departments to sell this region

and it has been created for each of the cities. He said that there are current

growth trends and in the direction that people are going with the projections

showing that Muscogee County will have the greatest growth with Lee and Russell

following second and third, Harris and Chattahoochee being the fifth. He said

when you take a look at Muscogee County, it is anticipated between now and the

year 2013 that there could be a growth of up to 15,000 new citizens.



He said when they went and came up with the key findings, we were pleased

to find out that our findings were parallel to the comprehensive plan and were

in sync with the studies that are being done and found that it is augmented

into the plan and has assisted and have flushed out some gaps. He then

highlighted those key findings of the Regional Growth Management Plan, which

are outlined below.



Key Findings:



Largest current economic development project in the Bi-State area

Numbers continue to grow

RGMP From Regional Prospective

Has Augmented Columbus Comprehensive Plan

Is in Synch And Supportive of Columbus Comprehensive Plan

Location, Location, Location

Must Continue to Think Regionally To Be Attractive to Incoming Industry

Continue to Address Public Transportation Needs of Growing Senior Population

Continue to Develop Library Services Web-based Access

Continue The Growth And Expansion of Workforce Development Programs Necessary

to Meet Economic Development Demands



Mr. Jones said when the new members comes here, they are going to decide

where they are going to live and said of the key factors in deciding where is

going to be safety, education, quality of life, spouse employment, childcare

facilities. He said we need to continue to encourage local contractors to

partner with existing contracts that go on post and said those citizens who

want employment; we will be showing them a site that they can go to which will

show Federal employment opportunities. He said in addition to that we have

received a $3 million grant where they will be working with Columbus Technical

College, Chattahoochee Valley Community College, Auburn, Columbus State

University, Georgia Tech, as well as other entities to go create program deals

for combat automotive; as well as go into communications and how you go in and

repair computers; etc. He said all these things we have applied to the military

requirements so that civilians can be hired as well.



Mr. Jones then continued to speak for several more minutes in outlining

what the next steps are in this Regional Growth Management Plan, as well as

what has already been done.



In concluding his presentation, Mr. Jones said that the Regional Growth

Management Plan is your tool and has been designed to assist the City Manager,

and is a document, which city managers and their staff can appreciate because

it not only addresses things historically but addresses the day and looks

forward to the future.



Mayor Wetherington said he would like to thank Mr. Jones and the Chamber

of Commerce for the work that has been done in this effort and all the good

things that are happening in our region. He said we are just a blessed

community.



Councilor Anthony said he would like to thank Mr. Jones for his years of

work on this project and said that long before we could begin to see the

obvious construction out at Fort Benning, from the Chamber of Commerce, City,

Regional Commission, you particularly have been pushing this and helping us to

stay in the forefront of it, we really want to thank you for your great

leadership and continuous efforts.



*** *** ***



ORDINANCE FOR FIVE CENTS METRA FARE INCREASE:



City Manager Hugley said at the last Council meeting, the ordinance for

the five cents Metra fare increase was listed on the City Attorney?s Agenda and

there was a public hearing held on this matter, and said it was supposed to

have been listed on the Consent Agenda for today?s meeting, but was

inadvertently left off. He said we do need to take a vote on this ordinance to

approve that five cents increase so that we may proceed forward with responding

to the Federal Government. He said it was on first reading at the last meeting

and should have been listed today on the Consent Agenda for second reading.



In response to Mayor Pro Tem Turner Pugh, City Manager Hugley said yes, it

has been publicized and we have gone through the public hearing and said we

also had a public forum to receive input from the citizens and then it went on

first reading and we didn?t have any citizens to respond.

City Attorney Fay, also responding further to the concerns said this does not

change the fare card, it only charges the $1.25 fare to $1.30 fare.



Mayor Pro Tem Turner Pugh then moved approval of the ordinance. Seconded

by Councilor McDaniel and carried unanimously by those seven members of Council

present for this meeting, with Councilors Allen, Baker and Woodson being absent

for this vote.



