Columbus, Georgia
Georgia's First Consolidated Government
Post Office Box 1340
Columbus, Georgia, 31902-1340
(706) 653-4013
fax (706) 653-4016
Council Members
MINUTES
COUNCIL OF COLUMBUS, GEORGIA
REGULAR SESSION
AUGUST 17, 2004
The regularly weekly meeting of the Council of Columbus, Georgia was called to
order at 9:00 A.M., Tuesday, August 17, 2004, on the Plaza Level of the
Government Center, Columbus, Georgia. Honorable Robert S. Poydasheff, Mayor,
presiding.
*** *** ***
PRESENT: Present other than Mayor Poydasheff and Mayor Pro Tem John J. Rodgers
were Councilors R. Gary Allen, Glenn Davis, Berry Henderson, Julius H. Hunter,
Jr., Charles E. McDaniel, Jr., Evelyn Turner Pugh, Nathan Suber and Evelyn
Woodson. City Manager Carmen Cavezza, City Attorney Clifton Fay, Clerk of
Council Tiny B. Washington and Deputy Clerk of Council Sandra Davis were also
present.
ABSENT: Councilor Wayne Anthony was absent, but was excused upon the adoption
of Resolution Number 349-04.
*** *** ***
INVOCATION: Offered by Reverend Bill Douglas, Pastor, Saint Andrews
Presbyterian Church.
---------------------------------------------*** ***
***--------------------------------------------------------------------
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Led by students from Hannan Academy After School
Program.
---------------------------------------------*** ***
***--------------------------------------------------------------------
PRAYER BREAKFAST:
Mayor Poydasheff pointed out that we had the Prayer Breakfast on this
morning, which was well attended. He said our next Prayer Breakfast is
scheduled for December 21st and there will be plenty of notice on that. He
said we certainly would love for everyone to attend.
---------------------------------------------*** ***
***------------------------------------------------------------------
MINUTES: Minutes of the August 3 & 10, 2004 meetings of the Council of the
Consolidated Government of Columbus, Georgia were submitted and approved
unanimously upon the adoption of a motion made by Mayor Pro Tem Rodgers and
seconded by Councilor Allen.
---------------------------------------------*** ***
***-------------------------------------------------------------------
PRESENTATION OF A CERTIFICATE:
Mayor Poydasheff pointed out that Sandra Davis has received a
certification from the Georgia Municipal Clerks and Finance Officers
Association as a Certified Deputy Municipal Clerk and then presented the
certificate to her and congratulated her on this accomplishment.
----------------------------------------------*** ***
***------------------------------------------------------------------
CITY ATTORNEY?S AGENDA:
WITH MS. TOMIKO WOMACK AND HER MOTHER STANDING AT THE COUNCIL TABLE, THE
FOLLOWING RESOLUTION WAS READ IN ITS ENTIRETY BY MAYOR PRO TEM RODGERS AND
ADOPTED BY THE
COUNCIL:
A Resolution (325-04) - Commending and expressing appreciation to Ms.
Tomiko Womack for her assistance in apprehending an armed robbery suspect at
the Macon Road branch of the Columbus Bank and Trust Company on May 15, 2004.
Mayor Pro Tem Rodgers moved the adoption of the resolution. Seconded by
Councilor Hunter and carried unanimously by those nine members of Council
standing to cast their affirmative vote.
----------------------------------------------*** ***
***-----------------------------------------------------------------
ZONING PUBLIC HEARING:
THE FOLLOWING ORDINANCE WHICH WAS DELAYED FROM THE AUGUST 3RD COUNCIL
MEETING WAS AGAIN SUBMITTED AND DELAYED BY THE COUNCIL FOR TWO ADDITIONAL WEEKS
AT THE REQUEST OF COUNCILOR DAVIS:
An Ordinance - Rezoning property located at 6910 River Road from an A-0
District w/conditions to an A-0 District w/ amended conditions.
(36-CA-04-River Island Group)
Councilor Davis said the representing parties of this rezoning request
have agreed and requested a two-week delay. He then made a motion for the
delay. Seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Rodgers and carried unanimously by those nine
members of Council present for this meeting.
*** *** ***
LAST WEEK?S COUNCIL MEETING:
Councilor Allen said there was a contentious rezoning issue on last week
and said he may have said some things that may have offended the Mayor and
Council. He said over the twelve years that he has been on this Council he
doesn?t think that has ever happened and said if he did say something that
offended the Mayor or Council, he would like to offer a sincere apology.
*** *** ***
THE FOLLOWING TWO ORDINANCES WERE SUBMITTED AND THEIR CAPTIONS READ BY
CITY ATTORNEY FAY AND A PUBLIC HEARING WAS HELD ON EACH AS ADVERTISED:
An Ordinance - Amending the text of the zoning ordinance to change the
Off-Street Parking requirements for shopping centers and developments.
(39-A-04-Planning
Division)
PROPONENTS & OPPONENTS:
Mr. Will Johnson, Zoning Administrator was present, but he did not make a
presentation, as there was no one present to oppose this proposed ordinance.
However, City Manager Cavezza did make some brief comments as to why this
proposal is being made.
