Columbus, Georgia

BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS



REGULAR MEETING - 2:00 P.M. ? JUNE 5, 2002





The Regular Meeting of the Board of Zoning Appeals was held Wednesday, June 5,

2002 at 2:00 P.M., on the 1st Floor of the Government Center Annex, 420-10th

Street. Members present were:





Mr. Larry Phillips

Mr. David Fox

Mr. Billy Edwards





Also present were Mr. Danny Cargill, Secretary of the Board, and Ms. Veronica

Pitts, Recording Secretary.





CASES TABLED FROM THE MAY 1st MEETING.



Case No. 02-V59?-Granted.



Kimberly Brown and Joe Jimmerson presented the appeal of Alphabet Train, 1332

Wynnton Road, appealing the decision of the Board of Historic & Architectural

Review that a fence is not allowed in the rear yard. The property is zoned A-O.





In their statements and in response to questions from the Board Members, Ms.

Brown and Mr. Jimmerson gave the following information: They have not changed

the fence.



There was no opposition present to this appeal.



Mr. Fox made a motion, which was seconded by Mr. Edwards, to grant this appeal

with the stipulation that you attach a picket fence to the existing chain link

fence on the Blandford Avenue side. New drawings must be submitted and

approved by BHAR. Motion carried by the affirmative vote of the three Board

Members present for this meeting.









BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS ? 06/05/2002





Case No. 02-V67?-Granted.



Trey Dykes presented the appeal of Billy Bickerstaff, 1902 Wildwood Avenue, for

a variance to reduce the rear yard setback requirement from 30 feet to 5 feet,

in order to subdivide property to develop a second lot with a single family

residence. The property is zoned R-3A. Contingent upon Planning approval.





In his statement and in response to questions from the Board Members, Mr. Dykes

gave the following information: He talked with his neighbors that were in

opposition and they agree with what he is planning to do.



Sally Routenna was in opposition last month along with her mother, but she is

not in opposition with Mr. Dykes if he does what he presented to them on the

plans as long as that is what happens.



There was no opposition present to this appeal.



Mr. Edwards made a motion, which was seconded by Mr. Fox, to grant this appeal

because he reached a compromise with his neighbors. Motion carried by the

affirmative vote of the three Board Members present for this meeting.



Case No. 02-HO90---Granted.



Charlotte Sanks, 758 Omega Drive, presented her application for a

Certificate of Occupancy for a Home Occupation for an office only for promoting

gospel programs (promoter), CVJ Productions. The property is zoned R-1A.



In her statement and in response to questions from the Board Members,

the applicant gave the following information: She will be using an office

only. There will be no employees and no additional traffic. This will be part

time.



There was no opposition to this application.



Mr. Fox made a motion, which was seconded by Mr. Edwards, to grant this

application because it does meet the intent of the Home Occupation definition.

Motion carried by the affirmative vote of the three Board Members present for

this meeting.







2

BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS ? 06/05/2002





Case No. 02-HO95---Granted.



Joby Duncan, 9289 Garrett Creek Drive, presented his application for a

Certificate of Occupancy for a Home Occupation for an office only for a

plumbing company, Duncan?s Plumbing. The property is zoned R-1A.



In his statement and in response to questions from the Board Members,

the applicant gave the following information: He will be using an office

only. There will be no employees and no additional traffic. This will be part

time.



There was no opposition to this application.



Mr. Fox made a motion, which was seconded by Mr. Edwards, to grant this

application because it does meet the intent of the Home Occupation definition,

but with the stipulation that there will be no storage of work material at the

residence. Motion carried by the affirmative vote of the three Board Members

present for this meeting.



Case No. 02-HO97---Granted.



Jimmy Williford, 4773 Wellborn Drive, presented his application for a

Certificate of Occupancy for a Home Occupation for an office only for a lawn

service and pressure washing business, JW Green Thumb Lawn & Garden and

Pressure Washing. The property is zoned R-2.



In his statement and in response to questions from the Board Members,

the applicant gave the following information: He will be using an office

only. There will be no employees and no additional traffic. This will be part

time.



There was no opposition to this application.



Mr. Fox made a motion, which was seconded by Mr. Edwards, to grant this

application because it does meet the intent of the Home Occupation definition,

but with the stipulation that there will be no storage of work material at the

residence. Motion carried by the affirmative vote of the three Board Members

present for this meeting.









3

BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS ? 06/05/2002





Case No. 02-HO101---Granted.



Stephen Michael Peoples, 5721 Wiltshire Drive, presented his

application for a Certificate of Occupancy for a Home Occupation for an office

only for a pressure washing business, Peoples Pressure Washing. The property

is zoned R-2.



In his statement and in response to questions from the Board Members,

the applicant gave the following information: He will be using an office

only. There will be no employees and no additional traffic. This will be part

time.



There was no opposition to this application.



Mr. Fox made a motion, which was seconded by Mr. Edwards, to grant this

application because it does meet the intent of the Home Occupation definition.

Motion carried by the affirmative vote of the three Board Members present for

this meeting.



END OF CASES TABLED FROM THE MAY 1st MEETING.



VARIANCES.



Case No. 02-V70?-Granted.



Joe Bishop presented the appeal of George C. Woodruff, 2801 Double Churches

Road, for a variance to reduce the required number of off-street parking spaces

from 77 to 64, in order to erect, Eckerd Drug Store. The property is zoned C-2.





In his statement and in response to questions from the Board Members, Mr.

Bishop gave the following information: They are proposing to develop a 13,824

square foot Eckerd Drug Store on this site. Eckerd?s is willing to live with

the number of parking spaces that they have. Also, they have the drive thru

lane which will accommodate a number of customers. They will have ample space

for landscaping.



There was no opposition present to this appeal.



Mr. Fox made a motion, which was seconded by Mr. Edwards, to grant this appeal

to erect an Eckerd Drug Store. Motion carried by the affirmative vote of the

three Board Members present for this meeting.





4

BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS ? 06/05/2002





Case No. 02-V71?-Granted.



Joe Bishop presented the appeal of George C. Woodruff, 6950 Beaver Run Road,

for a variance to reduce the required number of off-street parking spaces from

77 to 66, in order to erect, Eckerd Drug Store. The property is zoned C-3.



In his statement and in response to questions from the Board Members, Mr.

Bishop gave the following information: They are proposing to develop a 13,824

square foot Eckerd Drug Store on this site. Eckerd?s is willing to live with

the number of parking spaces that they have. Also, they have the drive thru

lane which will accommodate a number of customers. They will have ample space

for landscaping.



There was no opposition present to this appeal.



Mr. Fox made a motion, which was seconded by Mr. Edwards, to grant this appeal

to erect an Eckerd Drug Store. Motion carried by the affirmative vote of the

three Board Members present for this meeting.



Case No. 02-V72?-Tabled.



