Columbus, Georgia

Georgia's First Consolidated Government

Post Office Box 1340
Columbus, Georgia, 31902-1340
(706) 653-4013
fax (706) 653-4016

Council Members

Councilor Davis,



We will do a followup presentation regarding the two bond allocations to

Columbus, Georgia at the council meeting on December 15, 2009 and will outline

the rfp process for the one bond opportunity being made available to private or

non profit businesses.



I am providing a response to your questions below based on the information

available at this time. Also, i have attached the agenda report that we

provided the mayor/council on October 27, 2009. It provides a brief summary

regarding the two bond programs.



Regading your specific questions, see below:



1.What is the city's fiducuiary responsibility with these bonds:



The city's responsibility is to create/identify the recovery/enterprise zone

for qualification and make sure that the private entity meets all

qualifications. Beyond this, the private entity is responsible for issuance of

the bonds and payback. The city may be required to provide the private entity a

document that authorizes them to use the allocation made available through the

city as the pass through agency. So, debt is paid by the private or non profit

businesses that owns and uses the property in the recovery/enterprise zone.

Interest is tax-exempt and the private entity/non profit entity must issue the

bonds by 12/31/10. This is my understanding at this time.



2. What is the criteria for qualification/selection?



The city has not developed specific qualification criteria. The funding agency

criteria is that the property be located in a recovery/enterprise zone as and

they have idrntified businesses that do not qualify ( rental housing,

apartments, health clubs, liquor stores, race tracks, luxury boxes, and

gambling massage parlors). The city will ask for specific financial

information and will use this as part of our selection process.



3. What will the city's rfp standards/request be:



RFP standards are being considered at this time.



4. Are both bonds for profit and non profit or can they be used both ways?



One bond is for public projects through the city/county and one is for private

or non profit businesses.















Columbus Consolidated Government

Council Meeting





October 27, 2009







Agenda Report # 436







TO: Mayor and Councilors



SUBJECT: Recovery Zone Bond Allocations



INITIATED BY: Finance Department



Recommendation: Approve a resolution authorizing the Mayor to sign the Recovery

Zone Bond Notice of Intent to Issue.

Background: On August 20, 2009, the Georgia State Financing and Investment

Commission (GSFIC) took action to officially recognize the Recovery Zone Bond

(RZB) allocations made by the United States Department of Treasury. The

American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 created two new bond programs

for local governments: Recovery Zone Economic Development Bonds and Recovery

Zone Facility Bonds. The ability of local governments to use both types of

Recovery Zone bonds expires on December 31, 2010. The allocation for the City

of Columbus is $2,090,000 of Recovery Zone Economic Development Bonds and

$3,135,000 for Recovery Zone Facility Bonds. The Recovery Zone Economic

Development Bonds are for public infrastructure and facilities. The Recovery

Zone Facility Bonds are tax-exempt private activity bonds for financing

economic development.



Analysis: The Notice of Intent to Issue is due by November 2, 2009. The local

government may, at any time, waive its Recovery Zone Bond allocation by

adopting a resolution of waiver and providing written notice to the Georgia

Department of Community Affairs. The Recovery Zone Bonds will be evaluated

during the bond issuance process for any project that meets the

qualifications. The Recovery Zone Bonds will be utilized if the city will

realize a savings.



Alternatives: If the City of Columbus does not submit the Notice of Intent to

Issue, the allocation will be deemed waived and available by the State to be

re-allocated.

Financial Considerations: The Recovery Zone Economic Development Bonds has an

option to issue as tax credit bonds or ?direct pay? taxable bonds that will

benefit the borrower with a 45% direct subsidy from the US Treasury on interest

payments. The Recovery Zone Facility Bonds are issued for private projects, is

tax-exempt, and has no cash subsidy from the Treasury.



Legal Considerations: Council action is required to authorize the Mayor to sign

the Recovery Bond Notice of Intent to Issue.



Recommendations/Actions: Approve a resolution authorizing the Mayor to sign

the Recovery Bond Notice of Intent to Issue.















A RESOLUTION

No. ___





WHEREAS, the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 created two new

bond programs for local governments: Recovery Zone Economic Development Bonds

and Recovery Zone Facility Bonds; and,



WHEREAS, the Georgia State Financing and Investment Commission (GSFIC) took

action on August 20, 2009 to officially recognize the Recovery Zone Bond

allocations made by the United States Department of the Treasury; and,



WHEREAS, the City of Columbus allocation for Recovery Zone Economic

Development Bonds is $2,090,000 and Recovery Zone Facility Bonds is $3,135,000;

and,



WHEREAS, the City of Columbus is required to submit a Notice of Intent to

Issue to confirm the allocation; and,



WHEREAS, the City of Columbus can choose to waive the allocation at any time

by resolution.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF COLUMBUS, GEORGIA HEREBY RESOLVES:



The Mayor is hereby authorized to submit the Recovery Bond Notice of

Intent to Issue in the allocation amounts listed above.



