Columbus, Georgia
Georgia's First Consolidated Government
Post Office Box 1340
Columbus, Georgia, 31902-1340
(706) 653-4013
fax (706) 653-4016
Council Members
MINUTES
BOARD OF TRUSTEES
EMPLOYEES' PENSION PLAN
February 5, 2003
A meeting of the Board of Trustees for the Columbus Georgia Employees= Pension
Plan was held February 5, 2003 at 2:00 P.M. in the Mayor?s Conference Room.
PRESIDING: Mayor Bob Poydasheff, Chairman
PRESENT: Carmen Cavezza, Kay Love, Jack Nowell, Mary Strozier-Weaver,
Dan Gray, Alan Rothschild, Jr., Saundra Hunter, Michael Majure, and Capt. John
Starkey
ABSENT: Morton Harris
GUESTS: Henry Swift (Robinson-Humphrey), Denise Baxter, Investment
Manager (CCG)
Mayor Bob Poydashef, Chairperson, called the meeting to order. Kay Love,
Secretary/Treasurer, gave the attendance.
MINUTES OF THE PREVIOUS MEETING:
The motion was made and seconded that the minutes from the January 8, 2002
meeting be accepted as submitted. The vote was unanimous.
INVESTMENT UPDATE:
Mr. Swift reminded the board that he had sent a lot of information to them, but
had felt that with what was happening in both the bond market and the stock
market in the quarter ending in December, that some backup data would be
helpful to clarify what had happened. The bond market with the Lehmann Bros.
High yield bond index was up 6.7%. Basically that meant that the lower quality
bonds during the quarter had the greatest rise in values. Because our
investment policy statement requires that all Bonds have an ?A? or better
rating, we did not participate in the rally in the high yield market during the
quarter. Consequently, all fixed income managers under performed their index
for the quarter. From time to time we will pay this price for requiring only
high quality bonds be bought in our portfolios, but over time quality
investment have been a excellent policy
As for the stock market, all the managers missed the benchmark with the
exception of the international manager. This under performance by the equity
managers was also due to the lower quality stocks being the best performers
during the quarter. It was the stocks rated C and D and those selling for less
than $5.00 per share that had the best performance for this period. Once
again, our investment policy statement calls for quality stocks and thus we did
not participate when the low
Pension Board Minutes
February 5, 2003
quality stocks did so well. Furthermore, during the fourth quarter the telecom
sector was up 35% and our equity managers had been avoiding this sector due to
its? very poor performance over the past few years.
Next, using charts, Mr. Swift showed the performance summary of all the
managers for the quarter ending 12/31/02. The fixed income managers combined
were up 1.13% versus the index at 1.69% and since inception the fixed income
managers have outperformed the index by 10 basis points.
The second item was Synovus Securities. Mr. Swift stated that as he had
indicated in the information previously sent to the board members there is
reason for concern with Synovus. During the past year Synovus was up 6.6%
compared to the Lehmann Bros. Govt/Corp the index against which they are
measured was up 9.8%, a 300 basis point difference. This is rarely, if ever,
seen but due to the volatility in the market it has been seen both in fixed
income and in equities, which causes a concern.
With this concern Mr. Swift stated that he has asked the Mayor to appoint a
sub-committee to evaluate why this year has been so bad.
The Mayor stated that there was real cause for concern not only with Synovus
but also National and Victory and was appointing a sub-committee to evaluate
the problem. Serving on the committee would be Henry Swift, Morton Harris,
Mike Majure and Kay Love. He stated that he would like for them to come to the
board in a month with a report.
Victory was hired about 18 months ago and has not performed well from the
beginning. For the last quarter they had roughly a 7% return versus 9.2% on
the index. What is more alarming is the last 12 months and since inception,
both show some 500 basis points behind the index. Mr. Swift stated he felt
that the board could not afford to let this go by and should step in and do
some diligent evaluations this manager.
National Asset Management was hired in September 2000 to be the other core
manager and has also had a rough time, not as bad as Victory, but still
somewhat of a concern. Each of these managers is on the watch list and will be
asked to come down for a meeting with the sub-committee. As a note of interest
National and Victory have already called and requested an audience.
The next chart depicted all the equity managers. The total equities were up
about 5.6% versus 7.6% on the composite. For the year, which was encouraging,
the equity managers were down less than the market. Since inception, when all
the managers were reconstructed, they were up 8.7% versus 9.0% for the
composite.
The last chart is a combination of all the equity managers and the fixed income
managers. It?s encouraging that since 6/30/93 there?s been a return of 8.3%
per year and in light of all the turmoil and problems not only in the stock
market but, also, in the world since inception, it?s really been a
Pension Board Minutes
February 5, 2003
good return versus an 8.39% return for the index which is probably acceptable
over that period of time.
A copy of the evaluation report is maintained by the Board Secretary in the
Finance Director=s Office and is available for review upon request.
PRESENTATION:
Mr. Fred Gaskin, Director and Mr. Jerry Thimme, Managing Director for Deutsche
Asset Management (Value) presented today?s report:
? Investment Process
? Conservative
? Risk Averse
? Value Oriented
? Contrarian Execution
? Market & Performance Review
? Investment Results
? Relative Performance as of 12/31/02
? Portfolio Structure
? Contrarian Value
Performance vs. Large Cap Value Style
Cumulative Performance
Historical Performance
Rolling 5 Year Annualized Performance
Performance in S&P Down Quarters
? US Contrarian Value Equity Composite
? Fourth Qtr. 2002 Commentary
? Fourth Quarter 2002 Market Overview
? Standard & Poor?s 500 Stock Index
Capital Appreciation: Calendar Years 1950-2002
? Bull and Bear Markets
? Past Crises
Pension Board Minutes
February 5, 2003
? The Economy
? Consumer Trends
? Short-term Interest Rates and Equities
? S&P 500 Stock Index: 1945-2002
? List Of Stock Owned Companies
? Portfolio Appraisal as of 12/31/02
This concluded their presentation; they were thanked by the board and
subsequently dismissed.
OLD BUSINESS: None
NEW BUSINESS: None
Mr. Swift said he would like to give an update on the balances in the account
as of 02/04/03. Referring a chart on the S&P 500 he explained the from January
7, 2003 the S&P 500 had dropped from 922.93 down to 848.20, a drop of 8.1% in
30 days. This indicating just how bad the stock market has been since the last
meeting. The next chart was a depiction of how the asset allocation stood as
of 12/31/02. Mr. Swift then reminded the board that at the last meeting it was
established that a process of moving monies over the next four months would
take place to rebalance the account in accordance with the investment policy
statement. The valuation of portfolio report as of 02/04/03 showed how the
monies were moved and redistributed on January 15, 2003 including the first
$500,000 that was given to the city to pay benefits. This process will be
repeated each month on the 15th for February, March and April. He stated that
due to the condition of the market at this time that this is a very
conservative way to accomplish this task.
With no further business for discussion, the meeting was adjourned. The next
meeting will be April 2, 2003 at 2:00 p.m. and will be held in the Mayor=s
Conference Room.
_______________________
Julia A. Rasch,
Recording Secretary