He said when we made this change before we inadvertently excluded things
like food stores and small shopping centers, which should have been included in
the original ordinance and this is why they have come back with this
adjustment.
*** *** ***
An Ordinance - Rezoning properties along the south side of Cusseta Road,
between Alpine Drive and CSU property to the south from a C-2 District to R-2
and R-4 Districts. (40-A-04-Planning Division)
PROPONENTS & OPPONENTS:
Mr. Will Johnson, Zoning Administrator was present, but he did not make a
presentation, as there was no one present to oppose this proposed rezoning
ordinance. City Manager Cavezza said this is basically a residential area that
somehow got commercial zoning and said as part of cleaning up the process with
the Comprehensive Plan, we want to make that adjustment. He said they had a
public meeting and there were only three people in attendance, but they are in
support of this request. He said they have notified all the residents in that
area.
-------------------------------------------*** ***
***--------------------------------------------------------------------
CITY ATTORNEY?S AGENDA CONTINUED:
THE FOLLOWING SIX ORDINANCES WERE SUBMITTED AND THEIR CAPTIONS READ BY
CITY ATTORNEY FAY AND ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL ON SECOND READING:
An Ordinance (04-70) - Rezoning property located at 1048 & 1060 Double
Churches Road and property south of both parcels from an R-1 District to a R-2
District. (35-A-04-Ivy Park, LLC)
Councilor Davis said there are new conditions that have been placed in the
ordinance; however, he is not sure that the residents have seen the language
and then asked City Attorney Fay to read those conditions into the record.
City Attorney Fay then stated the four new conditions, which are outlined
below:
1. A 50-foot natural undisturbed buffer shall be preserved along the
western and southern property lines of the property subject to rezoning.
2. There shall be no more than 35 lots developed on the property subject
to rezoning.
3. The building setback from Double Churches Road for proposed Lot No.
1 west of the proposed entrance shall be at least as great as the setback for
the side yard of Lot No. 25, Block D, Section Two, Kirkwood Subdivision.
4. If any large canopy trees are removed from side or rear yards within ten
feet of the right-of-way of Double Churches Road, developer shall replant large
canopy trees at developer's expense.
Mayor Pro Tem Rodgers then made a motion to adopt the ordinance. Seconded
by Councilor Henderson and carried unanimously by those nine members of Council
present for this meeting.
*** *** ***
An Ordinance (04-71) - Rezoning property located at 2106 Cherokee Avenue
and 1919, 1921 & 2107 Garrard Street from a C-2 and an R-1A District to an R-3A
District. (33-A-04-W. C. Bradley) Councilor McDaniel moved the adoption of the
ordinance. Seconded by Councilor Suber and carried unanimously by those nine
members of Council present for this meeting.
*** *** ***
An Ordinance (04-72) - Rezoning property located at 8342 Veterans Parkway
and adjoining lots to its south (running east to the entrance of Lullwater
Apartments) and southeast from an R-1 District to a C-3 District.
(38-A-04-Developers Investors, Inc.) Councilor Allen moved the adoption of the
ordinance. Seconded by Councilor Woodson and carried unanimously by those nine
members of Council present for this meeting.
An Ordinance (04-73) -Rezoning property located at 5604 Dearborn Avenue
from an R-1A District to an R-2 District. (32-A-04-Wade) Mayor Pro Tem
Rodgers moved the adoption of the ordinance. Seconded by Councilor Woodson and
carried unanimously by those nine members of Council present for this meeting.
*** *** ***
THE FOLLOWING ORDINANCE WAS ALSO SUBMITTED AND EXPLAINED BY CITY ATTONEY
FAY AND AFTER MUCH DISCUSSION WAS DELAYED BY THE COUNCIL FOR THREE
MONTHS:
An Ordinance - Rezoning property located at 8271 & 8201 Midland Road and
8111, 8091 & 8101 Old Pope Road from an A-1 District to an R-1A District.
(30-D-04-Erickson) Councilor Allen made a motion to defeat the ordinance.
Seconded by Councilor McDaniel.
Councilor Suber said Mr. Erickson has brought some adjustments to his
previous request to the rezoning prior to this meeting and said no one would
get an opportunity to see that if this particular rezoning is defeated. He said
he voted against the delay on last week because as he stated before, he didn?t
think and still don?t believe that Mr. Erickson has had an opportunity to go
back to the community to discuss the changes that he has made; however, he
would make a substitute motion that we delay this matter for three months. He
also thinks it needs to go back through PAC so that they would have an
opportunity to look at it.
He said even though there has been a tremendous amount of contentious
discussion on this particular issue, he thinks this is something that Mr.
Erickson is showing where he is attempting to justify or make some type of
adjustment to his previous rezoning.
Councilor Suber said he would make that motion that we send it back to
PAC. Seconded by Councilor Turner Pugh.
Councilor Henderson said he was prepared not to support the delay based on
the same philosophy and thought process as last week, that is, it concerns him
that we get to the table and then we have some alterations. However, after
listening to Mr. Erickson and some of the changes that he has made, as well as
accompanying Councilor Allen to a meeting of the residents in the Midland area
and getting some input from them; while he doesn?t think the proposal that Mr.
