Columbus, Georgia

Georgia's First Consolidated Government

Post Office Box 1340
Columbus, Georgia, 31902-1340
(706) 653-4013
fax (706) 653-4016

Council Members

MINUTES

COUNCIL OF COLUMBUS, GEORGIA

REGULAR SESSION

APRIL 13, 2010



The regular session of the Council of Columbus, Georgia was called to order

at 9:03A.M., Tuesday, April 13, 2009, in the Council Chambers on the Plaza

Level of the Government Center, Columbus, Georgia. Honorable W. J.

Wetherington, Mayor, presiding.



*** *** ***



PRESENT: Present other than Mayor Wetherington and Mayor Pro Tem Evelyn Turner

Pugh were Councilors R. Gary Allen, Wayne Anthony, Mike Baker, Jerry Barnes,

Glenn Davis, Berry H. Henderson, Julius H. Hunter, Jr., and Charles E.

McDaniel, Jr., and Evelyn Woodson. City Manager Isaiah Hugley, City Attorney

Clifton Fay, Clerk of Council Tiny B. Washington and Deputy Clerk of Council

Sandra Davis were also present.

-------------------------------------*** ***

***-------------------------------------

ABSENT: No one was absent.

-------------------------------------*** ***

***-------------------------------------

INVOCATION: Offered by Pastor Valerie Thompson Revelations Missionary Baptist

Church.

-------------------------------------*** ***

***-------------------------------------

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Led by students from Generations Knowledge and Care

Center.

--------------------------------------------*** ***

***------------------------------

MAYOR?S AGENDA:



WITH MR. IAN WALKER AND HIS COACH STANDING AT THE COUNCIL TABLE, THE

FOLLOWING RESOLUTION WAS SUMBITTED AND READ IN ITS ENTIRETY BY COUNCILOR HUNTER

AND ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL:_________________



A Resolution (109-10) ? Commending Columbus High School wrestler

Ian Walker upon receiving the State Class AAA Wrestling Championship.

Councilor Hunter moved the adoption of the resolution. Seconded by Councilor

Henderson and carried unanimously by those ten members of Council standing to

cast their affirmative vote.



*** *** ***



WITH FIRE CHIEF JEFF MEYER AND MEMBERS OF THE COLUMBUS FIRE & EMS

DEPARTMENT STANDING AT THE COUNCIL TABLE, THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION WAS

SUMBITTED AND READ IN ITS ENTIRETY BY COUNCILOR MCDANIEL AND ADOPTED BY THE

COUNCIL:________________



A Resolution (110-10) ? Commending Columbus Fire and Emergency Medical

Services, Captain Nate Bader and Chief Jeff Meyer for receiving the Educator of

the Year and Emergency Medical Service of the Year Awards. Councilor McDaniel

moved the adoption of the resolution. Seconded by Councilor Hunter and carried

unanimously by those ten members of Council standing to cast their affirmative

vote.



Chief Meyer thanked the Mayor & Council for this honor. He said he would

also like to thank Captain Nate Bader for the job that he does in training

paramedics, EMTs and other employees. He also thanks Mrs. Jo McDaniel for the

work that she does with the Fire Department and getting the AEDs out into the

community.



*** *** ***



GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION TALBOTTON ROAD PROJECT

BRIEFING:____________________



Mr. Sam Wellborn, a Board Member of the Georgia Department of

Transportation Board came forward and gave a brief introduction of the widening

of Talbotton Road and then introduced Mr. Russell McMurray, State Roadway

Design Engineer Chuck Hasty, Assistant State Roadway Design Engineer and Mr.

Nell O?Brien.



He said the Talbotton Road project has been on the books of Columbus for

more than 20 years. He said the despite the fact that they have been working on

this project for so long, they are ready to move forward on this project as

soon as possible. He said several weeks ago, he attended a meeting here in the

Council Chambers with the Citizens Advisory Committee and heard the concerns

expressed at that meeting despite the fact that they have had many public

meetings and opportunities to express ourselves about this project over the

last five years. He said he heard the concerns and received the letters, got

the telephone calls and this lead him to believe that we needed to try to make

some changes in this project. Therefore, he strongly urged the DOT in a series

of meetings that he had with them in Atlanta and here in Columbus over the last

six weeks and tried to urge them to figure out how to make the Talbotton Road

project impact on the property owners as small as possible and said they did

just that.



Mr. Wellborn said before calling upon Mr. McMurray, he would like to thank

him and the DOT and said they have been patient, understanding and willing to

go back to the drawing board every time he has asked and said each time they do

that, it costs a lot of money to go back to the drawing board. He said he

believes that the plan that they are going to present to the Mayor & Council it

is as good a plan as it can get. He said while the redesign will delay the

official beginning another six months, it will be worth if in the process we

have lessen the impact on our people and on many, many property owners along

the way.



Mr. Wellborn then called upon Mr. McMurray to come forward and make his

presentation to the Mayor & Council.



Mr. McMurray then went into some details and highlighted the following

information with respect to Talbotton Road widening project.



Overview:

How did we get here?

Where we are now

Where do we go from here



How did we get here

?Need and Purpose? is Improving Capacity



Funding: 80% Federal

Project is funded!



Original Plan- 4 lane, 20 foot raised median, curb & gutter, sidewalks



How did we get here

August 1999 ? Concept Revised to minimize impacts to historical resources.

Four 11? Lanes, 16? Raised Median 12? Shoulders w/ 5? wide sidewalk



Public Meetings

February 1999: 109 attended, 7 support, 6 conditional, 5 opposed

August 2004: 146 attended, 18 support, 9 conditional, 7 opposed

March 2008: 41 attended, 9 support, 3 conditional, 3 opposed



Environmental Document Approved - June 2008

Recent concerns of impacts to property and business

Project History

1990 ? Added to GDOT Construction Work Program to develop a concept

Original Concept Approved Oct 2, 1991

Typical Section: Four 12? Lanes (2 each direction)

20? Raised Median

12? Shoulders

ROW: 92? minimum width

December 2, 1992 ? Local government agreement between GDOT and City executed.

City responsible for ROW acquisition and all Utility relocation costs.



1995 - GDOT Hires JJ&G to perform environmental studies and prepare document

for approval by FHWA

April 1997 - GDOT hires PBS&J to complete preliminary engineering

March 1998 ? GDOT agrees to purchase all ROW for the project and Talbotton/Warm

Springs is put on State System (SR 982).