*** *** ***



MONTHLY FINANCE REPORT:



Director of Finance Pam Hodge then came forward and presented the August

monthly finance report. She said this is the first report for FY-2010 and said

typically in July most of the revenue that is received is recorded as revenue

in FY-09. She then highlight the Local Option Sales Tax Information for August

2009; however, said that she has also left the full fiscal year of 2009 on the

report, as well as the first two months of fiscal year 2010.



She said with respect to the positions that have been filled, at the end

of August the Police Department has 82 of the 100 officers scheduled to be

hired and of those positions that have been authorized in the budget E911 has

filled 4 and there is also one court related position that has been filled,

which is in the public defender?s office. She said this is out of the Local

Option Sales Tax for public safety.



Ms. Hodge said the revenue collected for public safety for the 70% is

$1,840,074.14, which is the 70% allocation of the first month of

collection.



She also highlighted each of the departments that received all allocation

in FY-10, as well as the total amount that was spent, which includes the

following departments.



PUBLIC SAFETY EXPENDITURES (Including Encumbrances):





Police

Department



Police E911

Fire Department

MCP

Sheriff?s Office

Marshal?s Office



Court Related:

Public Defender

State Court Solicitor



Civic Center

Public Services

Parks & Recreation

Coroner

METRA



Ms. Hodge said the majority of the expenditures for personnel services

relates to the $3,000 supplement for all law enforcement-sworn officer?s

position. She said the Infrastructure Revenue, which is the 30%, the revenue

for the L.O.S.T. Infrastructure is $788,842.86, which is one month of

collections and said we have not made any expenditures relating to the

infrastructure.



Ms. Hodge also highlighted the Operating Funds in the August 2009 report,

which reflects the following:



General Fund: Decline from FY-09 to FY-10 of 35%. She then noted that in

FY-09, it included the Continental Carbon settlement, which skewed the numbers

for the general fund for August 2009, and said with the Continental Carbon, the

general fund is down 7.80%; which is a reflection of about $600,000. However,

there are a few revenue sources that makes up that difference, with one being

local option sales tax, comparing August 2009 to August 2008; which was down

7.77%. She said we are also seeing a slight reduction on the occupation tax in

the general fund.



Ms. Hodge pointed out that in the beginning of the each fiscal year, there

are oftentimes timing differences of when the revenue is collected and

receipted into the general ledger; therefore during the first few months of the

fiscal year, it is really difficult to do a true comparison, so they are

monitoring some of the revenue sources. She said there is nothing in the

general fund to be alarmed about with the decline of the 7.80%.

The property tax collection rate for FY-09 was 96.90%; so, in October when the

first payment is due on property taxes that will tell us how much compared to

last year are we seeing any changes in collection rates.



Sewer Fund up 2.27%, which represents about a $2,000 difference.

Paving Fund down 6.5%, less than a $20,000 difference.

Medical Center Fund down 9.86%.

lntegrated Waste Fund down 7.66%.

Emergency 9l1 Telephone Fund up slightly at 2.64%

Economic Development Authority Fund down 9,86%

Debt Service Fund down 10.37%

Transportation Fund up 3.71%

Parking Management Fund down 19.36%, which is a $6,000 difference.

Trade Center Fund down 17.73%

Bull Creek Golf Course Fund up 9.05%

Oxbow Creek Golf Course Fund up 9.68%

Civic Center Fund up 57.96%



Ms. Hodge said there are some revenue sources that they will continue to

monitor as we get through the first quarter of the year and as we start seeing

taxes come in to determine if we have any issues on the revenue side. She said

we did make some adjustments in our revenue projections for FY-2010 based on

some of the declines that we saw in FY-2009.



*** *** ***



EXECUTIVE SESSION:



City Manager Hugley requested a brief executive session to discuss a

property acquisition matter, as well as a personnel issue after the adjournment

of today?s meeting.



