Columbus, Georgia
Georgia's First Consolidated Government
Post Office Box 1340
Columbus, Georgia, 31902-1340
(706) 653-4013
fax (706) 653-4016
Council Members
MINUTES
COUNCIL OF COLUMBUS, GEORGIA
WORK SESSION
APRIL 27, 2004
The regular monthly Work Session of the Council of Columbus, Georgia was called
to order at 9:04 A.M., Tuesday, April 27, 2004, on the Plaza Level of the
Government Center, Columbus, Georgia. Honorable Robert S. Poydasheff, Mayor,
and Honorable John J. Rodgers, Mayor Pro Tem, presiding.
*** *** ***
PRESENT: Present other than Mayor Poydasheff and Mayor Pro Tem Rodgers were
Councilors Wayne S. Anthony, Glenn Davis, Berry H. Henderson, Julius H. Hunter,
Jr., Charles E. McDaniel, Jr., Evelyn Turner Pugh and Evelyn Woodson. City
Manager Carmen Cavezza, City Attorney Clifton Fay and Clerk of Council Tiny B.
Washington were also present. Councilor R. Gary Allen took his seat at 9:05
a.m. Councilor Nathan Suber and Deputy Clerk of Council Davis took their seats
at 9:10 a.m.
*** *** ***
ABSENT: No one was absent.
*** *** ***
INVOCATION: Offered by Mayor Pro Tem John J. Rodgers.
---------------------------------------------*** ***
***-------------------------------------------
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Led by Mayor Robert S. Poydasheff.
---------------------------------------------*** ***
***-------------------------------------------
PRESENTATION OF A RESOLUTION TO DARRION MITCHELL:
State Representative Carolyn Hugley said she is here this morning to honor
a hometown hero who has brought honor to our City on an International basis not
only once, but twice. She said she has a special resolution prepared for Mr.
Darrion Mitchell and then read the resolution in its entirety; which was House
Resolution Number 1120 that was adopted by the Muscogee County Legislative
Delegation.
WITH THOSE NAMED IN THE RESOLUTION STANDING AT THE COUNCIL TABLE, THE
FOLLOWING RESOLUTION WAS THEN SUBMITTED AND READ IN ITS ENTIRETY BY COUNCILOR
MCDANIEL AND ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL OF COLUMBUS,
GEORGIA:
A Resolution (197-04) - Commending and congratulating Metra Bus Operators
for demonstrating expert driving skills in the Annual Southwest Georgia Local
Transit Roadeo Competition. Councilor McDaniel moved the adoption of the
resolution. Seconded by Councilor Hunter and carried unanimously by those ten
members of Council present for this meeting.
---------------------------------------------*** ***
***-------------------------------------------
MAYOR?S FY-2005 BUDGET MESSAGE:
Mayor Poydasheff said as you know, every year at this time, the Mayor
presents his budget to the Council and then the Council meets as a Budget
Review Committee over the next few months with the final buget being adopted by
July 1, 2004.
He said today, he is presenting the budget books to the Council members.
He thanked City Manager Cavezza, as well as Finance Director Angela Cole and
members of her staff for all the hard work that was done in preparing this
budget.
Mayor Poydasheff then read his prepared budget message stating that the
balance budget that he brings you on today is a product of diligence and
concern ? diligence in the exercise of fiscal responsibility in a slow economy,
concern for continuing fulfillment of our shared vision for the future of
Columbus. The total operating budget for FY-2005 is $183,342,008, up a modest
1.15% over the revised budget for FY-2004. He said he believe this budget
provides a solid basis for continuing the momentum of the city?s progress as
well as maintaining the services citizens want and deserve.
He said recently there have been calls from the community and from groups
of city employees for increases in city employees? pay. Those calls resonate
with him because he believe in providing the best pay scale possible for our
dedicated workers and have publicly stated his intention to improve their pay.
This budget, therefore, despite the continuing slow economy and city revenue
shortfalls, contains a 3% across-the-board pay raise for city employees,
effective on their employment anniversaries ? a generous raise when compared
with the smaller percentage increases provided this year by some of our major
employers in the private sector. Additionally, this budget has good news for
employees in the field of health insurance: there is no increase in the amount
employees will have to pay for health insurance premiums.