Erickson has brought forward is something that he is prepared to vote to
approve, it is much closer than it has been in the past. He said the one
concern that he has with Councilor Suber?s motion is the three months.
He said he thinks that over the next two weeks, we ought to be able to
tell if there really is going to be a meeting of the minds and if it is worth
returning back to PAC. He said he does think that it should go back to PAC so
that the citizens can have another opportunity to review it at that
time. He said he thinks that the Mayor Pro Tem suggested 30-days and he thinks
that is okay, but he would hate to draw it out any longer than we have to
because the residents and the developer both have been doing this for four
years and to prolong it for three months might be a little too much.
Mayor Poydasheff then asked Councilor Henderson if he is offering a
substitute motion to Councilor Suber?s substitute motion.
Councilor Henderson said he would ask Councilor Suber if he would consider
amending his motion to thirty days.
Councilor Suber said he doesn?t have a problem in amending his motion, but
the question is whether or not it can go back to PAC and get back to the
Council within thirty days. Mr. Will Johnson, Zoning Administrator said it
couldn?t.
Councilor Henderson said we could leave it on second reading so that if
they don?t get any closer to a compromise and if we don?t see any merits in
sending it back to the PAC, then we can vote it up or down within the next two
to four weeks.
Several minutes of discussion continued on this matter with Councilor
Henderson pointing out that because of the advertising requirements for legal
notification, to go back to the PAC, it takes at least 60 days. He then asked
City Attorney Fay what are the options? He asked if we could leave it on second
reading for the next few weeks to make a decision as to whether or not we send
it back to the PAC.
City Attorney Fay said we need a time certain as far as on the Council
table, two weeks, or thirty days. He said you could do that if you want to and
then get a recommendation from the PAC. Councilor Henderson said he thinks it
would be more practical to delay it for second reading.
Mayor Poydasheff clarified the motion that is on the table, which is to
delay this matter for three months. He said he understands where Councilor
Henderson is coming from and once again asked him if he is going to amend this
motion to limit it to 30 days. Councilor Henderson said no, not based on what
he has been told.
Mayor Poydasheff said this is on second reading and normally most always
we vote them up or down. He said we now have a valid motion on the table to
delay and then asked, if it will come back on first reading, because part of
the motion is to send it back to the PAC; which would mean a substantial
amendment to this particular rezoning, what are the legal consequences of that
and should it go back on first reading?
City Attorney Fay said if there is going to be amendments made, it would
go back on first reading at some point. Mayor Poydasheff then asked if it
should be part of Councilor Suber?s amendment that it goes back to the PAC,
which is what he wanted and give them three months and that it be put back on
first reading.
City Attorney Fay said that is appropriate, he said there is no problem
with that. He said it would have to be re-advertised if it comes back on first
reading.
Mayor Poydasheff then reiterated his concerns and those comments made
above to Councilor Suber saying that he thinks he should include in his motion
that this goes back to first reading; however, Councilor Suber said that was
the discussion that we were having on last week, knowing the compromises that
would have to be made, he thinks that it would have to go back in the
beginning. He said he doesn?t have any problems, as long as we can get it back
to the PAC and allow the residents and Mr. Erickson to sit down seriously and
have some serious discussion so that everyone can be heard and compromises are
worked out.
Councilor Suber said he believes that Mr. Erickson is attempting to
address some serious issues with the community and he thinks it would be
encumbered upon us to give him an opportunity to do that. He said however we
need to do this, let?s do it. He said he knows that it is going to take
60-days to get back to the PAC and he thinks the PAC should have an opportunity
to review it.
City Attorney Fay said that is an appropriate method to send it back to
them, because they are a recommending body. Mayor Poydasheff then asked if we
are going to send it back as a second reading? He said it has to go back as a
first reading. City Attorney Fay said you are sending it back for a new
recommendation.
Mayor Poydasheff then asked Councilor Suber for clarification on his
motion, to which Councilor Suber said that his motion was for a three-month
delay.
Councilor Henderson said we will know after the negotiations, if they meet
and they are able to move a littler closer if its something that this Council
feels they can work with. He said if the Council doesn?t feel it is a
compromise we are going to work with, there is no real need to send it back to
the PAC. He said he thinks that we can leave it on second reading and delay
the second reading and if there is a movement towards some kind of meeting of
the minds, or even something that the Council thinks they can support, then we
can send it back to the PAC. He said if there is no movement toward that type
of agreement, then the Council can vote it down or up in two or three weeks;
whatever the pleasure of Council is.
He said instead of going ahead and automatically now remanding it back to
the PAC in three months, 60 or 90-days, he thinks if we delayed second reading
for a couple of weeks; then we can make a decision whether or not its
worthwhile to vote it up or down.
Councilor Henderson then offered a substitute motion to delay the second
reading for three weeks. Seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Rodgers.
Councilor Hunter said he favors Councilor Suber?s proposal and that we
send this matter back to the PAC. He said he thinks it is important that we
have comments from the citizens who live in the area that are affected. He said
by sending it back to the PAC, they would have an opportunity to comment before
the PAC as well as have the further opportunity to comment at a first reading
when it comes back before the Council. He said if we leave it on second
reading, there is not an automatic right to make comments on second reading
unless we waive that and provide that.
