Columbus, Georgia

Georgia's First Consolidated Government

Post Office Box 1340
Columbus, Georgia, 31902-1340
(706) 653-4013
fax (706) 653-4016

Council Members

MINUTES

COUNCIL OF COLUMBUS, GEORGIA

WORK SESSION

NOVEMBER 30, 2010





The regular monthly Work Session of the Council of Columbus, Georgia was

called to order at 9:03 A.M., Tuesday, November 30, 2010, in the Council

Chambers on the Plaza Level of the Government Center, Columbus, Georgia.

Honorable W. J. Wetherington, Mayor, presiding.



*** *** ***



PRESENT: Present other than Mayor Wetherington were Councilors R. Gary Allen

(arrived at 9:05 a.m.), Wayne Anthony, Mike Baker, Glenn Davis, Berry

Henderson, Julius H. Hunter, Jr., Charles E. McDaniel, Jr., and. City Manager

Isaiah Hugley, Deputy City Managers David Arrington and Lisa Goodwin, City

Attorney Clifton Fay, and Deputy Clerk of Council Sandra Davis were also

present.



*** *** ***



ABSENT: Mayor Pro Tem Evelyn Turner Pugh, Councilors Jerry ?Pops? Barnes and

Evelyn Woodson were absent, but Councilors Barnes and Woodson were officially

excused upon the adoption of Resolutions Number 432-10 and 433-10 respectively.

Clerk of Council Tiny B. Washington was also absent.



*** *** ***



INVOCATION: Offered by John Dreher, Middle School Teacher Kingdom Christian

Academy and Preparatory School.



*** *** ***



PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Led by Kingdom Christian Academy and Preparatory

School.

-------------------------------------------*** ***

***------------------------------------------



CONSENT AGENDA



THE FOLLOWING THREE ORDINANCES LISTED ON THE CONSENT AGENDA WERE SUBMITTED

BY CITY ATTORNEY FAY AND ADOPTED ON SECOND READING UPON A SINGLE MOTION MADE BY

COUNCILOR HENDERSON AND SECONDED BY COUNCILOR ALLEN, WHICH CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY

BY THOSE SEVEN MEMBERS OF COUNCIL PRESENT FOR THIS

MEETING:





An Ordinance (10-60) - Property located at 4124 Forrest Road is proposed

for rezoning from NC (Neighborhood Commercial) zoning district to GC (General

Commercial) zoning district. (33-A-10-Patel) The proposed use is convenience

store with gas sales.



An ordinance (10-61) - Amending Section 11.7.1 of the Columbus Code of

Ordinances by deleting the Fire District as described in Subsection (b); and

for other purposes.



An ordinance (10-62) - Extending the Billboard Moratorium to December 31,

2010.



THE FOLLOWING TWO RESOLUTIONS INCLUDING THE ADD-ON WERE SUBMITTED FOR THE

CONSENT AGENDA AND WERE APPROVED BY THE COUNCIL UPON A SINGLE MOTION MADE BY

COUNCILOR HENDERSON AND SECONDED BY COUNCILOR ALLEN, WHICH CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY

BY THOSE SEVEN MEMBERS OF COUNCIL PRESENT FOR THIS

MEETING:





A Resolution (432-10) - Excusing Councilor Jerry ?Pops? Barnes from the

November 30, 2010 Council Meeting.



A Resolution (433-07) - Excusing Councilor Evelyn Woodson from the

November 30, 2010 Council Meeting.

