Columbus, Georgia
Georgia's First Consolidated Government
Post Office Box 1340
Columbus, Georgia, 31902-1340
(706) 653-4013
fax (706) 653-4016
Council Members
MINUTES
COUNCIL OF COLUMBUS, GEORGIA
WORKSESSION
AUGUST 26, 2003
The regular monthly Work Session of the Council of Columbus, Georgia was called
to order at 9:00 A.M., Tuesday, August 26, 2003, on the Plaza Level of the
Government Center, Columbus, Georgia. Honorable Robert S. Poydasheff, Mayor,
presiding.
*** ***
***
PRESENT: Present other than Mayor Poydasheff and Mayor Pro Tem Rodgers were
Councilors R. Gary Allen, Wayne Anthony, Glenn Davis, Julius H. Hunter, Jr.,
Berry H. Henderson, Evelyn Turner Pugh, Nathan Suber and Evelyn Woodson. City
Manager Carmen Cavezza, City Attorney Clifton Fay, Clerk of Council Tiny B.
Washington and Deputy Clerk Sandra Davis were also present.
*** ***
***
ABSENT: Charles E. McDaniel was absent.
*** ***
***
INVOCATION: Offered by Councilor Wayne Anthony.
*** ***
***
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Led by Mayor Robert S. Poydasheff.
--------------------------------------------------*** ***
***---------------------------------------------------
MINUTES: Minutes of the August 19, 2003 Meeting of the Council of the
Consolidated Government of Columbus, Georgia was submitted and approved upon
the adoption of a motion made by Mayor Pro Tem Rodgers and seconded by
Councilor Woodson, which carried unanimously by those nine members of Council
present for this meeting.
--------------------------------------------------*** ***
***----------------------------------------------------
CONSENT AGENDA:
THE FOLLOWING TWO ORDINANCES WERE SUBMITTED AND ADOPTED BY THE COUNCILON
SECOND READING, PURSUANT TO THE ADOPTION OF A SINGLE MOTION MADE BY MAYOR PRO
TEM RODGERS AND SECONDED BY COUNCILOR WOODSON, WHICH CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY BY
THOSE NINE MEMBERS OF COUNCIL PRESENT FOR THIS
MEETING:
An Ordinance (03-70) - Rezoning approximately 59 acres of property located
on the north and east of the northeast corner of Whitesville Road and Double
Churches Road, froman R-1 District to an R-1A, A-O and R-3A Districts.
(21-CA-03-Charles Land)
An Ordinance (03-71)- Revising the promotional procedures for the
Columbus Department of Fire and Emergency Medical Services for the ranks of
Fire Captain and Fire Lieutenant.
*** *** ***
THE FOLLOWING TWO RESOLUTIONS WERE ALSO SUBMITTED AND APPROVED BY THE
COUNCIL, PURSUANT TO THE ADOPTION OF A SINGLE MOTION MADE BY MAYOR PRO TEM
RODGERS AND SECONDED BY COUNCILOR WOODSON, WHICH CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY BY THOSE
NINE MEMBERS OF COUNCIL PRESENT FOR THIS
MEETING:
A Resolution (414-03) - Authorizing the acceptance of a deed to Crosswinds
Drive and a portion of Windward Drive in Section One, Crosswinds Subdivision.
A Resolution (415-03) - Authorizing the acceptance of a deed to
Watervalley Drive and a portion of Waterview Drive lying in Section Three of
Waterstone Subdivision.
-------------------------------------------------*** ***
***-------------------------------------------------------
STREET ACCEPTANCES:
Councilor Davis said when we accept the streets, are we strategically
picking the roads that we accept; in subdivisions that are still being
developed. He then asked if we are accepting the main entrances to these
subdivisions, are we accepting these roads, or the off-street roads that are
being developed.
He said his reason for asking is because there is a lot of heavy
activities, such as concrete trucks and things like that running in and out on
these roads and said he is curious as to whether or not we are going to accept
those main roads where there is going to be a lot of construction traffic. He
said ultimately within a year or two, we are going to end up repairing the
damage.
City Manager Cavezza said we accept the roads if they meet the standards
and said there is a two-year warranty on the roads where the developer has to
maintain them for two years thereafter.
Mayor Pro Tem Rodgers said that has been a concern for many years and to a
large extent we have addressed that concern when we raised the standards for
those subdivisions roads; because in the past it was a very big problem. He
said where you still see some major detoration is in some of the older
subdivisions, where those standards were not in place; but there are adequate
standards in place now to deal with that.