He said he thinks that Mr. Erickson has made significant revisions in his
plan and he thinks everything would be better served if we sent it back to the
PAC.
Councilor Allen said the residents who were present at the meeting on last
week left the meeting thinking that we were going to be voting on this matter
today and his inclination was to vote to deny this request. He said we have not
had an opportunity to sit down and properly digest the plan as it was
presented. He said those who were able to sit down and talk about it, like this
step that Mr. Erickson has taken.
He said we could probably resolve it today, if we could get some consensus
from the developer to put, not one acres everywhere, but as they have always
asked for; those homes that are there, to be protected. He said he would ask
the Council to consider around the Odom?s property, if we could put one acre
around her lot, around her home site.
Councilor Allen said he thinks the plan that is offered in addition to
that one-acre home site around her Ms. Odom?s property is something we could
vote to amend this and pass the ordinance on today.
Mayor Poydasheff said when you vote to amend this plan, that is a
substantial amendment and therefore, as a matter of fairness, he thinks it
should go on first reading, because people have to have the right to comment.
Councilor Turner Pugh said she would like to ask Mr. Erickson if he could
do the one-acre lots that they are requesting around the Odom property.
Councilor Turner Pugh then made a motion that Mr. Erickson be allowed to
be heard. Seconded by Councilor Suber and carried unanimously by those nine
members of Council present for this meeting.
Mr. Dave Erickson, in response to Councilor Turner Pugh said if you made
the impact at that particular location, he thinks they can do it. However, Mr.
Allen amended his comments to also say everybody else. He said if it was just
that one specific property, we could do it.
Councilor Allen said the plan that Mr. Erickson put together on Wednesday
and distributed on Thursday included some buffering and some A-2 lots. He said
there are some lots across from the Old Pope Road residents where one is one
acre and there are some others that are ? of an acre or a little better. He
said they would like one acre around all the lots, but the concern is the
Odom?s property. He said to clarify his earlier comments, that is the property
that he was referring to. He said the plan as it is, combined with the one acre
lots around her property, he thinks the citizens would be able to agree to R-1,
R-1A combinations other than that.
City Attorney Fay also responded to questions of Councilor Turner Pugh as
it relates to the setting of certain restrictions of designating lot sizes.
He said we have to be specific as to how we draw these conditions.
Councilor Allen, in response to the question of Councilor Woodson as to
what adjustments that were agreed upon at the meeting held on Sunday, once
again said what they talked about was the homes that are there that has 5 - 7
acre tracts of land, we talked about one acres across the street from them. He
said Mr. Erickson has conceded to that. He said there are approximately five
lots that are ? quarter of an acre up to an acre and said if we could get those
up to an acre, he don?t think we would have a problem, in addition to putting
one acre lots along Liberty Hall. He said then the one-acre lots around
?Sherry?. He said outside of that, they didn?t have a problem with any other R
class that Mr. Erickson would be willing to do, the R-1A & R-1. He said not
everyone was able to be in attendance at that meeting because of the short
notice and not receiving the map until late Thursday. He said everyone left
the meeting on last week thinking that this was going to be voted down on
today.
Councilor Henderson said he thinks what Councilor Allen has suggested as a
starting point for trying to find some middle ground with the one acre around
the Odom?s property, he thinks that makes sense. He said he also thinks that
perhaps the one-acre along Liberty Hall also makes sense, because it is a more
dense area, with smaller lots that are contiguous with the development. He said
some of the others we can talk about, but he thinks those are larger lots and
there is some existing buffer, both on those lots and on the 50 foot side.
He said for clarification on his motion for the two weeks delay, which is
something that he doesn?t like to do; however, he thinks we are getting closer
and will know in two weeks whether or not it is something the Council will be
able to support and if it?s not, we can vote it down instead of continuing to
drag this thing out. He said if it is something we can support, then we can
send it back to the PAC.
Councilor Allen said one other thing that they did talk about was due to
the number of lots that the developer is proposing. He said we might give
consideration to an outlet on Midland Road just to avoid having congestion all
dumping onto Old Pope and then a short distance to Midland Road there might be
consideration given to having two outlets. He said they also talked about some
limitations maybe around 90 homes rather than having up to 140 or 150 homes.
Mayor Poydasheff then called the question on Councilor Henderson?s
substitute motion for a two-week delay, which resulted in an inconclusive vote
of 5 - 4. Voting for the motion was Councilors Allen, Davis, Henderson,
McDaniel and Mayor Pro Tem Rodgers. Voting against the motion was Councilors
Hunter, Turner Pugh, Suber and Woodson.
Due to the inconclusive vote on this motion, Mayor Poydasheff then called
the question on Councilor Suber?s earlier motion to the delay this matter for
three months and to return it back to the PAC for a first reading, which was
seconded by Councilor Turner Pugh.
Mayor Pro Tem Rodgers asked if we were talking about requesting a
different zoning classification, because that is not his understanding. He said
the lot limitations could be defined by acreage rather than a zoning
classification. He said the only point he is trying to get to is why is it
going to take 90 days. He said this is not new material that they are going to
have to go through.
