Columbus, Georgia

Georgia's First Consolidated Government

Post Office Box 1340
Columbus, Georgia, 31902-1340
(706) 653-4013
fax (706) 653-4016

Council Members

MINUTES

COUNCIL OF COLUMBUS, GEORGIA

WORK SESSION

OCTOBER 29, 2013



The meeting of the Council of Columbus, Georgia was called to order at

9:00A.M., Tuesday, October 29, 2013, on the 2nd Floor of the Citizens Service

Center, located at 3111 Citizens Way, Columbus, Georgia. Honorable Teresa Pike

Tomlinson, Mayor, presiding.



*** *** ***

PRESENT: Present other than Mayor Tomlinson were Mayor Pro Tem Evelyn Turner

Pugh and Councilors R. Gary Allen, Mike Baker, Glenn Davis, Bruce Huff, Judy W.

Thomas, and Evelyn Woodson. City Manager Isaiah Hugley, City Attorney Clifton

Fay, Clerk of Council Tiny B. Washington, Deputy Clerk of Council Sandra Davis

and Administrative Secretary Lindsey Glisson were also present.

------------------------------------------*** ***

***-----------------------------------

ABSENT: Councilor Charles E. McDaniel, Jr., was absent.

------------------------------------------*** ***

***-----------------------------------

INVOCATION: Led by Reverend Patricia Merchant, St. Thomas Episcopal Church.

------------------------------------------*** ***

***-----------------------------------

PLEDGE: Led by students from Brewer Elementary School.

------------------------------------------*** ***

***-----------------------------------

CONSENT AGENDA:



THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION WAS SUBMITTED AND

APRPOVED BY THE COUNCIL: ____________________________________



A Resolution (350-13) ? Excusing Councilor Glenn Davis from the October

22, 2013 Council Meeting.



Councilor Allen moved the adoption of the resolution. Seconded by

Councilor Woodson and carried unanimously by those nine members of Council

present, with Councilor McDaniel being absent for the meeting

------------------------------------------*** ***

***-----------------------------------

WORK SESSION:



EMPLOYEES HEALTHCARE INSURANCE COST:



Director of Finance Pam Hodge came forward and went into many details and

gave the financial impact review of the Health Insurance for the Columbus

Consolidated Government, which included the following information as outlined

below.



Health Insurance Fund Expenditures from FY-2002 through 2018.

HEALTH INSURANCE FUND:

Current City Contribution = Increased by $250/employee to $5,650/employee in

FY13

Annual Costs of healthcare $25+ million, expected $2 million shortfall in FY14

Projected to increase 5-10% annually

Adjusted plan benefits in FY13

Increased office visit co-pays

Increased deductibles

Restructured prescription co-pays

Health and Wellness Center opened spring of 2013

Last change in employee premiums was Jan 2009

HEALTH INSURANCE COMPONENTS:

Plan Benefits (includes deductibles, co-pays, covered services)

Employee premiums

Employer contributions

Amount budgeted per full time position as part of each department?s budget

COST OF INDIVIDUAL (Employee Only) PLANS with proposed plan changes

PLAN TOTAL MONTHLY PREMIUM EQUIVALENT EMPLOYEE MONTHLY RATE

HWC

$409.54 $91.00

HMO

$411.34 $92.80

PPO/POS

$429.86 $98.87

CONTRIBUTION STRATEGY:

YEAR EMPLOYEES PAYS CCG PAYS

2013

24% 76%

2014

28% 72%

(Proposed)

After the conclusion of her presentation, Director of Finance Hodge then

responded to several questions of Mayor Tomlinson and members of the Council.

Director of Human Resources, Reather Hollowell then came forward and

stated that at the October 8th Council meeting, we talked about some specifics

issues and said there ere a lot of questions of how we could allocate the plan.

She then went into more details regarding the plan, after which she then

called forward Ms. Cathy Showers with Northwestern Benefits, the Columbus

Consolidated Government?s consultant for health care, who then gave of

executive summary of the plan.

After more than two hours of discussion on this subject, after Ms. Showers

had concluded her presentation, Mayor Tomlinson and members of the Council made

several comments and expressed their views regarding the proposal for

employees? healthcare costs.

Ms. Showers also responded to questions of the Mayor and members of

Council.

------------------------------------------*** ***

***-----------------------------------

NOTE: Councilor Allen left at 10:55 a.m. (See below for his return back to the

meeting)

------------------------------------------*** ***

***-----------------------------------

After the Mayor and Council concluded their discussion on the employees?

healthcare plan, City Manager Hugley pointed out that at the Council

directions, he sent out a memorandum to all employees and advised them that the

Council has invited them to attend the Council meeting for the discussion of

the employees? healthcare plan. He said he has asked three department heads to

come forward and speak to the issue.

Council members indicated that they wanted to hear everyone who wanted to

be heard on this issue.

The following individuals then called forward and expressed their comments

and concerns regarding the proposed increased for the employees? healthcare

plan.

Ms. Esther Radcliff, of the City Attorney?s Office, Ms. Laura Murphy, of

the Inspections & Code Enforcement Division, Mr. Randy Robertson, representing

the Fraternal Order of Police, Mr. Billy Watson, President of the Retired City

Employees Association, Mr. Kelvin Wells of the Sanitation Department, Ms.

Connie Fuller of the Public Services Department and Mr. Joseph (inaudible) of

the Engineering Department.

*** *** ***

WORKER?S COMPENSATION CLAIMS MANAGEMENT:

Ms. Ann Marie Emeril, Risk Manager came forward and gave a presentation on

Worker?s Compensation Claims Management, which is outlined below.