*** ***
***
REZONING PETITIONS:
Councilor Allen said he would ask City Manager Cavezza to provide a report
as it relates to rezoning petitions. He said it appears when someone files for
a rezoning and for whatever reasons, they pull that after it is heard by the
Planning Advisory Commission (PAC) and they hold it indefinitely, there is no
defined timeline there.
He said he would ask City Manager Cavezza to look at that to determine if
there needs to be a certain timeline to bring it back. He said it seems like it
is somewhat of a burden for our staff to have to carry this packet of
information on and on indefinitely.
Councilor Allen said it is also a burden to the homeowners that live in
the area, not knowing when this will come back up if this is a contentious type
rezoning.
*** *** ***
EVICTIONS:
Councilor Hunter asked when we have an eviction in the community, if there
is anything that is setup whereby the Marshal?s Office notifies us so that we
can go out and cleanup the debris or the remnant of that eviction. City
Manager Cavezza said when there is an eviction, the Marshal?s Office
coordinates directly with Public Services and generally Public Services is
there at that time so there is no reloading and they take it out and put it on
the truck.
Mr. Rufus Riggs, Director of the Department of Public Services said
whenever there is an eviction, the Marshal?s Office coordinates it and does a
service request to the Citizens Service Center. He said they in turn get that
request and respond to it. He said often times, they don?t get there
immediately when the eviction is occurring; because they may very well be
working in another section of the City and can?t leave that service area until
the work is completed, but they get to that eviction as quickly as they can.
Councilor Hunter said in the event that the Marshal?s Office doesn?t get the
word out to the Public Services Division, could a citizen go ahead and call
Citizens Services Center, so that we will know that an eviction is taking
place, so they can go ahead and get out there.
Mr. Riggs responded to further questions of Councilor Hunter as it relates
to this matter.
Councilor Turner Pugh then asked, what happens on an eviction where the
Marshal?s Office is not the one doing the evictions, whereby the owner of the
property decides to evict the tenant and put their belongs on the side of the
road. She said she has seen items put on the side of the road and it stays
there for quite some time.
She said she wanted to know if there is some kind of way that we can send
a message to homeowners that if they are having individuals evicted, it is
their responsibility if they don?t go through the Marshal?s Office for
notification then they have to notify us.
Mayor Poydasheff said it is his understanding of the law that they must go
and get some type of warrant or eviction and there is a time procedure. He said
if the landlord does it on their own, they leave themselves open to claims.
City Attorney Fay said normally there is a dispossessory action and you
get a judgment before you go out and do an eviction.
Mayor Poydasheff said maybe we need to get the word out to homeowners to
let them know that they must go through the Marshal?s Office prior to evictions
being done.
After several minutes of discussion on this subject, with members of the
Council expressing their views, City Manager Cavezza said when we get
complaints from citizens, we usually go out and inspect and where appropriate
we tell them to cleanup, or cite them if they don?t clean it up. Mr. Riggs
then responded to further concerns of members of the Council, after which
several referrals and requests were made by the Council, as outlined below.
Councilor Turner Pugh said when we do our annual report, have the staff to
include a section, as it relates to cleanup in the community and when items and
garbage can be put out without penalty.
City Manager Cavezza said we could also run it on CCG-TV to further get
the word out.
Councilor Henderson said he would also ask that we contact Columbus
Housing Initiative to determine if there is some assistance that we can offer
from the City?s prospective to assist them in helping to get the word out as to
the legal rights of some of these tenants that don?t know they have rights, as
well as some of those landlords who may not know how to operate within the
bounds of the law.
*** *** ***
UPCOMING EVENTS:
City Manager Cavezza highlighted some upcoming events, which are outlined
below.
Tonight, August 26th, 6:00 p.m., South Columbus Revitalization Town Hall
Meeting, Baker Middle School
He said they are also going back out to the Public with a series of public
meetings on the Comprehensive Plan update. He said they have already gone
through one series of public hearings and briefed the Council several times and
said we now have a packet, which we want to take out to the public before we
bring it to the Council on first reading.
City Manager Cavezza then outlined the schedule for those public hearings as
outlined below.
Planning District 1, 2,3 & 4 - September 9, 6:00 p.m.
Planning District 5, 6 & 7- September 11, 6:00 p.m.
Planning District 11 - September 18,, 6:00 p.m.