---------------------------------------------*** ***

***----------------------------------------

WORK SESSION:



CITY OF COLUMBUS 10-YEAR PLAN TO END HOMELESSNESS UPDATE:



City Manager Hugley introduced Ms. Shana Young from the Cunningham Center

for Leadership Development at Columbus State University to provide an update on

the Columbus 10-Year Plan to end Homelessness. He also recognized Mr. Mark

McCollum, who is present



Ms. Shana Young, Assistant Director of the Cunningham Center, came forward

to report that this is an update to the plan since we provided the third draft

to the members of Council a month ago. She spoke of the two Public Hearings

held; October 15, 2010 at 12:00 noon and October 26, 2010 at 6:00 p.m. at the

Columbus Public Library located on Macon Road. She reported the number of

people in attendance, which was thirteen for the first meeting and eleven for

the second meeting. She advised that the third draft is included on the

Cunningham Center?s website in its entirety. She also mentioned some of the

comments she has received from people regarding the 10-Year Homelessness Plan.

She said that we are moving into the final phases of pulling a final version

together to include photographs of our local homeless and the appendix of all

of the documents to go into the plan for the final presentation to the Mayor

and Council on December 14, 2010.



City Manager Hugley recapped that the next step is to make a final

presentation on December 14, 2010; then, a request for action by the Mayor and

Council. He added that if this Council adopts the plan, the next step would be

execution of the plan. He then asked what it would take to execute the Plan,

at which time, Ms. Young provided the following details that would be necessary

to execute the plan and are listed as follows: (1) Hire a director to run the

plan, (2) The director would need to find new monies to support the strategic

initiative and (3) Provide housing to the homeless.



In response to a question of Councilor Anthony, Ms. Young estimated that

approximately 15% of the homeless are disabled veterans. Ms. Young also made

comments in response to a question from Councilor Davis regarding the inclusion

of the faith based initiatives into the plan with the support coming to them in

a way to provide more resources. She explained that a lot of our homeless

initiatives are faith based, because we have a lot of churches that assist with

individual work for the homeless. She recalled the one stop shop for the

homeless plan administered by Miami, Florida; whereas, a space is provided for

a central location for donation and services. She added that the other piece

of that with the faith based community is that there has been success in other

states; such as, Portland, Oregon and Seattle, Washington as far as having the

faith based community bring landlords together to talk about properties that

could be used as affordable housing for the homeless and used this pool of

money that helped the landlords who rented to the homeless.





Councilor Davis also asked about financial assistance to the local faith

based community, at which time, Ms. Young mentioned the HMIS (Homeless

Management Information System) that has the availability for 50 user codes for

different organizations to get on board at the start of this program. She

explained that we have written into the plan that there needs to be training

for these organizations; Homeless Resource Network is looking to hire an

individual to manage the HMIS and to be the overseer. She added that there

would be no initial cost to be on the system; however, the ongoing cost for

years to come, there would be a fee involved.



City Manager Hugley explained that if the Council adopts this plan, the

work of the Cunningham Center is complete. He said if we are going to move

towards execution, it is going to take an individual to administer the plan.

He said we would talk about how this government would partner with some 501c-3

non-profit organization to put the resources in place for execution and measure

the outcome.



Councilor Hunter asked about Columbus having the highest percentage of

chronically homeless. Ms. Young explained that Columbus is surrounded by five

of the poorest counties in the nation that provide no homeless services;

although, the majority of the homeless are from Columbus. She added that a

portion of that homeless population is from those surrounding counties.



At this time, the following referrals were made by members of Council and

are listed below:



Councilor Anthony requested the staff to get Columbus State University

Cunningham Center to include in their upcoming presentation, a description of

the homeless with statistical information; the cost to the City of Columbus due

to people being homeless and outline how the HMIS (Homeless Management

Information System) benefits the organizations that would use it in the

community.



Councilor Allen requested that staff provide information on those plans

that have failed or are not working successfully, as well as, provide some

additional information on Savannah?s Homelessness Plan and their success rate.



