Columbus, Georgia
Georgia's First Consolidated Government
Post Office Box 1340
Columbus, Georgia, 31902-1340
(706) 653-4013
fax (706) 653-4016
Council Members
MINUTES
COUNCIL OF COLUMBUS, GEORGIA
WORK SESSION
JULY 26, 2005
The regular monthly Work Session of the Council of Columbus, Georgia was
called to order at 9:00 A.M., Tuesday, July 26, 2005, on the Plaza Level of the
Government Center, Columbus, Georgia. Honorable Robert S. Poydasheff, Mayor and
Honorable John J. Rodgers, Mayor Pro Tem presiding.
*** *** ***
PRESENT: Present other than Mayor Poydasheff and Mayor Pro Tem Rodgers were
Councilors R. Gary Allen, Glenn Davis, Skip Henderson, Julius H. Hunter, Jr.,
Nathan Suber and Evelyn Woodson. City Manager Isaiah Hugley, City Attorney
Clifton Fay, Clerk of Council Tiny B. Washington and Deputy Clerk of Council
Sandra Davis were also present. Councilor Evelyn Turner Pugh arrived at 9:18
a.m.
*** *** ***
ABSENT: Councilor Wayne Anthony was absent, but was excused upon the adoption
of Resolution Number 353-05. Councilor Charles E. McDaniel, Jr., was also
absent.
*** *** ***
INVOCATION: Offered by Mayor Pro Tem John J. Rodgers.
-----------------------------*** *** ***----------------------------
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Led by Al-Faruck Group Number 145 & Boy Scout Troop 35
of St. Luke Church.
-----------------------------*** *** ***----------------------------
MINUTES: Minutes of the July 19, 2005 meeting of the Council of the
Consolidated Government of Columbus, Georgia was submitted and approved upon
the adoption of a motion made by Mayor Pro Tem Rodgers and seconded by
Councilor Allen which carried unanimously by those seven members present at the
time. (Councilor Turner Pugh had not yet arrived and Councilors Anthony and
McDaniel were absent for this meeting.)
-----------------------------*** *** ***----------------------------
CONSENT AGENDA
THE FOLLOWING ORDINANCE WAS SUBMITTED BY CITY ATTORNEY FAY AND APPROVED BY
THE COUNCIL:
An Ordinance (05-63) - Repealing Ordinance No. 05-52 and
substituting the following ordinance amending Article VII of Chapter 13
of the Columbus Code Solid Waste Collection and Disposal by changing
the guidelines for an offset to the residential rate for low-income
households, so as to reflect the February 18, 2005 guidelines
contained in the Federal Register. Councilor Suber moved the adoption
of the ordinance. Seconded by Councilor Woodson and carried
unanimously by those seven members of Council present, with
Councilors Anthony and McDaniel being absent from this meeting and
Councilor Turner Pugh not yet having arrived to the meeting.
*** *** ***
THE FOLLOWING THREE ITEMS WERE SUBMITTED BY CITY ATTORNEY FAY AND APPROVED
BY THE COUNCIL PURSUANT TO THE ADOPTION OF A SINGLE MOTION MADE BY MAYOR PRO
TEM RODGERS AND SECONDED BY COUNCILOR DAVIS, WHICH CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY BY THOSE
SEVEN MEMBERS OF COUNCIL PRESENT AT THE TIME, WITH COUNCILORS ANTHONY AND
MCDANIEL BEING ABSENT FROM THIS MEETING AND COUNCILOR TURNER PUGH NOT YET
HAVING ARRIVED:
A Resolution (352-05) ? Authorizing the acceptance of a $25,000 grant
from the Knight Foundation for the Marshall Movers After School and Summer
Program.
A Resolution (353-05) ? Excusing Councilor Wayne Anthony from
the July 26, 2005 Council Meeting.
TEMPORARY STREET CLOSING:
Application of Ms. Dawnette Dunn to temporarily close Rindheart Drive
at Wellborn Drive, on Tuesday, August 2, 2005, from 5:30 p.m. to
Midnight, in connection with the "National Night Out".
-----------------------------*** *** ***----------------------------
ZONING MATTERS:
Councilor Suber said he would like to make a public apology to the City
Attorney. He said on last week some of the Council members questioned things
that he said concerning our rezoning restrictions and said he just wants to
publicly apologize because he brought us information back saying that what we
said wasn?t true. He said he appreciates him doing that for us this morning and
he publicly apologies for accusing him of not telling us the whole truth.