Planning District 12 & 14 - September 23, 6:00 p.m.
Councilor Davis said he thinks it is wise to take this information back to
the public and said one of the concerns that he heard a number of complaints
about was people felt like they didn?t have enough notice, as they didn?t see
the signs up. He said he knows that we put signs up at certain strategic points
and for some reason, they didn?t see the signs and he is pleased that we are
going to try to get the word out, so that the people can be there.
---------------------------------------------------*** ***
***-----------------------------------------------------
WORKSESSION::
TREE LIMBS:
City Manager Cavezza said we have talked about trees and picking up tree
limbs previously where there was a lot of discussion and the Director of the
Department of Public Services went back and did a lot of research on this
subject and he is here today to give the Council the results of the research
that was done in this regard. He said this is not necessarily a decision
briefing, but we just want to tell you what we are thinking and what we think
we should do.
Mr. Rufus Riggs, Director of the Department of Public Services said during
the Council?s last Work Session, he briefed the Council as to the current
policy and procedures on picking up trees and limbs, some of the issues that
are associated with that to give you something to think about. He said at the
previous meeting, the Council gave him some things to go back and look at,
which he did.
He then went into some details in outlining those results, which are
indicated below.
LIMBS AND TREES COLLECTION IN OTHER CITIES
Albany, Ga. ? Collects brush and limbs only, no size restrictions. Resident can
take tree logs and stump to the landfill at no cost.
Athens/Clark County Ga.? Collects brush and limbs only, limbs must be cut to 6
feet in length and no larger than 4 inches in diameter. Trees downed by a storm
may be put out for collection at a charge of $35.00 plus $14.00 per ton
disposal fee.
Dekalb County, Ga. ? Collects brush, limbs and logs (logs must not weigh more
than 50 lbs.). Any pile of debris that does not meet specifications will incur
a charge of $100.00.
Macon, Ga. ? Collects brush and limbs only. No logs or stumps. Limbs must be
cut to 4 feet in length and be no larger than 4 inches in diameter for
collection.
Marietta, Ga. ? Collects brush and limbs only. No logs or stumps. Limbs must be
cut to 4 feet in length and no larger than 4 inches in diameter for collection.
Large piles over 200 cubic feet incur a charge of $100.00.
Valdosta, Ga. ? Collects brush and limbs only. No logs or stumps. Limbs must be
cut to 4 feet in length and be no larger than 4 inches in diameter for
collection. Brush must be in bundles that weigh no more than 35 lbs. large
piles $20.00, full truck $45.00 and if an additional trailer is needed $90.00.
Auburn, Ala. ? Collects brush and limbs only, not over 5 cubic yards
(6?x6?x4?). No Logs or stumps. Over 5 cubic yards must pay $25.00 up to ?
trailer, $50.00 full trailer and $25.00 for return trip.
Dothan, Ala. - Collects logs, brush and limbs must be cut in 6 feet in length
for collection. No stumps. No additional charges. (Do pick up trees except
stumps)
Opelika, Ala. ? Will pick up tree logs, limbs, stumps and brush only if cut
down by the resident. Tree services must remove their own. No additional
charges.
TREE COLLECTION FEE OPTIONS
Add cost to current garbage collection fee.
Everyone pays, users and non-users.
Easy to administer no additional administration required.
Fee for service to users.
Only users pay for service.
Additional administration required.
.
Customers? dissatisfaction, many customers? feel this service should be
provided with current garbage collection fee.
Types of fee for service.
By the cubic yard.
By the hour.
By the pound.
Implementing a voucher system.
Very difficult to administer and control.
TREE COLLECTION OPTIONS
1. Maintain current policy:
Customer dissatisfaction.
No additional equipment or personnel required.
2. Collect trees from storms:
Staff cannot distinguish trees put out from storms or other trees.
Other trees put out that are not picked up will generate customer
dissatisfaction.
This will delay normal collection and require overtime. If overtime cannot meet
the requirement, additional equipment and personnel will be required.
3. Collect trees cut by the property owner:
Staff cannot distinguish trees cut by property owner from trees cut by
contractors.
Trees put out by contractors and not pick up will generate customer?s
dissatisfaction.
Collection personnel will collect most trees put out.
Additional equipment and personnel will be required.
4. Collect all trees put out:
Additional equipment and personnel will be required.
No customer dissatisfaction.