Bruce and Angela Chapman, 3325 Edgewood Road, presented the appeal from a

Decision of the Building Official that an accessory structure, a storage

building, 8? x 16?, is not permitted in the front yard. The property is zoned

R-1A.



In their statements and in response to questions from the Board Members, Mr. &

Mrs. Chapman gave the following information: The storage building is already in

place. The back of the house is not accessible for a truck that will allow the

storage building to go in the back yard. There is also a sprinkler system in

the back yard. There is a privacy fence around the back yard. Even if they

could get the building in the back, the back yard would not accommodate the

building. There are other storage buildings in the front yard in the

neighborhood.



When the Chairman asked for opposition, Fred Belvin came forward. He stated

the storage building should not be in the front yard and it is an eyesore.









5

BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS ? 06/05/2002





Mr. Fox made a motion, which was seconded by Mr. Edwards, to table this appeal

so that the Board Members can go and look at the location of the storage

building. Motion carried by the affirmative vote of the three Board Members

present for this meeting.



Case No. 02-V73?-Granted.



Dave Erickson presented the appeal of Sage Development Inc., 6035 Warm Springs

Road Lot #33, for a variance to reduce the lot width requirement from 60 feet

to 25 feet, in order to erect a single family residence. The property is zoned

R-2. Contingent upon Planning approval.



In his statement and in response to questions from the Board Members, Mr.

Erickson gave the following information: This is an out parcel from an

established sub-division. They have a parcel in one corner of the property

that is approximately 4 to 5 acres that is not easily accessed because of a

large stream bed. They have the option of bringing in a driveway cut from Warm

Springs Road. He feels this will be a public safety hazard. The better option

is to come in off the end of a cul-de-sac. This will be better access. There

will be two over sized lots that are accessed from a common driveway at the end

of the court.

There was no opposition present to this appeal.



Mr. Edwards made a motion, which was seconded by Mr. Fox, to grant this appeal

so that they can enter from the cul-de-sac rather than Warm Springs Road.

Motion carried by the affirmative vote of the three Board Members present for

this meeting. Contingent upon Planning approval.



Case No. 02-V74?-Granted.



Dave Erickson presented the appeal of Sage Development, Inc., 6035 Warm Springs

Road Lot #34, for a variance to reduce the lot width requirement from 60 feet

to 25 feet, in order to erect a single family residence. The property is zoned

R-2. Contingent upon Planning approval.













6

BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS ? 06/05/2002





In his statement and in response to questions from the Board Members, Mr.

Erickson gave the following information: This is an out parcel from an

established sub-division. They have a parcel in one corner of the property

that is approximately 4 to 5 acres that is not easily accessed because of a

large stream bed. They have the option of bringing in a driveway cut from Warm

Springs Road. He feels this will be a public safety hazard. The better option

is to come in off the end of a cul-de-sac. This will be better access. There

will be two over sized lots that are accessed from a common driveway at the end

of the court.



There was no opposition present to this appeal.



Mr. Edwards made a motion, which was seconded by Mr. Fox, to grant this appeal

so that they can enter from the cul-de-sac rather than Warm Springs Road.

Motion carried by the affirmative vote of the three Board Members present for

this meeting. Contingent upon Planning approval.



Case No. 02-V75?-Granted.



Billy Strickland, 2723 West Britt David Road and Bobby Battle presented the

appeal for a variance to reduce the side yard setback requirement from 15 feet

to 4 feet, in order to make an addition, a bathroom, closet & extend the great

room, 9?5? x 24?, to a single family residence. The property is zoned C-2.



In their statements and in response to questions from the Board Members, Mr.

Strickland and Mr. Battle gave the following information: Mr. Strickland would

like to add a bathroom and increase the living space. The addition will be

lined up with the existing house.



There was no opposition present to this appeal.



Mr. Fox made a motion, which was seconded by Mr. Edwards, to grant this appeal

because the house already encroaches on the 4 feet. This will be a

continuation of the same side line of the house. Motion carried by the

affirmative vote of the three Board Members present for this meeting.













7

BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS ? 06/05/2002





Case No. 02-V76?-Granted.



Robert Teasley presented the appeal of Edgewood UMC, 2371 Elm Drive, for a

variance to increase the size of an I.D. sign from 15 square feet to 32 square

feet. The property is zoned R-1A.



In his statement and in response to questions from the Board Members, Mr.

Teasley gave the following information: This will be an unlighted sign. They

own the parcel and they want people to be aware that the property belongs to

the church.



There was no opposition present to this appeal.



Mr. Edwards made a motion, which was seconded by Mr. Fox, to grant this appeal

because the size of the sign is appropriate for the lot. They want to identify

that the property belongs to the church. Motion carried by the affirmative

vote of the three Board Members present for this meeting.



Case No. 02-V77?-Granted.



Greg Way, 1218 33rd Street and Ben Moon presented the appeal for a variance to

reduce the rear yard setback requirement from 30 feet to 10.63 feet and to

reduce the required number of off-street parking spaces from 8 to 1, in order

to replat a lot. The property is zoned R-4. Contingent upon Planning

approval.



In their statements and in response to questions from the Board Members, Mr.

Way and Mr. Moon gave the following information: He is the purchaser of this

lot. All of the buildings and all of the parking is in place. There are two

lots. They would like to divide the lots and put a building on a separate

lot. There are 33 parking spaces in the whole complex. There will be cross

easements.



There was no opposition present to this appeal.



Mr. Fox made a motion, which was seconded by Mr. Edwards, to grant this appeal

in order to replat a lot of an existing apartment complex. There will be a

permanent easement recorded. Motion carried by the affirmative vote of the

three Board Members present for this meeting. Contingent upon Planning

approval.







8

BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS ? 06/05/2002





Case No. 02-V78?-Granted.



Greg Way, 1219 32nd Street and Ben Moon presented the appeal for a variance to

reduce the rear yard setback requirement from 30 feet to 11.72 feet and to

reduce the required number of off-street parking spaces from 8 to 1, in order

to replat a lot. The property is zoned R-4. Contingent upon Planning

approval.



In their statements and in response to questions from the Board Members, Mr.

Way and Mr. Moon gave the following information: He is the purchaser of this

lot. All of the buildings and all of the parking is in place. There are two

lots. They would like to divide the lots and put a building on a separate

lot. There are 33 parking spaces in the whole complex. There will be cross

easements.



There was no opposition present to this appeal.



Mr. Fox made a motion, which was seconded by Mr. Edwards, to grant this appeal

in order to replat a lot of an existing apartment complex. There will be a

permanent easement recorded. Motion carried by the affirmative vote of the

three Board Members present for this meeting. Contingent upon Planning

approval.



Case No. 02-V79?-Granted.



Greg Way, 3201 13th Avenue and Ben Moon presented the appeal for a variance to

reduce the side yard setback requirement from 10 feet to 7.77 feet, in order to

replat a lot. The property is zoned R-4. Contingent upon Planning approval.