February 2, 1999 ? Public Information Meeting Held

109 attended, 18 comments received, 7 support,

6 conditional, 5 opposed

August 31, 1999 ? Concept Revised to minimize impacts to historical resources.

Typical Section: Four 11? Lanes (2 each direction)

16? Raised Median

12? Shoulders w/ 5? wide sidewalk

ROW: 84? minimum width



August 12, 2004 ? Public Hearing Open House held

146 attended, 34 comments received, 18 support, 9 conditional,

7 opposed

2005 ? Final draft of environmental document prepared by JJ&G

October 2005 ? Jordan Mill is destroyed by fire requiring history section of

document to be re-opened and revised.

June 2007 - Value Engineering Study performed

March 18, 2008 ? Public Information Open House held

41 attended, 19 comments received, 9 support, 3 conditional,

3 opposed

June 26, 2008 ? Environmental Document approved

June 30, 2008 ? Right of Way plans approved.

2008 ? Right of Way funds authorized



Where we are now



Mr. McMurray showed a graphic of the previous design, which was a

cookie-cutter; 20 feet raised median through the entire project and over a 100

feet of right-of-way impact to put something like this in place. He said what

they have looked at with their new design is to remove the raised median, which

reduces 4-feet out of the middle of the road, reduces the right-of-way impact

especially at intersections where they have right-turn lanes and when you put a

median in, you have to provide for cars making

U-turns which added another 12-feet of paving at each intersection.



He then went into some details in highlighting the areas that are included

in this proposed widening project.



Where we are now



Mr. McMurray said making these changes made about a $5.5 million reduction

in cost at this point, which are very preliminary numbers. He said the real

intangible that is not yet identified is that they made 31 significant

reductions in the impact to consequential damages; which are those impacts to

parking or impacts to property; even though it may be a small acreage or square

footage, it may have had a real negative result or operation of a business. He

said those are hard to quantify those at this time, because we won?t know what

those costs are until to get to right-of-way negations; but we are not at that

point right now. He said they eliminated one parcel entirely that they didn?t

have to get, as well as eliminated one relocation where someone was going to

have to be physically relocated.



Where do we go from here?



Mr. McMurray said they anticipate that they will have to go back and

revise the concept, which is a paperwork exercise. He said they do want to go

back out to the public to show that we have heard you as a Mayor and Council,

as well as the Citizens Advisory Committee and the constituents of Columbus and

we have done what we know best to do to minimize the footprint of this project

and still provide that transportation infrastructure that we need.



He said they have to go back and revise the plans as Mr. Wellborn

mentions. He said all the work that they have done, they have to start over on

the design, but they have a lot of engineering to do, which will be about six

months of work. He said the right-of-way authorization of funds has already

been done under the old project so some of the parcels that we know that we

still have a major impact on, we can go ahead and get started on those

acquisitions and possibly work concurrently with some of the right-of-way while

we are in the plans revision process.



Mr. McMurray said they would be making this same presentation to the

Citizens Advisory Committee later this evening to provide them an update and

hopefully address the concerns that they had. He said what he would like for

the Mayor & Council to understand is that they have taken an out of the box

approach on this project and have gotten rid of that cookie cutter approach. He

said they really looked at each segment of Talbotton and Warm Springs Road in a

way that we could balance the needs of transportation and infrastructure

project with the needs of the community.



After the conclusion of Mr. McMurry?s presentation, he then responded to

several questions of members of the Council.



Mayor Wetherington then thanked Mr. Wellborn for his assistance in all

that he has done to make these possible changes to this project. Members of

the Council also thanked Mr. Wellborn for the work he has done for Columbus and

for his assistance on this particular project.

-------------------------------------*** ***

***-------------------------------------

MINUTES OF COUNCIL MEETING: Minutes of the February 9 & 23, and March 9, 2010

Council Meeting of the Council of the Consolidated Government of Columbus,

Georgia were submitted and approved unanimously upon the adoption of a motion

made by Councilor McDaniel and seconded by Councilor Woodson, which carried

unanimously by those ten members of Council present for this meeting.

-------------------------------------*** ***

***-------------------------------------

CITY ATTORNEY?S AGENDA:



THE FOLLOWING ORDINANCE WHICH WAS DELAYED BY THE COUNCIL AT THE MARCH 23,

2010 COUNCIL MEETING WAS SUBMITTED AND EXPLAINED BY CITY ATTORNEY FAY AND

DEFEATED BY THE COUNCIL ON SECOND READING:_____



An Ordinance ? Rezoning property located at 3604 Hamilton Road from an

RMF1 (Residential Multi Family 1) zoning district to NC (Neighborhood

Commercial) zoning district. (4-D-10-Hartin) The proposed use is for

Professional Business Office. Councilor Henderson made a motion to defeat the

ordinance. Seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Turner Pugh and carried unanimously by

those ten members of Council present for this meeting.

--------------------------------------*** ***

***------------------------------------

ZONING PUBLIC HEARINGS:



THE FOLLOWING THREE ORDINANCES WERE SUBMITTED AND EXPLAINED BY CITY

ATTORNEY FAY AND INTRODUCED ON FIRST READING WITH A PUBLIC HEARING BEING HELD

ON EACH AS ADVERTISED:_________________________________________________



An Ordinance ? Rezoning property located at 2550 Wynnton Road from an SFR3

(Single Family Residential 3) zoning district to an RO (Residential Office)

zoning district. (8-A-10-White) The proposed use is for a Place of Worship.



An Ordinance ? Rezoning property located at 2622 Wynnton Road & 1315 and

1321 South Dixon from an RMF2 (Residential Multi Family 2) zoning district to

an RO (Residential Office) zoning district. (7-A-10-White) The proposed use is

for a Place of Worship.



PROPONENTS & OPPOENTS:



Mr. White, the petitioner of both of the petitions, as outlined above was

present, but he did not make a presentation on either of these petitions, as

there was no one present to oppose these proposed rezoning ordinances.



*** *** ***



An Ordinance ? Rezoning property located at 3606 Woodland Drive from SFR2

(Single Family Residential 2) zoning district to SFR4 (Single Family

Residential 4) zoning district. (6-A-10-Richardson) The proposed use is for

single family residential.



