Columbus, Georgia
Georgia's First Consolidated Government
Post Office Box 1340
Columbus, Georgia, 31902-1340
(706) 653-4013
fax (706) 653-4016
Council Members
MINUTES
COUNCIL OF COLUMBUS, GEORGIA
REGULAR SESSION
APRIL 2, 2002
The regular monthly night meeting of the Council of Columbus, Georgia was
called to order at 5:30 P.M., Tuesday, April 2, 2002, on the Plaza Level of the
Government Center, Columbus, Georgia. Honorable Bobby G. Peters, Mayor, and
Honorable John J. Rodgers, Mayor Pro Tem Rodgers, presiding.
*** *** ***
PRESENT: Present other than Mayor Peters and Mayor Pro Tem Rodgers were
Councilors R. Gary Allen, Berry Henderson, Julius H. Hunter, Jr., Charles E.
McDaniel, Jr., Robert Poydasheff, Evelyn Turner Pugh, Richard Smith, Nathan
Suber and Evelyn Woodson. City Manager Carmen Cavezza, City Attorney Clifton
Fay, Clerk of Council Tiny B. Washington and Deputy Clerk of Council Sandra
Davis were also present.
*** *** ***
ABSENT: No one was absent.
*** *** ***
INVOCATION: Offered by Chaplain Daniel Roby - Columbus Police Department.
-------------------------------------------*** ***
***------------------------------------
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Led by Mayor Peters.
-------------------------------------------*** ***
***------------------------------------
RECOGNITION OF FRANK MARTIN & O.P. CARLILE:
Mayor Peters recognized the presence of former Mayor Frank Martin and
former Police Chief, Mr. O. P. Carlile.
-------------------------------------------*** ***
***------------------------------------
PROCLAMATIONS:
?TAI CHI & QIGONG DAY?:
With Mr. Mark McGee standing at the Council table, Councilor Henderson
read the proclamation of Mayor Peters, proclaiming April 6, 2002, as ?Tai Chi &
Qigong Day?, in Columbus, Georgia.
*** *** ***
?BARBER SHOP HARMONY WEEK?:
With Mr. Charlie Garrett standing at the Council table, Councilor Hunter
read the proclamation of Mayor Peters, proclaiming the week of April 11, 2002
as ?Barber Shop Harmony Week?, in Columbus, Georgia.
*** *** ***
CITY ATTORNEY?S AGENDA:
WITH MS. HELEN MARTIN, MS. KIM YINKS, MS. JUDY PIERCE, AND
MS. LEE KENT STANDING AT THE COUNCIL TABLE, THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION WAS
SUBMITTED AND READ IN ITS ENTIRETY BY COUNCILOR POYDASHEFF AND ADOPTED BY THE
COUNCIL:
A Resolution (139-02) - Commending and congratulating the Columbus
Regional Tennis Association (CORTA) upon winning the award for the 2002 USTA
Member Organization of the Year. Councilor Poydasheff moved its adoption.
Seconded by Councilor Hunter and carried unanimously by those ten members of
Council present for this meeting.
-------------------------------------------*** ***
***------------------------------------
NOTE: The City Attorney?s Agenda is continued below.
-------------------------------------------*** ***
***------------------------------------
MINUTES: Minutes of the March 19 & 26, 2002 meeting of the Council of the
Consolidated Government of Columbus, Georgia were submitted and approved
unanimously upon the adoption of a motion made by Mayor Pro Tem Rodgers and
seconded by Councilor Poydasheff.
-------------------------------------------*** ***
***------------------------------------
ZONING PUBLIC HEARINGS:
THE FOLLOWING TWO ZONING ORDINANCES WERE SUBMITTED AND THEIR CAPTIONS READ
BY CITY ATTORNEY FAY AND A PUBLIC HEARING WAS HELD AS ADVERTISED:
An Ordinance - Rezoning approximately 22 acres of property located at 8091
Midland Road from an A-1 District to an R-1 District. (1-D-02-Erickson)
An Ordinance - Rezoning approximately 32 acres of property located at 8127
Midland Road from an A-1 District to an R-1 District. (2-D-02-Erickson)
Once again Mayor Peters pointed out that we have had numerous hearings on
this matter, and said we have tried to let everybody be heard each time, and
said if you have already been heard, he would respectfully ask you not to go
back over the same material. He said the Council has all the materials, staff
reports and the petitions, and everything that has been said.