Mayor Poydasheff said on the revenue side, the budget calls for raising
the property tax millage for operations less than one-half mill to 9 mills,
which is the limit set in the Charter. The change in the millage will produce
$1,200,000 additional revenue. We have experienced 3% growth in the tax digest
and that will produce $1,600,000 in additional revenue, so we continue to
benefit from progress and development in our city. These revenue increases are
minimal in their relationship to the overall budget, but they do help
counterbalance shortages in other areas. Additionally; however, we have some
increased expenditures that are beyond our control. For example, we anticipate
a $2,125,000 million increase will be required in city contributions to the
Pension Fund, $602,322 more for Workers Comp and $660,000 for automobile
insurance.
He said this FY-2005 budget would require a change in the fund balance
from a 90-day reserve to a 67-day reserve, a conservative adjustment that will
enable the city to meet its needs and reach essential goals in the coming
fiscal year without compromising our basic financial viability.
Mayor Poydasheff said this budget challenges us to make the dollars go
further than ever before, and together we will make it work for the good of the
people of Columbus. This is a conservative and responsible budget, based on
current assessments and analysis, not on our hopes for the future.
Budget Review Chairperson Turner Pugh thanked Mayor Poydasheff for his
budget and those remarks made by him, saying we accept your budget. She said
she wants everybody that heard your words to understand; that even though there
may be something in the budget that you have presented to us, it may not be in
there when it comes to the final resolution from a Council vote. She said we
will be going through the budget and have about six weeks that we will work
through it and anyone is welcomed to attend these budget sessions, as they are
open to the public. She said if individuals have questions that they need to
know about the budget, that individual would have to go through a Council
member.
She said we need to have a budget approved by the end of June and then
pointed out that the first meeting will be held on May 4th, at 3:30 p.m., and
would continue each Tuesday thereafter until we come up with a resolution of
the budget. She said first reading has to be no later than June 15th with the
second reading being June 22nd.
Councilor Turner Pugh said if anyone has any input they would like to
make, they are welcomed to give it to any Council member.
---------------------------------------------*** ***
***-------------------------------------------
L.O.S.T.:
Councilor Turner Pugh said Mayor Poydasheff mentioned the additional
L.O.S.T. that the Governor is coming to sign today, she said she would like to
commend our local legislative delegation because they have been working on this
for a long time. She said our legislative delegation really went to bat for us
and we really appreciate what they have done. She said after the signing of the
bill into law, she would like for the City Attorney to draft a resolution
thanking the legislators for their assistance in getting this bill passed.
---------------------------------------------*** ***
***-------------------------------------------
CONSENT AGENDA:
THE FOLLOWING THREE ORDINANCES WERE SUBMITTED AND ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL,
PURSUANT TO THE ADOPTION OF A SINGLE MOTION MADE BY MAYOR PRO TEM RODGERS AND
SECONDED BY COUNCILOR ALLEN, WHICH CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY BY THOSE TEN MEMBERS OF
COUNCIL PRESENT FOR THIS
MEETING:
An Ordinance (04-27) - Rezoning property located at 8351 Fortson Road from
an A-1 District to a C-3 District. (14-CA-04-Jordan)
An Ordinance (04-28) - Rezoning property located at 6740 Mobley Road from
an R-1 District to an R-1A District. (13-CA-04-Brian Grier, Inc.)
An Ordinance (04-29) - Rezoning property located at 3401 and 3507
Schatulga Road; 5615, 5619 and 5631 Peggy Drive and 6910 Aldora Drive from
an R-1A District to an R-2 District. (15-CA-04-George C. Woodruff Co.)
*** *** ***
THE FOLLOWING THREE RESOLUTIONS WERE ALSO SUBMITTED AND
ADOPTED BY THE
COUNCIL:
A Resolution (198-04) - Authorizing the execution of a Quit Claim Deed for
Turnberry Lane at Veterans Parkway to the Georgia Department of
Transportation. Councilor Allen moved the adoption of the resolution. Seconded
by Councilor Woodson and carried unanimously by those ten members of Council
present for this meeting.
A Resolution (199-04) - Authorizing the acceptance of a deed to Aaron
Lane located in Section Four, Spring Ridge Subdivision. Councilor Allen moved
the adoption of the resolution. Seconded by Councilor Turner Pugh and carried
unanimously by those ten members of Council present for this meeting.