PROPONENTS & OPPONENTS:



Mr. Richardson, the petitioner was present, but he did not make a

presentation, as there was no one present to oppose this proposed rezoning

ordinance.



City Attorney Fay said these zoning petitions would be voted on in two

weeks at the Council meeting that will be held at 5:30 p.m.



*** *** ***



THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION WAS SUBMITTED AND EXPLAINED BY CITY ATTORNEY FAY

AND ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL: ___________________________________________________



A Resolution (111-10) ? Providing for the levy and collection of an annual

ad valorem tax to provide funds for the payment of the principal and interest

on the $52,015,000 in principal amount of Muscogee County School District

(Georgia) General Obligation Sales Tax Bonds, Series 2010. Councilor McDaniel

moved the adoption of the resolution. Seconded by Councilor Henderson and

carried unanimously by those ten members of Council present for this meeting.



*** ***

***



THE FOLLOWING EIGHT RESOLUTIONS, EXPRESSING APPRECIATION AND CONDOLENCES

TO THOSE EMPLOYEES

WHO HAVE RECENTLY RETIRED FROM THE SERVICES OF

THE COLUMBUS CONSOLIDATED GOVERNMENT, AS WELL AS

THOSE WHO RECENTLY PASSED AWAY WERE SUBMITTED

AND EXPLAINED BY CITY ATTORNEY FAY AND ADOPTED BY

THE COUNCIL PURSUANT TO THE ADOPTION OF A SINGLE MOTION MADE BY MAYOR PRO TEM

TURNER PUGH AND SECONDED BY COUNCILOR ANTHONY, WHICH CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY BY

THOSE NINE MEMBERS OF COUNCIL PRESNET AT THE TIME, WITH COUNCILOR ALLEN BEING

ABSENT FOR THIS VOTE: _________________________________________________________



A Resolution (112-10) ? Expressing appreciation to Mrs. Vanessa D.

Bowers upon her retirement from the Public Services/Solid Waste Collection

Division after 15 years of service.



A Resolution (113-10) ? Expressing appreciation to Mr. Larry H. Collins

upon his retirement from the Public Services/Recycling Division after over 17

years of service.

A Resolution (114-10) ? Expressing appreciation to Mr. Larry V. Ellison

upon his retirement from Muscogee County Prison after over 13 years of

service.



A Resolution (115-10) ? Expressing appreciation to Mr. Edward Jackson upon

his retirement from the Muscogee County Sheriff?s Department after 38 years of

service.

A Resolution (116-10) ? Expressing appreciation to Honorable Robert G.

Johnston, III upon his retirement as Judge of Superior Court after 36 years of

service.

A Resolution (117-10) ? Expressing appreciation to Mr. Glenn C. Wallace

upon his retirement from Elections and Registration after 19 years of

service.



A Resolution (118-10) ? Expressing appreciation to Mr. Jon C. Weeks upon

his retirement from the Muscogee County Marshal?s Office after 24 years of

service.



A Resolution (119-10) ? Conveying condolences to the family of Mrs. Harrell

?JoAnn? McLeod, employee with Elections and Registration, who passed away on

February 22, 2010.



*** *** ***



RESOLUTION FOR BECCA HARDIN:



Councilor Anthony requested a resolution commending Ms. Becca Hardin and

the Chamber of Commerce for their recognition recently that appeared in an

article in the Georgia Trend Magazine.

-------------------------------------*** ***

***-------------------------------------

PUBLIC AGENDA:



THE FOLLOWING PERSON (S) APPEARED ON THE PUBLIC AGENDA AND PROVIDED IS A

SUMMARY OF EACH PERSON

COMMENTS:_________________________________________________



MR. DAVID ERICKSON, REPRESENTING NORTH BRENT PROPERTIES, LLC, RE: REFUND

OF PENALITY AND/OR INTEREST ON PROPERTY

TAXES:__________________________________________



Mr. David Erickson, representing North Brent Properties LLC, came forward

and went into much details outlining his request for a refund of penalty and/or

interest on property taxes. He said he provided the Council with a packet of

information regarding this matter. (A copy was not provided to the Clerk of

Council for the Council?s records.)



Mr. Erickson said the essence of this problem centers on the fact that this

property was on what they call a tax split and was held up for a couple of

years before the tax office decided to send out bills and in that process

somewhere along the way an address where the bill needed to be mailed was also

crossed out.



He said on Page 4 of the information provided, they provided the bills for

2007, 2008 and 2009 in successive months all mailed to them during 2009. He

said they received 2007 & 2008 in a timely manner, but for some reason they

didn?t receive the 2009 tax bill in a timely manner. He said the first time

they received it was when the penalty bill showed up and said part of that

might have been related that the bill was sent to an old address where they

were previously, but said they have not been there for several years.



Mr. Erickson said as he noted on the cover sheet, the issue seemed to be

one of that the tax office finally got around to mailing out the bill, and it

just didn?t quite happen in the right way for all three steps and they have

since corrected the address error. He said when he talked to the tax office to

request a waiver of the penalty and interest; they said our only option was to

come to Council.



After Mr. Erickson made his presentation in stating his case as to why he

felt like he should be granted a refund, he then responded to several questions

of members of the Council.



Mayor Pro Tem Turner Pugh said we need someone from the Tax Assessor?s

Office to come and explain to us why someone would be getting a 2007 bill in

2009. City Manager Hugley said we could have someone form the Tax Assessors

office but pointed out that as you know we had some problems in the past a few

years ago and they have been able to get caught up0 and correct those problems.

He said if you recall the problems were surrounding tax map splits and then

when properties were tied up in the legal process. He said those were the two

challenges that they have dealt with in the past and many of those they have

been able to work through.



After further discussion on this matter with members of the Council

expressing their concerns on this subject, and City Manager Hugley and Mr.

Erickson responding to further questions of the Council, Councilor Barnes made

a motion to approve the request of Mr. Erickson to waive the penalty and

interest on this request. Seconded by Councilor Henderson and carried

unanimously by a vote of 9 ? 1. Voting for the motion was Councilors Allen,

Anthony, Baker, Barnes, Davis, Henderson, Hunter, McDaniel, Woodson and Mayor

Pro Tem Turner Pugh voting no.