He said when this matter was last delayed, there was supposed to be a
meeting between the developer and the property owners and the Councilor for
that district.
Councilor Allen said in discussing this with the residents of the area,
they decided that unless something new comes in, that they feel like they need
to respond to, the Council has heard their story several times and are well
aware of their situation and pleas and their concerns in this area.
He said during the meeting on Saturday both sides had plans that they were
willing to discuss and agree to. He said the one-acre buffer around existing
home sites was a plan that the citizens had offered, and the compromise on the
external watts ranging from size of 16,500 or 17,500 up to 22,000 square feet.
He said in that discussion, it was pointed out that the developer wanted to
present a different alternative, but that it didn?t include a one-acre buffer
around existing home sites. He said his understanding of the Council?s request
on last week, was to start with the one acre buffer and then compromise on the
internal interior lot sizes and that was what they were willing to do, but the
developer said he couldn?t make it work.
Mayor Peters said the Council would be open to anything that they all
could agree to. He then asked Mr. Erickson, if his petition was in tact as it
started or if he is here to make any changes to his request tonight.
Mr. Erickson said he is going to offer an additional alternative, after
which Mayor Peters asked if the additional alternative has been discussed with
Councilor Allen and the residents. Mr. Erickson said no, because he just came
up with this plan on Sunday afternoon.
Mayor Peters then asked Mr. Erickson what is he requesting of the Council.
Councilor Turner Pugh said in reference to what Councilor Allen was
saying, said she don?t think the Council directed anyone to go start out with
one acre tracts all the way around. She said it was her understanding that we
just asked you all to get together to try to work out a proposal and bring back
some proposed drawings.
Councilor Suber said he spoke with Councilor Allen and he said the two of
you had discussed a proposal and agreed upon and when you met on Saturday, it
was a different proposal.
Mr. Erickson asked Councilor Suber to clarify what agreed upon was, as he
was of the opinion that he and Councilor Allen hasn?t agreed upon anything yet.
Councilor Allen then went into some details and elaborated on what he
referred to as an agreement with him and Mr. Erickson, after looking at and
reviewing about ten different plans with Mr. Fox and Mr. Erickson, showing a
plan that he said would be a good starting point had one acre sites and the
range of lot sizes intermingled in. He said that plan he did not see on
Saturday.
Mr. Erickson then approached the Council table where Councilor Allen was
seated and showed him the drawings which he had on Saturday. Councilor Allen
said we have found the plat.
Mr. Erickson then responded to several questions of Councilor Suber
regarding the drawing.
After several minutes of discussion regarding the meeting that was held on
Saturday, Mayor Peters then asked Mr. Erickson, what is he proposing tonight.
PROPONENTS:
Mr. Dave Erickson again appeared and distributed a packet of information
to the Mayor and Council. (A copy was not filed with the Clerk of Council for
the Council?s records.)
He went into some further details in explaining his request to the Mayor
and Council, referring to those documents that he provided to the Mayor and
Council.
Mr. Erickson proceeded to go into more details on what transpired on
Saturday during their meeting, when he was interrupted by Mayor Peters and
Councilor Turner Pugh and asked that he just tell the Council what he is
proposing for the Council to look at and decide on.
Mr. Erickson said in looking at the drawing on Page 2, he is asking that
you amend the petition to R-1 with a minimum lot size of 20,000 square foot on
every lot in the subdivision. (Drawing ?B?)
2nd Alternative: (Drawing ?C?) Makes better use of trying to provide more
protection to the residents of Midland as he has understood in previous
conversation. He said this would be a R-1, with a 15,000 square foot minimum,
with an additional requirement of 40,000 square foot lots along all of Old Pope
Road with a 25-foot buffer of existing vegetation.
