Columbus, Georgia

Georgia's First Consolidated Government

Post Office Box 1340
Columbus, Georgia, 31902-1340
(706) 653-4013
fax (706) 653-4016

Council Members







MINUTES

COUNCIL OF COLUMBUS, GEORGIA

REGULAR MEETING

MARCH 24, 2015



The regular weekly meeting of the Council of Columbus, Georgia was called

to order at 5:30 P.M., Tuesday, March 24, 2015, on the 2nd Floor of the

Citizens Service Center, located at 3111 Citizens Way, Columbus, Georgia

Honorable Teresa Tomlinson, Mayor and Evelyn Turner Pugh, Mayor Pro Tem

presiding.



*** *** ***



PRESENT: Present other than Mayor Teresa Tomlinson were Councilors Tom B. Buck

III, Glenn Davis, Berry H. Henderson, Bruce Huff, Judy W. Thomas and Evelyn

Woodson, City Manager Isaiah Hugley, City Attorney Clifton Fay, Assistant City

Attorney Lucy Sheftall, Clerk of Council Tiny B. Washington and Deputy Clerk of

Council Lindsey Glisson were also present. Mayor Pro Tem Evelyn Turner Pugh

took her seat at 5:34 p.m. Councilor R. Gary Allen took his seat at 5:37 p.m.



-----------------------------------*** ***

***-----------------------------------



ABSENT: Councilors Mike Baker and Jerry Barnes were absent



-----------------------------------*** ***

***-----------------------------------



INVOCATION: Offered by Mayor Teresa Tomlinson.



----------------------------------*** ***

***------------------------------------



PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Led by Members of Girls Inc.



-----------------------------------*** ***

***-----------------------------------



MAYOR?S AGENDA:



PRESENTATION:



Actuary Chuck Carr: FY2016 Pension Contribution and DROP Plan



Actuary Chuck Carr came forward with a presentation on the

FY2016 Pension Contribution and DROP Plan. Actuary Carr explained to

Mayor and Council, he met with the Pension Board on the results of the

Actuarial Evaluation of the Pension Fund, which is conducted every year as

of July 1.



The assumption that was assessed a few weeks ago was the possibility of

changing the morality table. The importance of this table is the life annuity

of each retiree and employee. In order to evaluate the liability, a mortality

table is used.



The following graph was presented projecting the employer pension

contributions over the next ten years. The table shows the cost with and

without the mortality table changes.



Projected Employer Pension Contributions

Old Mortality Normal Cost Old Mortality UAL Payment New Mortality Increase

2015/16 $16,836,999 $4,891,373

2016/17 $15,226,987 $4,891,373 $2,761,205

2017/18 $14,893,427 $4,891,373 $2,542,980

2018/19 $14,480,435 $4,891,373 $2574,665

2019/20 $13,964,287 $4,891,373 $2,595,816

2020/21 $13,344,267 $4,891,373 $2,628,667

2021/22 $12,619,481 $4,891,373 $2,672,532

2022/23 $11,791,137 $4,891,373 $2,728,748

2023/24 $10,862,749 $4,891,373 $2,798,204

2024/25 $9,840,520 $4,891,373 $2,883,153



The decision was made for the decision to change the mortality table

to be delayed for one more year by the Pension Board. This decision was delayed

in hopes to allow sufficient time to plan for the changes.



The required employee contribution for the General Government

Employees? Plan is $5.84 million for FY16. For the Public Safety Plan, the

required employee contribution is $12.34 million for FY16. This information is

based on the mortality table staying the same.



Mayor Tomlinson stated, with the City having a pension contribution

that totals more than $18 million a year, other avenues to come up with $2

million will need to be explored in the next 12 months.



Actuary Carr began the second part to his presentation in reference to

the DROP Plan. DROP means Deferred Retirement Option Plan. The DROP Plan is

considered a subset of the City?s Pension Program, which was added a few years

prior as part of the Pension Reform.



Employees that are eligible to utilize the DROP Plan are able to

continue to work for a specified amount of time. During this time, the

employee?s retirement payment is accumulated in an account that is similar to

that of an ESCROW Account, which acquires some rate of return on the

investment. Explained, instead of the employee receiving a paycheck, this money

is invested on their behalf and is made available to them, plus the investment

return, after the specified amount of time they are allowed to work.



The plan when the DROP Plan was added to the Pension Program was to

ensure that the expense of it was cost neutral. There are two ways in which a

DROP Plan may typically impact the cost of a pension plan.



The most important time of the utilization of a DROP Plan is when the

employee enters into the plan. From the standpoint of the pension, when an

employee enters the DROP Plan, it as if they have retired. At this point, the

employee contribution will cease and the employee is viewed as a retiree.



If there was a reduction in eligibility requirement by 1 year, from 35

years to 34 years of service, the cost would be $243,000 annually. If the

requirement was changed to 33 years of service, the cost impact would be right

under $550,000 annually.



Responding to questions from Councilor Thomas, Actuary Carr states,

Public Safety Employees are eligible to retire at the age of 55 with 25 years

of services, but they are not eligible to participate in the DROP Plan. A

Public Safety Employee can retire at the age of 55 with 35 years of service and

eligibility of the DROP Plan. Also, Public Safety Employees are able to retire

at 58, with 30 years of service and still be eligible to participate in the

DROP Plan. As of July 1, 2014, there are 14 Public Safety Employees that are

participating in the DROP Plan.



With the concerns expressed by Mr. Billy Watson at past meetings and

him being listed on the Public Agenda, Councilor Allen requests to hear from

him at this point in the meeting.



Mr. Billy Watson, of 5552 Perry Avenue, Columbus, Georgia 31909, took

to the podium to speak on his concerns of the DROP Plan. According to the

internet, in 19997 when Mobile, Alabama created their respected DROP Plan,

their Public Safety Employees were able to retire at the age of 50, with 30

years of service. It was told to the city of Mobile, having these specific age

and service year requirements would not be of any cost to them.



According to the research conducted by Mr. Watson, there are numerous

states, which have elected to make the DROP Plan available to their employees.

Of all the states, which make this option available, none of them require their

Public Safety Employees to work 35 years of service.



With the physically strenuous duties required of Public Safety

employees, Mr. Watson suggests that the Public Safety Employees and General

Government Employees have separate age and years of service requirements.



Actuary Carr responded to the statement of Mr. Watson, stating the city

of Mobile since the 1940s or 1950s, has been funding for their employees to

retire at age 50, whereas, Columbus has not.