In their statements and in response to questions from the Board Members, Mr.

Way and Mr. Moon gave the following information: He is the purchaser of this

lot. All of the buildings and all of the parking is in place. There are two

lots. They would like to divide the lots and put a building on a separate

lot. There are 33 parking spaces in the whole complex. There will be cross

easements.



There was no opposition present to this appeal.













9

BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS ? 06/05/2002





Mr. Fox made a motion, which was seconded by Mr. Edwards, to grant this appeal

in order to replat a lot of an existing apartment complex. There will be a

permanent easement recorded. Motion carried by the affirmative vote of the

three Board Members present for this meeting. Contingent upon Planning

approval.



Case No. 02-V80?-Granted.



Paul Tefft, 1207 19th Street, presented the appeal for a variance to reduce the

side yard setback requirement from 15 feet to 7 feet 6 inches, in order to

erect a storage building, 40? x 60?. The property is zoned C-3.



In his statement and in response to questions from the Board Members, Mr. Tefft

gave the following information: He would like to build a storage building. He

has poured the slab, but has not erected the building.



There was no opposition present to this appeal.



Mr. Edwards made a motion, which was seconded by Mr. Fox, to grant this appeal

because the slab was poured too close to the property line. Motion carried by

the affirmative vote of the three Board Members present for this meeting.



Case No. 02-V81?-Granted.



Doris Gates presented the appeal of Carmelo & Deborah Gaudinot, 1842 Somerset

Avenue, for a variance to reduce the rear yard setback requirement from 30 feet

to 12 feet, in order to make an addition, 17? x 18?, a sunroom, to a single

family residence. The property is zoned R-2.



In her statement and in response to questions from the Board Members, Ms. Gates

gave the following information: The Gaudinot?s would like to enclose a patio

to make a sunroom. The back yard is fenced in.



There was no opposition present to this appeal.















10

BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS ? 06/05/2002





Mr. Fox made a motion, which was seconded by Mr. Edwards, to grant this appeal

because they are erecting a sunroom that is over an existing patio area.

Motion carried by the affirmative vote of the three Board Members present for

this meeting.



Case No. 02-V82?-Granted.



James & Rhonda Harden, 1939 Wellborn Drive, presented the appeal for a variance

to reduce the side yard setback requirement from 8 feet to 3 feet, in order to

make an addition, 12? x 23?, a carport, to a single family residence. The

property is zoned R-2.



In their statements and in response to questions from the Board Members, Mr. &

Mrs. Harden gave the following information: They enclosed an existing carport

to make a living room. They would like to add a carport to their home. There

is plenty of room in the back, but the front is kind of tight. They will have

access to the back yard. It will have a gable roof. The water will flow to

the back and the side.



There was no opposition present to this appeal.



Mr. Fox made a motion, which was seconded by Mr. Edwards, to grant this appeal

because previously he enclosed a carport and is adding a new one. Motion

carried by the affirmative vote of the three Board Members present for this

meeting.



Case No. 02-V83?-Tabled.



Holley Talley, 5429 Wayne Drive and Ray Phillips presented the appeal for a

variance to reduce the side yard setback requirement from 8 feet to 2 feet, in

order to make an addition, a carport, 18? x 24?, to a single family residence.

The property is zoned R-2.





















11



BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS ? 06/05/2002





In their statements and in response to questions from the Board Members, Mr.

Talley and Mr. Phillips gave the following information: Mr. Talley had a

house, but it burned down. On the original plans they moved the house 3 feet

to the right in order to put up an awning. Mr. Talley thought when the permit

was bought to erect his new house, the permit for the carport was included.

When they found out they did not have a permit they stopped working on the

house and filed for a variance. There are similar carports in the area. The

water will go toward the street.



When the Chairman asked for opposition Douglas Jackson came forward, he was

representing his mother Bonnie Jackson. He stated the water from Mr. Talley?s

property is flowing on his mother?s property.



Mr. Fox made a motion, which was seconded by Mr. Edwards, to table this appeal

until the July meeting so that Mr. Tally and Mrs. Jackson can try to work this

situation out. Motion carried by the affirmative vote of the three Board

Members present for this meeting.



Case No. 02-V84?-Granted.



Ken Knuckles presented the appeal of Tricon Global Restaurants (KFC), 3340

Buena Vista Road, for a variance to reduce the required number of off-street

parking spaces from 38 to 29. The property is zoned C-3.



In his statement and in response to questions from the Board Members, Mr.

Knuckles gave the following information: KFC is hoping to open several new

restaurants in Columbus this year. This site is a small lot (approximately .6

acre lot). They have existing concrete, power poles and over head lines and

easements that they have to deal with. The building will be 2850 square feet.

It will have 60 seats and a drive thru.



There was no opposition present to this appeal.

















12

BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS ? 06/05/2002





Mr. Fox made a motion, which was seconded by Mr. Edwards, to grant this appeal

because this is a high traffic area. Most of the restaurants will have a lot

of drive thru traffic. Motion carried by the affirmative vote of the three

Board Members present for this meeting.



Case No. 02-V85?-Granted.



Ken Knuckles presented the appeal of Tricon Global Restaurants (KFC), 1934

Columbus-Manchester Expressway, for a variance to reduce the required number of

off-street parking spaces from 38 to 34. The property is zoned C-2.



In his statement and in response to questions from the Board Members, Mr.

Knuckles gave the following information: KFC is hoping to open several new

restaurants in Columbus this year. This site is comprised of two smaller lots

that total about an acre. The two lots are different in elevation about 14

feet. They have an unusual configuration. The building will be 2850 square

feet. It will have 60 seats and a drive thru.



There was no opposition present to this appeal.



Mr. Fox made a motion, which was seconded by Mr. Edwards, to grant this appeal

because this is a high traffic area. Most of the restaurants will have a lot

of drive thru traffic. Motion carried by the affirmative vote of the three

Board Members present for this meeting.



Case No. 02-V86?-Granted.



Warren Kennon and Joe Alexander presented the appeal of Mike Mason, 727 Double

Churches Road, for a variance to reduce the rear yard setback requirement from

40 feet to 12 feet, in order to make an addition, 18? x 28?, a den & a screened

porch, to a single family residence. The property is zoned R-1.



















13



BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS ? 06/05/2002





In their statements and in response to questions from the Board Members, Mr.

Kennon and Mr. Alexander gave the following information: The Mason?s would

like to add a den and a screened porch to their home. This will increase the

property value and add to the community. The addition can not be in the back

yard because of the sewer easement. The same materials will be used to match

the house.



There was no opposition present to this appeal.



Mr. Fox made a motion, which was seconded by Mr. Edwards, to grant this appeal

because this will be a nice addition. The same materials will be used to match

the house. Motion carried by the affirmative vote of the three Board Members

present for this meeting.



Case No. 02-V87?-Granted.