Mayor Peters then asked Mr. Erickson, what proposal, he is asking the
Council to amend his petition with. Councilor Henderson said he doesn?t think
it is out of order to allow Mr. Erickson to give the two options that he would
like for the Council to consider. He said it is up to the Council to decide
whether or not we want to choose one of those or deny the petition.
Mr. Erickson then continued outlining his two options. He said one of the
primary issues that he has heard is protecting Old Pope Road and said this
proposal makes maximum protection of the Old Pope Road community and still
leaves something on the table for the developer to do something with, that is
an R-1 proposal with a maximum density of two lots per acre on their total
acreage with 40,000 square foot lots along Old Pope Road, additionally they can
provide buffers along the entire parameter of the property where they contact
somebody who has an existing one acre or more residence.
He said if there is going to be a subdivision that has any chance of success,
this program would do that although it would not protect the people of Midland
to the degree that they have been demanding.
Mr. Erickson said the Midland Community has stated several times how they
have compromised from five (5) acres to half acres, and said one of the
proposals that he has given you is a planning half acre, 20,000 square feet. He
said he has now thrown everything on the table that there is to throw.
After Mr. Erickson concluded his presentation, several members of the
Council then expressed their views on this matter, after which Mr. Erickson
then responded to questions of the Council.
Councilor Allen and Mr. Erickson had a dialogue of what transpired at the
meeting on Saturday and the plans and proposals that were shown.
After more than an hour of discussion on this matter, Mayor Peters pointed
out that the petitioner has given the Council two options and then asked, if
the Council would like to amend the petition with one of these options? No such
amendments were made.
Mr. Erickson then responded to further questions of members of the
Council.
Councilor Poydasheff said it would be good, in the future that if we could
come in during a Work Session, we can be given some delineation of where the
transitional aspect would start. He said in the future, he thinks that we
should do something about the panhandle. He said maybe come in with a
conceptual plan of where we would suggest that there may be a transitional
bright line.
City Manager Cavezza said we are looking at a transitional plan throughout
the County, and in this particular case, until this is resolved, it is a little
difficult.
Once again Mayor Peters asked if anyone on the Council would like to make
any motions to amend the petition that is on first reading, with either one of
the proposals of Mr. Erickson. There was no such motion made.
OPPONENTS:
Mr. Terry Fields of Liberty Hall, said he was at the meeting on Saturday
and said that Councilor Allen is being truthful and said that they were not
given any handouts or anything. He said they were supposed to have a plan given
to them, as to what could be done with the one-acre perimeter to protect all of
the landowners out there.
He said they just wanted to see a plan of what Mr. Erickson was proposing
to do, so that all the homeowners could look at it. He said at the very end of
the meeting, they saw a plan that had one acre lots along Old Pope Road, but
said he hasn?t seen the plan that Mr. Erickson submitted this morning.
Mr. Fields said the Midland residents did try to talk about what could be
done, because they didn?t have anything to go on.
He said he told Mr. Erickson during that meeting that he had talked to
several builders and developers and said they could make it work. He said he
told him that they would pay him for what he paid for that property and they
would put one-acre lots out there.
Mr. Fields said he is opposed to anything, but one-acre lots.
Mr. Charles Rowe, 8081 Old Pope Road appeared and said he has been living
there for about thirteen years, and said the 22-acre tract that you are looking
at borders his property on two sides. He said whatever happens will happen
right next door to him. He said he attended the meeting on Saturday and felt
like there was an attempt on both sides to discuss this issue. He said there
was a lot of discussion and said there was some serious attempts to compromise
on the part of the people that were there.
He said he just want the Council to protect the people that are out there,
and think about the economic impact on the people that are already there. He
said he would ask you to keep the one-acre zoning that they have out there now.
After more than one and a half hour of discussion on this subject, City
Attorney Fay declared the public hearing been held.
*** *** ***
THE FOLLOWING TWO ZONING ORDINANCES WERE ALSO SUBMITTED AND THEIR CAPTIONS
READ BY CITY ATTORNEY FAY AND A PUBLIC HEARING WAS HELD ON EACH AS
ADVERTISED:
An Ordinance - Rezoning approximately 1.36 acres of property located at
3523, 3529 & 3533 Trinity Drive: & 2114 Box Road from an R-1A District to an
A-O District. (9-CA-02-Schuster Enterprises, Inc.)