A Resolution (200-04) - Excusing Councilor Evelyn Turner Pugh from the
April 20, 2004 Council Meeting. Councilor Allen moved the adoption of the
resolution. Seconded by Councilor Woodson and carried unanimously by those ten
members of Council present for this meeting.
*** *** ***
THE FOLLOWING TEMPORARY STREET CLOSING APPLICATION WAS SUBMITTED AND
APPROVED BY THE COUNCIL:
Application of Karen Stewart to temporarily close Wingfield Drive between
Downing and Dell Drive, on Sunday, May 2, 2004, from 4:30 p.m. - 8:30 p.m. in
connection with a ?Neighborhood Party?. Councilor Allen moved the approval.
Seconded by Councilor Woodson and carried unanimously by those ten members of
Council present for this meeting.
---------------------------------------------*** ***
***-------------------------------------------
DONATION OF LAND TO THE CITY:
Mr. Robbie Watkins of Georgia Power Company said he just wanted to stop by
and advise that he has some paperwork that he will be recording this afternoon;
whereby Georgia Power Company is going to donate property to the City of
Columbus, a beautiful piece of riverfront property. He said this property is
located adjacent to the Dillingham Street bridge and it has a value of over
$175,000. He said we are going to entrust this piece of property to the City of
Columbus for their use in their beautification and enhancement of the Uptown
Columbus area.
Mayor Poydasheff thanked Mr. Watkins for this presentation on this
morning.
---------------------------------------------*** ***
***-------------------------------------------
KENNETH WALKER MEMORIAL GOLF TOURNAMENT:
Councilor Anthony said he would like to recognize two individuals who are
present in the audience today to briefly speak to the Council to advise of an
upcoming event and then so moved. Seconded by Councilor Suber and carried
unanimously by those ten members of Council.
Councilor Anthony then called forward Reverend Howard White and Reverend
Steve Jones and those individuals who are working with them on the Kenneth
Walker Memorial Golf Tournament in the community and how we might help.
Reverend White and Reverend Jones then appeared and went into some details
in outlining their initiatives.
Reverend Jones said they are planning a Kenneth Walker Memorial Golf
Tournament, which will be held on Thursday, September 2, 2004. He said today
at 12:00 p.m., they would be publicly announcing the Kenneth Walker Memorial
Golf Tournament.
Mr. Howard White, of Pierce Chapel United Methodist Church said they
have a concern about unity in the community and would like to see that this
tragic event that has happened here in Columbus not be something that divides
us, but if possible, be something that unites us. He said that is largely what
this golf tournament is about.
He said these funds would also be used to help some child who may have
lost a parent and could use scholarship money. He said they would like the
Council?s support in this effort.
Mr. Jim O?Donnell, Chairperson of the Kenneth Walker Memorial Golf
Tournament said he has heard some interesting language used in the Council
meeting today, i.e. speaking in one voice, collegially and said that is the
kind of things that they want to do for this entire community. He said they
want to put a public face on this community that resembles the public face that
you, Council, together show right now. He said their first and foremost purpose
is unity in this community.
He said they want to change the way that people have traditionally thought
about race relations in this community and he would ask that the Council
endorse their endeavors. He said he would challenge the communities? political
bodies, political leaders, business leaders and various civic leaders to come
together as one and support this effort. He said he looks forward to working
with everyone in that effort.
Mayor Poydasheff said what Mr. O?Donnell and his group is doing certainly
fits in with the dedication of our City Manager in One Columbus, as well as the
Mayor?s Commission on Unity and Diversity. He said anything that we do as
individuals or collectively that will continue to bring our community together
in his opinion is something that the City Council, the Mayor and Administration
should support.
---------------------------------------------*** ***
***-------------------------------------------
WORK SESSION AGENDA:
ANIMAL & FOWL ORDINANCE:
Ms. Drale Short, Chief of the Special Enforcement Division of the
Department of Public Services went into some details in outlining a brief
summary of the recommendations that have been made to amend the Animal & Fowl
Ordinance, as outlined below.
SECTION 1.
Section 5-3(c) of the Columbus Code is hereby amended by adding a new
subsection (9) to read as follows:
?(9) A designated representative of PAWS Columbus, Inc. confirmed by Council."
SECTION 2.