*** *** ***



MS. SHARON E. BUNN, RE; LAWN SERVICES AND LANDFILL FOR

COMPOST:_____________________________________________________



Ms. Sharon E. Bunn, Vice-President of the Sears Woods Garden Club came

forward and said that she they have a concern with all those lawn services out

there. She said she is one of the 36 people that attended the public hearing on

the proposed garbage fee increase. She said she enjoyed the meeting and learned

a lot. She said she doesn?t have a problem with the fee, but what she does have

a problem with is all of these people who have a truck and a trailer with all

these expensive lawn equipment going out and charging people $50.00 to a

$100.00 to do somebody?s job. She said do they have a license and have they

paid city taxes and are they paying income taxes on this money.



She said they are putting bags out in front of people?s house for an

entire week. She said she wish the City Council could pass an ordinance that

says that everybody that does lawn service would have to take the grass

clippings, leaves, tree limbs and make them pay for the landfill; which would

help cover the cost of the landfill.



Ms. Bunn said she understands that the City does have a compost pile that

they do give away to people, but said she understands that the City is giving

it to a company that is going out and selling when we, the citizens can go out

and sell it and get the money for it.



Ms. Bunn spent several minutes in expressing her concerns with the way

that our City looks. She said the roads in our city are looking horrible. She

said we have people picking up paper on the weekend, and said why can?t we have

them also pick up cigarette butts. She said she thinks the City needs to have a

stricter ordinance with respect to these lawn service people. She said we also

needs to look at our parks especially Cooper Creek. She said people are out

there in the park after hours and said we need to control it much better than

we do.



City Manager Hugley thanked Ms. Bunn for her interest in our City and the

great community pride that she has. He said she is serious about cleaning up

our City. He said it is a tough thing to enforce unless someone from our

Special Enforcement Service can see that. He said we can take a look at what

other communities are doing and said it is somewhat difficult to enforce. He

said it is something that we need to take a look at and see if it is something

that we can deal with.



In response to Mayor Wetherington. City Manager Hugley said there is

nothing in the ordinance that would prohibit those lawn service businesses from

putting grass clippings and tree limbs on the curb. He said we need help from

the citizens whose neighbors are doing.



Councilor Baker thanked Ms. Bunn for her concerns in this matter, as well

as for being a good citizen for our community.

-------------------------------------*** ***

***-------------------------------------



NOTE: Councilor Baker left at this point in the proceedings, the time being

10:45 a.m.

-------------------------------------*** ***

***-------------------------------------



MR. MICHAEL L. DAVIS, RE: SIGNS POSTED ALONG THE CHATTACHOOCHEE RIVER

REGARDING FISHING FROM ROCKS AND

RIVERBED:____________________________________________



Mr. Michael L. Davis who requested to be listed on the agenda to speak to

the subject as outlined above, cancelled his scheduled appearance before the

Council.



*** *** ***



MR. LORENZA WILDER, RE: WRITTEN RESPONSE FOR BLINKING LIGHTS ON STEAM MILL

ROAD:__________________________________



Mr. Lorenza Wilder who requested to be listed on today?s Public agenda to

speak regarding a written response to his request with respect to the blinking

lights on Steam Mill Road did not respond when he was called upon to address

the Council.



*** *** ***



MR. PAUL OLSON, RE: 9 MILLS ROLL BACK, (2) GARBAGE FEE INCREASE, AND (3)

MEDICAL CENTER AND METHANE GAS PLANT CONTRACTS:

__________________________________________________



Mr. Paul Olson, 13830 Upatoi Lane came forward and addressed subject

matters regarding the 9 mills roll back, garbage fee increase, and the Medical

Center?s contract and Methane Plant Contract.



*** *** ***



MR. JIM RHODES, RE: GARBAGE FEE INCREASE AND COMMUNITY SERVICE

CENTER:_____________________________



Mr. Jim Rhodes, came forward and addressed concerns with respect to the

proposed garbage fee increase, as well as the Community Service Center.

He said he is in favor of the $2.00 per month garbage fee increase. He said we

need to go ahead and move the Citizens Service Center and move the Mayor?s

Office, as well as the City Manager?s Office.



*** *** ***



MS. BENITA H. BLANTON, RE: LITTLE LEAGUE FIELDS:



Ms. Benita H. Blanton, who had requested earlier to be listed on the

Council?s Public agenda called and cancelled her scheduled appearance before

the Council today.



*** *** ***



MR. RICHARD BISHOP, REPRESENTING UPTOWN COLUMBUS, INC. BID, RE: UPTOWN

COLUMBUS SPRING BROADWAY EVENT

SERIES:_______________________________________________________



Mr. Richard Bishop, CEO of Uptown Columbus came forward and highlighted

the activities that are going in Uptown Columbus. He outlined the dates for

each of the Concert Series, as well as the other events that will be held in

Uptown Columbus. He encouraged everyone who has not been down to any of these

events to come out during the month of May and June.



AT THE REQUEST OF COUNCILOR ALLEN, THE FOLLOWING TEMPORARY STREET CLOSING

APPLICATION WAS CALLED UP AS THE NEXT ORDER OF BUSINESS:

________________________________



Application of Richard Bishop to temporarily close Broadway from 11th

Street to 12th Street, on Friday, April 23, 2010, from 6:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m.,

in connection with the ?Haiti Benefit? pedestrian safety.



Councilor Allen moved the approval of the application. Seconded by

Councilor Woodson and carried unanimously by those ten members of Council

present for this meeting.

-------------------------------------*** ***

***-------------------------------------

NOTE: The Clerk of Council?s Agenda is continued below.



-------------------------------------*** ***

***-------------------------------------



MR. KEN CHUNG, RE: PURCHASE OF VACANT/SURPLUS LOT AT 2766 CORA DRIVE:

_____________________________________________



Mr. Ken Chung, who requested to be listed on today?s Public Agenda, did

not respond when given the opportunity to address the Council.

-------------------------------------*** ***

***-------------------------------------



PROPERTY LOCATED AT 2243 SIMMONS AVENUE:



City Manager Hugley said there was a piece of property on the demolition

list, located at 2243 Simmons Avenue. He said if you would recall a young lady

had done a lot of work on this house with no permits and no inspections. He

said it was scheduled for demolition and then she brought a couple here from

Buena Vista Georgia and they are here on today. He said they said they would

purchase the house and complete the repairs including complying with the code

violations that had been indicated. He said the couple has done what they have

said they were going to do and said we are satisfied with what they have done

and are continuing to do; therefore, based on them being true to their word, we

are now asking the Council to remove the property from the demolition list and

we would issue them the demolition and give them the due process and allow

their contractors and sub-contractors to purchase permits and begin the work on

the property.