*** *** ***



Deputy City Manager Arrington once again came forward and gave an update

on the Major Projects within the City, as well as the additional projects that

have been completed this year, which are highlighted below:



Major Project Update



Projects Completed or Substantially Complete in 2009

Streetscape ? 10th Street

Streetscape ? Front Ave. Parking Garage

Riverwalk ? 12th Street

Cougar/Algonquin Intersection Improvement

Brown/Peacock Intersection Improvement

Weracoba Creek Bank Stabilization



Additional Projects Completed in 2009

6th Avenue Flood Abatement ? Phase I

Annex HVAC Replacement

Cora Drive Pipe Replacement

Biscayne Drive Pipe Replacement

Warner Road Pipe Replacement



Active Projects

Rails to Trails

Contracts Awarded

Phase I, April 2009

Bridges, May 2009

Rest Areas, August 2009

Phase II, August 2009

Phase III, Ready for bid

Funding Source

1999 SPLOST

Projected Completion Date ? August 2010



Riverwalk ? 12th St. to 13th St.

Contract Awarded

September 2009

Funding Source

Transportation Enhancement Grant

Projected Completion Date ? March 2010



800 MHz Analog/Digital Upgrade

Contract Awarded

February 2009 (A/D Upgrade)

August 2009 (HPDS, 911)

HPDS & 911 expansion awarded August 2009

Funding Source

General Fund

L.O.S.T.

Projected Completion Date ? December 2009



Deputy City Manager Arrington said the vendor that bid on the contract to

do the remodeling in the 911 Center bid $911 out of probably a $20,000 job. He

said his company just wanted to do that work because it was for the Police

Department and to help safety in our community.



Fire Station 2 Replacement

Contract Awarded ? August 2009

Funding Source ? 2003 Bond

Projected Completion Date ? August 2010



Oxbow Meadows ? Phase I

Partnership with CWW and CSU

Phase I Elements

Environmental Learning Center expansion

Festival Field

Corporate Pavilion

Large & Small Dog Park

Walking Trail

Boat Dock

Funding Source- 1999 SPLOST

Bid scheduled November



Transportation

Whittlesey Road ROW- To be completed 12/09

Whitesville/Double Churches ROW ? To be completed 02/10

Technology Parkway, Phase IIROW ?To be completed 12/09

Corporate Ridge/AFLAC Under Construction

9th Street Railroad Crossings Veterans Scheduled 9/12

Blackmon/Warm Springs Round-a-bout Under Design

Moon Road ? J.R. Allen to Veterans ROW ? Ready for bid in 60 days

Forrest Road ? East (Under Design)

River Road/Bradley Park (Under Design)

Veterans/Double Churches (Under Design)

Wynnton Road Streetscapes (Under Design)

Veterans Parkway Streetscapes- 8th St. to 13th St. (Ready for Bid)

Cargo Dr./Transport (Under Review by DOT)

Woodruff Farm/Corporate Ridge (Under Design)

Moon Road ? Wilbur to Whittlesey (Under Design)

Forrest Road Bridges Environmental Underway



Quality of Life:



Deputy City Manager Arrington said we are ready to go to bid with the Ice

Rink and said that Mr. Sam Wellborn our DOT board member has secured a small

grant for us to make some trail improvements out at Lake Bottom Park. He said

we would also include some additional trashcans, park benches and etc. He said

we are waiting for the bid to be let.



Double Churches Pool Renovations

(Have some schematic drawings)

Recreation Center Improvements (Contracts Awarded)

Skateboard Park Gazebo

Replacing gym floors



Infrastructure:

Meritas Drive

14th Street Pedestrian Bridge

Charter Oaks/Sugar Mill Watershed

Sidewalk/Handicap Accessibility

Britt David Retaining Wall

Britt David Ball field

Citizen Service Center/Natatorium



With respect to Whittlesey Road, Councilor Davis said he had asked

previously that we have a Work Session on this particular subject. He said

people are getting impatient and don?t understand what the holdup is and what?s

taking so long with these road improvements. He then asked Deputy City Manager

Arrington to talk a little more in detail on the Whittlesey Road improvements.

He said it is not a project that we are directly involved in, but it?s a

Department of Transportation project and there are some issues there. He said

there was a traffic study done that said the supporting road needed to be in by

2006 and here it is 2009.



