Minutes 
       BUDGET REVIEW COMMITTEE   
 May 24, 2005       
 Members Present: Chairperson Evelyn Turner Pugh, Mayor Pro Tem John J. Rodgers    
 and Councilors Wayne Anthony, Glenn Davis, Berry Henderson, Charles E.    
 McDaniel, Jr., Julius Hunter, Jr., Nathan Suber and Evelyn Woodson.  Also    
 present were City Manager Isaiah Hugley, Assistant City Attorney Jamie DeLoach,    
 Deputy City Manager Richard Bishop, Finance Director Angela Cole, Assistant    
 Finance Director Pam Hodge, Clerk of Council Tiny Washington and Deputy Clerk    
 of Council Sandra Davis.        
 Members Absent:  Councilor R. Gary Allen was absent.       
 Call to Order:  Chairperson Turner Pugh called the meeting to order at 12:00    
 p.m. in the Council Chambers, Plaza Level, of the Government Center.           
 AGENDA:       
 City Manager   
 -Overview   
 -Non-Operating Funds   
 -Add/Delete List       
  Finance Director & HR Director   
 -Benefits   
 -Health   
 -Pension   
 -Questions       
 City Manager Hugley provided a brief recap of some of the overview highlights    
 from previous budget sessions.        
 OVERVIEW:       
 OPERATING FUNDS       
 FY-06 proposed budget - $184.5 million   
 Revenues - $177,153,722   
 Difference - $7.3 million   
 $5,151,898 in expenditures that would be taken from the General Fund ? Fund    
 Balance to balance budget   
 $1.8 million in expenditures from the Debts Service Fund Balance        
      Using the overhead projector, City Manager Hugley displayed a listing of    
 operating funds and are listed as follows:         
 FY-06 OPERATING FUNDS:       
 Fund	Revenues	Expenditures	Differences	2005 Budget	% Change   
 General	$119,444,915	$124,596,813	$ (5,151,898)	$120,934,554	   3.03%   
 Sewer	      3,526,152	      3,526,152	          -	      3,626,496	   -2.77%   
 Paving	    11,320,660	    11,320,660	          -	    11,524,171	   -1.77%   
 Medical Center	    10,311,002	    10,311,002	          -	      9,923,062	   3.91%   
 Integrated Waste	     9,124,455	     9,124,455	         -	      9,323,416	   -2.13%   
 E-911	     2,961,088	     2,961,088	          -	      2,797,904	   5.83%   
 Debt Service	     5,922,205	     7,811,905	   (1,889,700)	      8,663,464	   -9.83%           
 METRA	4,772,083	4,772,083	         -	4,635,387	   2.95%   
 Parking Mgmt	   320,737	   349,824	(29,087)	   330,565	   5.83%   
 Trade Center	2,049,358	2,049,358	         -	1,810,549	  13.19%   
 Bull Creek	1,350,300	1,350,300	         -	1,378,075	  -2.02%   
 Oxbow Creek	   562,022	   562,022	         -	   572,069	  -1.76%   
 Civic Center	4,672,457	4,997,021	(324,564)	4,136,800	  20.79%   
 Economic Dev.	   816,288	   816,288	         -	   826,850	   -1.28%   
 Total	$177,153,722	$184,548,971	$(7,395,249)	$180,483,362	   2.25%       
      City Manager Hugley reported that this budget is 2.25% greater than last    
 year?s budget.  He said that the 2.25% increase over the FY-05 budget is less    
 than CIP (Consumer Price Index), which is 2.97%       
 What is in the FY06 budget for employees?   
 5% Bonus for full-time employees & 2.5% bonus for part-time and retirees, which    
 totals ($4.6 million) *   
 City absorbs increase in Healthcare costs at an average of $250 per employee    
 ($640,000.00)   
 Public Safety Additional supplement for sworn personnel ($.2 million)   
 Total Benefit for Employees - $5.4 million   
 *For Qualified Employees employed Jan 1, 2005       
 *For Qualified Employees employed Jan 1, 2005   
 	Note:  2% Pay increase effective Jan 1, 2006 for constitutional officers       
      In response to a question of Councilor McDaniel, City Manager Hugley    
 explained that the City does not pay $640,000.00 for healthcare for the    
 employees of the government, but the $540,000 represents the amount the    
 healthcare cost would have gone up and normally that cost would have been    
 passed on to the employee; however, the administration is recommending that the    
 amount be absorbed by the City.       