Councilor Barnes so moved. Seconded by Councilor Woodson and carried

unanimously by those seven members of Council present at the time, with

Councilors Baker, Henderson and Turner Pugh being absent for this vote.

-------------------------------------*** ***

***-------------------------------------

CITY MANAGER?S AGENDA:



THE FOLLOWING FOUR RESOLUTIONS WERE SUBMITTED AND EXPLAINED BY CITY MANAGER

HUGLEY AND ADOPTED BY THE

COUNCIL:____________________________________________________



A Resolution (120-10) ? Authorizing the submission of an application and if

approved accept $32,555 in funds from the Corporation for National and

Community Service for the RSVP Program. Councilor Woodson moved the adoption

of the resolution. Seconded by Councilor Allen and carried unanimously by those

seven members of Council present at the time, with Councilors Baker, Henderson

and Mayor Pro Tem Turner Pugh being absent for this vote.



A Resolution (121-10) ? Declaring 0.4 +/- acres located at 2766 Cora Drive

as surplus and authorizing the advertisement to sell said property. Councilor

Woodson moved the adoption of the resolution. Seconded by Councilor Allen and

carried unanimously by those seven members of Council present at the time, with

Councilors Baker, Henderson and Mayor Pro Tem Turner Pugh being absent for this

vote.



A Resolution (122-10) ? Authorizing the purchase 3411 17th Avenue for a

Storm Sewer Replacement Project in the 17th Avenue area in order to repair a

storm sewer. Councilor Allen moved the adoption of the resolution. Seconded by

Mayor Pro Tem Turner Pugh and carried unanimously by those nine members of

Council present at the time, with Councilor Baker being absent for this vote.



A Resolution (123-10) ? Authorizing the approval to accept a grant for

$272,250 and any additional funds awarded this fiscal year from the United

States Army Child and Youth Services (CYS) Strong (ASPYN) Program.

Councilor Woodson moved the adoption of the resolution. Seconded by Councilor

McDaniel and carried unanimously by those nine members of Council present at

the time, with Councilor Baker being absent for this vote.



*** *** ***



THE FOLLOWING THREE RESOLUTIONS WERE SUBMITTED AND EXPLAINED BY CITY

MANAGER HUGLEY AND ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL PURSUANT TO THE ADOPTIOIN OF A SINGLE

MOTION MADE BY COUNCILOR WOODSON AND SECONDED BY MAYOR PRO TEM TURNER PUGH AND

CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY BY THOSE NINE MEMBERS OF COUNCIL PRESENT AT THE TIME, WITH

COUNCILOR BAKER BEING ABSENT FOR THIS VOTE:__________________________



A Resolution (124-10) ? Authorizing the acceptance of Updated Design

Guidelines as adopted by the Board of Historic and Architectural Review.



A Resolution (125-10) ? Authorizing the acceptance of a deed to that

portion of Antietam Drive located in Section Five, Lexington Hills. The

Department of Engineering has inspected this street and recommends the

acceptance.



A Resolution (126-10) ? Authorizing the acceptance of a deed to that

portion of Antietam Drive and that portion of Lexington Lake Drive located in

Section Eight, Lexington Hills. The Department of Engineering has inspected

these streets and recommends the acceptance.



City Manager Hugley said regarding the street acceptance to Antietam Drive

said this street would connect to Cusseta Road to St. Mary?s Road and said now

there is more than one way in and one way out.



*** *** ***



THE FOLLOWING FOUR PURCHASING RESOLUTIONS WERE ALSO SUBMITTED AND EXPLAINED

BY CITY MANAGER HUGLEY AND ADOPTED BY COUNCIL PURSUANT TO THE ADOPTION OF A

SINGLE MOTION MADE BY MAYOR PRO TEM TURNER PUGH AND SECONDED BY COUNCILOR

WOODSON, WHICH CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY BY THOSE NINE MEMBERS OF COUNCIL PRESENT,

WITH COUNCILOR BAKER BEING ABSENT FOR THIS VOTE:______



A Resolution (127-10) ? Authorizing the purchase of a gym system from

Promaxima Manufacturing, LTD, in the amount of $87,799.00. Promaxima

Manufacturing will provide and install new commercial grade strength,

free-weight and cardio equipment, which will replace existing, worn-out gym

equipment in the Public Safety Building.



A Resolution (128-10) ? Authorizing the execution of a construction

contract with Sports Turf Company, Inc., in the amount of $248,036.00 for track

and field resurfacing and trench drain installation at Lakebottom Park.



Sports Turf Company, Inc., will provide a polyurethane running track

surface with structural spray finish, long/triple jump runway and high jump

area resurfacing and related work. The City will be responsible for

demolishing and removing the existing track. The trench drain consists of

installing a pre-cast, interlocking polyester concrete trench drainage system

around the entire track.



A Resolution (129-10) ? Authorizing the execution of a construction

contract with Southern Concrete Construction Company, Inc., in the amount of

$1,392,800.00, for the construction of two bridges. Southern Concrete

Construction Company, Inc., will construct bridges at Cooper Creek and Flat

Rock Park. The project includes structure and site work.



A Resolution (130-10) ? Declaring a Hobart CRS864A stainless steel

dishwasher (Serial #85-1002821-H) as surplus in accordance with Section 7-501

of the Charter of Columbus Consolidated Government; and authorize the equipment

to be salvaged by E J Knight Company. The approximately 500-700 pound

equipment, which was utilized by Muscogee County Prison, is no longer in

working condition. Revenue from salvaged equipment will be deposited in the

General Fund - Sale of Surplus Equipment;



Council approved the purchase of turnout gear from NAFECO (Decatur,

Alabama) in the amount of $26,237.80. The equipment includes twenty sets of

coats and pants that will be worn by Firefighters for protection and safety. In

order to accomplish this purchase, the City is participating in a bid

administered by the City of Macon, Georgia. The City?s Procurement Ordinance,

Article 9-101, ?Cooperative Purchasing Authorized,? allows for participation in

the bid.



