Columbus, Georgia
Georgia's First Consolidated Government
Post Office Box 1340
Columbus, Georgia, 31902-1340
(706) 653-4013
fax (706) 653-4016
Council Members
MINUTES
COUNCIL OF COLUMBUS, GEORGIA
REGULAR MEETING
OCTOBER 21, 2003
The regular weekly meeting of the Council of Columbus, Georgia was called to
order at 9:00 A.M., Tuesday, October 21, 2003, on the Plaza Level of the
Government Center, Columbus, Georgia. Honorable Robert S. Poydasheff, Mayor,
and Honorable John J. Rodgers, Mayor Pro Tem, presiding.
*** *** ***
PRESENT: Present other than Mayor Poydasheff and Mayor Pro Tem Rodgers were
Councilors R. Gary Allen, Wayne S. Anthony, Glenn Davis, Berry H. Henderson,
Julius H. Hunter, Jr., Charles E. McDaniel, Jr., Evelyn Turner Pugh and Nathan
Suber. City Manager Carmen Cavezza, City Attorney Clifton Fay and Clerk of
Council Tiny B. Washington were also present. Councilor Evelyn Woodson arrived
at 9:05 a.m.
*** *** ***
ABSENT: Deputy Clerk of Council Sandra Davis was absent.
*** *** ***
INVOCATION: Offered by Pastor John Skelly, Pastor of Edgewood Drive
Presbyterian Church.
-----------------------------------------------*** ***
***-------------------------------------------------
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Led by students from Cusseta Road Elementary School.
-----------------------------------------------*** ***
***-------------------------------------------------
GARDEN CLUB OF GEORGIA:
Ms. Joann Brown said she is here this morning to inform the Council about
an event that will be coming up in Columbus very soon. She said the Garden Club
of Georgia, Inc., is a 16,000 member non-profit gardening organization
representing women throughout the State of Georgia who have been practicing
good horticultural stewardship for the past 75 years. She said on Wednesday,
November 5th, the Garden Club of Georgia and CSU is going to be sponsoring a
legislative one day seminar; which will be geared towards addressing the most
important environmental issues anticipated for the 2004 Legislative Session in
Georgia as well as in Washington.
She said some of the State?s most prominent legislative environmental
leaders would be participating along with representatives from Washington. She
said the Garden Club has chosen the City of Columbus to host this event;
because we are proud of the way you have protected our environment. You have
promoted smart growth and green space beautifully. You have carefully protected
the Chattahoochee River and they are aware that you share our concerns for
protecting this water all the way down stream, keeping it clean, free and
flowing. She said the seminar is open to the public, and they have also invited
high school and college students to attend this event as well, because they
seriously believe all Georgians need to be involved in protecting our natural
resources.
Ms. Brown said they encourage all Georgians to be better informed about
the legislative process. She said registration will be held on November 5th
from 9:15 - 10:00 a.m. and the seminar will end at 2:45 p.m. She said the
registration fee of $20.00 does include lunch, which will be held at the Frank
G. Lumpkin Athletic Center at CSU.
Mayor Poydasheff said we would like to thank the Garden Club of Columbus
for choosing Columbus to host this event. He said this Council and the City
Manager, as well as all of our people are very much in tune with smart growth,
protecting the environment and the Chattahoochee River.
-----------------------------------------------*** ***
***--------------------------------------------------
PROCLAMATIONS:
?FOREST PRODUCTS WEEK?:
With Mr. Don Burke, of Mead Westvaco Corporation standing at the Council
table, Councilor Davis read the proclamation of Mayor Poydasheff, proclaiming
the week of October 19 - 25, 2003, as ?Forest Products Week? in Columbus,
Georgia
-----------------------------------------------*** ***
***-------------------------------------------------
MINUTES: Minutes of the October 7 & 14, 2003 meeting of the Council of the
Consolidated Government of Columbus, Georgia was submitted and approved upon
the adoption of a motion made by Mayor Pro Tem Rodgers and seconded by
Councilor Woodson, which carried unanimously by those ten members of Council
present for this meeting.
-----------------------------------------------*** ***
***-------------------------------------------------
ZONING PUBLIC HEARING:
THE FOLLOWING ZONING ORDINANCE WAS SUBMITTED AND ITS CAPTION READ BY CITY
ATTORNEY FAY AND A PUBLIC HEARING WAS HELD AS
ADVERTISED:
An Ordinance - Amending text of the Zoning Ordinance of Columbus, Georgia
by limiting the period of time to table a case to six (6) months, regardless of
where the case is in the zoning process. (39-A-03-Planning Div.)
PROPONENTS & OPPONENTS:
Members of the Planning Division staff was present, but did not make a
presentation, as there was no one present to oppose this proposed rezoning
ordinance.
*** *** ***
THE FOLLOWING ZONING ORDINANCE WAS ALSO SUBMITTED AND ITS CAPTION READ BY
CITY ATTORNEY FAY AND A PUBLIC HEARING WAS HELD AS ADVERTISED AND AFTER MORE
THAN AN HOUR OF DISCUSSION WAS AMENDED BY THE COUNCIL:
An Ordinance - Rezoning approximately 22 acres of property located at 6802
Mobley Road fromR-1 District to an R-2 District. (40-A-03-Brian Grier, Inc.)
PROPONENTS:
Mr. Alan Kamensky, 6930 Weathersfield Road said he is here representing
Mr. Brian Greer, who has a contract to purchase 15.8 acres on Mobley Road for
future use as a subdivision. He said several months ago, they applied at the
Planning Advisory Commission from an R-1 & R-1A District to an R-2 District to
build a 46-48 lot subdivision. He said they are here today to again request
that the Council rezone this property to an R-2 District.