Bruce Walker presented the appeal of Easter Seals, 2515 Double Churches Road,

for a variance to increase the number of ground signs from 1 (which is allowed)

to 2 (as requested). The property is zoned A-O.



In his statement and in response to questions from the Board Members, Mr.

Walker gave the following information: They are requesting a 2nd sign. They

have no I.D. on their building. They are located 420 feet from the road. They

have very narrow frontage. The sign is not visible from the road because of

the size and the distance from the road. They share a driveway with the church

next door. They want to identify themselves as Easter Seals.



There was no opposition present to this appeal.



Mr. Edwards made a motion, which was seconded by Mr. Fox, to grant this appeal

because they want to identify their business. Motion carried by the

affirmative vote of the three Board Members present for this meeting.















14



BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS ? 06/05/2002





Case No. 02-V88?-Tabled.



Harold Kendrick, 6332 Parker Drive, presented the appeal for a variance to

increase the maximum height requirement from 14 feet to 15 feet, on a

building. The property is zoned R-1A.



In his statement and in response to questions from the Board Members, Mr.

Kendrick gave the following information: This is an existing building that was

put up by Home Depot. The building is over the height requirement 1 foot. The

drawings showed the building was more than 15 feet.



There was a letter of opposition from concerned neighbors that did not give

their names. The concerns were the appearance of the structure, the height and

the structure being fastened down on a permanent foundation.



Mr. Fox made a motion, which was seconded by Mr. Edwards, to table this appeal

because they need the accurate measurements of the building. Motion carried by

the affirmative vote of the three Board Members present for this meeting.



Case No. 02-V89?-Granted.



Lesley Steen, 7449 Fortson Road and James Wald presented the appeal for a

variance to reduce the corner side yard setback requirement from 30 feet to 3

feet, in order to make an addition, 24? x 28?, a carport, to a single family

residence. The property is zoned R-1.



In their statements and in response to questions from the Board Members, Mr.

Steen and Mr. Wald gave the following information: Mr. Steen would like to add

a carport to his home. The carport will be over an existing slab. The water

will go to the city drain.



There was no opposition present to this appeal.



Mr. Fox made a motion, which was seconded by Mr. Edwards, to grant this appeal

because this addition will be over an existing slab. Motion carried by the

affirmative vote of the three Board Members present for this meeting.









15

BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS ? 06/05/2002





Case No. 02-V90?-Granted.



William Griffin, 7209 Affirm Lane, presented the appeal for a variance to

reduce the side yard setback requirement from 8 feet to 9 inches, in order to

make an addition, a carport, 18? x 30?, to a single family residence. The

property is zoned R-2.



In his statement and in response to questions from the Board Members, Mr.

Griffin gave the following information: He would like to build a two car

carport. It will be over an existing slab. It will have a gable roof. The

same materials will be used to match the house. There is 9 inches from the

edge of the slab to the property line. The roof is hanging over slightly pass

the slab, but will not go to the property line.



There was no opposition present to this appeal.



Mr. Edwards made a motion, which was seconded by Mr. Fox, to grant this appeal

with the stipulation that the overhang can be no closer than 9 inches to the

property line. Motion carried by the affirmative vote of the three Board

Members present for this meeting.



Case No. 02-V91?-Denied.



John C. Chappelle, 756 Rudgate Road presented the appeal for a variance to

increase the maximum height requirement from 14 feet to 19 feet, to an

accessory structure. The property is zoned R-1A.



In his statement and in response to questions from the Board Members, Mr.

Chappelle gave the following information: He would like to build a 2 car

garage with a gambrel roof that will allow him to have a storage area in the

upper portion. The lower portion will be used for a wood working

shop.



When the Chairman asked for opposition, Floyd Mitchell and Chris Spence came

forward. They stated the accessory structure was too tall to fit into the

neighborhood scheme.















16

BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS ? 06/05/2002





Mr. Fox made a motion, which was seconded by Mr. Edwards, to deny this appeal

because a hardship was not shown. There was opposition to this appeal. There

are other options. Motion carried by the affirmative vote of the three Board

Members present for this meeting.



Case No. 02-V92?-Granted.



Gail Aderhold, Action Buildings, presented the appeal of Homer Harrison, 2721

Marion Street, from a Decision of the Building Official that an accessory

structure, a storage building, 10? x 20?, is not permitted in the side yard

(reduce the rear yard setback from 5 feet to 2 feet). The property is zoned

R-2.



In her statement and in response to questions from the Board Members, Ms.

Aderhold gave the following information: Mr. Harrison would like to build a

storage building. He does not have a rear yard. He has an existing storage

building. They have grandchildren and he will store their toys in the storage

building. There are similar structures in the neighborhood.



There was no opposition present to this appeal.



Mr. Fox made a motion, which was seconded by Mr. Edwards, to grant this appeal

because this lot does not have usable space. Motion carried by the affirmative

vote of the three Board Members present for this meeting.



Case No. 02-V93?-Granted.



Gail Aderhold, Action Buildings presented the appeal of Ralph Jackson, 6409

Villastone Drive, for a variance to reduce the side yard setback requirement

from 8 feet to 1 foot, in order to make an addition, a carport, 12? 6? x 33?,

to a single family residence. The property is zoned R-2.



In her statement and in response to questions from the Board Members, Ms.

Aderhold gave the following information: Mr. Jackson would like to add a

carport to his home. There is an existing slab. There are similar carports in

the area.











17

BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS ? 06/05/2002







There was no opposition present to this appeal.



Mr. Fox made a motion, which was seconded by Mr. Edwards, to grant this appeal

because there is an existing slab. This will be a nice addition. Motion

carried by the affirmative vote of the three Board Members present for this

meeting.



Case No. 02-V94?-Granted.



Gail Aderhold, Action Buildings, presented the appeal of William Putman, 1700

Stark Avenue, from a Decision of the Building Official that an accessory

structure, a detached carport, 20? x 21? 4?, is not permitted in the corner

side yard. The property is zoned R-1A.



In her statement and in response to questions from the Board Members, Ms.

Aderhold gave the following information: Mr. Putman would like to put a

carport in the corner side yard. He bought a garage and a carport at the same

time. The carport is too close to the property line. There was confusion

about where the property line was.



There was no opposition present to this appeal.



Mr. Edwards made a motion, which was seconded by Mr. Fox, to grant this appeal

because this would be the place to put the carport. Motion carried by the

affirmative vote of the three Board Members present for this meeting.



Case No. 02-V95?-Granted.



W. Bailey Gross, 1311 18th Avenue, presented the appeal for a variance to

reduce the side yard setback requirement from 10 feet to 8 feet and to reduce

the rear yard setback requirement from 30 feet to 18 feet, in order to replat a

lot. The property is zoned R-4 (H). Contingent upon Planning approval.

