Section 5-5 of the Columbus Code is hereby amended by adding new
subsections (20) and (21) to read as follows:
"(20)Tethering shall mean the act of fastening or restraining a dog to a
length of material in order to provide for the health, safety and welfare of
the dog. The tether may be made out of rope or metal chain and shall be a
minimum of twelve feet long and appropriate for the size of the dog.
(21) Caretaker shall mean any person entrusted with the short-term
responsibility for a domesticated animal. If an Owner gives short term
responsibility for an animal to a minor, the Owner remains responsible for any
liability in connection with the animal."
SECTION 3.
Chapter 5 of the Columbus Code is hereby amended by adding a new Section
5-7.1 to read as follows:
"An Owner or Caretaker of a dog who allows the dog to spend more than
eight hours in a twenty-four hour period outside must provide the dog an
outdoor facility that meets the following specifications:
(a) Outdoor facilities for dogs shall include one or more shelters that
are accessible to each dog and one or more separate outside areas of shade that
is large enough to contain all the dogs at one time to protect them from the
direct rays of the sun. Outdoor facilities shall be kept neat and free of
clutter, including equipment, furniture and stored materials as well as
accumulated trash, waste, junk, weeds and other discarded materials.
(b) Outdoor shelters shall comply with the following:
(1) Include a roof, four sides and a floor;
(2) Be of sufficient size to allow each dog in the outdoor facility to
sit, stand, lie in the fully stretched position, and to turn about freely;
(3) Provide an environment that will protect from the elements when the
ambient temperature is below 50 degree Fahrenheit or below 10 degrees Celsius;
(4) Be constructed of materials that are impervious to moisture and
easily cleaned and sanitized;
(5) Contain floors made of wood or concrete;
(6) Be structurally sound and kept in good repair, with no missing
boards, jagged edges or excessive rust;
(7) Be cleaned daily on all hard surfaces with which the dogs come
into contact; and,
(8) Be free of accumulated trash, waste, junk, weeds and other
discarded materials."
SECTION 4.
Section 5-10 of the Columbus Code is hereby amended by deleting the title
and inserting a new title to read as follows:
"Control of Domesticated Animals"
SECTION 5.
Subsection 5-10(c) of the Columbus Code is hereby deleted in its entirety
and is replaced by the following language:
"Use of a leash on all public property. No Owner or Caretaker shall allow
any canine, dog on any public property unless such animal is restrained by an
appropriate leash and under the control of a responsible person."
SECTION 6.
Section 5-10(d) of the Columbus Code is hereby amended by adding new
subsections (11) and (12) to read as follows:
"(11) Transporting of Animals. It shall be a violation of this Chapter
for a domesticated animal to be transported in the back of an open bed vehicle
unless such animal is securely tethered by a cross tie to prevent such animal
from jumping off or being thrown from the vehicle.
(12) Fence Height. Owners that rely upon a fence to secure their
domesticated animals must use a fence of sufficient height to ensure that such
animals are restrained within the confines of their property. The individual
size and abilities of any domesticated animal shall determine the height of the
fence. If such animal evades the fence, the Owner shall be in violation of
Section 5-10(a)."
SECTION 7.
Section 5-12 of the Columbus Code is hereby amended by deleting subsection
(1) and replacing it with the following language:
"Any violation of the Columbus Code Section 5-7.1 on Shelter shall be
guilty of a city ordinance violation, punishable as set forth in Section 1-8 of
the Columbus Code.?
SECTION 8.
Section 5-12 of the Columbus Code is hereby amended by adding new
subsections (7) and (8) to read as follows:
"(7) Tethering that does not meet the requirements of Section 5-5(20).
(8) Leaving an animal unattended inside a vehicle, regardless of window
position or use of air conditioning.?
SECTION 9.
Section 5-13.1 of the Columbus Code is hereby amended by deleting
subsection (a) and replacing it with the following language:
?(a) Holding Time. Any impounded animal, not under observation for
rabies, that is not claimed within five days of the date of impoundment or five
days after the Owner of the animal is notified, shall be disposed of in a
manner approved by the Director of Public Services. However, if the Owner is
incarcerated at the time of impoundment, the animal shall be held for ten (10)
days. After the tenth day the animal shall become the property of Columbus,
Georgia and be disposed of in a manner approved by the Director of Public
Services.?