He said over the past several months, they have discussed with the
neighborhood their rezoning proposal for this property. He said they have also
talked with PAC members, as well as members of the Council.
Mr. Kamensky said the PAC denied their request and an unusual thing
happened at that meeting when one of the PAC members instead of making a motion
to deny their request for R-2, made a motion to approve rezoning for R-1A; when
Mr. Johnson, Zoning Administrator informed them that they couldn?t do that, but
they had to either vote for or against the R-2 request, at which time they then
voted against the R-2 request. He said in going through this process, they
know that there is some opposition to rezoning this property from an R-1 to an
R-2 District. He said many people consider this a drop of two zoning
classifications; however, they consider it a rezoning within the same area,
i.e., single-family residential housing. He said they feel the R-2 is a
legitimate request and would allow them 46 to 48 lots; whereby an R-1A request
would only be about 42 lots.
Mr. Kamenskly said they are here for an R-2 classification today, but said
they are willing to listen to the Council in any requests that they Council may
have. He said because the Planning Division has approved this wholeheartedly,
they feel that the report the Planning Division has submitted to the Council
speaks for itself.
In response to Councilor Allen, Mr. Kamensky then outlined the size of the
lots and the type of homes that the developer is planning on building in this
area. He said as R-2, the proposed lot width is 60 feet and has a lot deep of
125 ? 130 feet average lots. He said there would be approximately 46 lots. He
said in rezoning it as an R-2 District, there is a 2.5 acre buffer area that
will be located in the northeast corner of the property.
Using a map of the area, Mr. Kamensky showed the area of the property,
saying under their R-2 plans there is 2.5 acres that abuts most of the lots in
Waterford Subdivision that will be left as a natural area. He said they are
planning on building houses in the 1500 - 1550 square foot range with a price
range between $167,500 - $185,000.
Councilor McDaniel then asked Mr. Kamenskly, if his client would agree to
an R-1A zoning, because it is surrounded by R-1A, to which he said that they
have discussed that and said it was requested at the PAC meeting and several of
the neighbors who have said that if they went to an R-1A they would acquiesce.
He said he and Mr. Grier have talked about it and he feels if that is what the
Council would like to see happen, R-1A; he could live with that.
Councilor McDaniel said eventually it is going to be rezoned and said the
only thing that we are trying to do is to protect the neighbors and try to be
fair with the petitioner. He said he has talked with some of the neighbors and
most of them have said they would support R-1A since it is surrounded by R-1A.
Mr. Kamensky said if the Council feels that is the best way to go, they
would agree to R-1A.
Mayor Poydasheff then asked Councilor McDaniel if he was making a motion
to rezone the property to R-1A, to which he said no.
Mayor Pro Tem Rodgers said Mr. Kamensky has spoken with all of the Council
members and said he doesn?t feel R-2 is going to be approved, and he thinks
that R-1A is a reasonable compromise on this and then made a motion that this
be changed to an R-1A classification. Seconded by Councilor Turner Pugh.
He said this Council in recent years has taken the position that we will
down zone property; however, he doesn?t like it, but it is a part of the
ordinance now and several members of the Council have addressed this issue the
last time this came up. He said within two weeks, he would bring forth an
ordinance to stop this practice, effective with any zoning that takes place
after December 1st. He said anything that is petitioned after December 1st
would have to go back through the entire process; so that the developers cannot
come in and ask for a higher classification, knowing they will settle for a
lesser classification.
Several members of the Council then expressed their views as it relates to
the motion of Mayor Pro Tem Rodgers to change the zoning classification to an
R-1A District.
Councilor Henderson said he feels that we need to wait and hear from the
residents before we vote on the motion to change the classification. There were
no objections expressed in this regard.
Mr. Kamensky then responded to several questions of the Council.
Councilor Turner Pugh said she doesn?t have a problem with listening to
the homeowners, but said one of the things that she thinks we should do, is to
give the homeowners some understanding as to what we are thinking or
considering. She said if they come forward and are opposed to an R-2 zoning and
if we already know that we don?t have any plans on rezoning it R-2, but are
planning on rezoning it R-1A then they need to know that.
Mayor Poydasheff said if there is anyone in the audience who is arguing
for a reduction to R-1A, which is what basically surrounds this area, pointed
out that there is a motion on the table and his sense of the Council is that
they are going to do just that. He said he would respectfully request that you
don?t make that argument, but any other argument against or for this will
certainly be entertained. He said that would save the redundancy.
Councilor Allen then asked Mr. Kamensky, if he would entertain a motion to
amend the ordinance, to allow no more than 42 lots on this project. Mr.
Kamensky said he would prefer to just rezone it to R-1A. He said under the
current situation, they are topped out at 42 lots and said he doesn?t like
restricting ordinances beyond the scope of the ordinance itself. He said they
would follow the letter of the law as R-1A.
Councilor Allen said he would make that motion and allow the Council to
make the final decision on it; however, he would wait until after the vote on
the motion to change the zoning classification is taken and then make it at
that time.
Councilor Davis said there are two things that he is concerned about on
this road, which is the excessive speeding and the narrow width of the road. He
said he thinks that we need to have the staff to go out and take a look at the
road, as it seems to be deteriorating at a rapid pace. He said he also knows
there is some storm water issues that the people are concerned about.