Regarding liability concerns mentioned by Councilor Allen, City Manager

Hugley said that city would not have any liability because they are a 501c-3

organizations not funded by the city. He explained the only funding we provide

at this point is to the Homeless Resources Network in the amount of $50,000 and

there are other organizations we fund for various other things, but we fund it

to them as a grant. City Attorney Fay agreed with the comments of the City

Manager by adding that we are envisioning a service agreement with a 501-c3;

therefore, we would not have any liability. He further advised that if it is a

501c3, under Georgia Law people who are on a charitable board or foundation are

protected by charitable immunity as long as they act in good faith.



In conclusion, City Manager Hugley did a recap of the chronology of events

that have occurred and the recommendations of the Administration. He said once

all of the questions have be answered and concerns addressed, we would urge the

Council to adopt this plan to allow this government to be the leader in

partnering with some 501c3 that we would make a CDBG (Community Development

Block Grant) allocation to for them to use as seed money for operations, which

means they could hire an executive director.



Mr. Mark McCollum, came forward to add that we have identified $50,000

that could be used for this year to execute this plan. City Manager Hugley

explained that for funding going forward, they would submit an application that

would go in just as other 501 c3 organizations would complete and the CDAC

(Community Development Advisory Council) would review it and approve for

recommendation to the Mayor and Council with the Council providing final

approval through the budget process. He said that any funding through CDBG is

on a yearly basis; therefore, we may not be able to fund at the same level each

year.



After some additional comments, City Manager Hugley then displayed on the

overhead projector the cost of one case of homelessness over a month.



Councilor Davis then asked about the level of funding received through

CDBG, at which time, Mr. McCollum said that we are not guaranteed any amount;

it is decided by Congress; however, there has not been any significant change

in the funding level and do not foresee any reductions.



*** *** ***



FINANCE / STIMULUS UPDATE:



Ms. Pam Hodge, Finance Director provided an overview of the Columbus

Consolidated Government Unaudited Monthly Revenue Report Summary FY2011 -

October 2010.



She reported that on the Local Option Sales Tax for the three months of

collection, we have collected a total of $7.8 million with the distribution of

Public Safety 70% equating to $5.5 million and Infrastructure of 30% equating

to $2.3 million.



She summarized that the General Fund is up 30.41%, which is a little

misleading we have made a transfer from the Local Option Sales Tax into the

General Fund for the rollback calculation; therefore, with that being excluded,

we are down slightly at 1% from where we were last year with all things being

equal. She reported that the Sewer Fund, Paving Fund, Medical Center Fund and

Economic Development it is showing a decline. She explained that these funds

are funding by majority from property taxes; therefore, it has to do with

timing of the remittance of tax distribution. She said in reviewing the

preliminary reports from November, we are actually up in those funds.



She then highlighted some of the other funds in the financial summary

report. She pointed out that the Transportation Fund is up 68.89%. She

reported that we did receive a stimulus allocation of $1.25 million to pay for

one of the stimulus projects; therefore, we have revenue reported this year

that was not there last year. (The complete report is on file for the record.)



Deputy City Manager Lisa Goodwin, came forward to provide the following

power point presentation and is listed below:



Economic Stimulus Request





City Request - $88,458,895 Confirmed - $27,604,663

Not Approved - $30,854,232 Pending - $30M





Transparency and Disclosure



http://www.columbusga.org/Eco Stimulus Briefing.htm





Government Accountability Office (GAO)



Planning and decision-making processes;

Decisions and justifications for spending Recovery Act funds;

Planned accountability approaches;

Up-front controls and best practices for grant and contract

Management;

Safeguards against fraud, waste, and abuse;

Assessments of impact; and

Reviewing the recipient reports.





Planning Department Director Rick Jones then came forward to outline the

Transportation Projects and are listed below:



Transportation Projects



Veterans Parkway Streetscape - $1.25 M

14th Street Bridge - $3.35 M

Rails to Trails - $1.25 M

I-185 at Victory Drive Gateway Improvement - $2 M

Intelligent Transportation System - $3.2M

Columbus-Phenix City MPO - $6.6M



Councilor McDaniel asked if anyone has expressed an interest in leasing

the two buildings located on the Rails to Trails. Mr. Jones explained that we

have had some interest in them; however, we have not had any real takers yet.