18



BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS ? 06/05/2002





In his statement and in response to questions from the Board Members, Mr. Gross

gave the following information: The lot already has a duplex on it. He would

like to develop it as a multi-family lot. In order to do that he would have to

either add on to the duplex or cut the duplex off and do a multi-family

structure. There is a vacant lot beside it. He would like to divide the lot.

He would like to make it an independent lot and develop it.



When the Chairman asked for opposition, Mr. Kromer came forward. He stated,

Mr. Gross has a duplex across from Lake Bottom Park and this would change the

character quite a bit. He would have to cut down about 10 or 12 trees. This

will de-value his home.



Mr. Fox made a motion, which was seconded by Mr. Edwards, to grant this appeal

because it is zoned for apartments. His intention is to try to save as many

trees as possible by redirecting parking and placement of the apartments.

Motion carried by the affirmative vote of the three Board Members present for

this meeting. Contingent upon Planning approval.



Case No. 02-V96?-Granted.



Eddie Miles presented the appeal of Kelvin Hill, 3886 Woodland Drive, for a

variance to reduce the side yard setback requirement from 8 feet to 2 feet 7

inches, in order to make an addition, 20? x 25? 1?, a garage, to a single

family residence. The property is zoned R-1A.



In his statement and in response to questions from the Board Members, Mr. Miles

gave the following information: Mr. Hill would like to add a 2 car garage to

his home. There is an existing slab. The same materials will be used to match

the house. The water will flow to the front and the back.

There was no opposition present to this appeal.



Mr. Fox made a motion, which was seconded by Mr. Edwards, to grant this appeal

because the garage will go over an existing slab. The same materials will be

used to match the house. Motion carried by the affirmative vote of the three

Board Members present for this meeting.







19

BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS ? 06/05/2002





Case No. 02-V97--Granted.



Joseph Morales presented the appeal of Aecha Gossett, 151 Bob-O-Link

Drive, for a variance to reduce the side yard setback requirement from 8 feet

to 7 feet, in order to make an addition, 16? x 20?, a sunroom, to a single

family residence. The property is zoned R-1A.



In his statement and in response to questions from the Board Members, Mr.

Morales gave the following information: He asked to change the side yard from

8 feet to 6 feet (request was granted). Mr. Gossett would like to have more

living space. They would like to add a sunroom to their home. They don?t have

any other place to put this type structure. The back yard is concrete and it

has a swimming pool.



There was no opposition present to this appeal.



Mr. Edwards made a motion, which was seconded by Mr. Fox, to grant this appeal

because the side yard is the only place to put the addition. Motion carried by

the affirmative vote of the three Board Members present for this meeting.



Case No. 02-V98--Denied.



There was no one present to present the appeal of A.H. Dudley III, 304 S.

Lumpkin Road, for a variance to reduce the requirement for a 6 inch aggregate

base to existing base. The property is zoned M-1.



When the Chairman asked for opposition Rebecca Wiggins, Housing Code

Coordinator for Inspections and Code Enforcement Division came forward. She

stated, In August of 1999 Council Enacted a new mobile home park ordinance.

All parks were to be in compliance with this ordinance by October 2000. I met

with Mr. Dudley in January 2000 to go over deficiencies that he had there at

Orchard Grove Mobile Home Park on South Lumpkin Road. He did not come into

compliance. He was cited to court in April 3, 2002. I will remind you that he

was to be in compliance by October 2000. I have worked with him all of this

time. We gave













20

BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS ? 06/05/2002





him a moratorium because he was in brief negotiations with the city to buy that

park. He told me that he would have the park in compliance by January 2002, he

did not. He was cited to court on April 3, 2002. He was fined for one of his

violations and on the other one, which was the road problem he was given a

continuance by the judge until May 6. At that time, he had done a small

portion of the road to bring it into compliance and he indicated to the court

at that time that he would do the rest of the road like that. He was found in

non-compliance by the court and fined for his failure to be in compliance. He

should be required to do what the ordinance requires and that he should not be

given any sort of leniency at all. All other parks have either come into

compliance, been to court or they have closed down. He will argue that his

road surface is adequate. It does not meet the ordinance. He has met with

Richard Smith, the Councilor. Who told him that it did not meet code. He has

met with Richard Bishop, assistant city manager and Bill Duck and myself at the

same time and all of us told him that it did not meet the ordinance. The court

has ruled that it does not meet the ordinance. I?m asking you to deny it.



Mr. Fox made a motion, which was seconded by Mr. Edwards, to deny this appeal

because there was opposition to the appeal from the Inspections & Code

Enforcement Division that the appellant has been under notice since August

1999, to bring the Mobile Home Park into compliance; he has been cited into

court; and, he still has not brought the property into compliance. Also, it

was noted that the appellant did not appear for the hearing.



Case No. 02-V99?-Denied.



Robert Teasley, Signs, Inc., presented the appeal of Tire King, 5403

Veterans Parkway, for a variance to increase the maximum height requirement

from 35 feet to 58 feet, in order to erect a ground sign. The property is

zoned C-3.



In his statement and in response to questions from the Board Members,

Mr. Teasley gave the following information which he illustrated by

photographs: A sign of the required height of 35 feet could not be seen

because of trees, wires, and the awning over the gas pumps. They tried to use

the 45-foot pole which was formerly used by the Shell Oil Company at this

location, but 45 feet was not enough height for the sign to be seen. Tire King

is







21

BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS ? 06/05/2002





the dealer for Michelin, B.F. Goodrich, and Uniroyal tires. All three should

have signs, but because of the highway frontage at this location, they can only

have two signs. They used a bucket truck to raise the sign to the 58-foot

height before it could be easily seen.



There was no opposition presented to this appeal.



Mr. Fox made a motion, which was seconded by Mr. Edwards, to deny this

appeal because the appellant did not show that enough hardship was created so

that there was a need to have the height of 58 feet. Also, they do have the

right to have a second sign on this property. Motion carried by the

affirmative vote of the three Board Members present for this meeting.



Case No. 02-V100--Granted.



Green Lewis, 248 Northstar Drive, presented the appeal from a Decision

of the Building Official that a sign is not allowed in an R-4 zone. The

property is zoned R-4.



In his statement and in response to questions from the Board Members, Mr. Lewis

gave the following information: He has two buildings. He was erecting a brick

sign that he thought was within the regulations. The building is zoned

residential, he can not have a sign in an R-4 zone.



There was no opposition present to this appeal.



Mr. Fox made a motion, which was seconded by Mr. Edwards, to grant this appeal

because this is a special exception use. Motion carried by the affirmative

vote of the three Board Members present for this meeting.



Case No. 02-V101--Withdrawn.



This appeal was withdrawn at the request of the applicant AFLAC, 1932

Wynnton Road, from a Decision of the Building Official that only 2 signs are

allowed, 6 signs are shown. The property is zoned A-O.















22

BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS ? 06/05/2002





There was no opposition present to this appeal.