      City Manager Hugley suggested the increase that is being proposed for the    
 employees are to be distributed in a separate paycheck on July 29, 2005.         
 ***      ***      ***   
 NON-OPERATING FUNDS:           
 Funds not for the general operation of the government   
 Restricted for a specific purpose   
 Must be budgeted annually   
 Maintained in a separate fund       
 Urban Development Action Grant  $72,822   
 Economic Development Program  $15,000   
 HOME      $1,264,437   
 HUD Section 108     $1,334,813   
 Multi-Governmental     $1,824,002   
 Hotel/Motel Tax     $2,652,398   
 Police Forfeiture     $100,000   
 County Drug Abuse Treatment   $100,000   
 Metro Drug Task Force    $90,000   
 County Jail/Penalty Assessment   $1,950,000       
      City Manager Hugley pointed out that the hotel/motel tax is split with the    
 Civic Center ? 2%, Trade Center ? 1%, Columbus Convention & Visitor?s Bureau ?    
 3% and the Performing Art Center - $1%       
      City Manager Hugley reminded everyone that in the County Jail/Penalty    
 Assessment, we have $1.9 million that we would use as revenue this year;    
 therefore, that $1,950,000 revenue would not be there next year.       
 Sheriff Forfeiture     $100,000   
 Special Projects (CIP)    $2,345,912   
 1999 Sales Tax Projects    $28,994,218   
 Columbus Bldg. Authority Taxable Lease Revenue Bonds Series 1999C   
 $300,000   
 Columbus Bldg. Authority Lease Revenue Bonds Series 2001  $100,000   
 Columbus Bldg. Authority Lease Revenue Bonds Series 2003A  $21,700,000   
 Columbus Bldg. Authority Lease Revenue Bonds Series 2003B  $3,500,000   
 G.O. Sales Tax Bonds Series 2003  $3,000,000   
 Family, Youth and Coalition   $50,000       
 ***      ***      ***       
 ADD/DELETE LIST:  GENERAL FUND           
 General Fund Expenditures  $124,596,813   
 3 Cadets (Pugh)     $78,760   
 Conditional Discharge (Pugh)    $77,049   
 DARE, GREAT (Pugh)    $0   
 Juvenile Diversion (Pugh)    $0   
 Drug Court (Pugh)     $100,000       
      Councilor McDaniel asked questions regarding the duties of the cadets at    
 the Police Department, at which time, Police Chief Ricky Boren came forward to    
 describe the various duties and to provide some brief information on the cadet    
 program.  He explained that the cadets range in age from 18 - 21.  He said that    
 we regulate their education requirements and provide in-house training to    
 ensure that they meet the qualifications to become police officers at the end    
 of that two or three year span.  He said that we can assign them anywhere from    
 the desk services to one of bureaus for reading case files, answering the    
 telephone, etc., which is all in preparation to become a police officer.         
      Councilor Woodson explained the reasons why she supports the cadet program    
 by mentioning that Spencer High School has a law enforcement training class    
 that prepares the students for the field of law enforcement.  She said that    
 upon completion of the four-year program the students are eligible to go into    
 the cadet programs.  She said this allows for high school students that are    
 interested in law enforcement to get some early on training.  Police Chief    
 Boren added that we do keep up with that program and if their grades are not    
 kept to a certain standard; then, they would not be eligible for the program.         
 #1:  3 Cadets ($78,760.00)       
      Councilor McDaniel moved approval.  Seconded by Councilor Woodson.         