A referral was then made by Councilor Henderson, requesting more

information concerning the DROP Plan. The information requested was for

clarification as to why the City chose to offer this option, who the primary

beneficiaries are, and what the actual cost is.



Actuary Carr explains the DROP Plan is more beneficial to Public Safety

Employees than it is to General Employees. Reason being, typically for General

Government Employees to participate in the DROP Plan, they would receive an

early retirement penalty because of the required retirement age.



*** *** ***



PRESENTATION:



Dr. Ben Blair, Columbus State University: Thaw the Freeze



Before Dr. Ben Blair, of Columbus State University, came forward with a

presentation on Thaw the Freeze, Mayor Tomlinson began a presentation entitled

?Thaw the Freeze, A New Tax System for a New Era?, which she has presented

throughout the community for several years. The discussion has been ongoing for

the current tax system, to include the impact to the citizens and the City. The

discussion has also consisted of whether or not there is an alternate plan to

protect the citizens who have relied upon the Property Tax Freeze that has been

in place for several decades.



Community Discussion

? Mayoral Debates

? Revenue Review Commission

? Work Groups of Elected Official/Community Leaders

? Civic Clubs, Neighborhood Associations, Realtor Groups, Let?s Talk Forums

? State of the City Addresses

? Media Coverage

? Editorials





Most discussions brought up during Mayoral Debates, was begun by senior

citizens living in the community. These seniors expressed concerns pertaining

to their wishes to downsize their homes. Most were not able to due to the fact

the property tax would be more on the new smaller home they would purchase

versus the large home they had lived in for many years.



The Revenue Review Commission tendered a report to Council, which

rendered the suggestion that the Property Tax Freeze be evaluated for various

reasons as it is inhibiting growth.





Citizens with the Freeze are Entitled to Keep It

? Approved by Referendum in 1982;

? Upheld via Referendum in 1991;

? The Freeze is a Pact;

? Citizens have Planned and Budgeted;

? If you have the Property Tax Freeze, you will keep it.





The current tax system that Columbus uses, which is referred to as The

Freeze, was approved by county-wide referendum in 1982. It was also upheld in

1991, when it was sought to uplift the tax freeze.





Thirty Years of Data to Determine Effectiveness of Property Valuation

Caps/Freezes





Muscogee County is one of many jurisdictions throughout the country

that has a type of property tax valuation freeze, but it is the only county in

the nation that has an absolute valuation freeze. Most jurisdictions throughout

the nation utilize a cap, which does not allow the property tax valuations to

be raised more than 3% a year.



Does the Freeze Achieve Its Goals?

? It does not cap city budgets ($50 million v. $263 million);

? It does not protect Seniors (benefits immobility);

? It does not help families in tough economic times (frozen from downward

valuations);

? It depresses the tax digest and economic development (high Occupation Tax and

Commercial/Investment Tax);



The Tax Freeze Valuation requires that homeowners continue to be taxed

at the purchase price of their home, whether or not the homeowner can prove

that the home is valued at much less.



The local business community does not support this particular tax

structure. Reason being, Muscogee County has the highest Occupation Tax in the

State of Georgia.





Does the Freeze Achieve Its Goals? (cont.)

? It inhibits transparency (pushes taxes around);

? It creates tax inequity (different tax levels for some house/lot); and,

? It constitutes a ?Welcome Stranger Tax?.





Sunset Proposal with Tax Break

? All those with the Property Tax Freeze keep it;

? All future transfer vest in a new Tax System where the property is valued on

the Fair Market Value;

? All future transfers receive an increased tax break in the form of a $20,000

increased Homestead Exemption.



Tax Break in New System

? Possible because of inefficiencies in current system.

? Proposal takes Homestead Exemption from $13,500 to $20,000 (nearly a 50%

increase in exemption).

? EXAMPLE ? Reduces first year property tax by $262 on $200,000.





The current tax system is so inefficient, that it does not allow the

City to reap the benefits of its growth. As soon as a new family locates to

this community the City is paying more to provide the services than the new

family is paying for the service to be provided. This is due to the freeze of

valuation and the cost of providing city services is dependant on a gradual

rate of inflation.





Effect of Tax Break

? Total Cost to City - $440,892 in first four years.

? Over 15 years net gain to City is $2.3 million.

? Had the Tax Freeze been sunset in 2003, the City could lower its millage rate

by 3 mills and still collect today?s revenues.



Effect of Tax Break on School District

? Total Cost to School District - $599,746 in first four years.

? Over 15 years net gain to School District is $3.1 million.

? Had the Tax Freeze been sunset completely in 2003, the School District could

lower its millage rate by 4 mills and still collect today?s revenues.





What is Fair Market Value?

? Defined by Law, Controlled by Department of Revenue Regulations ? Not

Arbitrary.

? FMV Requires One Uniform System ? No Spot Assessments.

? State Law Requires We Maintain A FMV Digest Regardless of Freeze.

? Council Approved a Uniform Reappraisal System, Which is Under Way.

? If FMV Rises Sharply, Council Can Roll Back Millage So That We Aren?t Against

Ceiling.





Process For Adoption

? Council Must Request Issue Be Placed On Ballot.

? Georgia Legislature Must Allow Muscogee County Ballot Question.

? Sunset Proposal With Tax Break Must Be Approved by Majority of Votes.

(November 2016).





Ballot Question and Tax System

? One Question Which Repeals Current System and Replaces It With Exact Freeze

System That Will Close On January 1, 2017.

? The Same Question Creates New FMV Tax System With Increased Homestead

Exemption Tax Break Of $20,000, For All Transfers Occurring After January 1,

2017.

? One Part Cannot Pass Without The Other.





No Severability

? Ballot Issue Rises Or Falls As One System

? By Virtue Of The Law And the Express Language Of the Referendum, Should Any

Part of the Ballot Issue or Tax System be Successfully Challenges, we Revert

Back To Prior Tax System.

? See Sample Ballot Language Approved By Multiple Legal Resources.



At this time Mayor Tomlinson called Dr. Ben Blair, Director of the

Butler Center for Business and Economic Research at Columbus State University

forward to give his presentation.