He then asked Mr. Kamensky, if the storm water would be diverted on the
backside of the property and not back onto Mobley Road, to which Mr. Kamensky
said under either plan, the detention basin is on rear of the property.
Speaking to Councilor Allen?s earlier request to allow a condition in the
ordinance, to limit the number of lots to no more than 42, Mr. Kamensky said if
that is the request of the Council, they would acquiesce, if the limitation is
desired.
City Attorney Fay pointed out there is a motion to amend the ordinance to
an R-1A, which is a less density classification and said we will allow those
who are in opposition to this ordinance, to be heard before the Council takes a
vote.
OPPONENTS:
The following individuals then appeared and expressed their opposition to
this proposed rezoning ordinance.
Mr. Mike Mayhew, 99 Lismore Drive, said he has some additional petitions
to file with the Council and then filed them with Clerk of Council Washington.
He said when they originally went before the PAC and Mr. Kamensky said it
was addressed R-1A; it was never addressed to his knowledge, as R-1A. He said
when they went before the PAC, it was an R-2 zoning request and that is what
they were against.
Councilor Suber said Mr. Crain is the individual from the PAC that asked a
question and he made a recommendation to amend the ordinance at that particular
time and he thinks that Mr. Kamensky stated that he would not go along with
that and that is when it was voted down 4 to 1 to go back to R-2 and Mr.
Kamensky said he would take his chances from that point on.
Mayor Poydasheff stated that is correct. However, Mr. Mayhew said Mr.
Crain did try to request an R-1A, but Mr. Johnson said he couldn?t do that, but
had to make the motion for the R-2 zoning.
Mr. Mayhew said when this matter first came up, they were fighting an R-2
District and said he is also opposed to R-1A as well. He said you are going
from 46 houses in an R-2 to 42 houses in an R-1A, which is not much of a
difference. He said the residents were fighting an R-2 that was originally
petitioned and now they come to the Council and it can be changed here, which
he opposes. He said he thinks that it needs to go back through the process.
Mayor Poydasheff explained that under the rules as they exist today, the
Council has the right to amend any ordinance with six votes. He said under the
rules today, it doesn?t have to go back through the process and PAC.
Mr. Mayhew then responded to questions of several members of the
Council.
He then expressed his further views and outlined the three most important
issues that their neighborhood is concerned with, which includes the following:
(1) Traffic on Mobley Road
(2) Decrease in property values
(3) Opposition to R-1A
In response to a question of Councilor Davis regarding how many lots can
be put into an R-1 zoning, Councilor Allen said that the total lots that can
fit on this property is 40 lots; however, it does not allow for road
infrastructure and right-of-way. He said once you put that in, you will go down
to around 30 lots. He said in an R-1A classification, you can put in
approximately 60 lots, but when you put in the infrastructure and right-of-way,
that would take it down to approximately 42 lots, which is what Mr. Kamensky
mentioned earlier. He said this is why he wanted to amend the ordinance to
restrict it to no more than 42 lots.
Several members of the Council responded to many of the concerns of Mr.
Mayhew pointing out that regardless of what the zoning classification will be,
the developer will be responsible for controlling the water runoff and said
they won?t get a building permit until they do control that runoff. They stated
that they must have an engineer drawing or plans for that entire development
before any permits are issued.
After several members of the Council continued to express their views on
this subject, other additional opponents were then allowed to be heard to
express their views, as outlined below.
Mrs. Sally Lassiter, 6855 Ranch Forest Drive said those who have come
today, came to voice their opposition, came prepared to defend their thoughts
with regards to an R-2 zoning petition and said they have had to do some
thinking on their feet. She said they came assuming this would be a discussion
of R-2 versus R-1 and they knew with rezoning to an R-2, there was a 2.5 acre
buffer; and then said she doesn?t understand why the buffer disappears if the
zoning becomes R-1A.
Mayor Poydasheff said there is no buffering between or among residential
R-1, R-1A or R-2; however, the buffering applies when you are confining the
zoning by a commercial and residential use; and said that is to protect the
residential property owners.
Mayor Pro Tem Rodgers said the green space in the pond area was offered as
a conciliatory measure to the neighbors in order for them to get R-2; to which
Mr. Kamensky stated that is correct.
Ms. Lassister asked the Council to notice the size of the lots that is all
around their neighborhood and said they would want these lots to be similar in
size to theirs.
City Manager Cavezza responded to some concerns of Councilor Suber, as to
the proposed R-1A lots as compared to those in the Lismore Drive area.
Mr. Tommy Butts, 6617 High Ridge Drive, Autumn Ridge Subdivisionsaid he
cannot support R-1A because there will be 3 lots that will be built behind his
property; no matter whether the zoning is R-2 or R-1A. He said even if this
property is rezoned, he would like to point out that at the southern end, there
will be R-1 and to the northwest and the north, there will be R-1 and to the
northeast, there will be R-1. He said he would like to see the area remain
R-1. He said he is also concerned about the trees as well as the animals.
Mrs. Kim Banks said her family is one of the newest members to the
community as they just moved to this area from Washington State. She said they
live on the corner lot of Ranch Forest Drive and Mobley Drive and have been
here for about three weeks. She addressed concerns as it relates to the
overcrowding of Double Churches Elementary School as well as the traffic in the
area.
She said if they have 42 more houses added to this area that would be an
additional 84 people trying to get to work in the mornings and more cars on the
road, as well as more children going to the schools. She said she is in the
process of trying to get them to change the school bus route so that the
children don?t have to stand on such a busy corner, as there are no sidewalks
on that particular corner where the school bus picks them up.