City Attorney Fay said he did distribute around the Council table this
morning information that should explain the previous restriction.
Councilor Woodson said she too would like to apologize to the City
Attorney. She said perception becomes a reality after you do a lot of things
and it has been heard.
---------------------------------*** ***
***----------------------------------
WORK SESSION:
METROPOLITAN MEDICAL RESPONSE SYSTEM:
Mr. Ed Saidla of the Muscogee County Health Department said Columbus is
one of 125 cities across the United States that has developed a Metropolitan
Medical Response System. He said the enhancement of local health and medical
response to victims of Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) terrorist incidents
provides for a unified response to a WMD or natural disaster.
He then outlined the MMRS Characteristics, which includes the following:
Integrated medical response system
Specially trained responders
Specialized response equipment
Specialized medical equipment and pharmaceuticals
Mr. Saidla gave some history on the program, pointing out that it began in
1996 in conjunction with the Olympics in Atlanta and is currently managed by
the Department of Homeland Security. He said the program began in Columbus in
September of 2001. He said Columbus is one of only two cities in Georgia
participating in the MMRS program. He said Atlanta has expanded to 21 Metro
Counties.
He said this program benefits all emergency responders in preparation for
a response to weapons of mass destruction (WMD) event, as well as mass casualty
incidents.
Mr. Saidla said the requirements of the MMRS Program involve the
development of multiple plans and integration of plans between Fire, EMS,
hospitals, area physicians, public health and other responders. He said it also
involves the acquisition of required pharmaceuticals and the storage of those
items, as well as the acquisition of required equipment to better equip our
responders. He said there is a requirement of integration of system
organization, plans, pharmaceuticals, and equipment to achieve operational
capability for the MMRS
Mr. Saidla outlined the total number of jurisdictions and the year it was
created.
Original MMRS 27*
MMRS 1999 20
MMRS 2000 25
MMRS 2001 25
MMRS 2002 25
MMRS 2003 3
The total jurisdictions are 125, which includes Washington DC MMST.
Mr. Saidla then showed a map of the Metropolitan Medical Response Systems
that shows the layout and an indication of where the different cities across
the Nation that are participating in this program are located.
Mr. Saidla said the Columbus MMRS program supports six counties within the
Columbus Metropolitan statistical area, which includes
Muscogee County
Russell County (Alabama)
Harris County
Lee County (Alabama)
Chattahoochee County
Marion County (As of 2003)
Mr. Saidla said Columbus is one of the few cities in the Nation that was
granted a modification of the initial $600,000 contract and provided with
$280,000 in additional funds. He said within the last year, they have received
two additional grants and have been awarded two grants in the amount of
$250,000 and $227,586.00. He said to date; they have received over $1.25
million dollars.
Mr.Saidla said we are better prepared because of the funding that we have
received. He said this funding has provided our area with specially Equipped
Mass Casualty Incident Response (MCI) trailers in?Columbus, Russell Co. Harris
Co., Lee Co. (on order). He said that each trailer could handle 100 mass
casualty victims.
He said other than training, this funding has allowed them to do other
things, which includes:
Pharmaceutical Cache
Emergency Alert/Reverse 911 System
Russell and Lee County
NIMIS Training
Radiological Detection Equipment and Training
Credentialing System for Columbus Fire and EMS
Mr. Saidla said the latest MMRS Grant Funding includes $25,000 for Weapons
of Mass Destruction training. He said it also provides over $71,000 to the
Muscogee County Sheriff?s Office with Level B First Responder Protective Gear
to protect that staff.
He then outlined the additional funding that this grant includes, which is
outlined below:
American Red Cross Shelter needs $44,685.00
Additional NIMS Training $10,000.00
Russell County EMA $27,840.00
Tone Alert Notification System
Lee County EMA $21,690.00
Tone Alert Notification System
Mayor Poydasheff pointed out that we are in compliance with NIMS Training
and said he is qualified and said if there is any Council member who is
interested in attending any NIMS training that is conducted in the Public
Safety building, let him know and he will get them scheduled.