The purpose of the Butler Center is to provide objective business and economic

analysis information to the community, while not advocating for a particular

position. In 2012, Mayor Tomlinson asked the Butler Center to perform an

analysis on the tax freeze of tax revenues. In addition, it was requested that

other proposed alternatives be evaluated. Since the initial information was

presented to Council in 2013, the last two years of data has been updated and

will be presented within this presentation as follows:



Community Information Brief

The Muscogee County Property Tax Freeze

Part 1: How are Property Taxes Calculated



As an example, the owner of a home in service district 1 with a fair market

value of $200,000, filing the standard homestead exemption of $13,500 will pay

the following local property taxes annually:



city property tax = $1,142.47

school property tax = $1,554.10

debt service property tax = $56.00____

Total Local Property Tax = $2,752.57



The Muscogee County School District has the 3rd highest millage rate in the

State.

The City?s rate of 17.18 mills is the 32nd highest of all non-school system

rates in the State.



In order for the City to provide services to the citizens, there must

be tax revenues coming in. If there is a freeze on a particular tax, the City

must find other ways to generate tax revenues through increasing millage rates.



Community Information Brief

The Muscogee County Property Tax Freeze

Part 2: The Effect of Inflation on Frozen Property Taxes



The Effect of the Freeze from Two Points of View?.

Frozen Tax Revenues = Frozen Tax Bill of Homeowner



Cumulative Loss in Purchasing Power of Tax Revenues = Cumulative Reduction of

Tax Burden on Homeowner

= $2,518.94



? In 2024, the purchasing power of the frozen taxes will be 18% lower than in

2015.

? In 2024, the burden of the tax on the homeowner will be 18% lower than in

2015.



From the homeowner?s perspective this is an effective tax break every

year, due to the fact they have to give up fewer goods and services to pay

their taxes every year. From the City?s point-of-view, this is a reduction in

real tax revenues, because it is paying more for those goods and services, but

still only receiving the same number of dollars every year.



Community Information Brief

The Muscogee County Property Tax Freeze

Part 2: The Effect of Inflation on Frozen Property Taxes



Due to the effects of inflation on frozen tax revenues, the local government

must either cut services or raise additional tax revenue by some other means

such as increasing tax rates. Residents in Muscogee County currently face some

of the highest property tax rates in the State.



Other Effects of the Tax Freeze:

Vastly different property taxes on nearly identical homes simply due to date of

purchase.

Some citizens paying less for city services than the cost of providing those

services. Some citizens paying more.



Community Information Brief

The Muscogee County Property Tax Freeze

Part 3: The Effect of the Freeze on Historical Tax Revenue



Accumulated Difference in Property Taxes = $28.8 Million



Given the tax reform described above, the city millage rate could have been

reduced by 3.3 mills in 2014 and still generated the same city operating taxes

that were collected under the freeze. The school system millage rate could have

been reduced by approximately 4.4 mills.



Community Information Brief

The Muscogee County Property Tax Freeze

Part 4: An Analysis of a Proposed Alternative



The Proposed Alternative

The property tax freeze is grandfathered for all homestead properties purchased

prior to a date to be determined. For any homestead property purchased after

that date and only for those purchased after that date, the tax freeze is

sunset in return for an increase in the homestead exemption of $6,500 for these

properties.



? Result in lower annual city tax revenues for 4 years by a total of

approximately $440,000

? Result in an increase in annual city tax revenues each year after the fifth

year

? Result in an additional $2.3 million in city tax revenue over 15 years

? Result in lower annual school tax revenues for 4 years by a total of

approximately $600,000

? Result in an increase in annual school tax revenues each year after the fifth

year

? Result in over $3.1 million additional school tax revenues over 15 years



Dr. Blair then presented slides with examples of these points.



At the time of Dr. Blair completing his presentation, two referrals were

made by Mayor Tomlinson, one being, for the presentation information to be made

available to the citizens on the CCG website. The second referral was done as a

suggestion to hold public forums concerning the property tax freeze and the

options available to help our community to be held to receive feedback from the

citizens of Columbus.



A referral was made by Councilor Davis, requesting a copy of the

original analysis done in 2013 and a copy of the current analysis is provided

to the members of Council.

-----------------------------------*** ***

***----------------------------------



MINUTES: Minutes of the January 6, January 13, & January 27, 2015 Executive

Sessions and the February 10, 2015 Council Meeting of the Consolidated

Government were submitted and approved upon the adoption of a motion made by

Councilor Allen. Seconded by Councilor Woodson and carried unanimously by

those eight members of Council present for this meeting, with Councilors Baker

and Barnes being absent from the meeting.

-----------------------------------*** ***

***----------------------------------



REQUEST FOR A PROCLAMATION:



A referral was made by Councilor Thomas, requesting a Proclamation

recognizing the Columbus State University Women?s and Men?s Basketball Teams

for their great season to be presented at the April 6, 2015 Proclamation

Session.

-----------------------------------*** ***

***----------------------------------



CITY ATTORNEY?S AGENDA :



THE FOLLOWING ORDINANCE WAS SUBMITTED AND EXPLAINED BY CITY ATTORNEY

FAY AND ADOPTED BY THE

COUNCIL:____________







An Ordinance (15-7) ? Rezoning Property located at 1500 Hilton Avenue

is proposed for rezoning from RMF2 (Residential Multi-Family 2) zoning district

to SFR3 (Single Family Residential 3) zoning district. (District 3-Councilor

Huff) (Applicant Kenny Livingston) The proposed use is a single family detached

residential dwelling.



With no discussion, Councilor Thomas moved the adoption of the ordinance.

Seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Turner Pugh and carried unanimously by those eight

members of Council present, with Councilors Baker and Barnes being absent from

the meeting.



*** *** ***



THE FOLLOWING ORDINANCES WERE SUBMITTED AND EXPLAINED BY CITY ATTORNEY FAY

AND INTRODUCED ON FIRST

READING:______



An Ordinance ? Rezoning Property located at 8223 Cooper Creek Road is

proposed for rezoning from NC (Neighborhood Commercial) zoning district to RO

(Residential Office) zoning district. (District 6-Councilor Allen) (Applicant

Stephen Coleman) The proposed use is a secondary entrance to the Crossings

located on Veterans Parkway. The Planning Advisory Commission and the Planning

Department recommend approval.



Applicant, Mr. Stephen Coleman, of 2740 Zelda Road, Montgomery, Alabama,

took to the podium to address Council. Mr. Coleman is employed with Home Corp.

Management, which manages the Crossings Apartment Homes.