Mr. John Benn, 993 Lismore Drive, Waterford Place said he has lived there
for approximately 15 years now. He said Councilor McDaniel had stated that this
property would be rezoned and said he needs to have someone explain to him, why
is it that this is an automatic rezoning.
Councilor McDaniel said it is not automatic; however, said one day it is
going to be rezoned.
Mr. Benn said what the Council is going to be voting on is very important
to them and said if this property behind him is rezone, he feels that his
property value will go down.
Ms. Margaret Alberici , # 5 Lismore Court, Waterford Place said she has
many reservations regarding the building of 42 lots if the R-1A zoning is
approved. She said the residents of Autumn Ridge, Waterford Place, Mobley Road
and Ranch Forest will be faced with living with the consequences of all these
houses that will be built. She said this will affect the overcrowding of the
schools, more congested traffic and the chance of more accidents with this
additional traffic, as well as more pollution and noise in the area.
She said even going from R-2 to R-1A there is going to be a lot of houses
in a small area and the consequences of overcrowding will be many. She said
when there are more houses there will be a drain on energy, water and other
resources. She said all these things needs to be taken into consideration.
Ms. Alberici said they like their green space and said she feels that
overcrowding does nasty things to people. She said she really would like to see
a nice park built so that the residents of the community can come and enjoy the
green space. She said she doesn?t feel that there are enough parks in the area
and adding all these extra houses would really put a damper on things.
Mr. Mike Mayhew who had spoke earlier came forward again and said he met
with Mr. Brian Grier on Friday and said there were three plans shown to him at
that time; however, one of those plans is not here today. He said that plan did
show a retention pond behind Waterford Place on the R-1A. He said the three
plans that were shown are not architectural drawings; therefore, from their
standpoint as homeowners, what are they to believe.
Mayor Pro Tem Rodgers said he thinks Mr. Mayhew?s comment should be
reinforced by Councilor Allen?s motion, to limit the number of houses that
would go into that development to 42. He said there is some engineering changes
that could conceivably be made that would change slightly the configuration of
that development and could possibly be one, two or three different plans. He
said regardless of what it is, the intention of Councilor Allen is to limit the
actual number of houses.
Mr. Mathis Banks, 6730 Ranch Forest Drive said he has heard a lot of
discussion as it relates to the overcrowding and all other aspects of the
rezoning; however, he would like to know what are the plans as far as widening
Mobley Road.
City Manager Cavezza said currently there are no plans of widening Mobley
Road, but said we would look into it. He said widening Mobley Road would be a
challenge like a lot of residential areas, where you are talking about the
taking of people?s front yards. He said that would probably be awhile before we
get to it.
Councilor Allen said in regard to the road, we will continue to repair and
patch as needed on an ongoing basis.
Regarding the comment made by Mr. Mayhew, Councilor Allen said he doesn?t
have any reason to doubt Mr. Grier?s ability to develop the subdivision and
said he has no reason to doubt that he is not going to do what he says he is
going to do. He said he has to file a plan and will follow that plan. He said
he is licensed by the City, and governed by the Home Builders Committee; so,
therefore, his peers govern him. He said he believes Mr. Grier is an honorable
man and will present a plan and will follow what the Council dictates. He said
he doesn?t doubt that he will do the right thing.
After more than one hour of discussion on this issue, City Attorney Fay
advised that there is a motion on the table to reduce the zoning classification
from an R-2 District to an R-1A, after which Mayor Poydasheff then called the
question on the motion, which carried unanimously by those ten members of
Council present for this meeting.
Councilor Allen then made a motion saying that under the R-1A zoning plan
that was just approved by the Council, a condition be added that there be no
more than 42 lots developed. Seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Rodgers.
Councilor Suber then asked Mr. Kamensky, how many homes can go into the
property with an R-1A zoning, to which Mr. Kamensky said approximately 44
homes. He said under R-1A they had plans to put in 42 homes and said he doesn?t
have a problem with Councilor Allen?s request.
The question was then called on Councilor Allen?s motion, which carried
unanimously by those ten members of Council present for this meeting.
Mayor Poydasheff then pointed out to those residents who were present in
the audience and interested in this matter that the proposal for an R-2
District has failed and said it is now an R-1A District, with no more than 42
lots being developed on this property.
City Attorney Fay then declared this public hearing having been held and
advised that this ordinance will be voted on at next week?s Council meeting.
-----------------------------------------------*** ***
***-------------------------------------------------
CITY ATTORNEY?S AGENDA:
THE FOLLOWING TWO ORDINANCES WERE SUBMITTED AND THEIR CAPTIONS READ BY
CITY ATTORNEY FAY AND ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL ON SECOND READING:
An Ordinance (03-95) - Amending the Zoning Atlas of Columbus, Georgia by
changing certain boundaries of a district located at 5385, 5389, 5393, 5397,
5401, 5405, 5409, 5413, 5417, and 5421 Schatulga Road, from an R-1A District to
a M-1 District. (38-CA-03-Driver) Mayor Pro-Tem Rodgers moved the adoption of
the ordinance. Seconded by Councilor Allen and carried unanimously by those ten
members of Council present for this meeting.
An Ordinance (03-96) -Providing for the demolition of structures located
at 3129 Schatulga Road (Susie Johnson Anderson, owner); 3133 Schatulga Road
(Susie Johnson Anderson, owner); 3636 St. Mary's Road, Lot D28 (Vanessa Barton,
owner); 2213 ? 1st Avenue (W. Richard Jordan, Jr., owner); 3466 Marathon Dr.,
Lot 31 (Mamie R. Nelms, owner); 3200 Tip Top Drive (Roger Rudd, owner); 400 ?