      City Manager Hugley noted that if the Council were to add everything from    
 the add/delete list into the budget, it would take the fund balance down to    
 69.34 days.  He said in addition to what he would be proposing in the amount of    
 $100,000.00, this would drop the fund balance to 69 days.  Mayor Pro Tem    
 Rodgers asked City Manager Hugley to translate the number of days in the fund    
 balance to dollars, at which time, City Manager Hugley requested some    
 additional time to calculate the figures.       
      After the discussion was concluded on this matter, the motion was defeated    
 by a vote of two to six.  Councilors McDaniel and Woodson voted yes and    
 Councilors Anthony, Davis, Henderson, Hunter, Pugh, Rodgers and Suber voting no.       
 #2:  Conditional Discharge Program ($77,049.00)       
      Councilor Henderson moved approval.  Seconded by Councilor Davis.       
      Councilor Suber asked if this was the program that the judges had stated    
 that they would increase the fines in order to retain this program?  City    
 Manager Hugley agreed with this statement.  Mayor Pro Tem Rodgers then asked if    
 we were going to adjust our revenue projections accordingly.  Mayor Pro Tem    
 Rodgers said that he asked the initial question regarding the dollar amount for    
 these add on items simply on the side of caution, because the next question is    
 where are the funds going to come from next year.  He suggested that his    
 colleagues exercise extreme caution.  He said if we are going to increase    
 revenues in those areas to fund that add on for the conditional discharge    
 program; he would support it but he is not going to support anything that    
 requires funding for next year when we do not know where it is coming from.     
 Finance Director Cole explained that the reason why we have not added the    
 amount on to the revenue side is because we don?t have any details on how they    
 are going to add that revenue; we don?t know if it is going to be added on to    
 the fees or how they are going to impose it from their courts.  Mayor Pro Tem    
 Rodgers requested a delay on this item to get a response from the interested    
 parties as to how they intend to do it.  Chairperson Turner Pugh pointed out    
 that if we don?t pay it here, we are going to pay in someplace else.       
      Regarding the expenditure amount, City Manager Hugley determined that it    
 would be $374,016.00 and new revenue would be $13,875.00.  He explained that it    
 was understood that with no new revenue source identified, any add on would    
 come out of the fund balance.       
      Councilor Henderson reminded everyone that we do have a statement from the    
 judges that they are going to increase fines to generate revenue, aside from    
 that, he would vote for this anyway because we are saving money by not adding    
 to the population of the jail, which cost the City approximately $25,000 -    
 $30,000. a year to house inmates.       
      Mayor Pro Tem Rodgers determined that if the letter is good enough for us    
 to take the judges? word; then, why is it not good enough for us to put in the    
 revenue line item.  City Manager Hugley agreed that the Finance Department    
 would put a revenue line item.       
      Chairperson Turner Pugh called attention to the motion on the table.     
 Mayor Pro Tem Rodgers added that with the caveat that the revenue would be    
 increased as well.  Chairperson Turner Pugh recalled that this was not a part    
 of the motion, because the motion on the floor is to add $77,049 back into the    
 budget for the Conditional Discharge Program.  The motion was approved by a    
 vote of eight to one.  Mayor Pro Tem Rodgers voted no and Councilors Anthony,    
 Davis, Henderson, Hunter, Pugh, Rodgers, Suber and Woodson voted yes.           
      City Manager Hugley pointed out that this means that the Administrative    
 Tech position in the Conditional Discharge Program would be retained for the    
 upcoming fiscal year.  He said that their operating expenses would be $48,000.    
 Administrative Tech with benefits is $29,049.00.         
 #3:  DARE, GREAT ($0):       
      City manager Hugley explained that there was no change, because we did not    
 take anything out of the budget for that; this was an administrative decision.         
      Councilor Henderson pointed out that this Council does not have to do    
 anything.         
 #4:  Juvenile Diversion ($0):       
      City Manager Hugley advised that it would be the same scenario with the    
 Juvenile Diversion Program.       