The City of Macon administered Bid No. 2010-25CP6 for the purchase of

Turnout Gear in September of 2009. The contract was awarded to NAFECO on

November 17. 2009. The procurement process administered by the City of Macon

meets the procurement requirements of Columbus Consolidated Government; and

NAFECO has agreed to provide the turn out gear under the same contract and

pricing.



*** *** ***



PROBATE COURT:



Councilor Anthony said we received a letter from Judge Julia Lumpkin

regarding a temporary position. Regarding the letter that the City Manager

Hugley said in Probate Court, they had an employee who had an illness and that

person was going to be out of work for some time and we authorized the Judge to

hire a temporary person to fill in while that person was out ill and when that

person recovered they returned to work. He said when they returned to work, the

Judge wanted to continue to keep the person that filled in for that staff while

they were out sick. He said the money is not there and that person served the

purpose of filling in for the employee while she was out sick. He said we don?t

typically allow someone to fill in when someone goes out sick and when that

person returns to work we let the department keep that temporary person.



Mayor Pro Tem Turner Pugh asked how much would it cost to keep that person

until September.



City Manager Hugley said our Clerk of Council had a temporary person and

said we sent that person home. He said she too had run out of money in her

budget.



City Manager Hugley said he would provide the cost for the position for

both the Judge of Probate?s Office, as well as the Clerk of Council?s Office.



Councilor Henderson said he has spoken with the Judge regarding this

matter as well. He said he agrees with the Mayor Pro Tem. He said when we have

a temporary person hired when someone is out sick, and then when they come back

and we want to keep those people on, he is against that. He said as the Mayor

Pro Tem pointed out, if there is a project whether real or perceived, that they

are working on and they can bring to fruition before September, $7,000 for this

budget session and then the Judge can make a presentation at the Budget meeting

if she wants to continue because that would only be another $4,000 to $5,000 to

get that through September. He said if there is a specified amount of time that

we can make sure of an employee and we are not paying benefits, he thinks it is

worth considering.



City Manager Hugley said the Finance Director just made him aware that the

person was kept beyond the time the person returned back to work and we have

already spent $12,000 on that.



Mayor Wetherington said he concurs with the City Manager. He said once you

start reviewing the budget very shortly and see that this budget is very, very

tight.



Councilor Henderson said to that end, we probably should have some more

budget meetings scheduled because there was only a few last week and he thinks

it is somewhat overwhelming for the Council to try to digest a lot of things.

He said in light of the fact that it is going to be very tight, he thinks that

adding some more opportunities for both of us to review it and to let the

public see what we are doing is a good idea.



Mayor Pro Tem Turner Pugh said before we can make a decision, we need to

know the dollar amount we are talking about for the rest of this fiscal year

and then we can deal with. City Manager Hugley said we would bring back the

dollar amount for both the Judge of Probate, as well as the Clerk of Council?s

Office.



*** *** ***



INTEGRATED WASTE FUND



Deputy City Manager Lisa Goodwin said today?s presentation would recap

information that you have already heard, as well as provide you with the

specific information that you asked for two weeks ago in terms of your specific

request. A copy of a survey was also submitted to the members of Council that

Ms. Goodwin said was put on CCG-TV.



She then pointed out the following dates are the times when we have had

discussions on the Integrated Waste Fund and then highlighted additional

information, as outlined below.



Fund Discussions

Strategic Planning Session: February 21, 2008



Fuel Conservation Measures: July 22, 2008



Once Per Week Proposal: Aug. 7 & 12, 2008



Rate Study Presented: January 27, 2009



Status of Fund Presented: December 8, 2009



State of Fund Hearings: March 4, 9, 15, 2010



Council Worksession: March 30, 2010



Garbage Fee



$14 Since 2001



Since 2002

Expenses increased by 52%



Revenues increased by 5%



OPTIONS ?

Monthly Residential Rates ? Currently $14

Current Rate: $14/Month

Example: $2 Increase

Year 1 - $16 monthly July 1, 2010 ? June 30, 2011 (FY11)



Year 2 - $18 monthly July 1, 2011 ? June 30, 2012 (FY12)



Year 3 - $20 monthly July 1, 2012 ? June 30, 2013 (FY13)



Year 4 - $22 monthly July 1, 2013 ? June 30, 2014 (FY14)



Year 5 - $24 monthly July 1, 2014 ? June 30, 2015 (FY15)



Public Input



March 4th Northside High School

March 9th Baker Middle School

March 15th Columbus Public Library



Survey



Ms. Goodwin showed the results of the survey that was conducted during the

public hearings held and then went through the Administration?s

recommendations.



Recommendation

$2 Increase each July 1st beginning in FY 2011 through FY 2015 for 5 years



Year 1 - $16 monthly July 1, 2010 ? June 30, 2011 (FY11)



Year 2 - $18 monthly July 1, 2011 ? June 30, 2012 (FY12)



Year 3 - $20 monthly July 1, 2012 ? June 30, 2013 (FY13)



Year 4 - $22 monthly July 1, 2013 ? June 30, 2014 (FY14)



Year 5 - $24 monthly July 1, 2014 ? June 30, 2015 (FY15)

Review in 4 years with a report back to Council with further recommendations

for year 6



Mandatory recycling upon completion and opening date of the recycling center

within the Sustainability Center.



Provide time to develop policies and guidelines, enforcement criteria and the

education and awareness campaign.



Ms. Goodwin provided the requests that were made by the Council at the last

Council meeting and provided the responses as indicated below.