Deputy City Manager Arrington said the City has been in the process of

acquiring right-of -way as far back as when the tornado came through Green

Island Hills and we were able to assist the citizens and to help them out so

that they wouldn?t have to rebuild for a year or two; but as the right-of-way

acquisition moved forward, it was identified that there were certain errors in

the right-of-way plans; therefore, our right-of-way people could not continue

to acquire the property until the plans were revised so they would be

purchasing the right amount of property.



He said the Department of Transportation had contracted out the planned

development for that project; however, have since dismissed the engineers and

have begun doing it in-house. He said as they were piece-mealing us

right-of-way changes our people would go out and begin negotiations and begin

that process. He said they have been meeting with the Mayor, as well as our

board representative, Mr. Sam Wellborn on this project for well over a year now

and this past spring the Mayor asked the Interim Department of Transportation

Commissioner Gerald Ross to come down to specifically talk about the Whittlesey

Road project. He said Mr. Ross committed that they would have all the

right-of-way plans completed and finalized by the end of May. He said they met

that deadline on the very last day and said we have been able to make a lot of

progress on acquiring right-of-way and at least getting it towards acquisition.

However, since that time, there have still been some minor changes in the plans

that are used to acquire right-of-way and they don?t know if we are going to be

able to meet the December 31st deadline, but shortly after the first of the

year, they should have all of the right-of-way acquired.



City Manager Hugley said he wants to point out that we did not make those

changes locally, but they were made by the Georgia Department of

Transportation. He said when they made those changes that meant that we had to

go back out because the lines had shifted and we had to do some work that we

had already completed. He said when they make a change at the Georgia

Department of Transportation it changes something that our people has to go

back out and do, which causes a setback.



He said our people had projected that they would be completed by the end

of the year, but said they will not be able to meet that timeline because of

the changes at the Department of Transportation.



Deputy City Manager Arrington said there are only about three parcels that

we are not well into the acquisition phase on, but said there are several

elements to acquiring the property and said we are making progress on this

matter.



He said for the past year, the Mayor has frequently asked for updates and

said they have had meetings with their board member in the Mayor?s office, as

well as the Interim Commissioner and every time they have an opportunity to

talk with the new Department of Transportation Commissioner, Mr. Smith they

have mentioned that this is a high priority for our community.



Councilor Davis said he think it is important to give this update to let

the citizens know where we are on this project, as it has taken some time and

what he understands is that there has been a lot of contributing factors that

has delayed this project. He said he thinks that everyone is aware of the

restructuring of the Georgia Department of Transportation, but he wasn?t aware

of the engineering change. He said this is a project that we don?t have control

over, but said one of the good things that the citizens were in support of was

taking the initiative to complete some of these road projects and building our

infrastructure and they choose to do so in the form of voting in support of the

Local Option Sales Tax.



In responding to further concerns of Councilor Davis as to when

construction may begin on this project, Deputy City Manager Arrington said as

soon as they certify right-of-way, and said it is certainly contingent upon the

State budget. He said what they are able to fund from one day to the next

changes based on the availability of State funds, but said the plan is that

next spring they should have let the project and be under construction.



Deputy City Manager Arrington said there were a number of projects that

were proposed to be funded in future years, but said when they changed the way

they do business at the Department of Transportation a lot of that went away

and said it is now on a cash basis.



City Manager Hugley also said that some projects that we had funded, which

was funded by the Department of Transportation the money was taken away and was

replaced with stimulus money.



Councilor McDaniel said he was under the impression that when they funded

something that was it. City Manager Hugley said they funded projects, but when

they went through this crisis we received a letter saying that if there weren?t

projects already actively moving forward, they de-funded them.



Deputy City Manager Arrington said he thinks that was a funding commitment

that funding in future years assuming all things equal; however, we know all

things weren?t equal as the economy turned, they had some accounting

irregularities at the Department of Transportation and a lot of things changed

that affected the commitments to funding projects that they had made in prior

years. He said he is not saying that they have de-funded this project, but that

is the only variable that he would hesitate in making a commitment on in

getting the money.