Mr. Will Johnson, Zoning Administrator said if the Council remands it back
to the PAC, it would have to go back through the process before it comes to
Council. He said if it went to the PAC on September 1st, he said they could get
Clerk of Council Washington the staff report that same day and she would ask
the Council to call for it on Tuesday, Sept 7th and the ad would run on the
10th and from that date, it would have to be fifteen days before it could be
heard by the Council again, which would put it at the first Tuesday in October
to be heard at the Council. He said Councilor Suber?s point is that 90 days
would give them a little more time to work out something, but said they could
do it in 60 days.
Councilor Allen said he has some extensive business travel in the month of
September and through the first week of October.
The question was then called on Councilor Suber?s motion, which carried by
a vote of 7 - 2, with Councilors Henderson and McDaniel voting no and all other
seven members of Council present voting yes.
Mayor Poydasheff then advised that this matter would then go back to the
PAC and come back to the Council in 90 days on first reading and the residents
will have an opportunity to comment on the proposed amendments.
City Attorney Fay said the PAC will hear this matter again and said they
may make recommendations that we talked about on today or additional
recommendations. He said when it comes back to the Council it will be back on
first reading with proper advertisement.
*** ***
***
THE FOLLOWING TWO ORDINANCES WERE ALSO SUBMITTED AND ADOPTED BY THE
COUNCIL ON SECOND
READING:
An Ordinance (04-74) - Regulating the use, maintenance, installation and
connection of building and other sanitary sewers; establishing standards of
liquid wastes acceptable into the sanitary sewage system of Columbus, Georgia;
regulating industrial wastes discharged into the sanitary sewer system;
providing a system of fees and charges for industrial waste and other
contributors; providing remedies and penalties for violation hereof; and for
other purposes. Councilor Suber moved the adoption of the ordinance. Seconded
by Councilor Turner Pugh and carried unanimously by those nine members of
Council present for this
meeting.
An Ordinance (04-75) - Amending Sections 19-151 and 19-152 of the Columbus
Code (Taxation and Licenses) so as to revise regulations for payment of
business license taxes by depository financial institutions located within the
consolidated government; and for other purposes. Councilor Hunter moved the
adoption of the ordinance. Seconded by Councilor Henderson and carried
unanimously by those nine members of Council present for this meeting.
*** *** ***
THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION WAS SUBMITTED AND EXPLAINED BY CITY ATTORNEY FAY
AND ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL:
A Resolution (343-04) - Authorizing, approving and ratifying the
execution of a Federal Aviation Administration Grant Agreement. Councilor Suber
moved the adoption of the resolution. Seconded by Councilor Henderson and
carried unanimously by those eight members of Council present at the time, with
Councilor Allen being absent for this vote.
-------------------------------------------------*** ***
***-----------------------------------------------------------------
PUBLIC AGENDA:
MS. CAROL KIRVEN, REPRESENTING THE ALS ASSOCIATION OF GEORGIA, INC., RE:
THE 2004 WALK TO DEFEAT
ALS:
Ms. Carol Kirven, of the ALS Association of Georgia, Inc., said for those
of you who are not familiar with ALS, it is better known as the Lou Gehrig
Disease. She said they want Columbus to be aware that the Association in
Georgia wants to extend their services to Columbus to serve their patients and
families with their needs with this dreadful and fatal disease.
She said on October 30th, they will be having their first walk to defeat
ALS and she is here this morning to extend an invitation to the Council members
and their families and the entire City of Columbus. She said the registration
would begin at 8:00 a.m., on October 30th at Rotary Park; which is a 5k walk.
She said they are trying to form teams; as well as said individuals can walk.
Ms. Kirven said if you know someone who has had this disease, you could
walk in his or her honor or memory. She said she has a personal friend who has
had this disease for 16 years, which is incredible because most patients die
within 2 ? 5 years. She said her friend is still trying to make a difference in
this world. She then encouraged everyone to attend this event.
She said there is also a website if anyone wants any additional
information about ALS, the walk or the organization. She said the website
address is www.ALSAGA.org.
*** *** ***
MR. EDWARD MOORE, JR., RE: THE CONDITION OF BUILDINGS LOCATED IN COLUMBUS
SOUTH:
Mr. Edward Moore, Jr., President of Benning Hills/Esquiline Heights
Neighborhood Watch Association said he comes here on their behalf, as well as a
lifelong resident of South Columbus. He said he come before you today with some
of the same concerns that he had just a few months ago when he promised to
return. He said he is here today because he wants to know and would like for
the citizens of South Columbus to know why these eyesores that you will see
from the pictures he has today are still among them. He said his next step is
to make known publicly the owners of such property.
He said he would like to ask the Task Force to come up with a plan that
would move people into South Columbus, as there are many good neighborhoods in
South Columbus. He said a lot of these houses have become vacant over the years
because of the death of individuals and others moving out and said what he
would like for the plan to contain is some useful information that would make
citizens want to move to South Columbus, but said this would require people who
are willing and able to work hard and truly restore what once was and still can
be the most beautiful part of town, but we must first start with the trash at
the front door.