29th Avenue, Lot 33 (Spellman-Hung Capital, LLC owner); 3137 Schatulga Road
(Willie Clarence Willis, owner); 1009 Britt Avenue (Naomi Fedd White, owner);
and for demolition services for the Inspections and Code Division in accordance
with a Tabulation of Bid sheet.
Mayor Pro Tem Rodgers moved the adoption of the ordinance. Seconded by
Councilor Woodson.
City Manager Cavezza said before the Council votes on the ordinance, he
would like to bring to the Council?s attention that Mr. Roger Rudd, the owner
of property at 3200 Tip Top Drive came here this morning, saying that he
received late notification of first reading on last week and that he was out of
town. However, he had his opportunity at first reading and there has been no
progress to the house; nothing has changed and said he indicated that he would
like to speak at the end of the Council agenda, to speak on this matter. He
said he wanted the Council to be aware of that before the vote.
Mayor Poydasheff then asked what was the pleasure of the Council in this
regard.
Councilor Suber then made a motion to allow Mr. Rudd be heard at this
time. Seconded by Councilor Henderson and carried unanimously by those ten
members of Council present for this meeting.
Mr. Roger Rudd, 1226 Dunbar Avenue said he is the owner of the property at
3200 Tip Top Drive, saying that he purchased that land from Mr. Kenneth Childs,
who is also present here this morning. He said he had spoken to Ms. Wiggins and
she told him that this matter was going to come before the Council and she
would send him a letter. He said he received the certified letter notice on
October 10th and said he was out of town. He said once he got back into town on
October 15th, he picked this letter up at the post office.
City Manager Cavezza said all that is really a moot point now as the
Council has allowed him to speak here this morning.
Mr. Rudd said he wants to have the house redone and brought up to Code and
to have someone in the home within 30 days. He said he is very interested in
what Ms. Wiggins wants, in that getting the property built up with the
materials brought in by the previous owner or bringing it back to its original
state. He said he could have this done within 30 days, if the Council would
allow him the opportunity to get started on that and have 30 days to complete
the job.
City Manager Cavezza then asked Ms. Rebecca Wiggins of the Inspections &
Code Enforcement Division to give a status report on this issue.
Prior to Ms. Wiggins making any presentation, Mr. Rudd then responded to
some questions from members of the Council. Mr. Rudd said he purchased the
property approximately 2 to 3 years ago and said that the reason he hasn?t done
anything on it is because Mr. Kenneth Childs wanted the property back. He said
his attorney, Mr. Kenneth Spencer told him he had title in the property that he
had in the house. He said he had a lot of collectable items in the house that
belonged to him. He said those items were not removed by Mr. Childs, therefore
the City came in and removed them.
Mr. Rudd said the house was vandalized and said he has cleaned up a lot of
materials and things that were stored in and around the property.
Ms. Wiggins then responded to questions of Mayor Pro Tem Rodgers regarding
the notices of the houses and notice of inspections. She said he was not
unaware that we were heading toward this process of demolition, to which Ms.
Wiggins said that he was aware.
Ms. Wiggins said Mr. Rudd did receive all of the notices that they are
required by law to send. He said they were all sent certified mail and were all
signed for. She said she talked with Mr. Rudd on a few occasions over this long
period of time and said before they condemned this house after many, many
complaints; they had written it up for repairs in the Summer of 2002, but no
repairs were done at that time. She said you would see from the photographs
that this house continues to deteriorate and continues to be vandalized. She
said these photographs were taken on October 1,
2003.
She said on last week when Mr. Rudd was not here, there was a neighbor
present who lives in the condominiums down below this property and she was here
to ask that the Council not extend any more time to Mr. Rudd. She said she is
not here today, because she didn?t know that Mr. Rudd would be here today. She
said they also received a letter from another neighbor and said with the
Council?s permission, she would read it into the record. However, Councilor
Suber said he didn?t think that was appropriate because they are not present
here this morning.
City Attorney Fay then advised Ms. Wiggins that she could put the letter
with the Council?s records and file it with the Clerk of Council. (Ms. Wiggins
did not file the letter with the Clerk)
Mayor Poydasheff said he agrees with Councilor Suber, you can put that in
the record, because he thinks that we have seen enough.
Ms. Wiggins said Mr. Rudd has stated that he wants a period of time to do
this job, but with all due respect to Mr. Rudd, this has not happened and they
believe that it will not happen.
Mayor Pro Tem Rodgers then moved the request of Mr. Rudd be denied.
Seconded by Councilor Suber and carried unanimously by those ten members of
Council present for this meeting.
Mayor Pro Tem Rodgers then made a motion to adopt the ordinance. Seconded
by Councilor Suber and carried unanimously by those ten members of Council
present for this meeting.
*** ***
***
THE FOLLOWING THREE RESOLUTIONS, EXPRESSING APPRECIATION TO THOSE
EMPLOYEES WHO HAVE RETIRED FROM THE SERVICES OF THE
CONSOLIDATED GOVERNMENT WERE SUBMITTED AND THEIR CAPTIONS READ BY MAYOR PRO TEM
RODGERS AND ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL, PURSUANT TO THE ADOPTION OF A SINGLE MOTION
MADE BY MAYOR PRO TEM RODGERS AND SECONDED BY COUNCILOR ALLEN, WHICH CARRIED
UNANIMOUSLY BY THOSE TEN MEMBERS OF COUNCIL PRESENT FOR THIS
MEETING:
A Resolution (478-03) - Expressing appreciation to Nurse Virginia E.