After Ms. Short outlined those recommended changes, she then responded to
several questions from members of the Council.
Ms. Short also responded to concerns expressed by Councilor Woodson as it
relates to fencing and said she had mentioned this sometime earlier; however,
there was no action taken on it, because she was told that the Board would be
looking at this ordinance. She said she doesn?t see anything in the ordinance
to increase the height of fences depending on the size of the dog.
Several minutes of discussion continued on this aspect of the ordinance,
as it relates to the fencing requirements, with City Attorney Fay also
responding to questions of Mayor Poydasheff and members of the Council.
After more than fifteen minutes of discussion on this subject, Councilor
Woodson then said she would get together with the City Attorney and Ms. Short
to take them out to a location so they can see what her concerns are.
City Manager Cavezza said before the ordinance comes before the Council on
first reading, we would hold a public hearing to get the public?s input. He
said once we resolve all that, we would then bring it back to the Council for
first reading.
Mayor Poydasheff encouraged City Attorney Fay and Ms. Short to get
together with Councilor Woodson and address her concerns.
*** ***
***
PUBLIC SAFETY:
Councilor Wayne Anthony, Chairperson of the Mayor?s Public Safety Committee
thanked the members of his committee, Councilors Henderson, Hunter, Suber and
Woodson for the time that they have given to work on some additional
recommendations. He also thanked members of the Public Safety who have given
them advice and directions.
He said as you know, they were commissioned by Mayor Poydasheff to look at
the recruitment issues of Public Safety, which lead into other human resources
issues as it relates to Public Safety and other parts of the City government.
He said this morning, they are bringing to the Council a series of
recommendations for consideration and that is why they wanted it to come to
this Work Session.
Mayor Poydasheff said as he understands it, neither the Police Chief of
the Chief of Fire/EMS have seen these ordinances and then asked Chairperson
Anthony if he was proposing to bring these ordinances on next week; because he
thinks that before we do that, we need to give them an opportunity to view
these recommendations.
Councilor Anthony then outlined the Committee?s recommendations as listed
below:
1. The Finance Committee should provide additional funding for public
safety recruitment in the FY05 budget.
2. All public safety recruitment should be coordinated through the Human
Resources Department.
3. The Columbus Council should consider consolidation of all human
resources functions.
4. The Columbus Council should adopt the ordinance containing
modifications of educational requirements for public safety departments.
5. The Columbus Council should conduct a comprehensive compensation and
benefits study for the entire consolidated government to include public safety
employees and general government employees.
Councilor Davis said he knows that there were a lot of studies and
research going on as it relates to Public Safety and said he would like to know
the conclusions that have been made dealing with starting pay and what was said
about the removal of the 5% contribution to the public safety retirement plan,
as well as what was the conclusion as it relates to the shortage of street
police.
Councilor Anthony said, yes it was a part of the research; however, it is
a funding issue. He said the staff is looking into how much these items would
cost. He said the next issue would be what do we have in terms of funds to be
able to do those things.
He said starting pay was one of these issues, with pay compression being
another one, as well as retention, pay and benefits being another position,
which are financial issues that are going to be driven by whether or not we
have the funding to do those.
After more than thirty minutes of discussion on this subject, with
Councilor Anthony and members of the Committee responding to those questions
and concerns expressed by Councilor Davis, this matter was concluded.
Councilor Davis then asked that he be provided with an updated comparison
of those issues that were studied earlier as it coincides with other Public
Safety Departments around the State.
Mayor Poydasheff said he and City Manager Cavezza would get together with
Councilors Anthony and Davis to go into more details in addressing his
concerns.
*** *** ***
PSOA:
Mr. Mike Green, representing the PSOA; which he said is a group of
professionals, business owners and agencies in our community that have taken
the task to volunteer their time to try to enhance the life of senior adults.
He said they have distributed around the Council table, a publication, which he
said is a one-year effort to put together a resource book that they put in the
hands of senior adults; whereby they can have a resource manual to live a
quality life. He said there are approximately 50 members who are part of their
organization.
He said their next project would be to look at transportation for senior
adults, to help them who may have problems with finances and being able to get
to the doctor.
Mr. Green said he just wanted to come and present this book to the Council
for them to be able to show to the people in their areas.