Mr. Coleman states, the reason for the rezoning request is the road

improvements being done by the Georgia Department of Transportation on Veterans

Parkway will block the entrance into the apartment community. The blocked

driveway will prohibit apartment residents to exit the complex by turning left

on Veterans Parkway.



Ms. Linda Kennedy, of 7908 Cooper Creek Road, Columbus, Georgia, took to

speak in opposition. Ms. Kennedy speaks on the heavy traffic on Cooper Creek

Road and Veterans Parkway due to the development of apartment complexes,

convenience store, and school.



At this time, Director Newman came forward and provided information to

Mayor and Council regarding the Veterans Parkway Widening Project, as requested

by Councilor Allen. Director Newman showed a blueprint of the current plan from

the Georgia Department of Transportation (GDOT), which shows no u-turns on

Veterans Parkway.



Director Newman explains, traffic counts from 2012, along with

consideration for growth of the area and a physical count of vehicles coming in

and out of the Crossings, to establish a timing plan for the traffic signal at

the intersection of Veterans Parkway and

Cooper Creek Road. Currently, that particular traffic signal is running at a

length of 140 seconds a cycle, with the majority devoted to Veterans Parkway.

With the current traffic count and plan, she believes that the traffic can be

handled accordingly.



There was a brief discussion between Councilor Allen and Director Newman

on the traffic issues experienced in this area due to all of the apartment

complexes. At this time Councilor Allen made a referral requesting for the

traffic control light at the intersection of Cooper Creek Road and Veterans

Parkway be monitored, and the cycles be adjusted to accommodate the traffic

resulting from the new entrance.



A diagram depicting the plans for the roadway improvements at the

intersection of Veterans Parkway and Cooper Creek Road was presented to Mayor

and Council. A referral was made by Mayor Tomlinson requesting that Mr. Stephen

Coleman, the applicant, to receive a copy of the diagram.



*** *** ***



Councilor Thomas explained, an email was received by Council informing

them, Whittlesey Road, from Bradley Park Drive to Whitesville Road, will be

closed for 45 days, beginning April 6, 2015. A concern was expressed in

reference to those businesses located on that roadway. A referral was made for

clarification on the admittance of throughway traffic to be made to those

business owners. Additionally, Councilor Thomas requested that the media be

informed of this particular street closure.



During the discussion, Councilor Davis made a referral requesting that

there be plenty of signage directing drivers to the detour.



*** *** ***



An Ordinance ? To adopt Personal Transportation Vehicle (PTV) Plan

pursuant to State law which will allow the use of PTV?s on designated street

segments in the Uptown area; and for other purposes.



City Attorney Fay explained to Mayor and Council, the PTV?s will not be

allowed on 13th Street as the Ordinance was currently written, and will be

allowed as far East as 3rd Avenue. There were many requested received from

Uptown Columbus, requesting that the Ordinance allow PTV?s as far East as 3rd

Avenue.



Councilor Thomas made a motion to amend the ordinance to outline the

designated streets for the use of PTVs. The outline specifications included the

western edge of Veterans Parkway to Bay Avenue and 8th Street to 14th Street,

with no throughway traffic on 13th Street and 2nd Avenue. This motion was

seconded by Councilor Woodson and there was a brief discussion by Council.



Columbus Police Department Patrol Major, JD Hawk, took to the podium to

state the department?s main concern is the use of PTV?s on 13th Street and 2nd

Avenue. He stated with the flow of traffic, these PTV?s will only be allowed to

cross these major thoroughfares.



During the discussion, Councilor Woodson made a referral requesting for

the permit renewal of PTV?s is required annually versus every 5 years is added

to the next legislative agenda. City Manager Hugley stated he has asked staff

to add this to the next legislative agenda.



In addition to the referral made by Councilor Woodson, Councilor Davis

made a referral requesting to ask our delegation to determine if the fees on

PTV?s can be raised to be equivalent to that of a motor vehicle.



After some discussion, a substitute motion was made by Councilor Thomas,

specifying PTV?s be allowed to operate on the western edge of Veterans Parkway

to Bay Ave and 4th Street to 14th Street, with the exception of 13th Avenue and

2nd Avenue. Seconded by Councilor Woodson and carried unanimously by those

eight members of Council present, with Councilors Baker and Barnes being absent

from the meeting.

-------------------------------------*** ***

***---------------------------------



At the conclusion of his agenda, City Attorney Fay stated there was a need for

an Executive Session after the Council Meeting, for reasons of discussion on

litigation, security plans and personnel.

-------------------------------------*** ***

***---------------------------------



At this time Councilor Woodson took a point of privilege to make a motion

to send a referral to the Board of Honor suggesting the Brown Avenue Bridge be

renamed in honor of Zelma Hennessey, former activist with the Drug Fighters of

Columbus. Seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Turner Pugh and unanimously by those eight

members of Council present, with Councilors Baker and Barnes being absent from

the meeting.

-------------------------------------*** ***

***---------------------------------



PUBLIC AGENDA



THE FOLLOWING INDIVIDUALS APPEARED BEFORE THE COUNCIL ON THE PUBLIC AGENDA

TO DISCUSS THE FOLLOWING SUBJECT MATTERS, AS LISTED BELOW: ___ _



Ms. Charlotte Davis, representing Area Agency on Aging, Re: A Matter of Balance

Coach Training & Chronic Disease Self-Management Leader Training.



Ms. Davis explains to Mayor and Council the purpose of the Chronic Disease

Self-

Management Program is to teach those in the community who have a chronic

condition how to manage their health in a more positive manner. The training

will be

held at the Pastorial Institute on March 30th & 31st, and April 6th & 7th.



The Matter of Balance Program was developed by Boston University to help

older

adults who have a fear of falling, to learn practical strategies reduce the

risk, increase

muscle strength and to improve balance. This training will take place at River

Valley

Regional Commission, on April 13th.



A referral was made by Councilor Woodson, requesting for the Clerk of

Council?s office to send the

information submitted by Ms. Davis to the members of Council.



Attorney Raymond Tillery, representing Mrs. Marian Hood, Re: Property

Damage Claim. (Cancelled

his scheduled appearance for tonight?s meeting.)



-------------------------------------*** ***

***--------------------------------



CITY MANAGER?S AGENDA :



THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTIONS WERE SUBMITTED AND EXPLAINED BY CITY MANAGER

HUGLEY AND WAS ADOPTED BY THE

COUNCIL:









A Resolution (66-15) ? Authorizing the City Manager to enter into an

agreement with the Georgia Department of Transportation (GDOT) for funding the

construction of the 14th Street Plaza. GDOT will provide 80 percent of the

construction cost with the local match of 20 percent.