*** *** ***



PRESENTATIONS DELAYED:



City Manager Hugley said he would like to delay the presentation on the

Enterprise Zone, as well as the update on Ft. Benning Road Streetscape project

until a later date. There were no objections.



*** ***

***



EXECUTIVE SESSION:



City Manager Hugley said he would like to have an executive session to

discuss a personnel matter, as well as property acquisition.



Councilor McDaniel so moved. Seconded by Councilor Henderson and carried

unanimously by those seven members of Council still present at the time, with

Councilors Allen, Hunter and Woodson being absent for this vote.



*** *** ***



At 12:00 noon, the regular session was adjourned to allow the Council to

go into an executive session to discuss a personnel matter, as well as a

property acquisition matter.



The meeting was called back to order at 12:55 p.m. at which time Mayor

Wetherington pointed out that an executive session was held to discuss those

two issues as outlined above, but there were no votes taken.



*** *** ***



TRAFFIC CALMING DEVICES:



Councilor Barnes said as the Mayor is always saying, we have a good

government but said that we can always do better. He said when it comes to the

speeding traffic we can do better by improving the process. He said in

September 2008, the residents called him, as they were having problems with

speeding on Lamore Drive and said that he went out there and visually saw a

couple of times himself where people were speeding.



He said he told the residents to interface with the Traffic Engineering

Department, which they did. He said they gave them the survey, which he doesn?t

think that we should task our citizens with doing; however, he said they did

complete the survey and returned it back on October 7, 2008.



Councilor Barnes then went into some details highlighting days, which says

these things are still in progress. He said then in August he went to the

Citizens Service Center to ask for an update to see what was going on because

during this time, the people were asking him what?s going on. He said every

time he goes out there, he sees people speeding.



Councilor Barnes said three weeks ago, they called him again because a car

in that same location he had witnessed the people speeding almost hit a little

girl. He said when the citizens calls the Citizens Service Center they are

looking for help and when they call us, the elected officials, they are

definitely looking for something to be done. Therefore, he would like for some

of the councilors to get with the Traffic Engineer so that we can take a

re-look at the process and how we handle this. He said we, as elected officials

are directly responsive to the people



He said a Mr. McGruder came before this Council to inform the Council of

the speeding problem and only after that time, and after they had an accident

there, did they go out and put up the directional signs. He said he would like

for us to look at how we conduct business.



City Manager Hugley said the buck stops with him and said he accepts

full responsible with whatever the concern is and said if Councilor Barnes

wants to talk with him, that?s fine and he will deal with his engineers.

He said he would be happy to bring the process to the Council and outline it

for you and if there is something about the process that we need to change, we

can change it. He said he doesn?t have a problem with changing it.



Councilor Barnes said they did come before us and made a presentation and

went through the process with us. He said that is when he brought up the fact

about the survey and said personally, the survey was distasteful to him because

a lot of time conducting that survey served as an impediment because a lot of

people don?t have the time to do a survey. He said he would like for us to sit

down and look at the process.



*** *** ***



TEXTING IN SCHOOL ZONES:



City Manager Hugley said that they would do that. He said he will bring

the process back and will outline what he believes is going to be an improved

process with the Global Connect and this telephonic survey.



*** *** ***



In responding to a question of Councilor Henderson, City Manager Hugley

said he had a conversation with State Representative Carolyn after our

Legislative Session and she saw the information on texting and said she

indicated her indication to introduce legislation that would prohibit texting

in such in school zones.

------------------------------------*** ***

***----------------------------------



NOTE: Councilor McDaniel left at this point in the proceedings, with the

time being 1:05 p.m.

------------------------------------*** ***

***----------------------------------



With there being no other business to come before the Council, Mayor Pro

Tem Turner Pugh then made a motion for adjournment. Seconded by Councilor

Henderson and carried unanimously by those six members of Council present at

the time, with Councilors Allen, Hunter, McDaniel and Woodson being absent for

this vote, with the time being 1:09 p.m.



*** *** ***







Tiny B. Washington, CMC

Clerk of Council

The Council of Columbus, Georgia





Attachments


No attachments for this document.

Back to List