Williams upon
her retirement with the Jail Medical Clinic after 5 years of service.
A Resolution (479-03) - Expressing appreciation to Herman M. Murphy upon
his
retirement with the Columbus Water Works after 15 years of service.
*** *** ***
THE FOLLOWNIG THREE RESOLUTIONS, EXPRESSING CONDOLENCES TO THE FAMILY OF
THOSE FORMER EMPLOYEES OF THE CONSOLIDATED GOVERNMENT WHO HAVE PASSED AWAY WERE
ALSO SUBMITTED AND THEIR CAPTIONS READ BY MAYOR PRO TEM RODGERS AND ADOPTED BY
THE COUNCIL, PURSUANT TO THE ADOPTION OF A SINGLE MOTION MADE BY MAYOR PRO TEM
RODGERS AND SECONDED BY COUNCILOR ALLEN, WHICH CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY BY THOSE TEN
MEMBERS OF COUNCIL PRESENT FOR THIS
MEETING:
A Resolution (480-03) - Conveying condolences to the family of Jerry S.
Patterson, former Plans Examiner with the Inspections & Code Enforcement
Division, who passed away on September 5, 2003.
A Resolution (481-03) - Conveying condolences to the family of B. O.
Newsome, former District Fire Chief with the Columbus Fire Department, who
passed away on August 14, 2003.
A Resolution (482-03) - Conveying condolences to the family of John W.
Chapman, Sr., former Lieutenant with the Columbus Police Department, who passed
away on September 25, 2003.
-----------------------------------------------*** ***
***--------------------------------------------------
PUBLIC AGENDA:
Mr. John Kittrell, who had requested to be listed on today?s Public Agenda
to hold a hearing before the Council regarding his certificate of
qualifications being suspended for one year, called on yesterday morning and
cancelled his scheduled appearance.
City Manager Cavezza pointed out that Mr. Kittrell has opted not to come
before the Council on today.
City Attorney Fay then advised that Mr. Kitrell has waived his right to
appeal to the Council on a suspension on his contractors license.
-----------------------------------------------*** ***
***-------------------------------------------------
RECOGNITION OF ROBERT L. WRIGHT:
Councilor Turner Pugh recognized the presence of former City Councilor
Robert L. Wright, who was present in the Council Chambers.
-----------------------------------------------*** ***
***--------------------------------------------------
CITY MANAGER?S AGENDA:
THE FOLLOWING FIVE PURCHASING RESOLUTIONS HAVING BEING INCLUDED WITH THE
CITY MANAGER?S AGENDA WERE ALSO SUBMITTED AND EXPLAINED BY CITY MANAGER CAVEZZA
AND ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL PURSUANT TO THE ADOPTION OF A SINGLE MOTION MADE BY
COUNCILOR TURNER PUGH AND SECONDED BY COUNCILOR ALLEN, WHICH CARRIED
UNANIMOUSLY BY THOSE TEN MEMBERS OF COUNCIL PRESENT FOR THIS
MEETING:
A Resolution (483-03) - Authorizing the purchase of five (5) Ticket Reader
Issuing Machines (TRIM) from GFI Genfare, Inc., (Elk Grove Village, IL), in the
amount of $18,100.00. The TRIM units are mechanisms attached to the bus fare
boxes that allow customers to use swipe cards to ride the bus.
A Resolution (484-03) - Authorizing the purchase of eight (8) ShopFax
Pocket PC?s
from World Information Systems, Inc.(Greensboro, NC), in the amount of
$19,325.00.
The PC?s will be used to keep inventory on repair parts for the buses and other
vehicles
used by the METRA Transit System.
A Resolution (485-03) - Authorizing the purchase of kitchenware from
Aramark
Corporation in the amount of $61,843.88. The items will be used at the
Columbus
Convention and Trade Center, and include condiment dispensers, coffee urns,
pots and
pans, chafers and accessories, table skirts, serving utensils, etc.
A Resolution (486-03) - Authorizing payment to Sheraton Inn Columbus
Airport to
provide assessment center accommodations for the Columbus Fire and Emergency
Medical Services in the amount of $29,168.00.
A Resolution (487-03) - Authorizing the purchase of an additional
telephone
system upgrade from BellSouth/BSFS in the amount of $42,615.26 for the Columbus
Convention & Trade Center.
*** *** ***
NEXT WEEK?S COUNCIL MEETING:
City Manager Cavezza said next week?s meeting will be a Council Work
Session and said we would like to have that Work Session at the Trade Center.
Mayor Poydasheff said that he thinks that we need a vote on that.
Clerk of Council Washington pointed out that we have an add-on resolution
for the Council?s approval in that regard. Mayor Pro Tem Rodgers then moved the
adoption of the resolution. Seconded by Councilor Woodson and carried
unanimously by those ten members of Council present for this meeting.
THE ABOVE ACTION APPROVED THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION:
A Resolution (488-03) - Changing the location of the October 28, 2003 Work
Session from the Council Chambers to the Convention & Trade Center at 9:00 a.m.
*** ***
***
LEGISLATIVE LUNCHEON:
City Manager Cavezza said immediately after the Council?s Work Session we
would have the Legislative Luncheon with the School Board and the Legislative
Delegation.