Mayor Pro Tem Turner Pugh moved the adoption of the resolution. Seconded

by Councilor Allen, and with no discussion, was carried unanimously by those

seven members of Council present, with Councilor Buck being absent for this

vote and Councilors Baker and Barnes being absent from the meeting.



*** *** ***



A Resolution (67-15) ? Authorizing the Mayor or City Manager of Columbus,

Georgia to submit an application and, if approved, accept a Federal Transit

Administration (FTA) grant for $1,646,614 and a Georgia Department of

Transportation (GDOT) grant for $310,794 for capital, planning and operating,

total of $1,957,408 or otherwise awarded.



A Resolution (68-15) - Authorizing the City Manager of Columbus, Georgia to

submit an application for, and if awarded, accept a grant in the amount of

$116,631, or otherwise awarded, from the Department of Transportation, United

States of America, and Georgia Department of Transportation, under Title 49

U.S.C., Section 5303.



Councilor Henderson moved the adoption of both resolutions. Seconded by

Councilor Allen, and with no discussion, was carried unanimously by those seven

members of Council present, with Councilor Buck being absent for this vote and

Councilors Baker and Barnes being absent from the meeting.



*** *** ***



A Resolution (69-15) ? Authorizing the City Manger or his designee, being

the Chief of Police to submit an application and, if approved, accept a $20,000

reimbursement grant offered by the Georgia Association of Chiefs of Police

(GACP) and further authorize the purchase of four (4) MW810 mobile data

computers from Motorola in the amount of $22,984, and amend the

Multi-Governmental Fund by the $20,000 award.



Councilor Woodson moved the adoption of the resolution. Seconded by

Councilor Allen, and with no discussion, was carried unanimously by those seven

members of Council present, with Councilor Buck being absent for this vote and

Councilors Baker and Barnes being absent from the meeting.



*** *** ***



A Resolution (70-15)? Authorizing the City Manager to accept a donation of

a Toro Utility Vehicle valued at $3500 for Cooper Creek Tennis Center from

Columbus Regional Tennis Association for Cooper Creek Tennis Center.



Councilor Allen moved the adoption of the resolution. Seconded by

Councilor Woodson, and with no discussion, was carried unanimously by those

seven members of Council present, with Councilor Buck being absent for this

vote and Councilors Baker and Barnes being absent from the meeting.



*** *** ***



THE FOLLOWING TEN PURCHASING RESOLUTIONS WERE SUBMITTED BY CITY MANAGER

HUGLEY AND READ BY MAYOR TOMLINSON, AND ADOPTED BY COUNCIL PURSUANT TO THE

ADOPTION OF A SINGLE MOTION MADE BY COUNCILOR ALLEN AND SECONDED BY COUNCILOR

WOODSON AND CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY BY THOSE SEVEN MEMBERS OF COUNCIL PRESENT, WITH

COUNCILOR BUCK BEING ABSENT FOR THIS VOTE AND COUNCILORS BAKER AND BARNES BEING

ABSENT FROM THE MEETING:____________________

______







A Resolution (71-15) ? Authorizing the agreement with Emergency

Communication Network, LLC, to provide emergency notification to households in

Columbus, Georgia, and CCG Employees, for the annual amount of $32,000.00.



*** *** ***



A Resolution (72-15) ? Authorizing the purchase of heating and

refrigeration supplies, on an ?as needed basis?, from Refrigeration Supplies,

Inc., d/b/a Johnstone Supply (Columbus, GA), for the estimated annual contract

value of $10,202.73.



*** *** ***



A Resolution (73-15) ? Amending Resolution No. 68-14 (approved February

11, 2014) to change the name of the awarded vendor from Public Risk

Underwriters of Georgia, Inc., (Peachtree Corners, GA) to Apex Insurance

Agency, Inc., d/b/a Apex Insurance Services (Norcross, GA) to continue

providing service for workers? compensation excess coverage and loss control

services.



*** *** ***



A Resolution (74-15) ? Authorizing the purchase of stone from Columbus

Quarry LLC, (Columbus, GA) on an ?as needed basis?, for the estimated contract

value of $80,000.00. Director of the planning department made a

presentation prior to this resolution being discussed.



*** *** ***



A Resolution (75-15) ? Authorizing the payment to Yancey Brothers Company

(Atlanta, GA), in the amount of $31,039.14 for repairs performed on a

sanitation truck, vehicle #6966.



*** *** ***



A Resolution (76-15) ? Authorizing the purchase of two (2) electric carts

from Adrenalin Powersports, Inc., (Griffin, GA), in the amount of $36,969.76 (2

@ $18,484.88 each), by cooperative purchase, utilizing National Joint Powers

Alliance, contract #090512-psi.



*** *** ***



A Resolution (77-15) ? Authorizing the purchase of four (4) mw810 mobile data computers from

Motorola Solutions, Inc., in the amount of $22,984.00 ($5,746.00), by

cooperative purchase, utilizing State of Georgia (Georgia Technology Authority)

contract # 980-2800008.



*** *** ***



A Resolution (78-15) ? Authorizing the purchase of computer hardware,

software and installation services from CDW-Government (Vernon Hills, Il), in

the amount of $483,107.84 to facilitate the RMS and Iasword Project; and

authorizing the City Manager to signed the statement of work for the project.



*** *** ***



A Resolution (79-15) ? To authorize and direct the City Manager to

execute one or more lease supplements for a lease or leases under the GMA

Direct Leasing Program; to designate such leases as qualified tax-exempt

obligations; to provide an effective date; and for other purposes.



*** *** ***



A Resolution (80-15) ? Authorizing the purchase of maintenance, repair &

operations (MRO), industrial supplies and tools from Grainger Industrial

Supply, via the National Intergovernmental Purchasing Alliance (NIPA) contract

number 141003 on an ?as needed basis?.



*** *** ***



A Resolution (81-15) ? Authorizing landscape/site improvements for the

Fort Benning gateway to be performed by Outdoor Solutions (Columbus, Ga), in

the amount $182,429.85.