Mr. Riggs said he thinks that we have a program in place that is workable
and he thinks that we can continue doing what we are doing. He said he would
ask Council supports the current policy and that the staff continues to educate
customers on the policy.
Mayor Poydasheff said he thinks this was a very good and indepth study and
said whatever we do, we will get praised and criticism, but said that?s what we
get paid for. He said he thinks in the long run, in his survey of different
cities, in the northeast and the south, he finds that the best approach would
be a fee pickup. He said what the fee should be is based on amortization cost,
but something similar maybe once or twice every two weeks. He said the cost
would be based something comparable to what tree services do now, plus cost if
you have to hire additional personnel. He said he thinks the fairest and the
greatest good for the greatest number of people, in his opinion, would be to
consider a fee. He said this will satisfy a number of people and will avoid a
number of telephone calls to the members of the Council.
Mayor Pro Tem Rodgers said he personally concurs with Mr. Riggs?
recommendation and agrees with what the Mayor has said, in that sometimes with
them trying to provide a service to their constituents, which raises these
issues with this matter. He said also we are in a unique period right now,
because of the amount of water that has uprooted some trees; however, it?s
going to go away over time. He said he don?t want to overact to hopefully, a
short term situation.
He said he would like to recommend to the City Manager that we utilize
CCG-TV, to run the policy as it relates to the pickup of tree limbs and outline
those limbs we pick up and under what circumstances.
Councilor Turner Pugh said she would like to also have included in that
notice that citizens can also take their tree limbs to the landfill at no cost
to them, as long as it does not exceed the weight limitation.
Mr. Riggs said if a person takes it from their residence, there is no cost
and no limit to the weight. He said if you take it from your house, you can
take as much as you want, they will take it at no cost.
Councilor Allen asked that we consider looking at putting this information
on the City?s website as well.
Several members of the Council then expressed their further views as it
relates to this current policy.
Councilor Turner Pugh said if anyone knows of any groups that are
available to cut down trees and take them to the landfill for our senior
citizens, if they could call in and let us know, so we would have a list. She
said oftentimes we get telephone calls from senior citizens where they have had
someone to cut down a tree.
Councilor Suber then asked Mr. Riggs to explain what his recommendation
is, as he needs some clarification.
Mr. Riggs said his recommendation is that we maintain the current policy
and that policy be supported and that they do a better job of educating people
of what the policy is; both through direct mail and CCG-TV.
Councilor Suber said whether we like it or not everything that we charge
people is a tax or user fee. He said he believes that we could have
accomplished what you had suggested before, by charging $1.00. He said he has
had a number of complaints, even from tree services, saying that we were trying
to put them out of business.
He said personally, he thinks the previous recommendations that Mr. Riggs
suggested would have alleviated a lot of problems for you and your personnel.
He said he don?t know how they are going to educate all these people, because
until a storm comes up, the Mayor makes a declaration that we have had an act
of God and now we will pick up the tree limbs. He said two months later we have
had people come to us dealing with the same situation, and said one person had
been out of town and said he shouldn?t have been penalized for that, but we
penalized him anyway.
Councilor Suber said what you are recommending now is somewhat
contradictory to what you said before, but said he will support what you want
to do.
After continued discussion on this subject, City Manager Cavezza responded
to further concerns of the Council and also pointed out that he has received a
number of telephone calls from people objecting to the previous recommendation
to increase it by $1.00. He said we are leaning towards the current policy;
however, if everybody is not going to support the current policy, then we need
to change it.
Mayor Poydasheff said the position of the City Manager, as he understands
it is that we maintain the status quo; however, if any member of the Council
wants to change that in any manner, then the Council has every right to move it
and we can take a vote on it. He said if Councilor Suber wants to do that
today, it is perfectly legally.
Councilor Suber said he would like to have the information that was
previously submitted to the Council at an earlier Work Session regarding this
subject. City Manager Cavezza then said that they would bring back a
recommendation to the Council on this issue.
Councilor Davis asked that he be provided with some options that the
Council can look at prior to a final decision being made on this issue. Also,
provide a copy of the fee structure from the Cities that we surveyed, as to
what they charge and what does that charge cover.
Mayor Poydasheff asked City Manager Cavezza to provide an estimate, if we
decide to charge for pickup of tree limbs and what that cost would be
amortized.
*** *** ***
COLUMBUS POLICE DEPARTMENT:
Mayor Poydasheff, speaking to Chief of Police Willie Dozer, said we are
all sorry for the loss of one of your officers and said he would like for you
to convey to his family, our sadness and condolences. He said if there is going
to be a memorial service, we would certainly like to know.