Deputy City Manager Goodwin continued with the power point presentation

at this point and announced that in the Federal Transit Section of the Ora

Capital Assistance Digest Columbus - Metra was the only Georgia city listed in

this report as having met all of the transparency requirements and criteria.



Metra Transit Projects - $2.7M

Workforce Investment Act - Youth & Adult Programs - $3M





CDBG-R Projects



Neighborhood Revitalization: $484,489

Storm Drain Rehab - South Lawyers Lane

Storm Drain Rehab

(Construction is complete)



Homeless Prevention and Rapid Re-Housing Program:

$740,907



Assisted 491 households/1,179 individuals



EECBG Projects:

Intelligent Transportation System

Air Quality Alliance

Energy Audit Program

Pedestrian Traffic Signals



Economic Stimulus Request



GA Criminal Justice Coordinating Council Projects (JAG Grant):

Victim Witness Assistance $ 40,000

2 Contracted Victim Advocates Hired - $12,730

Circuit-Wide Grant for Chattahoochee Judicial Circuit



$267,000



Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant Confirmed:



Court Related Activities $666,990



$973,990



Court Related Activities



Funds for Law Enforcement $666,990



Juvenile Drug Court

Adult Drug Court

Mental Health Court

Marshal?s Office

Sheriff?s Office

Police Department



Spent to Date: $545,815.32

Balance: $121,174.68



Muscogee County Sheriff?s Office - additional $28,500 for propane auto gas

hybrid vehicles for up to 25 vehicles to be converted; funding from LOST and

the Ora.



TOTAL ECONOMIC STIMULUS FUNDS CONFIRMED - $27,604,663



*** *** ***



FRISBEE GOLF COURSE:



Councilor Davis asked Deputy City Manager Goodwin to comment on the ribbon

cutting for the Frisbee Golf Course and thanked her publicly for bringing this

project to fruition. Deputy City Manager Goodwin announced that last Saturday,

we had the ribbon cutting for the Frisbee Golf Course; she has since learned

that it is called ?Disc Golf?. She recalled that a year or so ago, Councilor

Davis asked her to look at finding a location for Disc Golf. She had staff to

research the matter and they reported to her some communities that had Disc

Golf Courses. She said she went to visit the Albany course and gathered some

ideas. She said our Disc Golf Course is located in Flat Rock Park, across from

Friendship Hall. She explained that this is an 18-tee course, where baskets

are located at each of the tees. She said there are weighted Frisbee looking

discs that are very similar to golf clubs in its use. She encouraged everyone

to go out and visit the new Disc Golf Course.



*** *** ***



STIMULUS FUNDING:



Councilor Anthony also praised staff for applying for $90 million in

stimulus money, and it was less than a two-year window of opportunity to apply

for this grant. He commended staff to for taking the initiative to go after

this money and to have received over $28 million.



*** *** ***

BILLBOARD ORDINANCE UPDATE:



Planning Department Director Rick Jones approached the rostrum once again

to provide a presentation on the UDO Revisions to Billboards and is listed as

follows:



UDO Revisions to Billboards

Sections 4.4.13 & 4.4.14

Original Sign Ordinance



Sign Committee formed in 1997 to create a city sign ordinance

Committee consisted of sign professionals, citizens, and city staff

Sign Ordinance was adopted by Council in 1998



UDO



Sign ordinance was incorporated into the UDO in 2005

Over time, loop holes and inconsistencies have been identified and rectified

The current issues within the billboard & multiple message sign sections have

required elevated scrutiny



Current Issues with Billboards

Orientation/Location

Use of Side or Secondary Streets



Interpretation of the Existing 1,250 foot requirement

Clarification of the ordinance



Intersections

Use of Billboards on All Four Corners





2010 Billboard Committee



Council passes billboard moratorium in December 2009

Billboard Committee formed in January 2010 to review billboard/multiple message

boards

Committee consisted of billboard professionals, citizens, and city staff

Council extends moratorium again in March 2010 for 120 days

In June, Council again extends the moratorium until November 30, 2010



Proposed Revisions



There are 11 revisions to the aforementioned sections

The most important of which is clarifying language regarding sign separation

requirements on the same side of the street

New subsections have also been added related to sign facing; distance from

residential zones; and distance requirements at intersections



Revision 1 ? Section 4.4.13.B. Prohibited Locations, add new Subsection 3

3. River Road, north of J.R. Allen Parkway





Revision 2 ? Section 4.4.13.G.1. Spacing of Signs

Current Language

?1. Minimum Separation Required. No part of any permitted, outdoor

advertising structures may be erected within 1,250 feet on the same side of the

street with any other billboard sign.?



Proposed Added Language. ?No other billboard sign shall be erected within

1,250 feet as measured by an arc from a permitted billboard sign on the same

side of the street. Said minimum separation for billboard signs are indicated

in Figure 4.4.1.?



Figure 4.1.1

Revision 3 ? Section 4.4.13.G. Spacing of Signs, add new Subsection 3



?3. Intersections. Measuring from the center point of an intersection, no

outdoor advertising structure shall be located within a 650 feet radius of said

center point. Said minimum separation for billboard signs at intersections are

indicated in Figure 4.4.2.?



Figure 4.4.2

Revision 4 ? Revised Section 4.4.13.H



Current Section 4.4.13.H will become 4.4.13.I. Structure Specifications

Current Section 4.4.13.I will become 4.4.13.J. Height Requirements



New Section 4.4.13.H: H. Sign Facing Orientation. Any permitted, outdoor

advertising structure facing shall face perpendicular to the street to which it

has been permitted. Said sign facing orientation for billboard signs is

indicated in Figure 4.4.3



Figure 4.4.3

Revisions 5 & 6



Revisions 5 and 6 were listed in the slide for Revision 4, and are repeated

here:

Current Section 4.4.13.H. Structure Specifications will become 4.4.13.I.

Structure Specifications

Current Section 4.4.13.I. Height Requirements will become 4.4.13.J. Height

Requirements



Revision 7 ? Section 4.4.13 Add New Section K, Cap and Replace



Cap and Replace. No billboard or multiple message board shall be erected until

such time as the following criteria is met:



1. If a static billboard is erected, two (2) square feet of existing space

shall be removed for each square foot of new space to be erected.

2. If a multiple message board is erected, five (5) square feet of existing

space shall be removed for each square foot of new space to be erected.

3. A fifty (50) percent space bonus shall be applied to square footage of

existing, legal non-conforming structures removed.

4. A structure removal permit shall be submitted when a new structure permit is

requested.

5. Relocation of existing structures shall not be subject to this section if

removal or relocation is due to road projects or safety upgrades.



Revision 8 ? Revised Section 4.4.14.C. Minimum Separation

Part 1



Current Language:

?C. Minimum Separation. No such sign shall be placed within 5,000 feet of

another multiple message sign on the same side of the highway.?



Proposed Language divides the section into 2 subsections under 4.4.14.C.

Subsection 1:

1. No part of any permitted multiple message sign shall be erected within

5,000 feet as measured by an arc from another multiple message sign on the same

side of the street. Said minimum separation for multiple message signs are

indicated in Figure 4.4.4.



Figure 4.4.4

Revision 9 ? Revised Section 4.4.14.C. Minimum Separation

Part 2



A new Subsection 2 will address distance requirements regarding multiple

message boards and residentially zoned areas



Proposed Language for Section 4.4.14.C. Subsection 2:



2. No digital multiple message sign shall be placed within 1,000 feet of a

residential structure. Said minimum separation for digital multiple message

signs from residential structures are indicated in Figure 4.4.5.



