Columbus, Georgia

Georgia's First Consolidated Government

Post Office Box 1340
Columbus, Georgia, 31902-1340
(706) 653-4013
fax (706) 653-4016

Council Members

A RESOLUTION



NO.________





A RESOLUTION DEFINING RULES FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FY2007 PAY PLAN FOR

EMPLOYEES OF THE CONSOLIDATED GOVERNMENT OF COLUMBUS, GEORGIA.



WHEREAS, the proposed FY2007 consolidated government budget provided for the

implementation of the University of Georgia Pay Plan, the Columbus Council must

approve rules for administration of said Pay Plan.



NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF COLUMBUS, GEORGIA, HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:

Section I.



That the University of Georgia Pay Plan adopted by the Council of Columbus,

Georgia, shall be implemented subject to the following conditions:



1. Personnel Actions During the New Pay Plan Implementation Period.

Newly hired employees will start work on/after July 1 at the new pay plan rate

for their respective positions, to simplify administration and help prevent

errors.

Promotions and transfers (intra and inter-departmental) during the

implementation period are discouraged. However, those that occur will be held

and processed with retroactive pay (when required), after full implementation

of the pay plan.



2. Multi-level Qualification and Career Ladder positions.

UGA assigned some positions multiple levels to provide salary differentials for

different levels of qualifications and competency. Clear measurable criteria

will be used to determine qualification for each advanced level. In some cases

UGA evaluated and placed employees at specific levels while requirements for

others are stated in the plan such as a Georgia Professional Engineer license;

others will require departmental development with approval by the City Manager.

Employees that qualify for advancement will receive the salary obtained by

advancing the current salary in the current grade one (1) step for each grade

that the new grade exceeds the prior grade, or the equivalent thereof, the

employee will then be placed in the new grade at this salary.

While levels at which UGA places employees will normally be implemented,

obvious errors will be corrected. Department heads may also request changes in

recommended levels with appropriate justification. In all cases approval of

the City Manager is required.

Employees not placed at initial implementation must fully satisfy approved

criteria and/or present valid credentials prior to advancing.

In the UGA pay plan the higher-level designation ?Senior? is used in two ways.

The first is when a Tag number is assigned and the position has a separate job

description. Positions so designated are promotional positions and not part of

a career ladder. Employees may only advance to these positions by successfully

competing for an authorized vacant position.

The other reference to Senior occurs as a numbered footnote to a position.

When so designated, it is a career ladder advancement opportunity, open to all

employees in the underlying position that meet the established/approved

qualification criteria.



3. Reclassified Positions

In developing the new pay plan, UGA evaluators analyzed the duties and

responsibilities of all classified positions. This resulted in many of our

positions being classified at different levels or ranks than they were

previously, some lower and some higher.

According to Dr. Condrey a change in classification level is not a promotion

event but, as noted on page 4 of the plan report, ?assignment to a grade in the

classification plan.?

Following instructions provided by Dr. Condrey, all employees are placed in the

classification plan according to the position they occupied on June 30, 2006,

including employees that changed positions during the study.

Therefore, the new promotion policy as approved by Council does not apply to

the initial placement of employees into the new classification plan and will

not result in a promotional salary increase.









Introduced at a regular meeting of the Council of Columbus, Georgia, held the

_________day of _____________ 2006, and adopted at said meeting by the

affirmative vote of

_____________members of said Council.



Councilor Allen voting __________.

Councilor Anthony voting __________.

Councilor Davis voting __________.

Councilor Henderson voting __________.

Councilor Hunter voting __________.

Councilor McDaniel voting __________.

Councilor Turner Pugh voting __________.

Councilor Rodgers voting __________.

Councilor Suber voting __________.

Councilor Woodson voting __________.





___________________________________ _____________________________

Tiny B. Washington, Clerk of Council Robert S. Poydasheff, Mayor

Attachments


No attachments for this document.

Back to List