Have the staff to provide the projections out to year ten or beyond to show

what the deficit or surplus would be in ten years if we followed any one of the

recommendations as submitted. Also, provide the impact of taking either a $4 or

$5 increase immediately, which would accrue those funds much sooner for the

first 2 to 3 years, instead of phasing in $1 for the next few years; and see

what kind of impact that would be. (Request of Councilor Henderson)



Have the staff to provide a 10-year projection. Also, if you pull out the

capital expenditures in the Integrated Waste fund, what would our projections

be? Have the staff to see how our garbage fee compares to other cities

comparable to our size. (Request of Councilor Anthony)



Have the staff to consider including in the water bill, the survey that

was presented at the public hearing on the proposed garbage fee increase and

ask the customers to send back a response to us. Also, have the staff to look

at putting the survey out on the City?s website. (Request of Councilor Woodson)



Have the staff to provide a cost breakdown of the operating expenses that

includes a scheduled vehicle replacement; and how that would impact the numbers

presented. (Request of Councilor Henderson)



With respect to the recycling program, let?s consider going ahead and

moving forward with a mandatory recycling program. (Request of Councilor

Henderson)



When the staff gets the rates of what other cities are paying for garbage

fees, include rates from consolidated governments, as well as Jacksonville,

Florida and Athens, Georgia. (Request of Councilor McDaniel)



When the staff brings back the numbers on recycling, instead of a

mandatory recycling program, let?s look at considering some type of incentive

program with respect to recycling; whereby, if residents are participating in

the recycling program maybe they can get some kind of a discount. (Request of

Councilor Allen)



After the conclusion of her presentation, members of the Council expressed

their views regarding the subject, which has been discussed on several

occasions. City Manager Hugley responded to various questions of members of the

Council.



After more than forty-five minutes of discussion on this subject, it was

determined that at the current time, the Council is not ready to consider a

garbage fee rate increase.



Councilor Davis said he would like to look at some creative ways to look

at how we could make the numbers work to generate some revenues.



Councilor Hunter said he would hope that we not put this off for another

year, but that we would have the courage to go ahead and tackle this matter.





*** *** ***



CITY SERVICE CENTER COMPLEX:



Deputy City Manager David Arrington came forward and gave an update of the

City Service Center Complex, which included the following.



Overview

Project Concept

Funding Sources

Property Acquisition

Design Approach

Space Utilization Study

Recommendation



City Service Center

A public-governmental facility

Primary designed for customer convenience

Central location (site to be determined)

Easily accessible

Ample parking

It would house such offices as:

The Tax Commissioner?s Office

The Tax Assessor?s Office

A One-Stop Small Business Office

The Office of Elections and Registration

Police Office





Project Funding Sources

Two Funding Sources



Property Acquisition

9 acres on the site



Design Approach

Architects Engaged- 2WR, Hecht Burdeshaw

Space Study ? Urban Collage

Phase I, Relocation to City Service Center

Tax Commissioner, Tax Assessor, Elections, Revenue Division, Citizen Service

Center, Council Chambers, Human Resources, CCTV, Police Precinct, Assistant

City Manager ? Operation.



Phase II, Reallocation of vacated space at Government Center



Deputy City Manager Arrington pointed out those departments who are scheduled

to be moving to the Citizens Service Center.





Phase II

Planning Recommendations

Add two Superior Court Courtrooms to accommodate six functioning courts with

adjacent judge?s chambers.

Co-locate two existing State Courts to improve organization and efficiency.

Co-locate Municipal/Magistrate Court and Marshal?s Office to improve efficiency

and effectiveness.

Accommodate Juvenile Court?s expanding needs and programs.

Consolidate District Attorney and affiliated programs.

Relocate Public Defender?s Office to Government Center.

Space Allocation

Summary

Diagrams represent preliminary concept only and are subject to change.

Additional analysis will be conducted prior to implementation of plan.

Proposed improvements will be programmed on an as needed basis according to the

needs of the Government and the Courts.

Project will be funded through pay-as-you-go method.



Construction Options

Option 1 ? Design and construct a 2 story building with an approximately 63,000

gross sq. ft.

Meets current space requirements

Minimal space for future growth, no space for additional government departments.

Option 2 - Design and construct 3 story building of approximately 96,000 gross

sq. ft. Develop 1st and 2nd floor, 3rd floor to remain as shell for future

growth.

Meets current space requirements

Provides undeveloped space to accommodate future growth.



Government Center

Phase II

Space Needs Assessment Findings

Phase II



Purpose

To improve organization and efficiency of facility to clarify flow of public

and maintain separation between public, jury and prisoner circulation. To

accommodate expansion of judicial departments and update and enhance court

facilities.



Overview

Study was developed far in advance of proposed renovations and represents only

preliminary assessment and concepts.

Judicial and Government needs may change over time, which may impact the

projections and plans outlined in the study.

Future needs will require additional further before more detailed programming

and budgeting can be developed.



Recommendation

Proceed with Option 2 to design and construct a 3-story building of

approximately 96,000 sq. ft. Develop 1st and 2nd floor to meet current space

needs as identified in Space Utilization Study and construct 3rd floor as a

shell to accommodate future growth.

Meets original scope as outlined in 1999 SPLOST.

Is consistent with development plan for the original Government Center to

prepare for future growth.

We believe it can be accomplished within the project budget.



Supplemental Study

Relocate all General Government Offices from Government Center to City Service

Center Building.

Additional offices to include Mayor, City Manager, City Attorney, Clerk of

Council, and Finance.

Findings ?

Additional 32,500 sq. ft. required

Cost prohibitive to move Information Technology

Approximate costs $5-$6 million

Additional costs not in current project budget



Mr. Arrington responded to questions of members of the Council after

presenting



City Manager Hugley then responded to questions of members of the Council.

He said we are going to have to come back to the Council to determine which

option the Council would like to consider. He said we would come back to the

Council with the three options.

-------------------------------------*** ***

***-------------------------------------

CLERK OF COUNCIL?S AGENDA:



THE FOLLOWING ITEMS WERE SUBMITTED BY CLERK OF WASHINGTON AS INFORMATION

FOR MAYOR AND COUNCIL:



(1) Letter from Tax Commission Lula Huff, Re: Refund of Penalty and/or Interest

?North Brent Properties LLC, 5768 Miller Court, Columbus, GA 31909.



(2) Letter from Uptown Columbus, Inc. and Business Improvement District, Re:

Citizens Service Center.



(3) Correspondence from Ms. J. Dent-Fitzpatrick, Re: ?Women of Courage?

Resolution.



(4) Mayor?s Committee for Persons with Disabilities Weekly Report for the week

of March 22, 2010 through April 5, 2010.



*** *** ***



THE FOLLOWING TEMPORARY STREET CLOSING APPLICATION WAS SUBMITTED AND

EXPLAINED BY CLERK OF COUNCIL WASHINGTON AND APPROVED BY THE

COUNCIL:_________________



Application of Richard Bishop to temporarily close Broadway from 11th

Street to 12th Street, on Fridays, from April 30 ? May 28, 2010, from 6:00 p.m.

to 11:00 p.m., in connection with the ?Broadway Event Series? pedestrian

safety.