Revision 10 ? Revised Section 4.4.14. By adding New Subsections G, H, I, J, K,

L, and M



These new subsections will refer the reader back to Section 4.4.13

regarding various components that include billboards and multiple message signs



Revision 11 ? Revised Section 4.4.14. By Adding New Subsections N, Existing

Non-Digital Multiple Message Boards



N. Existing non-digital multiple message boards shall be permitted to convert

to digital multiple message boards within twelve (12) months of the date of

this ordinance. Said conversions shall be completed within the aforementioned

twelve (12) months. No digital multiple message sign face shall be placed

within 500 feet of a residential structure as measured by an arc from the

sign?s digital face. Said minimum separation for digital multiple message sign

faces from residential structures is indicated in Figure 4.4.6.



Existing Multiple Message Boards



Address Identifier



4445 Milgen Road Shooters

2901 University Avenue Mission Square

2650 Manchester Expressway Texaco

3127 Macon Road CVS

3863 St. Mary?s Road Ace Hardware

3411 Buena Vista Road Old Buena Vista Road

2107 Floyd Road Hunter Road

4332 Old Cusseta Road West side of I-185

4603 Hamilton Road Beallwood Baptist Church





In conclusion, Councilor Henderson recognized the presence of Mr. Bob

Hydrick and Mr. Jeff Hudson from CBS Outdoor. Mr. Bob Hydrick spoke of the

compromise that was made and expressed his support of the ordinance. Mr. Jeff

Hudson also made some brief comments in this regard. Councilor Henderson then

thanked them for their work on this ordinance.



Planning Department Director Jones then outlined the recommended action

and is listed below:



December 7 ? Continue first reading from June to include the language discussed

today

December 14 ? Hold second reading and amend this section of the UDO as it

pertains to Billboards





*** *** ***



EXECUTIVE SESSION:



City Manager Hugley requested a brief executive session on litigation.



*** *** ***



FLOODING STUDIES UPDATE



Deputy City Manager David Arrington came forward to provide the following

power point presentation and is listed below:



Mitigation Strategies



Conduct drainage studies as proposed and report findings to Council for funding

consideration.

Acquire property as proposed to mitigate future flooding risk.

Provide private property owners guidance on measures to improve storm water

runoff.

Increase storm water system maintenance capability by adding two eductor crews

(crew consists of one city employee and one prisoner) and trucks.



Drainage Studies Authorized



Robert E. Lee / Artillery

Levy Road / Victory Drive

Albion Way

Oakland Park (Rice, Knox)

Joy Road / Cusseta Road

Breeds Hill Loop



Acquisition



Califon Court (4 structures)

Englewood Drive (1 structure)



At this point, Engineering Department Director Donna Newman approached the

rostrum to provide the following update with power point presentation and is

listed below:



Drainage Studies



Joy Road / Cusseta Road / Albion Way ?

Drainage study complete. Identified several locations of possible mitigation

($42,500) ?

Phase II design under way ($97,300)

Oakland Park-

Initial inventory complete- Working on hydraulic analysis for mitigation

strategies ($133,100)



Structural Flooding Mitigation Strategies



Robert E. Lee-

Design 95% complete- need to identify funding source for construction estimated

for construction estimated at $650,000

Levy Road / Victory Drive-

Additional study underway identifying drainage structures not previously

identified due to pipes being clogged for hidden ($10,000)

Breeds Hill Loop- To Be Authorized



In conclusion, Deputy City Manager Arrington provided the following

summary as listed below:

Summary



Property acquisition complete and structures have been cleared from floodplain.

Storm water maintenance capability has been increased by adding two additional

eductor trucks and crews.

Recommendations for structural improvements are under development, funding

source to be identified



*** *** ***



ROAD PAVING:



Councilor Davis requested that staff look into the area where the Columbus

Water Works is putting in a major sewer line to also take a look at the narrow

portions of the road that may potentially be dangerous to see if this would be

an opportune time to widen the road and extend the paving plan all the way out

Cascade Road.