*** ***
***
UPCOMING EVENTS:
City Manager Cavezza highlighted the following additional upcoming events,
which are outlined below.
Saturday, Oct. 25, 2003, 10:00 a.m. Parade of Heroes,
11:30 a.m. Session at Golden Park for the soldiers & their families
*** *** ***
EXECUTIVE SESSION:
City Manager Cavezza requested a brief executive session after the
adjournment of today?s meeting, to discuss a personnel issue.
*** *** ***
TRAFFIC CALMING DEVICES:
Councilor Woodson said some time ago, she had asked about the possibility
of having some speed bumps put in on a couple of streets and was told that they
didn?t meet the criteria. She said on yesterday, she drove through a street
that is a lot smaller and even though there is a lot of heavy traffic; the
length is not as wide as the ones that she had mentioned and said it concerns
her that she saw them installed there.
City Manager Cavezza said the speed tables are all part of a system called
traffic calming devices. He said for every call that we have in favor of them,
we have calls that oppose them. He said we have some criteria that has to be
met in order to put the speed table in. He said in the Lakebottom area where
there was an exception with regards to a safety issue in that children were
running across the road at all times, we put them in there.
Councilor Woodson said it is her understanding that there are now some
new requirements for these streets and then asked the City Manager to do an
analysis of those two streets, which was previously requested, to determine
whether or not they meet the new criteria to have them installed in the area.
City Manager Cavezza said to the best of his knowledge, with the exception
around Lakebottom, they haven?t put any in unless they met the criteria, but
said they would follow up on that.
*** *** ***
STREET LIGHTING:
Councilor Woodson said she would like to have the City Manager to provide
her with the requirements for street lighting in neighborhoods. She said she
would like to know how far light poles have to be; because there are some
neighborhoods in Oakland Park where the trees cover some of the lighting. She
said there are a lot of areas were it is really dark.
City Manager Cavezza said in many of the old areas like that, they are 400
feet apart and the new standard is 200 feet; however, if the neighborhood wants
to go to the 200 feet or adjust it, the way they have been doing it, is that
the community pays for the pole and any digging that has to be done; Georgia
Power pays for the light, and the City picks up the light bill. He said a lot
of the neighborhoods don?t want their front yards dug up and said we can handle
it on a case-by-case basis.
Mayor Poydasheff said we should send someone out to trim the trees, to
which City Manager Cavezza said we are in the process of doing that citywide.
*** *** ***
DISTRICT TWO:
Councilor Davis said for the last four to six weeks, he has had a lot of
his constituents before the Council and said everyone at the Council table have
heard their concerns; and said they are very valid concerns. He said there
seems to be a popular demand for growth in the District 2 area in the north end
of the area. He said some of the issues that are an extreme concern of his and
the residents are the roads, the infrastructure dealing with roads, traffic,
overcrowding of schools and green space development. He said it is not going to
go away and development is going to continue.
He said he is very concerned about planning and smart growth issues, and
said today we need to really consider some type of Work Session or perhaps,
when we have the Retreat, to discuss this matter. He said the issues that we
are going to deal with are going to get bigger and bigger and said that we need
to start looking at some of these issues, to try and determine how we are going
to deal with some of them.
Councilor Davis said he is starting to hear from a lot of the constituents
that he represents, that we need to deal with it. He said we are going to have
to plan and talk about these things in some type of forum, i.e., a Retreat or
Work Session. He said he don?t know if we are behind the curve; however, he
knows that we are not ahead of the curve. He said Columbus is not the only City
that is dealing with these matters. He said he has great confidence in our
Engineering and Planning Division and they do a good job; however, everyone
agrees that things are moving at such a rapid pace that we need to take some
time to study these issues.
City Manager Cavezza said during the Work Session on next week, we will
review several projects that touch on what Councilor Davis is talking about and
you will see what projects are on the TIP (Transportation Improvement Plan). He
said the Council would have to address these and make some decisions if the
Council wants to juggle the priority around. He said the Comprehensive Plan has
been well received during the public meetings all across the board, and he
believes that it will go a long way to take a lot of the arbitrary out of our
zoning issues and discipline the system.
He said the suggestion that Mayor Pro Tem Rodgers made about going back
through the cycle, he certainly supports it; because he thinks it will help
discipline the system and makes it very mechanical for the staff to follow a
plan that the Council has approved. He said the other part of that is the
Unified Development Ordinance that we are also working on; which has
opportunities to control growth or make some significant changes if we want to;
however, we need some guidance from the Council on that.
He said we would soon be brining that to the Council, for their suggestions.
Councilor Turner Pugh said Councilor Davis?s area is not the only area
that is experiencing growth; however, it has taken over from where Councilor
Allen?s District has left off on the most contentious on zoning issues, which
is probably why you don?t hear from the rest of them as much. She said we all
have that same heartache as it relates to traffic and our road projects.
She said we have a lot of growth out in the St. Mary?s Road area, as well
as Southeast Columbus and we are all going through the same thing. She said
that is why it is important that our legislators continue to fight to allow us
to get the additional one cents sales tax for operations; because we are
running out of funds to operate. She said we have a lot of State and Federal
mandates that are coming down, one of which is a mandate for Indigent Care that
might cost us additional funds. She said we are meeting with the Judges and the
individuals from the State. She said that could be a potential to cost our
budget an additional $2 - 3 million. She said we feel your pains and we have
those same pains.
Councilor Davis said when there is new development there is a cost and
expenditures that we are dealing with. He said expenditures are becoming far
greater than the revenue that the City is generating and as you expand the
boundaries, the bigger the issues; the more things we have to deal with.