*** *** ***



THE FOLL0WING UPDATES WERE PROVIDED ON THE CITY MANAGER?S AGENDA:



FY15 Supplemental Budget Requests- Pam Hodge, Finance Director



At the request of Councilor Thomas, Director Hodge came forward with an update

on the FY15 Supplemental Budget Requests pertaining to Court Reporters for

Superior Court. She stated, the request was submitted by Judge Jordan, as it

relates to Court Reporters and expenditures from 2010.



Director Hodge further explains, prior to 2012, Court Reporters were paid their

salary plus the per page charges. In 2012, there was a limit put in place for

the amount of charges per page, and the salary for Court Reporters was changed.

The invoices that have been submitted with the request are from charges prior

to 2012, which the reporters were given a deadline to submit the invoices for

payment.



City Attorney Fay stated, approval of this request is recommended since the

invoices were submitted before the deadline of December 31, 2014.



In response to a question by Mayor Pro Tem, Director Hodge explains,

the invoices were submitted prior to the beginning of January. When there are

funds available in the Judge?s budget, the invoices would be processed. The

cost of these charges exceed what is available in the Judge?s budget,

therefore, the payment of the invoices has been restricted.



After some discussion, a motion for approval was made by Mayor Pro Tem

Turner Pugh. Seconded by Councilor Woodson and carried unanimously by those

seven members of Council present, with Councilor Buck being absent for this

vote and Councilors Baker and Barnes being absent from the meeting.



*** *** ***



Information Technology Update- Dr. Forrest Toelle, Director of

Information Technology



Dr. Forrest Toelle, Director of Information Technology provided information on

the 90-day assessment conducted on the Information Technology Department.





Staffing

? Current staffing model was designed around a mainframe model and related

applications

? Growing emphasis on serve and web based systems

? Currently with only one person assigned to support the Network

? The staff has few certifications or formal trainings on current technologies





State of the Data Center

? Currently the data center is comprised of the Mainframe that houses the

payroll, courts, and jail systems along with a few other business critical

applications.

? Most of the rest of the applications in the data center are server based.

? Many of the resources of the data center are used for virtual desktops as

well as hosting VoIP.

? The data center has a 6509 as its core switch and it has recently reached end

of life.





State of the Wide Area Network (WAN)

? Currently more than half of the Columbus Consolidated Government locations

are not connected to the WAN.

? For the locations that are connected, the average WAN speed is approximately

200Mbps with a range from location to location of 1.5Mbps to 1Gbps.

? Current Internet Bandwidth is 50Mbps.



Director Toelle explained, the Wide Area Network (WAN) is the distance

between buildings or a group of buildings. Half of the CCG buildings are not

connected to a WAN.



State of the Local Area Networks (LAN?s)

? Currently 2 locations have modern LAN?s with approximately another 10% of the

locations with older LAN?s.

? The remaining locations have no LAN or a very limited LAN configuration.

? Wireless is in most locations but on a very limited and Ad Hoc basis.

? Managed wireless is in only 5 locations.





State of Voice Over Internet Protocol (VoIP)

? Te current VoIP system was purchased in 2003 and partially upgraded in 2009.

? The current VoIP system needs to be updated and replaced





Active Projects

? iasWorld ? Oasis Replacement

? RMS- Record Management System for the Columbus Police Department

? E-Ticket for the Columbus Police Department

? Various other smaller efforts to support various stakeholders



Major Recommendations

? What are the Recommendations?

? What do we do?

? Where do we want to go?

? Why do we want to go there?

? How do we begin?

? Why now?





Recommendation 1

? Upgrade the existing Data Center to correct capacity issues in order to

prepare for an increase in technology, Web presence, and improved access to

business resources as well as mitigating some issues associated with data

backup, retrieval, restoration, business continuity, and disaster recovery.





Recommendation 2

? Upgrade the existing WAN (Wide Area Network), including the Internet, to

correct capacity issues in order to prepare for an increase in technology and

improved access to business resources.





Recommendation 3

? Upgrade the existing LAN?s (Local Area Networks) to correct capacity issues

in order to prepare for an increase in technology and improved access to

business resources and the associated efficiencies.





Recommendation 4

? Implement server based systems to improve the performance and efficiency of

the business function, information technology, finance, and human resource

functions, while phasing out the mainframe system and maintaining business

continuity.



Recommendation 5

? Review, analyze, realign and increase the staffing level and organizational

structure of the Information Technology Department.



At this time, Dr. Toelle presented an Organizational Chart to be

implemented March 2015 transitioning the Information Technology Department

towards Mainframe Decommissioning.





Recommendation 6

? Review, analyze, create, and modify the technical support systems to include

support policies, procedures, service level agreements, standards, licensing,

and tracking in order for software and related systems to remain current as

well as implementing best practices, procedures, and standards as recommended

by the various transition audits conducted for Information Technology.



Recommendation 7

? Establish and fund a staff training program to ensure greater technical

capacity and cross training in order to provide better customer service and

continuity of service efforts.



Recommendation 8

? Develop and implement recommended technology configurations and equitable

distribution strategies standards for all Columbus Consolidated Government and

associated work spaces to ensure the integration of technology in support of

the business function of that state.



Recommendation 9

? Implement a functional Data Warehouse/Operational Data Store and associated

data retrieval, analysis, and reporting tools to increase the efficiency of the

different systems and to help with real time data driving decision.



Recommendation 10

?

Establish working, mutually beneficial relationships with Governmental, Civic,

and Private Partners in

the community to leverage the resources already available and provide working

synergy to improve the

technology needs for the citizens of Muscogee County.





Next Steps

? Create a 3 year plan

? Create a 5 year plan

? Create a 10 year vision

? Create a Comprehensive Blueprint

? Identify Staffing, Cost, and Funding

? Develop a timeline

? Implement the Plan



To conclude his presentation, Dr. Toelle showed the proposed Strategic

Framework for the Columbus Consolidated Government with the implementation of

the recommendations covered throughout his presentation.



After the presentation was concluded, Dr. Toelle responded to questions

from Council. During the discussion, Councilor Woodson made a referral

requesting information concerning the dollar amount that the

plans/recommendations will cost and where the funds will come from.



During the update, there was mention of other companies or organizations that

may be willing to partner with CCG, with helping to accomplish the plans for

the IT Department. A referral was made by Councilor Woodson, requesting a list

of these possible partners.



*** *** ***



FY15 Supplemental Budget Requests (cont.) - Pam Hodge, Finance Director



Director Hodge came forward and continued with the update on the FY15

Supplemental Budget Requests. She explains, the Clerk of Superior Court Linda

Pierce submitted a supplement FY15 budget request on March 2, 2015. From this,

Ms. Pierce was invited to a meeting with staff and Finance to discuss the

budget, to which she declined.