Chief Dozier said as he understands, there will be a memorial service for
Detective McDonald on tomorrow at 11:00 a.m., at the Civic Center.
Mayor Poydasheff said he will ask City Manager Cavezza to represent him,
as he has an emergency in his family and he will be going to Charleston that
day.
Police Chief Willie Dozier said he was asked to come before the Council
this morning to give an overview on some of the staffing issues that are
affecting the Columbus Police Department, as well as hopefully to provide you
with some information that could be used in the decision making process as
these issues come forward.
Chief Dozier then gave a thirty minutes slide presentation, outlining
statistical information, as well as using graphs, highlighting those numbers
and figures supporting his request for the need of additional officers, as
outlined below in the following charts:
Police Service Area: 220 sq. mi
Population: 186,880
MSA Population: 283,000
Authorized Strength: 388 Sworn Officers
105 Civilians
Present Personnel Allocation
# CPD Nat?l
?Patrol Svcs 232 59.8% 59.8%
?Investigative Svcs 103 26.5% 26.3%
?Support Svcs 14 3.6% 3.6%
?Administrative Svcs 16 4.1% 6.2%
Present Personnel Allocation
# CPD Nat?l
?Vice/Metro 15 3.9%
?Professional Stds 4 1.0%
?Chief?s Office 4 1.0%
Strategic Initiatives
1. Goals and Objectives
Each bureau develops goals annually
Meet quarterly with Command Staff
Proactive vs. Reactive
2. Workload Assessments/All Positions
Two year process
Reassignment of personnel
3. Multi-year Plan Developed
Identify issues in public safety for future growth
Changing Demographics
Uptown Columbus
Businesses, River Center, CSU Students, visitors,
Loft Apartment Residents
Commercial/Retail Development
Veterans Pkwy
Bradley Park
Columbus Park Crossing
Technology Park/Lynch Road
? Aging Population
? Brings the need for specialization due to increased needs and
targeted victimization
? Cultural Diversity (2000 census)
? White 49% Black 43%
? Hispanic 4.5% Other 3.5%
? New challenges to provide services to overcome differences in cultures,
language, etc.
1998 ? Two (2) Beats Added For Quicker Response
Nine Officers from existing personnel for 24/7 coverage
Three (3) Member Bicycle Patrol From Existing Personnel
Bibb City Annexation
Housing Authority Services
Deloyment of Personnel
?Precincts
?North Precinct ? Macon Road (Old Crime Lab)
?South Precinct ? South Columbus Super Center
?(Third Precinct ? Citizens Service
Center
Macon Road
?Park Security
?Existing & newly developed city-wide
?Riverwalk Security
?Park Security
?Existing & Newly Developed City-Wide
?Riverwalk Security
?North ? 1 Hour, 13 Minutes
?South ? 48 Minutes
City Parks
52 Parks in Columbus
? 6 Recreational Super Centers
? 52 Playgrounds
? 46 Tennis Courts
? 6 Swimming Pools
?24 miles of walking trails
? 24 picnic areas
? 85 athletic fields
City Parks are being improved and attracting more users.
Juvenile Offenses
? Juvenile Processing Time has Increased
? Intake / Parent Notification Time
? Number of Cases Increasing
911 Calls for Service
2000 2001 2002 2003
July 90,569 85,243 87,285 89,292
Yearly 511,724 146,803 151,671
Total
Chief Dozier also highlighted graphs which included the following
information:
Average Service Time per Calls
Average time spent on calls
Percent of 2-Officer Calls Dispatched
Total Alarm Calls
Critical Manpower Shortages
Traffic Accident Reports
DUI Cases ? 2 Hour Processing Time Per Incident
CHA & Parks & Recreation Property Calls
Traffic Citations
Crime Index ? Part One Crimes
Crime Index ? 15% Increase
TRAINING IMPACT:
32 Hours Annual In-Service (on duty)
Computer Use/Technology
Specialized Training (Search & Seizure, Arrests, etc.)
Automatic Electronic Defibrillators (4 hours)
Continuous Improvement Training
Firearms Training ( 4 times annually)
GCIC ? Criminal History (4 hours mandated)
Chief Dozier also highlighted those areas, which he felt needed attention,
as outlined below:
DUI Enforcement
Neighborhood Patrols
Park Security
Business & Residential Burglaries
Complaints From Citizens
Traffic Accident Investigations
Special Details (Business Robberies, Burglaries & Thefts)
Selective Traffic Enforcement
Vehicle Theft
Community Involvement (i.e. Columbus Against Drugs)
Patrol Officers? work schedules prohibit adequate concentration of time in
theses areas.