 #5:  Drug Court ($100,000):       
      City Manager Hugley advised that they have applied for a $100,000.00    
 grant, but they have not received the word on if they have been approved for    
 that grant.  He pointed out that the Council wanted it on the add list.  He    
 added that if they get the grant and the Council approves the $100,000.00;    
 then, this money would go back into the general fund.  He said of course if    
 they don?t get the grant; then, the program would be funded if this money were    
 added back into the budget.       
      Councilor McDaniel asked if some of the drug money that is confiscated    
 could be used for this, at which time, City Manager Hugley said that he would    
 check into that.  Police Chief Ricky Boren explained that Drug Court is not    
 under his control, it is under the court system.  He said that the seized money    
 that we use under the Federal guidelines could not be used in that court and    
 under the State guidelines it states that it could be used for the continuation    
 of drug work or undercover work on the streets.  He said that this is a legal    
 question that would have to be addressed by the city attorney.  In response to    
 questions regarding the jurisdiction of the drug court, Finance Director Cole    
 advised that this is dealing with juvenile drug cases that deal with    
 psychological evaluations and working with the family, which is primarily out    
 of the Juvenile Court system.           
      Assistant City Attorney Deloach mentioned that they have better then a 90%    
 success rate from the Juvenile Drug Court.  She said that one place that the    
 funding could come from is money called ?DATE?.  She said that it is from    
 Superior Court add ons and that money is available; even though, the drug    
 seized money cannot.  She pointed out that there is a criminal fee that we    
 collect that could be used for drug court.  Chairperson Turner Pugh asked    
 questions regarding this money and where does it go now, at which time,    
 Assistant City Attorney Deloach advised that it goes to the Police Department.         
      Police Chief Boren reiterated that the drug court is not a program of the    
 police department; it is something that is handle for the court and by the    
 court.  Chairperson Turner Pugh clarified that the City Manager is saying that    
 the funds from the DATE are controlled by the Superior Court Judges; therefore,    
 the Administration would need to talk to the judges to see if the City could    
 use part of that money for the Drug Court Program.  City Manager Hugley added    
 that the judges are obviously using their discretion to assign this money to    
 the county drug abuse treatment program at the Police Department in the amount    
 of $100,000.00.  He said that what we would be doing is taking from one program    
 to fund another, but he would go to the judge to ask about diverting that money    
 from the program at the Columbus Police Department to the Drug Court; then, we    
 are fine with that.       
      City Manager Hugley suggestion that the discussions regarding the two fire    
 trucks be held when that particular times come up on the add/delete list.       
 ------------------------------------------***      ***         
 ***------------------------------------------       
 NOTE:  Councilor Henderson left the meeting during this portion of the    
 proceedings with the time being 1:00 p.m.   
 ------------------------------------------***      ***         
 ***------------------------------------------       
      Councilor Hunter expressed his support for the continuation of the Drug    
 Court, because the greatest percentage of crimes is drug related; therefore, if    
 we could control the drug problem, the jails would be emptied.       
      When Mayor Pro Tem Rodgers questioned Police Chief Boren about the DATE    
 funding, Police Chief Boren advised that he is not receiving this funding.  He    
 said that we have a Juvenile Diversion Program that we operate on our own but    
 is unaware of this money.  City Manager Hugley said that he would find out    
 exactly where the $100,000.00 is going.       
      At this time, City Manager Hugley suggested that we delay the motion on    
 the Drug Court.       
      Police Chief Boren then responded to questions related to the number of    
 slots available in the Police Department and the amount of manpower that is on    
 the streets to respond to 911 calls.  Police Chief Boren recalled that he is    
 short 30 police officers that are needed on the streets.  Chairperson Turner    
 Pugh suggested using retired police officers to administer some of these    
 programs, at which time, Police Chief Boren advised that we have started the    
 process of looking at the possibility of doing that.  He pointed out that this    
 would take some work with rewriting the accreditation and the Human Resource    
 Department would have to get involved to determine their status so that the    
 retired officers could keep receiving their retirement money.  She then asked    
 Police Chief Boren to provide the Council with the projected figures on the    
 amount of money we are talking about.   