The request that was submitted is asking for an additional $1,364,926, which is

a 70.86% increase to their adopted budget of $1,926,245.



When asked about what should take priority, Director Hodge stated, Finance

recommends the approval of $10,000 for postage, $3,000 for copier charges, and

$3,600 for a lease agreement.



Part of the request submitted by the Clerk of Superior Court covered requesting

funds for computer software. With the Clerk of Superior Court not being present

to answer questions of Council, Councilor Davis made a referral requesting for

the IT Department to evaluate the software being requested was made.



In addition to his previous referral, Councilor Davis made a suggestion that

the Internal Auditor to evaluate and determine if the request submitted is

justified.



Councilor Henderson made a motion to approve the supplemental budget

request for $10,000 for postage, $3,000 for copier charges, $3,600 for a lease

agreement, and $6,176 for office supplies. Seconded by Councilor Thomas and was

inconclusive with a five Councilors voting yes, two Councilors voting no by

those seven members of Council present, with Councilor Buck being absent for

this vote and Councilors Baker and Barnes being absent from this meeting.



-------------------------------------*** ***

***---------------------------------



At the conclusion of the City Manager?s Agenda, a referral was made by

Councilor Huff, requesting staff to look into the large size potholes in the

area of Poplar Drive and Cherokee Avenue.



-------------------------------------*** ***

***---------------------------------



CLERK OF COUNCIL?S AGENDA:



CLERK OF COUNCIL WASHINGTON SUBMITTED THE FOLLOWING ITEMS AS INFORMATION

FOR THE MAYOR & COUNCIL: _______ _________



1. Memorandum from Clerk of Council Washington, Re: Employee Benefits

Committee.



2. Memorandum from Clerk of Council Washington, Re: Housing Authority of

Columbus.



3. Biographical sketch of Mr. Terry ?Gene? Fields, Councilor Allen?s nominee

for the Board of Zoning Appeals.



4. Biographical sketch of Mr. Ty Harrison, Councilor Allen?s nominee for the

Board of Zoning Appeals.



5. Biographical sketch of Mr. Ralph King, Councilor Henderson?s nominee for

the Board of Zoning Appeals.



6. Biographical sketch of Mr. Gerald B. Saunders, III, Councilor Henderson?s

nominee for the Board of Zoning Appeals.



7. Application of Ron Brown to temporarily close Edgewood Circle, from 4001

to 4013, on Sunday, April 5, 2015, from 6:00 a.m. to 9:30 a.m., in connection

with the Living Grace UMC?s ?Easter Sunrise Services in the Triangle?.



8. Application of Elizabeth Hurst to temporarily close the 1100 block of

Broadway, on Saturday, April 11, 2015, from 8:00 a.m. to 11:00 a.m., in

connection with the ?Uptown Fight the Fire 5K?.



9. Application of Andrew Chalmers to temporarily close the Dillingham Street

Bridge, on Friday, April 24, 2015, from 8:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m., in connection

with the Teen Challenge ?Community Event?.



*** *** ***



THE FOLLOWING ITEM WAS SUBMITTED AND EXPLAINED BY CLERK OF COUNCIL

WASHINGTON :____ __

__________________ _____



Email correspondence from Ms. Tana McHale, declining her appointment to the

Airport Commission.



Councilor Allen made a motion that this letter be received with regrets.

Seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Turner Pugh and carried unanimously by those seven

members of Council present, with Councilor Buck being absent for this vote and

Councilors Baker and Barnes being absent from this meeting.



*** *** ***



THE FOLLOWING ITEM WAS SUBMITTED AND EXPLAINED BY CLERK OF COUNCIL

WASHINGTON AND REFERRED TO THE BOARD OF

HONOR:



Request from members of the Canaan Baptist Church, for an honorary street

designation, at Branton

Woods Drive, in honor of their late founder and Pastor the Reverend Dr. James

Harold Carter.



Mayor Pro Tem Turner Pugh made a motion that this request be forwarded to

the Board of Honor. Seconded by Councilor Woodson and carried unanimously by

those seven members of Council present, with Councilor Buck being absent for

this vote and Councilors Baker and Barnes being absent from this meeting.



*** *** ***



THE FOLLOWING ADD-ON RESOLUTIONS WERE SUBMITTED AND EXPLAINED BY CLERK OF

COUNCIL WASHINGTON AND APPROVED BY THE COUNCIL PURSUANT TO THE ADOPTION OF A

SINGLE MOTION MADE BY COUNCILOR HENDERSON AND CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY BY THOSE

SEVEN MEMBERS OF COUNCIL PRESENT, WITH COUNCILOR BUCK BEING ABSENT FOR THIS

VOTE AND COUNCILORS BAKER AND BARNES BEING ABSENT FROM THE

MEETING:__________________________





A Resolution (82-15) ? Changing the March 31, 2015 Consent Agenda/Work

Session to a Work Session/Business Meeting, at 9:00 a.m.



A Resolution (83-15) ? Excusing Councilor Mike Baker?s absence from the

March 24, 2015 Council Meeting.



*** *** ***



MINUTES OF THE FOLLOWING BOARDS WERE SUBMITTED BY CLERK OF COUNCIL

WASHINGTON AND OFFICIALLY RECEIVED BY THE COUNCIL:_____

_______



Board of Tax Assessors, 08-15 & 09-15.

Board of Water Commissioners, January 12 & February 9, 2015.

Community Development, September 16 & December 16, 2014 and January 27 &

February 24, 2015.

Tree Board, February 11, 2015.



Councilor Allen made a motion that these minutes be received. Seconded by

Councilor Woodson and carried unanimously by those seven members of Council

present, with Councilor Buck being absent for this vote and Councilors Baker

and Barnes being absent from the meeting.



*** *** ***



NOMINATIONS AND/OR CONFIRMATION OF BOARD MEMBERS WERE MADE TO THE

FOLLOWING BOARDS BY THE COUNCIL OF COLUMBUS,

GEORGIA:______



BOARD APPOINTMENTS:



AIRPORT COMMISSION OF COLUMBUS:



Clerk of Council Washington explained to the Mayor and Council that the

seat of Ms. Sherry Goodrum, who resigned from the Airport Commission, is still

in need of three nominees.