Case No. 02-V102?-Granted.



Kathy Douthit, 708 3rd Avenue, presented the appeal for a variance to reduce

both side yard setback requirements from 5 feet to 2 feet, in order to install

an accessory structure, 10? x 20?. The property is zoned H. Contingent upon

BHAR approval.





In her statement and in response to questions from the Board Members, Ms.

Douthit gave the following information: This is a pre-existing building that

she obtained. She is moving a house to this lot. She is almost certain that

the house will pass BHAR?s approval, but wanted to know if the variance would

be approved.



There was no opposition present to this appeal.



Mr. Fox made a motion, which was seconded by Mr. Edwards, to grant this appeal

because this is an odd shaped lot. Motion carried by the affirmative vote of

the three Board Members present for this meeting. Contingent upon BHAR

approval.



HOME OCCUPATIONS.



CaseNo. 02-HO112?-Granted.



William Johnson, 1365 Kings Mountain Road, presented his application for a

Certificate of Occupancy for a Home Occupation for an office only for a lawn

care service, Bill?s Lawn Service. The property is zoned R-1A.



In his statement and in response to questions from the Board Members, the

applicant gave the following information: He will be using an office only.

There will be no employees and no additional traffic. This will be part time.



There was no opposition to this application.

















23

BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS ? 06/05/2002





Mr. Fox made a motion, which was seconded by Mr. Edwards, to grant this

application because it does meet the intent of the Home Occupation definition,

but with the stipulation that there will be no storage of work material at the

residence. Motion carried by the affirmative vote of the three Board Members

present for this meeting.



Case No. 02-HO113--Granted.



Felecia Mathews, 5823 Wiltshire Drive, presented her application for a

Certificate of Occupancy for a Home Occupation for an office only for a

consulting service, Nutrition Consulting Service. The property is zoned R-2.



In her statement and in response to questions from the Board Members, the

applicant gave the following information: She will be using an office only.

There will be no employees and no additional traffic. This will be part time.



There was no opposition to this application.





Mr. Fox made a motion, which was seconded by Mr. Edwards to grant this

application because it does meet the intent of the Home Occupation definition.

Motion carried by the affirmative vote of the three Board Members present for

this meeting.





Case No. 02-HO114?-Granted.



Eric T. Kelto, 7331 Hedgestone Drive, presented his application for a

Certificate of Occupancy for a Home Occupation for an office only for a

mortgage brokering business, Kelto Mortgage, Inc. The property is zoned A-1.



In his statement and in response to questions from the Board Members, the

applicant gave the following information: He will be using an office only.

There will be no employees and no additional traffic. This will be part time.



There was no opposition to this application.















24

BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS ? 06/05/2002





Mr. Fox made a motion, which was seconded by Mr. Edwards, to grant this

application because it does meet the intent of the Home Occupation definition.

Motion carried by the affirmative vote of the three Board Members present for

this meeting.



Case No. 02-HO115?-Granted.



Selus Brown, Jr., 7421 Cedar Creek Loop, presented his application for a

Certificate of Occupancy for a Home Occupation for an office only for selling

household items, jewelry, clothes, toys, office supplies, tools, sodas, bottled

water & snacks (items will be sold away from the home), Set Enterprise. The

property is zoned R-1A.



In his statement and in response to questions from the Board Members, the

applicant gave the following information: He will be using an office only.

There will be no employees and no additional traffic. This will be part time.



There was no opposition to this application.





Mr. Fox made a motion, which was seconded by Mr. Edwards, to grant this

application because it does meet the intent of the Home Occupation definition.

Motion carried by the affirmative vote of the three Board Members present for

this meeting.



Case No. 02-HO116?-Granted.



Lester Booth, 609 Zeron Drive, presented his application for a Certificate of

Occupancy for a Home Occupation for an office only for photography, multimedia

and business consulting. The property is zoned R-1A.



In his statement and in response to questions from the Board Members, the

applicant gave the following information: He will be using an office only.

There will be no employees and no additional traffic. This will be full time.



There was no opposition to this application.















25

BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS ? 06/05/2002





Mr. Fox made a motion, which was seconded by Mr. Edwards, to grant this

application because it does meet the intent of the Home Occupation definition.

Motion carried by the affirmative vote of the three Board Members present for

this meeting.



Case No. 02-HO117?-Granted.



Bina Dale, 6537 Tidewater Court, presented her application for a Certificate of

Occupancy for a Home Occupation for an office only for a lawn care service,

Lawn Service For You. The property is zoned R-2.



In her statement and in response to questions from the Board Members, the

applicant gave the following information: She will be using an office only.

There will be no employees and no additional traffic. This will be part time.



There was no opposition to this application.



Mr. Fox made a motion, which was seconded by Mr. Edwards, to grant this

application because it does meet the intent of the Home Occupation definition,

but with the stipulation that there will be no storage of work material at the

residence. Motion carried by the affirmative vote of the three Board Members

present for this meeting.



Case No. 02-HO118?-Granted.



Michael Allen, 6811 Beaver Trail, presented his application for a Certificate

of Occupancy for a Home Occupation for an office only for video production,

Allen Videography. The property is zoned R-2.





In his statement and in response to questions from the Board Members, the

applicant gave the following information: He will be using an office only.

There will be no employees and no additional traffic. This will be part time.



When the Chairman asked for opposition, Susan McBride came forward. She

stated, that she does not want additional traffic.













26

BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS ? 06/05/2002





Mr. Fox made a motion, which was seconded by Mr. Edwards, to grant this

application because it does meet the intent of the Home Occupation definition.

Motion carried by the affirmative vote of the three Board Members present for

this meeting.



Case No. 02-HO119?-Granted.



Gregory & Cherlyn Haynes, 7532 Nature Trail, presented their application for a

Certificate of Occupancy for a Home Occupation for an office only for a health

insurance company, GNC Marketing. The property is zoned R-1.



In their statements and in response to questions from the Board Members, the

applicants gave the following information: They will be using an office only.

There will be no employees and no additional traffic. This will be part time.



When the Chairman asked for opposition, Richard Smith and Mr. & Mrs. Prophet

came forward. They stated that there are cars in the yard and there home

doesn?t look appropriate now, how can they have a business.



Mr. Cargill made a motion, which was seconded by Mr. Fox, to grant this

application because it does meet the intent of the Home Occupation definition.

Motion carried by the affirmative vote of the three Board Members present for

this meeting.



Case No. 02-HO120?-Granted.



Mark Davis Sr., 7513 Rock Springs Drive, presented his application for a

Certificate of Occupancy for a Home Occupation for an office only for

remodeling & general contracting (sub-contractor). The property is zoned R-1A.



In his statement and in response to questions from the Board Members, the

applicant gave the following information: He will be using an office only.

There will be no employees and no additional traffic. This will be full time.



There was no opposition to this application.