THE REASONS FOR STAFF?S RECOMMENDATION:

Claims handling

Size

Administrative expenses

Provision of care

RFP

CLAIMS HANDLING ? PANEL COMPARED TO MANAGED CARE

ORGANIZATION________________________________________________

Claims Handling

The Panel

Employee develops back pain after lifting something heavy at work

Managed Care

Employee develops back pain after lifting something heavy at work



The Panel

Employee tells his supervisor, is shown the posted panel and asked to make a

selection.

Managed Care

Employee tells his supervisor who can help him call the 800 number 24/7.

Employee also has a wallet card with that number for his own use. Employee

will speak to a medical professional, and still has a choice of medical

provider.

Claims Handling ? Panel Compared to Managed Care Organization

The Panel

An adjuster is assigned to the case by the TPA, usually after the employee has

sought treatment at an Urgent Care facility due to the fact that specialists

require appointments. The adjuster has no medical training and may have little

experience in handling personal injuries.

Managed Care

The medical professional called by the employee will find out what happened,

what is hurting, and any other pertinent information. If circumstances

warrant, that person can contact a specialist directly to request that the

employee be worked into the schedule.

CLAIMS HANDLING- PANEL COMPARED TO MANAGE CARE ORGANIZATAION:

________________________________________________

The Panel

In many cases the Urgent Care facility will order tests and see if an initial

treatment plan works prior to referral to a specialist. This can result in

expenditures in excess of $6,000 before the employee sees a specialist.

Managed Care

CLAIMS HANDLING ? PANEL COMPARED TO MANAGED CARE

ORGANIZATION:__________________________________________________

The Panel

Providers contact the adjuster assigned to the case for authorizations for any

treatment or referrals. Depending on the knowledge level and experience of the

adjuster response times are variable.

Managed Care

A medically-trained case manager, assigned only to CCG cases, will be the

contact person for all providers and will be able to interact with the provider

regarding the treatment plan and provide prompt authorizations.

The Panel

The Authorized Treating Physician (ATP) has total control of the treatment and

return to work of the employee, and is not required to enter into any

discussion about treatment options or address any concerns of the employer or

the adjuster.

Managed Care

Treating physicians are still in charge, but are subject to review by

medically-trained personnel. Thus, a more collegial approach to treatment is

taken, and this can benefit all those involved.

The Panel

If an ATP refuses to discuss a case where a patient has been out of work for

years with little more than an annual exam, all we can do is go to the State

Board for a ruling. The Board, not surprisingly, almost always accepts the

opinion of the physician over that of the non-medically trained Administrator.

Managed Care

Due to more involvement with medical specialists, fewer cases are likely to

result in employees being out of work long term. Where it is felt necessary to

take a case to the State Board, the Board will see a more complete picture,

resulting in more objectively fair rulings.

CLAIMS HANDLING:

Examples ? The good, the bad and the ugly

Claims cost breakdown

SIZE:

Member County size

Management models

ADMINISTRATIAVE COSTS:

Projected 2014 administrative costs per bids

National trends for excess coverage

PROVISION OF CARE:

Necessity for 24/7 triage coverage

Best care for employees as quickly as possible

Saving taxpayer dollars

Peer review as a benefit to physicians and patients

RFP:

No RFP since 2002

Standard procurement procedure followed

Evaluation committee drawn from Public Safety and General Government departments

Unanimous recommendation

SUMMARY:

CCG has word to do to reduce rate of injury

Injuries will still occur

Once an injury occurs we owe it to our employees and citizens to manage it well

The recommendation of the RFP Evaluation Committee provides the best

opportunity for quality provision of care and cost effective management of

injury claims.

------------------------------------------*** ***

***-----------------------------------

NOTE: Councilor Woodson left at this point in the proceedings, with the

time being 1:45 p.m.

------------------------------------------*** ***

***-----------------------------------

After Ms. Emeril concluded her presentation, several members of the

Council expressed some comments and concerns regarding the presentation. Ms.

Emeril then responded to those questions and concerns of the Mayor and members

of the Council.

*** *** ***





GAP TIME:



Director of Finance Pam Hodge came forward and went into some details in

explaining to Council what gap time is, as well as how it is calculated and to

whom gap time is paid.



Ms. Hodge, City Manager Hugley and Mayor Tomlinson responded to questions

of members of the Council with regards to gap time.



Attorney Kristen Stevenson also came forward and pointed out what the Fair

Labor Standards Acts says about gap time. Ms. Stevenson also responded to

questions of members of the Council as it relates to this subject matter as

well.



Muscogee County Prison Warden Dwight Hamrick came forward as well and

outlined the schedule he has instituted for his employees. He also responded to

questions of Mayor Tomlinson and members of the Council.



*** *** ***



PENSION BENEFITS CALCULATIONS:



Mayor Tomlinson pointed out that they have received a legal memo regarding

this subject matter and said that her and the City Attorney will be taking a

look at that and will bring this matter back at a later time. She said they

will also share it with the Pension Board.



With there being no other business to come before the Council, Mayor

Tomlinson then entertained for motion for adjournment. Mayor Pro Tem Turner

Pugh so moved. Seconded by Councilor Allen and carried unanimously by those six

members of Council present at the time, with Councilors Davis, Henderson and

Woodson being absent for this vote, and Councilor McDaniel being absent for the

meeting, with the time of adjournment being 3:57 p.m.







Tiny B. Washington, MMC

Clerk of Council

The Council of Columbus, Georgia



Attachments


No attachments for this document.

Back to List