*** *** ***



ANIMAL CONTROL ADVISORY BOARD:



Discussion was held as it relates to the position formerly held by Dr. Carol

Houston on the Animal Control Advisory Board, which is to be held by a

Veterinarian Association Representative. A referral was made by Mayor Pro Tem

Turner Pugh, requesting for the City Attorney to look at amending the Ordinance

to allow the person holding this position, which may live outside the county,

but requires the individual to work in Muscogee County.



*** *** ***



BUILDING AUTHORITY OF COLUMBUS:



Clerk of Council Washington explained to the Mayor and Council that the

seat of Ms. Shonalee Gamble has expired and she is eligible to succeed herself,

and this seat is Mayor Tomlinson?s appointment.



Clerk of Council Washington explained to Mayor and Council that the seats

of Pastor Vincent Allen and Ms. Leila Carr have expired and both are eligible

to succeed themselves. At that time, Councilor Henderson nominated Pastor Allen

and Ms. Carr to succeed themselves on the Building Authority of Columbus.



*** *** ***



CIVIC CENTER ADVISORY BOARD:



Clerk of Council Washington explained to the Mayor and Council that the

seat of Mr. Abdur Hassan, District 4 Representative, is still vacant and in

need of a nominee.



Clerk of Council Washington explained to the Mayor and Council that

nominees are needed for the seats of Mr. Roger Granger as the Columbus Hockey

Association Representative and Mr. William ?Bill? Logan as the Columbus Hockey

Association President.



*** *** ***



COLUMBUS BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS:



Clerk of Council Washington explained to the Mayor and Council that the

term of Mr. Ed Adams, III on the Columbus Board of Zoning Appeals has expired,

but he is eligible to succeed himself. At that time, Councilor Huff nominated

Mr. Adams to succeed himself.



Councilor Huff nominated Mr. Ray Brinegar, III and Mr. Tom Moore to

succeed themselves on the Columbus Board of Zoning Appeals.



*** *** ***



COMMISSION ON INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS & CULTURAL LIAISON ENCOUNTERS

(C.I.R.C.L.E):__________________________________________________________________

______



Clerk of Council Washington explained to the Mayor and Council that a

nominee is needed for the seat of Mr. Neal McCrillis, as Mayor Tomlinson?s

nominee and Post 7?s Representative, on the C.I.R.C.L.E. Commission.



Councilor Woodson made a motion to confirm Mr. Danny Arencibia to

succeed Mr. John Kuforiji, as the Post 8 Representation, on the C.I.R.C.L.E.

Commission. Seconded by Councilor Allen and carried unanimously by those seven

members of Council present, with Councilor Buck being absent for this vote and

Councilors Baker and Barnes being absent from this meeting.



Councilor Woodson made a motion to confirm Mr. Jong Yoon to succeed

himself, as the Post 9 Representative on the C.I.R.C.L.E. Commission. Seconded

by Councilor Allen and carried unanimously by those seven members of Council

present, with Councilor Buck being absent for this vote and Councilors Baker

and Barnes being absent from this meeting.



*** *** ***



COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COUNCIL:



Clerk of Council Washington explained to the Mayor and Council that a

nominee is needed for the seat of Mr. Chuck H. McDaniel, III, who is not

eligible to succeed himself, on the Community Development Advisory Council.



*** *** ***



COOPERATIVE EXTENSION ADVISORY BOARD:



Councilor Henderson made a motion to confirm Ms. Vanessa Lewis to fill

the unexpired term of Dr. Xavier McCaskey on the Cooperative Extension Advisory

Board. Seconded by Councilor Allen and carried unanimously by those seven

members of Council present, with Councilor Buck being absent for this vote and

Councilors Baker and Barnes being absent from this meeting.



*** *** ***



HISTORIC & ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD:



Councilor Davis nominated Ms. Leslie Heard Jones to succeed Mr. John

Sheftall, as the Historic District Resident, on the Historic & Architectural

Review Board.



*** *** ***



KEEP COLUMBUS BEAUTIFUL COMMISSION:



Clerk of Council Washington explained to the Mayor and Council that Ms.

Chris Henson, District 2 Representative, on the Keep Columbus Beautiful

Commission has resigned and her seat is still in need of a nominee.



*** *** ***



PLANNING ADVISORY COMMISSION:



Councilor Thomas nominated Mr. Joseph C. Brannan to succeed himself on the

Planning Advisory Commission.



Councilor Davis nominated Mr. Robert Bollinger and Councilor Henderson

nominated Mr. Larry Derby for the seat of Mr. Walter Calhoun, who is not

eligible to succeed himself, on the Planning Advisory Commission.



Councilor Barnes nominated Dr. Deepali S. Agarwal and Councilor Davis

nominated Ms. Paige Swift for the seat of Mr. Ralph King, who is not eligible

to succeed himself, on the Planning Advisory Commission.



*** *** ***



TAXICAB COMMISSION:



Clerk of Council Washington explained to the Mayor and Council that the

seat of Ms. Jodi Sears, as the Hotel/Motel Industry Representative, is still

vacant on the Taxicab Commission.



*** *** ***



VALLEY PARTNERSHIP JOINT DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY:



Councilor Woodson made a motion to confirm Mr. Jim Martin to fill the

unexpired term of Ms. Jacki Lowe on the Valley Partnership Joint Development

Authority. Seconded by Councilor Allen and carried unanimously by those seven

members of Council present, with Councilor Buck being absent for this vote and

Councilors Baker and Barnes being absent from this meeting.



*** *** ***



EXECUTIVE SESSION:



Mayor Tomlinson entertained a motion to go into executive session to

discuss a litigation matter. Mayor Pro Tem Turner Pugh made a motion to go

into executive session to discuss a litigation matter. Seconded by Councilor

Woodson and carried unanimously by those seven members of Council present at

the time, with Councilor Buck being absent for this vote and Councilors Baker

and Barnes being absent from the meeting.



At 10:10 p.m., the Council adjourned its meeting to go into executive

session. At 10:45 p.m., the meeting was reconvened.



*** *** ***



With there being no other business to come before the Council, Councilor

Henderson made a motion for adjournment. Seconded by Councilor Allen and

carried unanimously by those nine members of Council present at the time, with

Councilor Baker being absent for this vote, with the time being 10:56 p.m.









Tiny B. Washington, MMC

Clerk of Council

The Council of Columbus, Georgia

Attachments


No attachments for this document.

Back to List