27

BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS ? 06/05/2002





Mr. Fox made a motion, which was seconded by Mr. Edwards, to grant this

application because it does meet the intent of the Home Occupation definition,

but with the stipulation that there will be no storage of work material at the

residence. Motion carried by the affirmative vote of the three Board Members

present for this meeting.



Case No. 02-HO121?-Granted.



Rosalind Weathers, 2700 Double Churches Road Apt. 581, presented her

application for a Certificate of Occupancy for a Home Occupation for an office

only for selling electronics, clothing, toys, houseware, automotive supplies,

tools, jewelry, luggage, bags, optics, appliances & office supplies (internet

sales). The property is zoned A-O.



In her statement and in response to questions from the Board Members, the

applicant gave the following information: She will be using an office only.

There will be no employees and no additional traffic. This will be part time.



There was no opposition to this application.



Mr. Fox made a motion, which was seconded by Mr. Edwards, to grant this

application because it does meet the intent of the Home Occupation definition.

Motion carried by the affirmative vote of the three Board Members present for

this meeting.



Case No. 02-HO122?-Granted.



Brenda Tyson, 7140 Daisy Street, presented her application for a Certificate of

Occupancy for a Home Occupation for an office only for a sitting service,

Professional Sitter/Companion Services (PSCS). The property is zoned R-1A.



In her statement and in response to questions from the Board Members, the

applicant gave the following information: She will be using an office only.

There will be no employees and no additional traffic. This will be part time.















28

BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS ? 06/05/2002





There was no opposition to this application.



Mr. Fox made a motion, which was seconded by Mr. Edwards, to grant this

application because it does meet the intent of the Home Occupation definition.

Motion carried by the affirmative vote of the three Board Members present for

this meeting.



Case No. 02-HO123--Granted.



Torrey Thomas, 1567 Amber Drive, presented his application for a Certificate of

Occupancy for a Home Occupation for an office only for home repairs, painting &

lawn service, Torrey?s Handymen. The property is zoned R-1A.





In his statement and in response to questions from the Board Members, the

applicant gave the following information: He will be using an office only.

There will be no employees and no additional traffic. This will be part time.



There was no opposition to this application.



Mr. Fox made a motion, which was seconded by Mr. Edwards, to grant this

application because it does meet the intent of the Home Occupation definition,

but with the stipulation that there will be no storage of work material at the

residence. Motion carried by the affirmative vote of the three Board Members

present for this meeting.



Case No. 02-HO124--Tabled.



There was no one present to present the application of Troy Monroe, 2342

Simmons Avenue, for a Certificate of Occupancy for a Home Occupation for an

office only for a landscaping business, O.P. Landscaping. The property is

zoned R-2.





There was no opposition to this application.



Mr. Fox made a motion, which was seconded by Mr. Edwards, to table this

application until the July meeting because there was no one present to present

the application. Motion carried by the affirmative vote of the three Board

Members present for this meeting.









29

BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS ? 06/05/2002





Case No. 02-HO125--Granted.



Maxine Hudson, 6361 Rivermont Court, presented her application for a

Certificate of Occupancy for a Home Occupation for an office only for interior

design, Elegant Accents. The property is zoned R-1A.



In her statement and in response to questions from the Board Members, the

applicant gave the following information: She will be using an office only.

There will be no employees and no additional traffic. This will be part time.



There was no opposition to this application.





Mr. Fox made a motion, which was seconded by Mr. Edwards, to grant this

application because it does meet the intent of the Home Occupation definition.

Motion carried by the affirmative vote of the three Board Members present for

this meeting.



Case No. 02-HO126--Granted.



Laura Hines, 909 Farr Road #10, presented her application for a Certificate of

Occupancy for a Home Occupation for an office only for medical billing, Hines

Electronic Medical Billing. The property is zoned R-4.





In her statement and in response to questions from the Board Members, the

applicant gave the following information: She will be using an office only.

There will be no employees and no additional traffic. This will be part time.



There was no opposition to this application.



Mr. Fox made a motion, which was seconded by Mr. Edwards, to grant this

application because it does meet the intent of the Home Occupation definition.

Motion carried by the affirmative vote of the three Board Members present for

this meeting.

















30

BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS - 06/05/2002





Case No. 02-HO127?-Granted.



Kerry Hall, 527 Chandler Drive, presented his application for a Certificate of

Occupancy for a Home Occupation for an office only for a concrete finisher, AKA

Concrete Finishes. The property is zoned R-1A.



In his statement and in response to questions from the Board Members, the

applicant gave the following information: He will be using an office only.

There will be no employees and no additional traffic. This will be part time.



There was no opposition to this application.



Mr. Fox made a motion, which was seconded by Mr. Edwards, to grant this

application because it does meet the intent of the Home Occupation definition.

Motion carried by the affirmative vote of the three Board Members present for

this meeting.



Case No. 02-HO128?-Granted.



Rita Alto, 2238 Barnes Drive, presented her application for a Certificate of

Occupancy for a Home Occupation for an office only for a cleaning service, R &

J Cleaning Service. The property is zoned R-1A.



In her statement and in response to questions from the Board Members, the

applicant gave the following information: She will be using an office only.

There will be no employees and no additional traffic. This will be part

time.



There was no opposition to this application.



Mr. Fox made a motion, which was seconded by Mr. Edwards, to grant this

application because it does meet the intent of the Home Occupation definition.

Motion carried by the affirmative vote of the three Board Members present for

this meeting.



Case No. 02-HO129?-Granted.



Charles Geer, 873 Heiferhorn Trace, presented his application for a Certificate

of Occupancy for a Home Occupation for an office only for trim carpentry, CGC

Construction. The property is zoned A-1.





31

BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS ? 06/05/2002





In his statement and in response to questions from the Board Members, the

applicant gave the following information: He will be using an office only.

There will be no employees and no additional traffic. This will be full time.

He will be a sub-contractor.



There was no opposition to this application.



Mr. Fox made a motion, which was seconded by Mr. Edwards, to grant this

application because it does meet the intent of the Home Occupation definition,

but with the stipulation that there will be no storage of work material at the

residence. Motion carried by the affirmative vote of the three Board Members

present for this meeting.



Case No. 02-HO130?-Tabled.



There was no one present to present the application of Melvin Battle, 2502

Walker Street, for a Certificate of Occupancy for a Home Occupation for an

office only for a janitorial service, M. & F. Cleaning Service. The property

is zoned R-2.



There was no opposition to this application.



Mr. Fox made a motion, which was seconded by Mr. Edwards, to table this

application until the July meeting because there was no one present to present

the application. Motion carried by the affirmative vote of the three Board

Members present for this meeting.



Case No. 02-HO131?-Granted.



Alan Ingley, 964 Overlook Drive, presented his application for a Certificate of

Occupancy for a Home Occupation for an office only for a consulting business,

i-consult dba, Creative Spaces. The property is zoned R-1A.