Also present with Mr. Green was Mr. Joe Robbins, Ms. Catherine Fussell,
Ms. Mary Beth Plott, Ms. Kim Abercorn and Mr. Danny Plemmons.
Councilor Woodson said she would like permission to give this brochure to
the Asian Pacific Alliance to see if they can translate it and get it out to
the Hispanic community. There were no objections expressed by Mr.
Green.
*** *** ***
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:
City Manager Cavezza said they have been working on this plan for well
over a year. He said we are doing the Land Use plan and following this will be
the Unified Development Ordinance, which addresses a lot of the administration
of the Comprehensive Plan, as well as a consolidation of all our ordinances
affecting the Comprehensive Plan and Land Use plan.
He said we have had many public meetings on this plan and have gone out to all
the Planning Districts, which was generally well received. He said the Council
has also been briefed off and on as it relates to the plan.
He said they also took it to the Planning Advisory Commission, not that we
needed to, but as a courtesy because we felt that since they are going to be
acting on zoning requests, they needed to know what was going on in this
process. He said at that time, the developers came in full force and expressed
some concerns about the plan. He said the PAC said they didn?t recommend the
plan be approved without specifics.
City Manager Cavezza said we are here today to show you some of the
specific issues that came up. He said he was somewhat disappointed that a
general comment like that was made, because it did not contribute to the
process. He said they have extracted some of those comments that we will
address with you on today. He said what they really need to do, is once we get
the Council?s input and any concerns that they may have, we need to move
forward with it and get it closed out.
Deputy City Manager Bishop said during the PAC review process they captured
about twenty different issues that were brought up and then made a
twenty-minute presentation in which they gave a review of those issues that
were raised during the Planning Advisory Commission meeting as it relates to
the Comprehensive Plan. Those issues of concerns are outlined below:
Issue # 1 - Maps were inaccurate: Because this has been a dynamic process,
changes were made to maps after they were given to Home Builders and the maps
have been corrected.
Issue # 2 - The Plan does not allow for sufficient housing for working
families: Over 1500 R-1, R-1A and R-2 lots currently available. The proposed
COMP Plan adds approximately 800 acres to higher density land use.
Issue # 3 - Input was not solicited from the Development Community:
Public meetings were held for all Planning Areas and open participation was
encouraged and the proposed plan was presented at the City?s monthly
Developer?s Meeting.
Issue # 4 - Demographic information is missing: Although demographic
information is not included in the Chapter 8 update, demographics were
considered.
Issue # 5 - The Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) is referenced in the
Update, but it has not been adopted: It was anticipated that the UDO would have
been completed before Comprehensive Plan was approved. The term UDO has been
removed from the Comprehensive Plan Text.
Issue # 6 - Large areas are designated as Rural Residential, however, currently
there is not Rural Residential Zoning designation: Rural Residential is a land
use, A-1 is the corresponding zoning.
Issue # 7 - Plan States that Rural Residential is limited to areas without
water or sewer: There is sewer availability in areas that are Rural Residential.
The Comp Plan states that areas without water and sewer need to be Rural
Residential.
Issue # 8 - Planning District 4 is 71.8% undeveloped, but does not accommodate
any planned growth: Planning Area 4 currently has over 900 lots that are zoned
R-1, R-1A, R-2 and other A-1 developments under construction or in the planning
process.
Issue # 9 - North Columbus growth is limited to pending further study:
Growth in North Columbus is on going with residential, multi-family and
commercial. Because of development restraints such as topography and geology
issues, studies are sometimes needed prior to development.
Issue # 10 - There are no plans to accommodate housing for the future working
families, police and firemen to support job growth: There are over 1500 Low
Density lots that are supported by the land use plan or currently zoned for low
density residential development. The proposed COMP Plan provides for over 800
acres for a higher density development.
Issue # 11 - In 2003, 74.6% of single-family permits issued were for zoning
classification of R-2 or less. With this in mind, have there been any
considerations made to add an equal amount of medium to high-density land use
to replace what will be lost by moving R-2 to medium density: Only 9 of 39 R-2
zoned developments were built to R-2 zoning requirements.
Issue # 12 - The proposed UDO has not been passed, therefore, the new zoning
classifications have not either. How can PAC be asked to pass a plan that list
zoning classifications that do not exist: There are no new zoning
classifications, the proposed recommendation moves R-2 from low density to
medium density residential and R-3A from medium density residential to high
density residential.