  ------------------------------------------***      ***         
 ***-----------------------------------------       
 NOTE:  Mayor Pro Tem Rodgers left the meeting during this portion of the    
 proceedings with the time being 1:15 p.m.   
 ------------------------------------------***      ***         
 ***------------------------------------------       
      City Manager Hugley said that if that $100,000. remains; then, the General    
 Fund would go to $124,773,862.       
 ***      ***      ***       
      City Attorney?s Salary:       
      Councilor McDaniel asked about the salary of the City Attorney.  City    
 Manager Hugley said that the City Attorney?s salary is $75,000.00.  Councilor    
 McDaniel said that the City Attorney has not received a raise since he accepted    
 the position, at which time, City Manager Hugley agreed with this statement and    
 pointed out that he has been the City Attorney for about four years.         
      Councilor McDaniel then requested a pay increase to $85,000.00 for City    
 Attorney Fay be placed on the add list for discussion.  Councilor Suber    
 recalled that he is a City Employee; therefore, he has been receiving some kind    
 of raise, at which time, City Manager Hugley made a correction in his previous    
 statement by saying that there was a 3% raise two years ago.  Chairperson    
 Turner Pugh determined that the request would be listed for next week?s meeting.       
 ------------------------------------------***      ***         
 ***------------------------------------------       
 NOTE:  Mayor Poydasheff left the meeting during this portion of the proceedings    
 with the time being 1:20 p.m.   
 ------------------------------------------***      ***         
 ***------------------------------------------   
 Fire Trucks:       
      Councilor Suber asked about the number of fire engines that are needed.     
 He recalled that we added two additional fire trucks through the GMA Lease    
 Program last week.  He pointed out that one has already been added, but the    
 Fire Chief is asking for two more fire engines.  He then asked Fire Chief Roy    
 Waters to respond to several questions relating to when the last time new fire    
 trucks were added and the life expectancy of the engines.       
      After Fire Chief Waters provided the reasons for the request, Councilor    
 Suber made a motion that two additional fire trucks be added to the budget    
 through the GMA Lease Program, which would be an additional $10,000.00 added to    
 the budget because we already have $60,000.00 in there.  Seconded by Councilor    
 Woodson and carried unanimously by those seven members present for this vote    
 with Mayor Pro Tem Rodgers and Councilor Henderson having already left the    
 meeting and Councilor Allen being absent for this meeting.       
 ***      ***      ***       
 Pursuit Vehicles:       
      Councilor Davis asked questions regarding the pursuit vehicles.  He    
 recalled that last week we were looking at the need for more pursuit vehicles.     
 Police Chief Boren advised that he has a total of 244 police pursuit vehicles    
 and he is still waiting on the 30 cars for this fiscal year to come in.  He    
 said the highest amount of mileage on any one of these vehicles is 177,900.  He    
 pointed out that the request was for 38 vehicles with only 15 making it in the    
 budget, but he is fine in regards to the vehicles.         
 ***      ***      ***       
      Chairperson Turner Pugh said that the only other add/deletes are coming    
 from the staff.  City Manager Hugley agreed with the statement and pointed out    
 that it would be coming out of the general fund.  He determined that we could    
 wrap this up next week.  Chairperson Turner Pugh said when these requests are    
 brought back next week, then, the staff needs to explain why the items were not    
 included in the original budget.  City Manager Hugley said that at the next    
 meeting, we would also try to bring back answers to some of the questions that    
 were asked during the course of these budget review meetings.        
 ***      ***      ***       
      Civic Center:       
      Councilor Woodson reminded City Manager Hugley to bring a response    
 regarding the porter deck, the soundboard and the additional stage equipment    
 for the Civic Center.  City Manager Hugley said that he did have a response to    
 those questions and would provide the answers to Councilor Woodson after the    
 meeting.             
      There being no other budget related items to discuss, this meeting    
 adjourned at 1:30 p.m.               
 ________________________   
 Sandra T. Davis   
 Deputy Clerk of Council   
 Council of Columbus, Georgia
        
Attachments
        
    No attachments for this document.