PROPONENTS & OPPONENTS:
An unidentified gentleman was present, but he did not make any
presentation, as there was no one present to oppose this proposed rezoning
ordinance.
An Ordinance - Rezoning approximately 10.42 acres of property located along
the west side of North Lumpkin Road, north of Airview Drive from an C-3
District to an R-4 District. (10-CA-02-Ironwood Group, Inc.,)
City Attorney Fay outlined the three conditions that are included in the
ordinance, which are as follows:
(2) All lighting shall be directed internally using deflectors.
(3) Access to the property shall be restricted to one ingress/ egress
(4) If these properties are not used as multi-family residential within two (2)
years of the adoption of this ordinance, then these properties shall revert
back to a C-3 (General Commercial) zoning district
PROPONENTS & OPPONENTS:
An unidentified gentlemen, in response to Mayor Peters said that he agrees
to those conditions; however, there are three land sellers that they are having
to purchase the property from and said initially they had talked to the land
sellers on some issues which was based on some previous rezoning that the
Council had approved, and that was if they didn?t purchase the property or
close on it by a date certain next winter, then it would revert back. He said
they are a little concern in that their property will sit there with an R-4
zoning for two years. He said if he doesn?t develop this property, they would
like for it to revert back to C-3 so that they can maximize their property for
that area.
He said this was their initial request to the Planning Division, which he
believes was approved; however, the City Attorney had some issues with that
exact language. He said whatever the Council approves, they will go with, but
he did want to mention that at least one of the sellers had this concern.
City Attorney Fay said the legal concern was just tying it to a particular
contract, which may or may not occur. Mayor Pro Tem Rodgers pointed out that we
have done it with the advise of the City Attorney, which is called a
reversionary clause.
City Attorney Fay said generally it is not tied to a particular purchase
or a particular closing and said that was his concern.
Mayor Pro Tem Rodgers then asked the petitioner, if it would satisfy him
that the language read, that it closes or is developed by a certain date, then
if it does not it would revert. City Attorney Fay said if you leave it generic
like that, he wouldn?t have a problem with that, as it would be similar to the
reversionary language.
The gentlemen then asked if they don?t close on the land or develop it, at
which point does that timeframe stop, so he can come back and see that the
reversion does happen, will it be a building permit being pulled by a certain
date or what.
After several minutes of discussion on this matter, Mayor Pro Tem Rodgers
then made a motion stating that if these properties are not used as
multi-family residential within one (1) year of application for a building
permit, then these properties shall revert back to a C-3 (General Commercial)
zoning district. Seconded by Councilor Woodson.
City Manager Cavezza said they are already doing a development along North
Lumpkin Road, and they are attempting to expand that development.
After further discussion on this matter, the question was called on the
motion to amend the ordinance, as stated above, which carried unanimously by
those ten members of Council present for this meeting.
-------------------------------------------*** ***
***------------------------------------
CITY ATTORNEY?S AGENDA:
THE FOLLOWING ORDINANCE WAS SUMBITTED AND ITS CAPTION READ BY CITY
ATTORNEY FAY AND INTRODUCED ON FIRST READING AND AFTER SEVERAL MINUTES OF
DISCUSSION, ITS FIRST READING WAS DELAYED FOR TWO
WEEKS:
An Ordinance - Amending Section 21-14 of the Columbus Code so as to
increase the membership of the Columbus Taxicab Commission from seven members
to nine members with the two additional members serving at-large.
Councilor Henderson said it appears to him that since the public is the
one served by the taxicab industry it makes eminent good sense to have two
people not affiliated with the industry serving on the authority.
Mr. Wallace Archie, Chairman of the Taxicab Commission said what really is
the rationale behind the additional two members, and said this has not been
discussed with the Commission.
Mayor Peters asked Mr. Archie what is wrong with that rationale?
Mr. Archie stated that there is nothing wrong with it, but said that it has not
been discussed with the Taxicab Commission.