*** *** ***



AIR QUALITY ? PSA:



City Manager Hugley advised that this next item is a short commercial for

the Air Quality PSA (Public Service Announcement). Planning Department

Director Rick Jones came forward to describe the contents of the commercial

before its viewing. He also commended Mr. Mike King- CCG-TV Manager for his

works in putting together this PSA video.



*** *** ***



ANNOUNCEMENTS:



City Manager Hugley made the following announcements and are provided as

follows:



December Council Meetings: December 7, 2010, at 5:30 p.m. Proclamation /

Regular Council Session, December 14, 2010, at 9:00 a.m. Regular Council

Meeting. There would be no meeting on December 21 and 28, 2010; therefore, the

December 14, 2010 Council Meeting would be the last meeting for the year 2010.

Public Services Director: Mr. Gary Stickles- Public Services Director is

recuperating from surgery on yesterday; he is at St. Francis Hospital.



EXECUTIVE SESSION:



City Manager Hugley renewed his previous request for an executive session

on litigation.



*** *** ***



PRESENTATION OF GIFTS:



Mayor Wetherington advised that the students from Kingdom Christian

Academy and Preparatory School that led us in the pledge of allegiance this

morning would like to make a presentation. City Manager Hugley renewed his

previous request for an executive session on litigation.



Offered gifts of appreciation to the Mayor and Council for their tireless

work within the community and the city of Columbus. An unidentified young

student then approached the podium to offer the gifts.



*** *** ***



CHAMBER INTER-CITY VISIT:



Councilor Henderson recalled his visit to the City of Mobile, Alabama

organized through the Chamber of Commerce. He said that he would just suggest

a brief work session on December 21, 2010 to discuss a program called ?City

Smart? that the City of Mobile has implemented that he believes was borrowed

from Baltimore, Maryland. He then asked if staff could send out an email to

see how the other Council members feel about having a meeting on December 21,

2010 and he would check with the gentleman from Baltimore, Maryland where the

program was first implemented to see if he could make a presentation to this

Council.



*** *** ***



CHARTER REVIEW COMMISSION:



Councilor Anthony asked City Attorney Fay to make some comments with

regards to the Charter Review Commission nominations. City Attorney Fay

advised that Councilor Anthony has made his appointment, and it does not

require confirmation by this Council. He explained that Georgia Law, as it

stands, does allow sitting / outgoing Mayor and Council to make appointments in

December or January at the Council?s discretion.



*** *** ***



EXECUTIVE SESSION:



Mayor Wetherington called attention to the previous request to go into

executive Session. City Attorney Fay advised that the executive session is for

litigation and potential litigation. Councilor Hunter moved to go into

executive session to discuss litigation and potential litigation. Seconded by

Councilor McDaniel and carried unanimously by those seven members present with

Mayor Pro Tem Turner Pugh and Councilors Barnes and Woodson being absent from

this meeting.



*** *** ***



At 11:15 a.m., the Council adjourned its regular session to go into

executive session to discuss litigation and potential litigation. At 11:29

a.m. the Council reconvened its regular session, at which time, Mayor

Wetherington announced that the Council did meet in executive session to

discuss litigation and potential litigation; however, there were no votes taken.



*** *** ***



With there being no other business to come before the Council, Councilor

Allen made a motion for adjournment. Seconded by Councilor Henderson and

carried unanimously by those six members of Council present with Councilor

McDaniel being absent for the vote and Mayor Pro Tem Turner Pugh and Councilors

Barnes and Woodson being absent from this meeting, with the time being 11:29

a.m.



*** *** ***







Sandra T. Davis, DCMC

Deputy Clerk of Council

The Council of Columbus, Georgia

Attachments


No attachments for this document.

Back to List