Mr. Saidla said with this additional funding, they are hoping that they
will be able to do a large training that will include a number of area
businesses that have expressed an interest to cooperate with the City, Public
Health and the MMRS group.
In his conclusion, Mr. Ed Saidla said the importance of the MMRS program
effort is no longer unequivocal, questionable, or debatable. He said the
enhanced organization and cooperation demanded by a well-functioning MMRS
program helps prepare and unify the public health system, as well as the local
community. He said they have seen how collaboration and working together have
made a major impact in their ability to become an MMRS community, as well as to
enhance their ability to deal with mass casualty situations. ?
Dr. Koypanni, Director of the Columbus Health then expressed some comments
on this subject, saying that besides providing quite a bit of equipment and
some additional training for all the agencies, their program has been very
instrumental in creating a team. He said they meet on a regular basis and have
been having some tabletop and functioning exercises.
He thanked the City of Columbus for this partnership and working with them
in many of their programs and functions.
Mr. Saidla then responded to several questions of members of the Council.
*** *** ***
HEALTHCARE PLAN PROPOSAL:
City Manager Hugley said our healthcare costs continues to increase year
after year and said we are concerned as governments are concerned across this
Nation at each level of government; cities and counties are struggling trying
to find ways to contain the increased cost of healthcare and likewise we are
doing that here in our City.
He said the State made some changes to their health care plan and he has
noticed in various periodicals that other cities and counties have made changes
in their healthcare plans similar to what the State of Georgia has done. He
said we are coming to the Council today to share with you some proposed changes
that we would like to make for FY-07 starting July 1, 2006. He said Mr. Barron
is here this morning to share those with you and said we would like to get some
feedback on those proposed changes.
Mr. Tom Barron, HR Director said the issue of how to pay for healthcare is
a major one that they have been struggling with for a number of years. He said
as they have researched the issue, one constant continues to show up; that is,
cost is going to continue to rise and someone is going to have to pay those
costs. He said they have a proposal this morning that they believe is a more
fair method of sharing the cost of our program.
He said we have three approaches that we are going to focus on; which are
(1) Preferred Rates for Healthy Lifestyles (tobacco product abstinence)
(2) Spousal Rate Surcharges when City plan selected and other employer plan
available
(3) Dependent Audits to verify eligibility and deter fraudulent coverage
Tobacco Product Use
Mr. Barron said in looking at the tobacco use approach, studies show that
tobacco users incur higher average healthcare costs than those who don?t use
tobacco. He said there are other cost to employers in other ways, which
includes higher absenteeism, decreased productivity, early (disability)
retirement higher life insurance premiums, higher fire damage risk and higher
fire insurance premiums. Therefore, higher premium charges for tobacco users
are both appropriate and reasonable.
He said the State of Georgia ($40 monthly) and Synovus ($20 monthly) have
recently enacted a plan where they currently charge extra premiums to smokers.
Mr. Barron said the specific proposal is that the Preferred Premium for
non-tobacco users (rather than a punitive surcharge). He said the initial
differential that they are proposing is $18.50 biweekly as a premium reduction
for those who abstain from tobacco use. He said they would also require a
signed attestation and there would be random nicotine testing to validate that
the agreement is being upheld.
He said false enrollment in the plan as a non-tobacco user, if discovered
would results in 1-year plan suspension. He said this is the same penalty that
is used by the State of Georgia on their plan.
Mayor Poydasheff said he doesn?t know of any insurance company that does
random testing of members of that insurance policy. He said he doesn?t
know how much it would cost. He said if someone tells him that they are not
smoking, he would think that we take the word of our employees unless someone
sees them or catches them or something like that which raises the issue. He
then asked, if that would be a little more costly than is necessary.
Mr. Barron said obviously there is going to be a cost for that, but he
don?t? know if its going to be cost prohibitive; because he don?t anticipate
that we would be testing a lot of people, just enough to make sure that they
did honestly answer the question regarding smoking or tobacco use.
Mayor Pro Tem Rodgers said he understands that this is just a proposal and
said that the approach that we have taken; he thinks that the tobacco use is
something that needs to be considered, but said it seems to him that there are
an awful lot more people who don?t smoke, than who do smoke now. He then asked,
if we will be shooting ourselves in the foot by reducing premiums by $18.50 for
the majority of our insured, as opposed to using the surcharge for those who do
smoke.