Mayor Peters then pointed out that the Commission follows the direction of
the Council, which sets the policy that you are working under. He said the
Councilor felt like it would be good to have some other citizens on the
Commission rather than just taxicab people.
Councilor Henderson said the response that Mr. Archie has given adds some
credibility to his argument, that there should be some people who actually
utilize the cab services to be on the Commission to help administer and govern
the way those businesses are transacted. He said the Commission is doing a good
job, but said it came to light about a month ago when we were talking about
replacing an individual who is rotating off. He said he thinks there should be
representation, at-large from the general public, the people who utilize the
services on every authority that we have in place.
Mr. Archie said he doesn?t think it is necessary to add two additional
people. He said the reason this came up is because one of the people on the
Commission, who owned a cab company and was on the Commission as a cab company
owner, no longer owns the cab company; and consequently, he would have to
vacate the position.
Councilor Henderson said he doesn?t even know the individual and said it
doesn?t matter to him if he serves another term, but said he thinks that we
need to go back and check to see how many terms of office Mr. John Golden has
served on the Taxicab Commission.
Discussions continued on this ordinance for some twenty minutes with Mr.
Archie expressing his further disagreement with the ordinance, after which
Mayor Peters and several members of the Council addressing those concerns of
Mr. Archie.
After still further discussion on this subject, Councilor Suber then made
a motion that we delay the first reading of this ordinance for two weeks to
allow the Commission and Councilor Henderson to get together to discuss this
issue. Seconded by Councilor McDaniel and carried unanimously by those ten
members of Council present for this meeting.
*** *** ***
THE FOLLOWING ORDINANCE WAS ALSO SUMBITTED AND ITS CAPTION READ BY CITY
ATTORNEY FAY AND INTRODUCED ON FIRST
READING:
An Ordinance - Regulating vehicular traffic in Columbus Georgia by
deleting from the ?Official Street Map, City of Columbus, Georgia?, the street
segment and right-of-way of Eighteen Street from the east right-of-way line of
Fifth Avenue east to a point 342 feet west of the west right-of-way line of
Tenth Avenue; by deleting the street segment and right-of-way of Sixth Avenue
from the north right-of-way line of Seventeenth Street north to the south
right-of-way line of Eighteenth Street; reserving utility easements;
authorizing the disposal of said street segments; and for other purposes.
-------------------------------------------*** ***
***------------------------------------
CITY MANAGER?S AGENDA:
AT THE REQUEST OF COUNCILOR HUNTER, THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION WAS CALLED UP
AS THE NEXT ORDER OF BUSINESS AND APPROVED BY THE COUNCIL AFTER BEING EXPLAINED
BY CITY MANAGER
CAVEZZA:
A Resolution (140-02) - Amending Resolution Number 168-00, which provides
for support of the redevelopment of The Robin?s Trace Apartments (FKA Traffic
Gardens). Councilor Hunter moved its adoption. Seconded by Mayor Pro Tem
Rodgers and carried unanimously by those nine members of Council present at the
time, with Councilor McDaniel being absent for this vote.
-------------------------------------------*** ***
***------------------------------------
NOTE: The City Manager?s Agenda is continued below.
-------------------------------------------*** ***
***------------------------------------
PUBLIC AGENDA:
MR. JACK WRIGHT, RE: WAIVER OF TAX PENALTY:
Mr. Wright said he provided the Clerk of Council with some additional
information since the last Council meeting. He said he provided the minutes
from the Board of Tax Assessors, where he met with them and said that it stated
that they said the first bill that he received was incorrect due to a clerical
error. He said he went ahead and paid the tax when they said they had the right
to go back and change it.
Mayor Peters said that Ms. Huff said that they did make a clerical error,
but she sent you out a new notice.
Mr. Wright said he wrote Ms. Huff a letter regarding the clerical error
and said that the letter, which she wrote to him, she said there was an
assessment change causing the local assessed value to increase, but said that
is wrong. He said the minutes state that they made a clerical error and said he
paid the tax, but she returned it.