After a forty-minutes presentation by Chief of Police Dozer, he then
outlined the following recommendations:
Increase Overtime Budget
Strategy to Fill Existing Vacancies
Increase Size of Traffic Unit/Motor Squad
Allow deployment of 2 shifts
Establish a DUI Enforcement Unit
45% Decline in DUI Arrest in the last 5 years
Increase size of Bike Patrol for Park Security
Two shifts, 7 days a week for Riverwalk and Park Security
PERSONNEL RECOMMENDATIONS:
Eleven (11) additional officers ? Motor Squad
Ten (10) Accident Investigators
One (1) Sergeant/Supervisor
7:00 a.m. ? 8:00 p.m./ Overlapping Shifts
DUI Enforcement
Six (6) additional officers
Five (5) Patrol Officers
One (1) Sergeant / Supervisor
Increase DUI Enforcement Arrests
Bike Patrol
Nine (9) additional officers
2 Shifts 7-days a week
One 6-Officer Squad ? Riverwalk
One 6-Ofifcer Squad ? Remaining Parks in City and to supplement
other
Needs and Events
Mayor Poydasheff thanked Chief Dozier for keeping him informed, as well as
briefing him, in his role as Public Safety Director. He said he agrees that we
have to develop a strategy and said he is going to do something that he doesn?t
believe has ever been done before. He said he is going to appoint an ad-hoc
committee under his authority as Public Safety Director to assist you in coming
up with an overall strategic plan, an overall strategic plan that will suggest
guidelines, working with you, short-term, as well as long-term needs.
He said he would ask Councilors Anthony, Suber, Henderson, Hunter and
Woodson to serve on this ad-hoc committee. He said he would ask Councilor
Anthony to serve as the Chairperson on this committee. He said we need a
strategy and said this committee will be to help create that strategy, looking
at all aspects of the department, including the marketing that they are doing.
He said he would ask the committee to report back to him and the Council, as
there will be budgetary implications and the guidelines will also come from the
City Manager.
Mayor Poydasheff said we have as good a Police Department as any City in
the United States and said the evidence is all the awards won, as well as the
accreditation won. He said you have some great personnel and your idea of
moving 11 people out of the Metro Drug Task Force to create our own Vice-Squad
was an extraordinary smart move and he commends you for that. He said he thinks
this committee will enhance and further move us forward in the role of public
safety.
After Chief Dozier concluded his presentation, several members of the
Council then expressed their views and concerns; with Chief Dozier then
responding to several questions of members of the Council.
Councilor Suber said whenever we start the committee, he would ask
Councilor Anthony that we have enough information dealing with the makeup of
other Police Departments and the number of individuals that they have; so, we
can compare the number of calls, along with how many officers are sitting
inside taking the calls over the phone versus going out and responding. He said
he thinks that the 41.4 minutes could be somewhat deceiving to a number of
people.
Councilor Davis said several months back, he had asked for some of the
salary comparison that the City has on record and said he has not received them
yet. He said he would like to look at them to do some comparison himself. He
said the ones that we have in the Human Resources Department.
City Manager Cavezza said he would provide that information to the
Council.
Councilor Woodson said when the committee meets, she would also like to
see what programs other Police Departments have as it relates to volunteers,
information on their Cadet Program, what they are using and what their success
story is. She also requested information on their recruitment, as well as
provide some of the ads that are being used for recruitment.
She said once we look at all of this information, that we look at doing a
survey from the officers that are out on the beat and what they see and what
they are going through.
Chief Dozier said his purpose of being here today was not to cast blame,
but to paint a picture as to where they are in Public Safety and highlight some
of the issues that he thinks are pertinent to the growth of this City and to
make a decision about how we want to go forth and deal with them. He said he
looks forward to working with the committee.
*** *** ***
With there being no other business to come before this Council, Mayor Pro
Tem Rodgers then made a motion for adjournment. Seconded by Councilor Woodson
and carried unanimously by those nine members of Council present for this
meeting, with the time being 10:45 A.M.
*** *** ***
Tiny B. Washington, CMC
Clerk of Council
The Council of Columbus, Georgia