Councilor Allen moved the approval of the application. Seconded by

Councilor Woodson and carried unanimously by those seven members of Council

present at the time, with Councilors Baker, Henderson and Turner Pugh being

absent for this vote.



*** *** ***



THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION WAS SUBMITTED AND EXPLAINED BY CLERK OF COUNCIL

WASHINGTON AND ADOPTED BY THE

COUNCIL:_________________________________



A Resolution (132-10) ? Excusing Councilor Julius Hunter from the March

30, 2010 Council Meeting. Councilor Allen moved the adoption of the

resolution. Seconded by Councilor Woodson and carried unanimously by those

seven members of Council present at the time, with Councilors Baker, Henderson

and Turner Pugh being absent for this vote.



*** *** ***



MINUTES OF THE FOLLOWING BOARDS WERE SUBMITTED BY CLERK OF COUNCIL

WASHINGTON AND OFFICIALLY APPROVED BY THE

COUNCIL:_____________________________________________



Board of Elections & Registration, March 4, 2010

Board of Tax Assessors, Nos. 11-10, 12-10 & 13-10

Columbus Airport Commission, February 24, 2010

Greater Columbus Golf Authority, February 23, 2010

Muscogee County DFCS, March 24, 2010

Planning Advisory Commission, May 6, 2009

Planning Advisory Commission, May 20, 2009

Planning Advisory Commission, June 3, 2009



Councilor McDaniel moved the approval of the minutes. Seconded by Councilor

Barnes and carried unanimously by those seven members of the Council present at

the time, with Councilors Baker, Henderson and Turner Pugh being absent for

this vote.



*** *** ***



BOARD APPOINTMENTS:



BUILDING AUTHORITY:



Clerk of Council Washington pointed out that Paula Johnson is eligible to

succeed herself and would like to serve again. Councilor Woodson then nominated

Ms. Johnson.



She further pointed out that Mr. Terry Ballard is eligible to succeed

himself for another term of office, but does not desire reappointment.



*** *** ***



CIVIC CENTER ADVISORY BOARD:



Clerk of Council Washington pointed out that the seats of Mr. Julius

Arrington, District 3, Mr. Wane Hailes, District 4 and Ms. Wanda Jenkins,

District 1 has been declared vacant and that we will need a nominee from each

of these Council members.



She further pointed out that Ms. Sharon Pierce, District 8 and Mr. Robert

Wetzel, District 2 term of office has expired, but they are eligible to succeed

themselves for another term of office and would like to serve again. Councilor

McDaniel and Davis then nominated each of these individuals to succeed

themselves for another term of office. Clerk of Council Washington said because

this is a district appointment, they may now be confirmed. Councilor Allen so

moved. Seconded by Councilor Woodson and carried unanimously by those seven

members of Council present at the time, with Councilors Baker, Henderson and

Mayor Pro Tem Turner Pugh being absent for this vote.



*** *** ***



COMMISSION ON INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS & CULTURAL LIAISON ENCOUNTERS (CIRCLE):

____________________________



Clerk of Council Washington pointed out that Mr. Yuriy Peter Totskiy and

Ms. Ella Mae Lewis were both nominated at the last meeting to succeed

themselves for another term of office and may now be confirmed. Councilor

Anthony so moved. Seconded by Councilor Woodson and carried unanimously by

those seven members of Council present at the time, with Councilors Baker,

Henderson, and Mayor Pro Tem Turner Pugh being absent for this vote.



She also pointed out that Ms. Deidre Williams? seat has been declared

vacant and that we still need a nominee for this position.



Councilor Barnes nominated Pastor Diaz and pointed out that he would

provide Clerk of Council Washington with the additional information. Clerk of

Council Washington said she would bring this matter back at the next Council

meeting for the Council?s confirmation.



*** *** ***



COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COUNCIL:



Clerk of Council Washington said that Mr. Tyrone Rowe is no longer a

resident of Muscogee County and that Councilor Allen is working on getting a

replacement for this District 6 Representative.



*** *** ***



HOUSING AUTHORITY:



Clerk of Council Washington pointed out that Mr. Steve Melton has resigned

from the Housing Authority and that this is the Mayor?s appointment.



*** *** ***



LAND BANK AUTHORITY:



Clerk of Council Washington pointed out that Mr. Carson Cummings has been

nominated to succeed Mr. William Baird and that he may be confirmed. Councilor

Davis so moved. Seconded by Councilor Barnes and carried unanimously by those

seven members of Council present at the time, with Councilors Baker, Henderson

and Mayor Pro Tem Turner Pugh being absent for this vote.



She also pointed out that Mayor Wetherington is nominating Mr. Justin

Krieg to succeed Mr. Joseph Powell and Mr. Thomas Gristina to succeed Mr. Rob

Doll and that they may be confirmed. Councilor Woodson so moved. Seconded by

Councilor Allen and carried unanimously by those seven members of Council

present at the time, with Councilors Baker, Henderson and Mayor Pro Tem Turner

Pugh being absent for this vote.



Councilor Barnes then nominated Mr. Douglas Bryant to succeed Mr. Terry

Hattaway. Clerk of Council Washington said she would bring this back at the

next meeting for the Council?s confirmation.



*** *** ***



Mr. Lorenza Wilder then came forward to address the Council regarding the

subject matter for which he was listed on the Agenda to speak to.



*** *** ***



Mr. Paul Olson also came forward once again to speak to the subject of the

Citizens Service Center.



City Manager Hugley responded to some of the comments addressed by Mr.

Olson.



City Attorney Fay also responded to some of the comments made by Mr. Olson

with respect to the contract for the Medical Center, as well as the Methane Gas

Contract.

-------------------------------------*** ***

***-------------------------------------



With there being no other business to come before this Council, Councilor

Allen then made a motion adjourn. Seconded by Councilor Anthony and carried

unanimously by those seven members of Council present at the time with

Councilors Baker, Henderson and Mayor Pro Tem Turner Pugh being absent for this

vote, with the time being 1:19 p.m.







Tiny B. Washington, CMC

Clerk of Council

The Council of Columbus, Georgia











Attachments


No attachments for this document.

Back to List