In his statement and in response to questions from the Board Members, the

applicant gave the following information: He will be using an office only.

There will be no employees and no additional traffic. This will be part time.











32

BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS ? 06/05/2002





There was no opposition to this application.



Mr. Fox made a motion, which was seconded by Mr. Edwards, to grant this

application because it does meet the intent of the Home Occupation definition.

Motion carried by the affirmative vote of the three Board Members present for

this meeting.



Case No. 02-HO132?-Granted.



Stacy Lee, 1432 Alta Vista Drive, presented the application for her husband,

Terry Wayne Lee, for a Certificate of Occupancy for a Home Occupation for an

office only for a drain cleaning service, All American Discount Drain Service.

The property is zoned R-1A.



In her statement and in response to questions from the Board Members, Mrs. Lee

gave the following information: He will be using an office only. There will

be no employees and no additional traffic. This will be full time.



There was no opposition to this application.



Mr. Fox made a motion, which was seconded by Mr. Edwards, to grant this

application because it does meet the intent of the Home Occupation definition,

but with the stipulation that there will be no storage of work material at the

residence. Motion carried by the affirmative vote of the three Board Members

present for this meeting.



CaseNo. 02-HO133?-Granted.



Royce Bowles, Jr., 2380 Old River Road, presented his application for a

Certificate of Occupancy for a Home Occupation for an office only for printing

consulting & art, Bucky Bowles, Inc. The property is zoned A-1.



In his statement and in response to questions from the Board Members, the

applicant gave the following information: He will be using an office only.

There will be no employees and no additional traffic. This will be full time.













33

BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS ? 06/05/2002





There was no opposition to this application.



Mr. Fox made a motion, which was seconded by Mr. Edwards, to grant this

application because it does meet the intent of the Home Occupation definition.

Motion carried by the affirmative vote of the three Board Members present for

this meeting.



Case No. 02-HO134?-Granted.



Jean Hogue, 1600 Boulevard Street, presented her application for a Certificate

of Occupancy for a Home Occupation for an office only for making & selling

jewelry (sold away from the home), Bumble Beadz. The property is zoned R-4.



In her statement and in response to questions from the Board Members, the

applicant gave the following information: She will be using an office only.

There will be no employees and no additional traffic. This will be part time.



There was no opposition to this application.





Mr. Fox made a motion, which was seconded by Mr. Edwards to grant this

application because it does meet the intent of the Home Occupation definition.

Motion carried by the affirmative vote of the three Board Members present for

this meeting.





Case No. 02-HO135?-Granted.



Leigh Beach, 2118 Lancaster Drive, presented her application for a Certificate

of Occupancy for a Home Occupation for an office only for making & selling

jewelry (sold away from the home), Bumble Beadz. The property is zoned R-2.



In her statement and in response to questions from the Board Members, the

applicant gave the following information: She will be using an office only.

There will be no employees and no additional traffic. This will be part time.



There was no opposition to this application.















34

BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS ? 06/05/2002





Mr. Fox made a motion, which was seconded by Mr. Edwards, to grant this

application because it does meet the intent of the Home Occupation definition.

Motion carried by the affirmative vote of the three Board Members present for

this meeting.



CaseNo. 02-HO136?-Granted.



George Andrews, 610 Vista Drive, presented his application for a Certificate of

Occupancy for a Home Occupation for an office only for a painting company, West

Ga. Coatings. The property is zoned R-1A.



In his statement and in response to questions from the Board Members, the

applicant gave the following information: He will be using an office only.

There will be no employees and no additional traffic. This will be full time.



There was no opposition to this application.



Mr. Fox made a motion, which was seconded by Mr. Edwards, to grant this

application because it does meet the intent of the Home Occupation definition,

but with the stipulation that there will be no storage of work material at the

residence. Motion carried by the affirmative vote of the three Board Members

present for this meeting.



Case No. 02-HO137?-Granted.



Mrs. Martin, 6727 Scoter Drive, presented the application for her husband, Gary

Martin, for a Certificate of Occupancy for a Home Occupation for an office only

for telemarketing, American Consumables. The property is zoned R-2.



In her statement and in response to questions from the Board Members, Mrs.

Martin gave the following information: He will be using an office only. There

will be no employees and no additional traffic. This will be part time.



There was no opposition to this application.















35

BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS ? 06/05/2002







Mr. Fox made a motion, which was seconded by Mr. Edwards to grant this

application because it does meet the intent of the Home Occupation definition.

Motion carried by the affirmative vote of the three Board Members present for

this meeting.





Case No. 02-HO138?-Granted.



John Rhodenizer, 2926 Howard Avenue, presented his application for a

Certificate of Occupancy for a Home Occupation for an office only for a

photography business, JR Photography. The property is zoned R-4.



In his statement and in response to questions from the Board Members, the

applicant gave the following information: He will be using an office only.

There will be no employees and no additional traffic. This will be full time.



There was no opposition to this application.



Mr. Fox made a motion, which was seconded by Mr. Edwards, to grant this

application because it does meet the intent of the Home Occupation definition.

Motion carried by the affirmative vote of the three Board Members present for

this meeting.



CaseNo. 02-HO139?-Granted.



Janice Ansari, 5831 Laing Street, presented her application for a Certificate

of Occupancy for a Home Occupation for an office only for a cleaning service, J

& J Cleaning Service. The property is zoned R-2.



In her statement and in response to questions from the Board Members, the

applicant gave the following information: She will be using an office only.

There will be no employees and no additional traffic. This will be part time.



There was no opposition to this application.



















36

BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS ? 06/05/2002





Mr. Fox made a motion, which was seconded by Mr. Edwards, to grant this

application because it does meet the intent of the Home Occupation definition,

but with the stipulation that there will be no storage of work material at the

residence. Motion carried by the affirmative vote of the three Board Members

present for this meeting.



Case No. 02-HO140?-Granted.



William Borst, 6168 Candlestick Loop, presented his application for a

Certificate of Occupancy for a Home Occupation for an office only for internet

consulting, Borst & Blanchard Development. The property is zoned R-1A.



In his statement and in response to questions from the Board Members, the

applicant gave the following information: He will be using an office only.

There will be no employees and no additional traffic. This will be part time.

He will be a sub-contractor.



There was no opposition to this application.





Mr. Fox made a motion, which was seconded by Mr. Edwards to grant this

application because it does meet the intent of the Home Occupation definition.

Motion carried by the affirmative vote of the three Board Members present for

this meeting.





END OF HOME OCCUPATIONS.





































37

BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS ? 06/05/2002









The minutes of the regular meeting of May 1st were approved as presented.



There being no further business to come before the Board,

the meeting adjourned at 5:15 p.m.



















____________________ __________________

Leah Braxton, Bill Duck,

Chairperson Secretary





_____________________ __________________

Larry Phillips, Danny Cargill

Vice Chairperson Acting Secretary











































38