Mr. Moore said the trash that he is talking about is dilapidated buildings
as well as buildings with unsightly junk around them that are located on such
main thoroughfare as Victory Drive, Andrews Road, Brown Avenue, Cusseta Road,
Old Cusseta Road, Fort Benning Road, Benning Drive and North & South Lumpkin
Road.
Mr. Moore spent some ten minutes or more in expressing his concerns and
displeasure of those properties that have not been dealt with since his last
appearance before this Council. He said the citizens of South Columbus would
like to know why these buildings are still standing.
After the conclusion of his presentation, Mr. Moore then responded to
several questions of Mayor Peters and members of the Council.
Mr. Moore then asked if there is someone today who can tell him what is
being done about some of these pieces of property.
Mayor Poydasheff told Mr. Moore he would have been better served if he had
spoken with the City Manager to go over these details.
City Manager Cavezza said the last time Mr. Moore was before this Council,
he, Mr. Duck and Ms. Wiggins met with him and we explained the process to him
and addressed some specific concerns that he had at that time. He said he left
there feeling that the process should be expedited; however, if the Council
will remember, we have gone through this expediting process before and came to
the conclusion as far as the due process issue; where if we went any shorter,
we would run into some due process concerns. He said when Mr. Moore left the
meeting, he was supposed to call us and identify any houses or problems and we
would get right on them and give him some feedback.
He said the next time we heard from Mr. Moore was when he saw his name on
the public agenda on last week. He said he had Ms. Wiggins to call
him and asked him what his issues were and during that conversation, he told
her the Main Gate Plaza was full of potholes, which is a private business.
City Manager Cavezza said he talked about an apartment complex that we
talked about on last week, the one that is in litigation that we have been
having a lot of difficulties with; which came up on last week that we explained
to the Council. He said he also talked about some property behind Kendrick?s
Pecan, which is already under the demolition process.
He said Mr. Moore also talked about several businesses on Fort Benning
Road, but he didn?t have any addresses for those businesses and he said he
would come and talk to the Council about them and this is where we stand. He
said we have looked at those buildings along Fort Benning Road and understand
they are not pretty buildings and there are problems with that; however, when
it comes to the Code violations, where we start the demolition process, it is
more than just not being a pretty building. He said the offer goes out again to
Mr. Moore, if he would give us an address we will look at it and will
personally call him and explain to him what?s going to happen to with that
building.
Mr. Moore said his point still stands that some of these buildings have
been there for years and nothing has been done about them over the years up to
the present time.
Discussions continued on this subject, with Mayor Poydasheff and members
of the Council expressing their concerns to Mr. Moore about this situation,
after which he then responded to questions of the Council.
Councilor Woodson asked City Manager Cavezza if it was possible for us to
have an update at the Council?s next Work Session, since Columbus South Task
Force has completed their work and what actions are going to be taken. She said
we could see if any action can be taken immediately.
She said she would like to encourage Mr. Moore to meet with a small group
after they have their meeting to find out where the Task Force is heading in
that area.
Councilor Suber said Mr. Moore has asked, why is there so many buildings
still standing and said the reason is because a number of citizens haven?t
complained. He said he thinks it gets to the point that sometimes we accept
things and we assume someone else is doing something about it, and the reality
is everybody is accepting it.
He said he thinks it is important that we make sure that the Councilors
are aware of what Mr. Moore is talking about so that we can follow up on these
particular things.
Mayor Poydasheff informed Mr. Moore that we are going to have a Work
Session with the Columbus South Revitalization Task Force and said he is more
than welcome to attend and get some of the reports that are going on right
now.
-------------------------------------------*** ***
***------------------------------------------------------------
CITY MANAGER?S AGENDA:
THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION WAS SUBMITTED AND EXPLAINED BY CITY MANAGER
CAVEZZA AND ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL:
A Resolution (344-04) - Accepting a deed for the extension of Commercial
Court located in Parts of Tract Three, Section One, Veterans Parkway West.
Councilor Allen moved the adoption of the resolution. Seconded by Councilor
Suber and carried unanimously by those eight members of Council present at the
time, with Councilor Turner Pugh being absent for this vote.
THE FOLLOWING FOUR PURCHASING RESOLUTIONS WERE SUBMITTED AND EXPLAINED BY
CITY MANAGER CAVEZZA AND ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL PURSUANT TO THE ADOPTION OF A
SINGLE MOTION MADE BY COUNCILOR MCDANIEL AND SECONDED BY COUNCILOR WOODSON,
WHICH CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY BY THOSE EIGHT MEMBERS OF COUNCIL PRESENT AT THE
TIME, WITH COUNCILOR
TURNER PUGH BEING ABSENT FOR THIS
VOTE:
A Resolution (345-04) - Authorizing the purchase of steel shelving from
DEMCO Library Services (Madison, WI) in the amount of $353,672.01, auditorium
seating from American Seating Company (Grand Rapids, MI) in the amount of
$52,474.88, various furniture from The Overby Company (Columbus, GA) in the
amount of $596,585.60, and various furniture from Knoll in care of The Overby
Company (Columbus, GA) in the amount of $19,321.68. The furnishings will be
purchased via Georgia State Contract SWC S-030748, and will be installed in the
new library.