City Manager Hugley said he sees the premium of the smokers increasing by
that amount and said the current premium would not decrease.
Mr. Barron said the way that this would be handled is that we would have
an initial premium increase that would at least be equal to the amount of the
discount.
City Manager Hugley said when he talked with Mr. Barron about this issue,
his thought is that for smokers, there would be the $18.50 surcharge and for
non-smokers, the premium would not be changed, it would not be reduced.
Some discussion developed on the nicotine testing aspect of this proposal
with several members of the Council expressing their views on this subject,
after which City Manager Hugley and Human Resources Director Barron responded
to questions of the members of the Council.
City Manager Hugley said what they want to present to the Council on today
is the concept and said all the details have not been ironed out, but we just
wanted to let you know what we are working on. He said we know the State has
done this and it is working well there, and other communities have done this as
well. He said we wanted to give you something that we are thinking about, as
well as give employees as much an advanced notice as possible before the next
fiscal year starts to let you know that this is something that we are looking
at. He said we have between now and then to iron out any concerns that we have;
to fine tune it and come back with something that you can accept. He said we
would like to hear from the Council on any concerns that they have and we will
go back and research those and will fine tune it; and hopefully, we can bring
something back that the Council can accept.
He said if we have employees who do smoke, we want to work with them to
offer some kind of help that would allow them to quit smoking before the next
fiscal year starts and before this becomes effective, if you decide it is
something that you want to adopt.
After twenty minutes of discussion on this matter, with Mr. Barron
responding to further questions of the members of Council, Mayor Pro Tem
Rodgers requested that this matter be suspended, saying that the problem he has
with this is that this is being broadcast city-wide and all of our city
employees are going to be viewing this and said, what do you think their
preference will be. He said you are putting us in an untangible position here
and he thinks that we need to be careful of what we talk about.
City Manager Hugley said he agrees that we need to be careful and said that
is why he is providing the direction that he intends to pursue.
Mayor Poydasheff interrupted City Manager Hugley at this point, and asked
him to consider backing off on this presentation and to take into consideration
those concerns expressed by the Council and come back at a later date, either
individually or in smaller groups after he and the Mayor Pro Tem sit down and
discuss this matter.
City Manager Hugley said he doesn?t have a problem with that; however, he
would like to reiterate that unless there is a change in the cost overall;
because of an increased cost in healthcare, then we would not anticipate any
change for those who are non-smokers.
After City Manager Hugley then responded to some further questions of the
Council, this matter was concluded after Councilor Turner Pugh, who served as
Budget Review Chairperson had requested that this matter be brought forth to
the Finance Committee. She said this is a finance issue and it should have been
brought to the Finance Committee for discussions, but it wasn?t.
City Manager Hugley said Councilor Turner Pugh did mention that to him and
said he yields to her direction on that matter.
Discussion was then suspended on this subject.
*** *** ***
EMINENT DOMAIN:
City Manager Hugley said in recent weeks with the court decision, there
has been a lot of discussion about eminent domain. He said there is some
pending legislation at the State level regarding eminent domain. He said in
this presentation, what we will do is to show you when we have used eminent
domain.
Mayor Poydasheff said he would like to thank the City Manager for getting
the City Attorney to give them an update on the Georgia portion as it relates
to eminent domain. He said the Senate passed what may or may not be a
restrictive proposal. He said he don?t want anybody to think that we are going
to be doing anything without first waiting for the State of Georgia to decide
how they are going to handle the decision. He said what we have always done has
been surgical rather than utilizing public eminent domain as a weapon of mass
destruction.
Ms. Lynnette Gross said on June 23, 2005 the Supreme Court ruled on Kilo et
al v. City of New London, Connecticut on the right of the City to ?take?
property for public purposes through eminent domain.
She said in her presentation today, she will give the Council some
examples of the uses in Columbus, the benefit of eminent domain, and the
process for eminent when using Federal funds.
Ms. Gross then outlined several examples of eminent domain uses in
Columbus Georgia, which includes:
Cusseta Road ? Economic Development/Job Creation
Medical Center Redevelopment Area - Expansion of Doctors Hospital and Columbus
Regional, doctor?s offices, medical facilities and the Amos Cancer Center
allowed this area to be a medical ?hub?. The Amos Cancer Center property was
acquired and assembled under ?threat of eminent domain?