Issue # 13 - In the proposed plan where would a developer have the opportunity
to develop a master planned community, such as a Maple Ridge: A developer can
make a proposal at any time Maple Ridge did not evolve because of a zoning
ordinance, but by an acceptable Master Plan.
A conservation subdivision concept which is being developed can be a tool for
developing this type community.
Issue # 14 - Could a provision be put into the Comp Plan that would not allow
the proposed land use to be a negative in a developer?s zoning efforts if the
land to be rezoned has access to sewer: This would be a Council decision.
Issue # 15 - Why hurry: Although the Comprehensive Plan does not have a full
review until 2008, Chapter 8 has historically been updated every 5 years. 1998
was the last update of Chapter 8. The update of Chapter 8 has been in process
for over a year.
Issue # 16 - What is the UDO and when will it be completed: The UDO provides
the regulations necessary for development; it should be adopted in 2004.
Issue # 17 - Why vote on a Comprehensive Plan that is based on a document that
has not been adopted: The Comprehensive Plan and UDO are two different
documents. The Comprehensive Plan is the road map, while UDO provides the
regulation that guide the implementation of development of the Comprehensive
Plan. Pieces of the proposed UDO could be brought forward as needed.
Issue # 18 - Why increase Rural Residential: Although Rural Residential has
been increased; it is in areas where sewer availability is limited and areas
that have historically been in large tracts, such as farms. There are
currently 1500 lots that are available to be developed Low Density Residential.
The proposed Comprehensive Plan adds another 800 acres to a higher density land
use.
Issue # 19 - Where is the planning for Commercial and Multi-family:
Approximately 200 acres have been proposed for a Mixed-Use Land Use area on
Williams Road. There is also a proposed area at the intersection of
J. R Allen and Psalmond Road. 1650 units are currently in the planning process.
Issue # 20 - Why move R-2 from Low Density to Medium Density Residential: Lot
dimensions for R-2 (7,500?) and R-3 (6,000?) are more aligned than R-2 being
in Low Density (20,000?, 15,000?, and 10,000?)
Although there are areas that are zoned R-2, historically the lot sizes have
been R-1A Labor Profile.
After the conclusion of his presentation, Deputy City Manager Bishop, as
well as City Manager Cavezza, then responded to several questions and concerns
of Mayor Poydasheff and members of the Council. There were also some referrals
made by members of the Council, which are outlined below:
Councilor Turner Pugh asked that the staff check and determine if there is
any additional or new information from the Columbus Health Department as it
relates to septic tanks and the lot sizes, etc.
Mayor Pro Tem Rodgers asked Deputy City Manager Bishop to do some research
and determine if there is any legislation that says if a sewer connections
comes on line that you are required to tap onto it, even if you have a septic
tank.
Mayor Pro Tem Rodgers also asked that he be provided with the total amount
of land that is available for housing developed, which Mr. Bishop referenced in
this presentation.
Councilor Henderson and Mayor Pro Tem Rodgers asked that the Planning
Advisory Commission make some recommendations on the Comprehensive Plan and
then forward those to the Council.
*** *** ***
FT. BENNING:
Mayor Poydasheff responded to some concerns of Councilor Subers as it
relates to the personnel and financial report concerning Ft. Benning that was
provided to the members of Council at the request of Mayor Poydasheff,
*** *** ***
COMMUNITY PLANNING CONSULTING SERVICES:
As it relates to the RFP for community planning consulting services,
Councilor Davis asked what is the normal cost of those consulting services,
to which City Manager Cavezza said they don?t know, as we don?t have a City
Planner. He said we had talked about going out with an RFP to see if we could
get a consultant to serve as a planner on an as needed basis to look at various
projects. He said we don?t have a feel for that and this is the reason why we
are going out with an RFP.
With there being no other business to come before this Council, Councilor
Suber then made a motion for adjournment. Seconded by Councilor Allen and
carried unanimously by those seven members of Council present, with Councilors
Anthony, Henderson and McDaniel having already left the meeting earlier during
the proceedings and the time being
11:30 A.M.
*** *** ***
Tiny B. Washington, CMC
Clerk of Council
The Council of Columbus, Georgia