_________________

Introduced at a regular meeting of the Council of Columbus, Georgia,

held the _________day of _____________, 2009 and adopted at said meeting by the

affirmative vote of _____________members of said Council.



Councilor Allen voting __________.

Councilor Anthony voting __________.

Councilor Baker voting __________.

Councilor Barnes voting __________.

Councilor Davis voting __________.

Councilor Henderson voting __________.

Councilor Hunter voting __________.

Councilor McDaniel voting __________.

Councilor Turner Pugh voting __________.

Councilor Woodson voting __________.







_______________________________ ____________________________

Tiny B. Washington, Clerk of Council Jim Wetherington, Mayor











Isaiah Hugley

City Manager

Columbus Consolidated Government

P.O. Box 1340

Columbus, GA 31902

Phone: (706) 653-4029

Fax: (706) 653-4032

Ihugley@columbusga.org







Glenn Davis

12/02/2009 06:06 PM



To

Isaiah Hugley

cc

gallen@aflac.com, juliusatty@aol.com, mwoodson@columbusga.org,

ewoodson@tsystsol.com, pops9784@aol.com, evelyn.pugh@suntrust.com, Jim

Wetherington , mbakercpa@charter.net,

Wontergrn@aol.com, wanthony@knology.net, eturner325@aol.com, skhndrs@aol.com,

Judy Thomas , David Arrington

, Lisa Goodwin ,

lturner@columbusga.org

Subject

Re: Email from Tony Whitehurst regarding Valley Healthcare System















isaiah.....as you remember i asked at council about the development

criteria for qualification/selection of the bonds when you asked us to

approve.....your response was "what do you mean".....you were suppose

to get back with me, or me with you.......it seems that there is now

an interest......please answer a couple of questions......1.) what is

the award process criteria going to be as related to the city's

fiduciary responsibility with these bonds? 2.) what is the criteria

for qualification/selection? 3.) what are the city's RFP

standards/request going to be? 3.) are there both bonds for

non-profit and for profit, or can they be used both ways? .....thanks,

glenn



On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 7:12 AM, Isaiah Hugley wrote:

> Councilor Henderson,

>

> Below is the email that I sent to some yesterday regarding the email from

> Tony Whitehurst.

>

>

>

> I saw Sarah Lang/Executive Director Valley Healthcare System some months ago

> and brought to her attention the Recovery Zone Bond opportunity through the

> City. The City is unable to use this Recovery Bond opportunity as it is to

> be designated for use by a nonprofit organization in a Recovery Zone. That

> Is why I approached Sarah Lang about this opportunity. I further had Pam

> Hodge, Joe Riddle and Rick Jones look into how we can make this work for

> Valley Healthcare System. As they looked into the matter, they discovered

> that the property location where Valley Healthcare plans to build is not in

> the Enterprise Zone and must be in the Enterprise Zone/Recovery Zone to

> qualify.

>

> Once learning that they were not in the Enterprise Zone, I had staff look at

> amending the Enterprise Zone to take in the tract of property where Valley

> Healthcare propose building. Staff reported back that this census tract did

> not meet at least three of the five criteria to qualify for the Enterprise

> Zone.

>

> Rick Jones did a presentation at the pre council last Tuesday wherein I made

> the point that staff have not convinced me that the property does not

> qualify by meeting three of the five criteria, when the property around the

> library site and extending back to Morris Road does qualify. We concluded

> the pre council discussion on the Enterprise Zone by letting the

> mayor/council know that we will do a follow up presentation to further

> discuss.

>

> With this said, if we can legally declared that they are in the Enterprise

> Zone or meet the criteria for a Recovery Zone, we will support Valley

> Healthcare as a candidate for the Recovery Zone Bond allocation. Please let

> me know if you have further questions.

>

>

> Isaiah

> Isaiah Hugley

> City Manager

> Columbus Consolidated Government

> P.O. Box 1340

> Columbus, GA 31902

> Phone: (706) 653-4029

> Fax: (706) 653-4032

> Ihugley@columbusga.org



Attachments


No attachments for this document.

Back to List