A Resolution (346-04) - Authorizing the purchase of three (3) MW800 mobile data computers with
automatic vehicle location, in the amount of $26,937.36, from Motorola
Corporation. The equipment, costing $8,979.12 each, will be installed in new
pursuit vehicles for the Marshal?s Office. This purchase is part of a
continuing SPLOST project aimed at equipping all appropriate public safety
vehicles with advanced technology, in order to maximize the efficiency of
public safety responses to calls for service from the public.
A Resolution (347-04) - Authorizing payment to the Georgia Municipal
Association (GMA) in the amount of $31,022.37 for 2004 - 2005 membership dues
for the City of Columbus, Georgia.
A Resolution (348-04) - Authorizing payment for the emergency purchase
of a 7-passenger van from Bill Heard Chevrolet (Columbus, GA) in the amount of
$17,441.00, which is a replacement for a sedan that was taken into the Fleet
Maintenance shop for routine repairs. It was determined that the sedan would
need to be taken out of service and salvaged. Most of the Muscogee County
Prison?s vehicles are high mileage and already have maintenance concerns. This
vehicle is mission critical and the reduction of their fleet by this vehicle
has put extra demands on these existing vehicles. Therefore, the City Manager
has approved this purchase as an emergency procurement, per the Procurement
Ordinance, Article 3-115.
*** *** ***
UPCOMING EVENTS:
City Manager Cavezza highlighted some upcoming events as outlined below.
o September 2nd - United Way Luncheon - Trade Center, 11:30 a.m. ? 1:00
p.m.
o September 18th - POW/MIA Monument Dedication Ceremony
Government Center
*** *** ***
EXECUTIVE SESSION:
City Manager Cavezza said he would like to go into a brief executive after
the adjournment on today?s meeting to discuss a real estate issue.
DEMOLITION LIST:
Councilor Woodson said she would like for the City Manager to check and
see if it is possible to put the list of homes that have been placed under
demolition or those that have been reported to the City to be looked at, to be
put on the City?s website in order to allow those constituents that call in to
make a complaint; to be able to go on the website to determine the status of
that property.
Mayor Poydashff said whatever information is put out on the website, we
need to make sure that we clear it with the City Attorney.
*** *** ***
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:
Councilor Davis said a constituent of his was present at the Council
meeting this morning and said he wanted to know about the possible meeting
dealing with the Comprehensive Plan and Land Use Plan and then asked if there
is a public hearing that is going to soon be coming up.
City Manager Cavezza said right now there are meetings ongoing between the
homebuilders and a group that is concerned about the environment and the
residents as well. He said they have a meeting scheduled this week with two of
those groups to hopefully resolve their concerns. He said we are down to one
point on that plan and said we think that if we get that resolved, we can bring
to the Council a comprehensive plan that basically people agree to and that
would solve a lot of these concerns and debates that we have had. He said as
far as a public meeting is concerned, he is not sure that we need one; because
if these groups come in and say they support it, it won?t be necessary. He said
if we feel like we need to have a meeting, we certainly would have one.
He said there was an issue about the A-2 & R-2 zoning and another
low-density area. He said we would need to talk about that briefly on next
week, to make sure everyone is aware of that.
-------------------------------------------------*** ***
***---------------------------------------------------------------
CLERK OF COUNCIL'S AGENDA:
MEDICAL CENTER HOSPITAL AUTHORITY:
Clerk of Council Washington pointed out she has received a letter from Mr.
Murray Solomon, Chairman of the Medical Center Hospital Authority, advising
that Mr. Edward Griffin has been appointed to succeed Dr. Ashok Kumar on this
board and the Council needs to confirm Mr. Griffin.
Councilor Allen so moved. Seconded by Councilor McDaniel and carried
unanimously by those nine members of Council present for this meeting.
*** *** ***
KEEP COLUMBUS BEAUTIFUL COMMISSION:
Clerk of Council Washington submitted a letter from Mr. Chuck Granberry
resigning from his position on the Keep Columbus Beautiful Commission.
Councilor McDaniel moved the letter be received with regrets and thanks
for his service. Seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Rodgers and carried unanimously by
those nine members of Council present for this meeting.
*** *** ***
MINUTES OF THE FOLLOWING BOARDS WERE SUBMITTED BY CLERK OF COUNCIL
WASHINGTON AND OFFICIALLY RECEIVED BY THE
COUNCIL:
C. I. R. C. L. E., July 13, 2004.
Council Briefing, February 3, 2004.
Council Briefing, March 9, 2004.
Council Briefing, July 20, 2004.
Tax Assessors, No. 31.
Uptown Fa?ade Board, July 19, 2004.
Councilor Allen made a motion that these minutes be received. Seconded by
Councilor McDaniel and carried unanimously by those nine members of Council
present for this meeting.
*** *** ***
THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION WAS SUBMITTED BY CLERK OF COUNCIL WASHINGTON AND
ADOPTED BY THE
COUNCIL:
A Resolution (349-04) - Excusing Councilor Wayne Anthony from the August
17, 2004 Meeting. Councilor McDaniel moved the resolution be approved.