Therefore, he thinks it is very important that we talk about these things as
soon as possible.
Councilor Anthony said he would like to suggest that in January, we do
another one of the planning retreats similar to the one we had on last year. He
said he would like for the City Manager to look at two possible dates, January
22-23 or 29-30.
City Manager Cavezza said that we are planning for a Retreat during that
timeframe; however, he doesn?t know the exact dates.
-------------------------------------------*** ***
***---------------------------------------------
CLERK OF COUNCIL?S AGENDA:
THE FOLLOWING ITEMS WERE SUBMITTED BY CLERK OF COUNCIL WASHINGTON AS
INFORMATION FOR THE MAYOR AND
COUNCIL:
(1) ACCG Memorandum, Re: Farmland Protection Program.
(2) GMA Memorandum, Re: NLC Steering and Standing Committee Appointments.
(4) GMA Mayor?s Day Conference on January 24?26, 2004 at the Omni Hotel
at CNN Center, in Atlanta, Georgia.
*** *** ***
NLC STEERING & STANDING COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS:
Councilor Woodson asked that her name be submitted for reappointment to
serve on the HD Committee.
*** ***
***
BOARD OF HEALTH:
Clerk of Council Washington submitted a letter from Dr. Jimmy Sullivan,
Chairman of the Board of Health, submitting the resignation of Dr. Bobbi Farber.
Mayor Pro Tem Rodgers moved the letter be received with regrets and thanks
for her service. Seconded by Councilor Allen and carried unanimously by those
ten members of Council present for this meeting.
Councilor McDaniel said that Dr. Sullivan called him regarding Dr.
Farber?s resignation and said they are recommending Marquette McKnight for this
seat. He said she has been working with them on some issues. He said he is
nominating her for this seat.
*** *** ***
MINUTES OF THE FOLLOWING BOARDS WERE SUBMITTED BY CLERK OF
COUNCIL WASHINGTON AND OFFICIALLY RECEIVED BY THE
COUNCIL:
Building Contractor?s Examining Board, June 5, 2003.
Building Contractor?s Examining Board, July 3, 2003.
Building Contractor?s Examining Board, July 22, 2003.
Building Contractor?s Examining Board, July 23, 2003.
C.I.R.C.L.E., August 12, 2003.
Elections & Registration, September 4, 2003.
Housing Authority, September 17, 2003.
Planning Advisory Commission, October 16, 2002.
Planning Advisory Commission, November 7, 2002.
Planning Advisory Commission, November 20, 2002.
Tax Assessors, No. 40.
Uptown Fa?ade Board, September 15, 2003.
Mayor Pro Tem Rodgers made a motion that these minutes be received.
Seconded by Councilor Allen and carried unanimously by those ten members of
Council present for this meeting.
*** ***
***
THE FOLLOWING NEW ZONING PETITION, RECOMMENDED FOR CONDITIONAL APPROVAL BY
BOTH THE PLANNING ADVISORY COMMISSION AND THE PLANNING DIVISION WERE SUBMITTED
BY CLERK OF COUNCIL WASHINGTON AND AN ORDINANCE AND PUBLIC HEARING WAS CALLED
FOR BY MAYOR PRO TEM RODGERS:
Petition submitted by the Planning Division to rezone approximately
2.88 acres of property located at 2818 8th Street, et al., from an R-4 and C-2
Districts to an R-3A and R-3 Districts. (42-CA-03-Planning Division)
*** *** ***
BOARD APPOINTMENTS:
INDUSTRIAL & PORT DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION:
Clerk of Council Washington pointed out that we still need someone to
filled the unexpired term of Mr. Wade Tomlinson on the Industrial & Port
Development Commission. There were no nominations.
*** *** ***
UPTOWN FA?ADE BOARD:
Clerk of Council Washington pointed out that she has spoken
with Ms. Lisa Collins of Uptown Columbus and they are working on a
recommendation for someone to succeed Mr. Peter Bowden on the Uptown Fa?ade
Board. Councilor Davis asked Clerk of Council Washington, if Mr. Kelvin Welch
has been re-nominated, to which she said he has been nominated for another term
of office and confirmed by the Council on last week.
*** ***
***
Mayor Poydasheff then asked if there was anyone who was not listed on the
Council?s Public Agenda, but had an issue to address before the Council, they
could be heard at this time. There was no one who wanted to be heard.
*** *** ***
EXECUTIVE SESSION:
Regarding an earlier request of City Manager Cavezza, Mayor Pro Tem
Rodgers made a motion to allow the Council to go into an executive session to
discuss a personnel issue. Seconded by Councilor Henderson and carried
unanimously by those eight members of Council present at the time, with
Councilors Turner Pugh and Suber being absent for this vote.
*** *** ***
At 10:45 A.M., the Council adjourned its regular session to allow the
Council to go into an executive session to discuss a personnel matter. At 10:54
A.M., the meeting was called back to order, at which time Mayor Poydasheff
pointed out that the Council met in an executive session and discussed a
personnel matter, but there were no votes taken.
With there being no other business to come before this Council, Mayor Pro
Tem Rodgers then made a motion for adjournment. Seconded by Councilor Allen and
carried unanimously by those nine members of Council present at the time, with
Councilor Woodson having left the meeting immediately following the adjournment
of the Executive Session, with the time being 10:58 A.M.
Tiny B. Washington, CMC
Clerk of Council, The Council of Columbus, Georgia