South Lawyers Lane Redevelopment Area (East Wynnton Park) ? Cleaned up slum and
blight and redeveloped.
Liberty District ? soon to be developed into mixed use with commercial, retail
and residential.
Second Avenue Redevelopment Area ? Revitalization of a deteriorated old
automobile district of our City.
Southwest Columbus Redevelopment Area ? preserved and restored
the Historic District
She said eminent domain has been used for Road projects, and to clear
title.
Councilor Woodson said she thinks it is important to point out that in
the areas we used eminent domain, we did relocate the businesses and
homeowners. She said we just didn?t take their property and left them out on
the street. She said they were paid fair market value. She said we need to
make sure that we do clarify that, because she received a telephone call to
that effect.
Mayor Poydasheff said people have to understand that governments, Federal,
State or local, just don?t go and take property. He said due process clause of
the Bill or Rights and the Constitution demands that we pay fair market value.
He said in the cases that we have been involved in; we have even gone further,
as we assist in the relocation process.
Ms. Gross then outlined the benefits of using eminent domain, which
includes the following:
Redevelopment
Road widening Projects
Can be used to ?clear? title to a parcel of property
Tax advantages for seller (in certain cases)
She said it is very important to note that the City has not used eminent
domain to assemble properties for redevelopment since 1999. She said although
it has been done, it is done with caution and is on a case-by-case basis.
Ms. Gross said the process for eminent domain when using Federal funds
is quiet lengthy and burdensome only because it is a protection. She said when
we identify a project for redevelopment (economic, housing, eligible government
facility) or road improvement, a Redevelopment Plan or Transportation Plan is
written. She said Public Hearings are conducted and citizens are informed as to
what area will be impacted. She said the Council approves the plan.
.
She said an appraisal is performed to establish Fair market Value (FMV)
The owner is present during the appraisal process, if they want to be and
another Appraiser must perform a review of the initial appraisal and follow the
applicable regulatory process. The owner must be paid the FMV as determined by
the Appraisal and Review.
Ms. Gross said additionally, we also compensate for relocation. She said
this includes moving and storage. She said relocation consists of finding a
?comparable unit? that meets the current unit, example: number of rooms, number
of bedrooms, porches, garages, etc. She said an owner occupant is paid the
difference between the FMV paid for his property and the price of the
comparable (less any outstanding mortgages)
She said a renter is compensated by paying the difference between their
current rent and the comparable rent for 42 months, and additionally, there are
rules and regulations for commercial/retail relocation.
Ms. Gross said it is very seldom that a case goes to a Special Master as a
contested eminent domain for compensation issues. She said it is also important
to know that there is tax advantages to having property processed through
eminent domain and as previously stated it is the preferred manner of clearing
title for Interstate properties. She said we must exercise caution when it
comes to Eminent Domain. She said there are many checks and balances built in
to the law by requiring a regulatory process and we need to use them. She said
it should be on a case-by-case basis.
She said in order to determine what?s best for Georgia; the Georgia
Association of County Commissioners (GACC) has formed a 27-member committee to
draft language to submit to Legislative body. She said she attended the first
meeting, which was July 12th and the next meeting is scheduled for August 4th.
Ms. Gross said there is an outpouring to amend the language of our current
State law; however, the committee?s challenge is how to protect the City/County
ability to redevelop, while insuring the citizens rights are not violated for
?non-public good?. She said the committee is exploring ways of providing a more
detailed ?process? that follows Federal Guidelines that must be met prior to a
governing body authorizing the ?taking? of private property by eminent domain.
In her conclusion, Ms. Gross said Washington DC?s Mayor Anthony Williams,
who is the President of National League of Cities, said it?s important to note
the court did not expand the power, but reaffirmed its current use. She said
Washington?s Mayor, Anthony Williams said with cities and towns facing
ever-shrinking resources, we need all the help we can get to redevelop our
neighborhoods.
After the conclusion of her presentation, Ms. Gross, as well as City
Manager Hugley then responded to questions of Councilor Davis as it relates to
demolition and eminent domain.
Mayor Poydasheff said when you exercise eminent domain you are taking the
property and you become the fee simple owner. He said when you demolish
property, you demolish for health, welfare and other safety concerns; but said
the property remains that of the owner.