Seconded by Councilor Henderson and carried unanimously by those nine members
of Council present for the meeting.
*** *** ***
THE FOLLOWING NEW ZONING PETITION, RECOMMENDED FOR CONDITIONAL APPROVAL BY
BOTH THE PLANNING ADVISORY COMMISSION AND THE PLANNING DIVISION WAS SUBMITTED
AND EXPLAINED BY CLERK OF COUNCIL WASHINGTON AND AN ORDINANCE AND PUBLIC
HEARING WAS CALLED FOR BY COUNCILOR MCDANIEL:
Petition submitted by Ralph Austin to rezone approximately 0.23 acre of
property located at 3402 6th Avenue from an R-4 District to a C-2 District.
(47-CA-04-Austin)
Councilor McDaniel called for the ordinance and public hearing on thIs new
zoning petition.
*** *** ***
.
BOARD APPOINTMENTS:
CIVIC CENTER ADVISORY BOARD:
Clerk of Council Washington pointed out that Mr. Eugene Roper was
nominated on last week to succeed Mr. Terry Hattaway, who has resigned his seat
on the Civic Center Advisory Board and that he may now be confirmed.
Councilor Woodson moved he be confirmed. Seconded by Councilor Turner Pugh
and carried unanimously by those nine members of Council present for this
meeting.
*** *** ***
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COUNCIL:
Clerk of Council Washington pointed out that we still need a nominee for
Council District Four, for someone to fill the seat of Mr. Douglas Bryant who
currently serves on this board, but has moved out of Council District Four and
is now a resident of Council District Seven and has been appointed as the new
District Seven representative. There was no nomination.
She also informed Councilor McDaniel that we still need someone for Ms.
Leigh Stewart, who represents Council District Eight, but there was no
nomination.
*** *** ***
PUBLIC SAFETY ADVISORY COMMISSION:
Clerk of Council Washington said she has outlined the Public Safety
Advisory Commission seats and said that the Council may begin making their
nominations.
*** *** ***
TREE BOARD:
Clerk of Council Washington pointed out that Mr. James Head has been
nominated to succeed Ms. Susan Kleto on the Tree Board and that he may now be
confirmed.
Councilor Woodson moved he be confirmed. Seconded by Councilor Allen and
carried unanimously by those nine members of Council present for this meeting.
*** *** ***
YOUTH ADVISORY COUNCIL:
Clerk of Council Washington said we still need someone for Council
District Five.
*** *** ***
PUBLIC SAFETY ADVISORY COMMISSION:
Councilor Allen said he would like to nominate Mr. Allen McMullen as
Council District Six?s representative on the Public Safety Advisory Commission.
Councilor Woodson asked Clerk of Council Washington to contact the
President of the Young Professionals Organization and inform them that she is
looking for a nominee for consideration to serve on the Public Safety Advisory
Commission for Council District Seven.
*** *** ***
With there being no further business to come before this Council, Mayor
Poydasheff then asked if there was anyone who was not listed on the Public
Agenda, but had an issue to bring before the Council, they could be heard at
this time.
Ms. Francine Climer, 7432 Sierra Drive said she was present on last week
to speak to the issue of the rezoning on Double Churches Road and said she
thought the Council would want to know that someone has written on the rezoning
sign a comment that says ?greed based on fear?. She said the feeling in
Columbus with a lot of people is that even if they come to the Council meeting
it?s not going to do any good. She said she has lived here for 10 years and she
has seen a lot of that, but she has seen several people speak out; however,
things get passed and its almost like the voices aren?t heard. She said they
are heard but they aren?t listened to.
Ms. Climer said she also has some concerns about you having a public
meeting for the land use and she thinks that you need the input of the public
to find out what the people want. She said she thinks it?s important for the
Council to let the public know that you are willing to hear and listen to them
and that you care about our concerns. She said somewhere down the line this has
all gotten lost and people think you feel that way. She said they think a few
of you might feel this way, but not as a whole. She said that is terrible for
the people of a City to feel this way about a City Council because you are our
voice and are the only voice that we have.
Mayor Poydasheff and members of the Council responded to those concerns
and comments expressed by Ms. Climer.
*** *** ***
EXECUTIVE SESSION:
Mayor Poydasheff said he would entertain a motion for the Council to go
into an executive session as requested by City Manager Cavezza. Councilor
McDaniel so moved. Seconded by Councilor Suber and carried unanimously by those
nine members of Council present for this meeting.
*** *** ***
At 10:37 a.m., the Council adjourned its regular session to allow the
Council to go into an executive session.
At 10:46 a.m., the regular session was called back to order at which time
Mayor Poydasheff pointed out that the Council met in an executive session and
discussed a real estate issue, but there were no votes taken.
*** *** ***
With there being no further business to come before this Council,
Councilor McDaniel then made a motion for adjournment. Seconded by Mayor Pro
Tem Rodgers and carried unanimously by those nine members of Council present,
with the time being 10:48 a.m.
Tiny B. Washington, CMC
Clerk of Council
The Council of Columbus, Georgia