Councilor Woodson then asked City Manager Hugley to provide a copy of the
presentation on eminent domain to all members of the Council. She said she
would also like this presentation aired on CCG-TV.
*** *** ***
DRAINAGE DITCHES:
City Manager Hugley said that we have Director of Public Services, Rufus
Riggs here this morning to give some clarification on the maintenance of
drainage ditches, creeks and easements.
Mr. Riggs said in his presentation, he will provide information to the
Council members as it relates to the ownership of creeks, ditches and how they
perform maintenance on these, as well as what our goals and objectives are.
He said normal vegetation and growth will restrict and retard the flow of
water and said when that happens, it acts as a filter for debris, which will
increase the potential for flooding. He then showed an example of what will
happen when that occurs. He said they cut the weed and grass to maintain the
flow of water; he said they cut all of those ditches and most creeks twice a
year. He said they would like to cut them two times during the growing season,
but said it?s just not possible with the total number of miles of creeks and
ditches that we maintain. He said we do this with the same number of people
that they had more than 15 years ago.
Mr. Riggs said their goal is to reduce, as much as possible, the potential
for structural flooding. He said when we have torrential downpour and deluge of
rain the streets oftentimes will flood, but said we want to keep it out of
people?s homes.
He said as it relates to the maintenance of the banks of creeks and
ditches, residents will often ask them to go in and stabilize the banks of
creeks and banks with rip raft or some other permanent structure. However, we
don?t do this because we don?t have the equipment, manpower or funding. He said
what they do is stabilize the first 20 feet from the outfall of the pipe. He
said after that, the water then normally picks up a normal flow and then flow
on down the creek. He said while it is flowing, there would be some natural
erosion flowing down the creek. He said there is no maintenance beyond the
first 20 feet.
Mr. Riggs then spent some thirty-five minutes in outlining what the
Public Services Department does in maintaining the creeks and ditches.
He then highlighted several different aspects in that process, which is
outlined below.
STORM PIPES IN RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS
City Repairs/Replaces When System Serves More Than A Single Lot
?
STORM PIPES ON COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL PROPERTY
Property Owner Repairs/Replaces
?
City Ordinance 17D-31 (a) States: Any storm water management facility, which
serves a single lot, or commercial and industrial development shall be
privately owned and maintained.
OWNERSHIP OF DITCHES/CREEKS
Ownership is determined by plat during subdivision layout
When the plat does not show ownership, the beds of non-navigable streams belong
to the owner of the adjacent land (O.C.G.A. Sec 44-8-2).
After Mr. Riggs concluded his presentation, he then responded to several
questions of members of the Council. Several members of the Council then
expressed their views and concerns regarding this subject.
City Attorney Fay also responded to questions of members of the Council.
There were requests made for additional information and research by
members of the Council, which is detailed below.
Councilor Henderson asked Mr. Riggs if they participate in any kind of
ongoing conservations or anti-siltation issues with other counties. He said he
was out at Bull Creek Golf Course this weekend and he was looking at the creeks
that feed the big lakes that they rely on for irrigation. He said they dredge
them out a few years ago, and got them to 15 ? 16 feet deep; however, they are
now 2 ?3 feet deep in those areas, and said they seem to think that a lot of
that is the siltation that comes down those creeks from Harris County. He said
a lot of the building and construction, the siltation is collecting right down
there and its making the water flow tougher. He said it?s going to be a
financial burden for us when we eventually have to go out there and re-dredge.
Mr. Riggs said there would be some natural erosion along every bank; when
the water is high and flowing fast. He said the sentiment is going to settle
some place and oftentimes it?s in those areas. He said they do participate in
the Statewide Soil & Water Conservation District. He said they do look at what
the best management practices are, so they can reduce that as much as
possible.
Councilor Henderson then asked Mr. Riggs to do some research and see if
maybe some of the building and construction processes, could be re-routing the
water during this process or possibly lending themselves to creating some of
the issues we have down here.
Councilor Hunter said he would like to have this presentation aired on
CCG-TV.
Councilor Turner Pugh said prior to airing this presentation on CCG-TV
Access Channel, inform the citizens whether or not they are owners of a
drainage ditch or creek; and advising them that they must maintain this ditch;
let?s make sure that the City Attorney gets involved in this process; to inform
them what rights they have in doing what they need to do to keep erosion from
occurring onto their property.
Mayor Poydasheff said he would like for the City Attorney to prepare a
basic statement informing the citizens of what their rights are as far as them
owning an easement. drainage ditch or creek and what they can do to try to fix
the problem.
Councilor Davis said he would like to have some information provided to
him as to the problem of drainage and waterways; when it comes to protecting
these drainage and waterway areas as it pertains to development in certain
areas, highlight what current protection measures are in place; and also
provide some suggestions as to what can we do to increase the protection of
some of these areas.
Mayor Poydasheff said he thinks that we need to consider sending letters
to the real estate companies and developers as to their obligation to disclose
to their clients, the rights and liabilities of drainage ditches, easements and
etc.
Councilor Allen said he would like for the City Manager to look at
developing a list of the dos and don?ts and the rights to ask that a potential
buyer would have as it relates to drainage ditches/storm water issues and let?s
put it on the website. Also, have the staff to look at the stormwater brochure
and determine whether or not there needs to be updates that may need to be
incorporated in it and let?s put an updated date on it.
Councilor Turner Pugh said she would like for the City Manager to check
and see if they can provide a list of those individuals who might have called
in about cleaning ditches and let?s send them a copy of the stormwater
brochure.
EASEMENTS
Mr. Riggs also provided information on easements, as outlined below.
He said an easement is a right of the owner of one parcel of land, by
reason of such ownership, to use the land of another for a special purpose not
inconsistent with the general property in the owner.
Ownership of property remains with the property owner.
Mr. Riggs said the many challenges that they have is that the public wants
the grass on stream banks cut routinely.
The public wants stream banks permanently stabilized.
Commercial/Industrial property owners want the City to repair storm water
systems on their property.
HOW DO PROPERTY OWNERS BECOME AWARE OF STORM WATER ISSUES?
Distribution of storm water brochures to all new requests for water service
customers.
He said they will put all this information on CCG=TV, as well as on their
website.
*** *** ***
STREETSCAPES UPDATE:
Deputy City Manager Bishop gave a brief update on the streetscapes work
that is being done in the Uptown and Broadway area. He said they are currently
working in the block between 12th & 13th Street and said they started on the
west side from 12th Street up to 13th back in December. He said they have
completed that area with the exception of tree planting and some minor issue on
that side. He said they are now in the last quadrant, which is mid-block north
to 13th Street on the east side. He said they should be completed with that
block sometime in September, with the exception of the work inside the big
median, but will be out of the impact area of all the merchants and property
owners in that area.
He said the process is moving well and said sometime during the first or
second week in August, they will start at 12th Street, working south down to
11th Street and they will be meeting with those merchants soon. He said they
are meeting with the merchants and property owners on a monthly basis to keep
them informed on what?s going on; where we are in the schedule and they have
been very patient with us so far. He said as we get down into the busy area
between 10th & 11th, it will become more contentious and we will have to do a
better job with coordinating with all the business owners in that area.
*** *** ***
OXBOW MEADOWS GOLF COURSE:
Mayor Poydasheff said he received a number of telephone calls and has
received a letter from Colonel Cecil Calhoun about a number of good citizens
living here in Columbus, who are influenced to an extremely greater strength by
Mr. Howard Pitts, who unfortunately died at the age of 92.
Mayor Poydasheff said Mr. Pitts was a great man and said there had been
some golf tournaments in his honor at the Oxbow Meadows Golf Course.
He said Colonel Calhoun has formally recommended and requested that the
Columbus South, the Oxbow Meadow Golf Course, be dedicated and renamed the
Howard Pitts Memorial Golf Facility.
Mayor Poydasheff said he is a strong proponent of this request. He said he
knows before it comes to the Council that it needs to go to the Board of Honor
for a recommendation and said he would like to request that.
Councilor Suber then made a motion that the request be referred to the
Board of Honor. Seconded by Councilor Hunter and carried unanimously by those
eight members of Council present for this meeting.
*** ***
***
LETTER TO THE EDITOR:
Councilor Suber said on Saturday there was a letter to the Editor from
Mrs. Lori Watts and said he personally takes exception to the last sentence in
this letter. He said it says that since the Council is knowingly disregarding a
dangerous situation. He said she is referring to the Council?s decision to
delay for 30-days the guardrails on Cherokee Avenue.
He said he just want to clear it up that we are not consciencely and
knowingly disregarding a dangerous situation; we understand her concerns and
most individuals who drive Cherokee Avenue. He said his intent was that we are
trying to save taxpayers money in Muscogee and we are also giving the
opportunity for the State of Georgia and DOT, as well as our local officials
concerning the transportation area to look at this and see if we can do it in a
way where it doesn?t put additional citizens at risk because we inadvertently
put guardrails at the wrong location, which could cause additional problems
versus clearing up that particular area.
*** *** ***
LICENSE PLATES:
Councilor Woodson said she heard in the media this morning that there was
a new law put in place on the license plates if they are covered. She said she
thinks that law has been in existence for sometime now. She said she knows that
our Police Department has been enforcing that law because she knows that
someone who received a ticket for that. She then asked the Mayor to look into
that.
Mayor Poydasheff said there is a new piece of legislation and said what it
is, is that there appears to have been some people had what appeared to be a
transparency on their license plate, but when you look at it some other way,
the lettering was obliterated. He said thanks to Mrs. Cameron, Senator Harp and
our local legislative delegation, the law has been modified and changed so that
you can no longer put any transparency or anything on your license plate; that
it has to be clear. He said this is the cover of the license plate.
*** *** ***
GOLDEN FOUNDRY:
Councilor Davis said he thinks that everyone knows that we went through
some issues as it pertains to non-attainment status of air quality and said he
noticed the letter that was included in the Agenda where it states that Golden
Foundry has applied for air quality permit and then asked someone to address
that to him, as to whether or not this is going to have any affect on the City
at all.
Mayor Poydasheff said it is not. He said someone had asked that we double
check this with our Environmental people and said we did receive a response
back, which states that it will not affect air quality. He pointed out that it
was enclosed in the information section today; and then read that response into
the records.
*** *** ***
SOUTHERN COMPANY:
Councilor Henderson said he would like to thank our local employees from
the Southern Company and Georgia Power in Columbus. He said when Hurricane
Dennis came through the devastation was not as widespread or as bad as it was
with Ivan last year. He said he had a unique prospective and said his wife drew
storm duty and went down there. He said instead of just hearing how these folks
work, she brought back some personal testimony and pictures showing just how
hard these linemen who are working for the Southern Company, who come from all
over Georgia, Florida, & Alabama. He said it shows hard they work in adverse
conditions, with one objective in mind, which was to restore power to those who
desperately needed it.
He said he just wanted to publicly congratulate that organization. He said
they are a great corporate citizen and said we don?t really recognize and
realize what an impact they have throughout this region.
*** *** ***
BOMB THREAT:
Mayor Poydasheff said he just wanted to point out to the Council that on
yesterday, we had a bomb threat at Publix on Schomburg Road and our Public
Safety personnel responded quickly and said he was very pleased with their
actions. He said they have been highly trained to handle these matters and he
just wanted to inform the Council of this matter.
He said it was not a bomb, but some sort of a toolbox.
He said there was another one early this morning at Petsmart, and said
that turned out well also. He said he doesn?t know all the details, but he
knows it wasn?t a bomb as such. He said he just want to commend our Public
Safety personnel for what they do.
*** *** ***
EXECUTIVE SESSION:
Mayor Poydasheff pointed out that there was a request of the City Manager
for the Council to go into an executive session to discuss a personnel matter
after the adjournment of this meeting and then asked what was the pleasure of
the Council in this regard. Mayor Pro Tem Rodgers then made a motion to allow
the Council to go into an executive session. Seconded by Councilor Turner Pugh
and carried unanimously by those eight members of Council present for this
meeting.
*** *** ***
At 11:19 a.m., the Council adjourned its regular session to allow the
Council to go into an executive session.
At 12:10 p.m., the meeting was called back to order at which time Mayor
Pro Tem Rodgers pointed out that the Council met in executive session to
discuss a personnel issue, but there were no votes taken.
*** *** ***
With there being no other business to come before this Council, Councilor
Suber then made a motion for adjournment. Seconded by Councilor Henderson and
carried unanimously by those eight members of Council present for this meeting,
with the time being 12:12 P.M.
Tiny B. Washington, CMC
Clerk of Council
The Council of Columbus, Georgia