Councilor Smith said if we look at the State law as it relates to the
waiver of penalties due to unpaid taxes said it states that when the Tax
Commissioner reasonably determines that the default given rise to the penalty
was due to a reasonable cause and not due to gross or willful neglect, and said
he don?t think we can say that it was gross or willful neglect; so, he is going
to recommend that we not require the penalty to be paid.
City Manager Cavezza said Tax Commissioner Huff could not be here tonight,
but she forwarded the information to the Council.
Councilor Smith then made a motion to waive the penalty.
After still further discussion on this subject, with several members of
the Council expressing their views on this issue, Councilor Woodson then
seconded Councilor Smith?s motion. The question was then called on the motion,
which resulted in a five to five tie vote. Voting for the motion was Councilors
Henderson, Woodson, Poydasheff, McDaniel and Smith. Voting against the motion
was Councilors Turner Pugh, Suber, Allen, Rodgers and Hunter. Mayor Peters then
broke the 5 -5 tie vote, by voting against the motion, making it a 6-5 vote.
Mr. Wright then asked what does he need to do to appeal the Council?s
decision, to which he was informed that he could appeal to the Courts. City
Attorney Fay said there is a statute that requires Court action to contest what
the Council does on a refund request.
Mayor Peters said if Ms. Huff had said it was an error, he thinks that we
all would support that, but said she didn?t say that.
*** *** ***
CSM (Ret.) ROBERT MCCOY, RE: TO EXTEND AN
INVITATION:
CSM (Ret.) Robert McCoy appeared and distributed an invitation to Mayor
Peters and members of the Council to attend the 227th Army Birthday Ball, which
will be held at the Convention & Trade Center on June 14, 2002 at 7:00 p.m.
He said on last year they had approximately 420 individuals present for
that event and said this year they are preparing for 700 - 800 individuals to
participate in this event. He said they would like for the Mayor and Council to
come out and join them.
*** *** ***
ATTORNEY WILLIAM J. MASON, RE: NON-RENEWAL OF AN ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE
LICENSE OF THE SALOON & OYSTER
BAR:
Attorney William J. Mason said they are here pursuant to the City
ordinance allowing the Council to make the final determination on a
recommendation for non-renewal of an alcoholic beverage license.
He then introduced Mr. Jeff Jackson, who is the license holder and owner
of the Saloon & Oyster Bar, located on Macon Road, next to Crystal Valley. He
said Mr. Jackson has owned the business since March of last year. He said it is
a conditional location, which means they have to serve 50% food to be open.
Mr. Mason said Mr. Jackson was audited first in August and received no
reply and then got a letter in the middle of March, auditing him for all the
entire year of 2001, alleging that he did not meet the 50% requirements. He
said they are here today to show that the City?s numbers are not correct and he
in fact, did meet the 50% requirements.
Mayor Peters then asked Mr. Mason who did Mr. Jackson?s audit, which shows
he does meet the 50% requirements? Mr. Mason said Mr. Jackson turned the
figures over to the City. He said Mr. Jackson keeps up with them on a daily
basis, as to how much food and alcohol and compiles it into a monthly statement
and turns his monthly statements over to the City.
Mr. Jackson said he is saying that their percentage is 59% food and 41%
alcohol. He said they are buying more food than alcohol, according to their
receipts.
Director of Finance Kay Love said they did use Mr. Jackson?s figures and
came up with 47% food and 53% alcohol. She said her staff has sat down with Mr.
Mason and his client on this matter; however, she was not present at that
meeting.
Mr. Mason said it is obvious that the City didn?t use Mr. Jackson?s
figures and said that he can show you what the City did. He then distributed
copies of the audit that the City performed around the Council table. (A copy
was not filed with the Clerk of Council, for the Council?s records.)
Ms. Love pointed out to City Attorney Fay that they need to waive
confidentiality because there are sales figures and items that are listed on
the information that are not a matter of public records. City Attorney Fay then
asked Mr. Mason, if they waiver that confidentiality?
Mr. Mason said they don?t think that there is any confidentiality, he said
they are handing them out, so it?s okay.
Mayor Peters said we are not in the business of trying to put anyone out
of business and said this is a very nice place, which is in a good location and
away from all neighborhoods. He said this 50/50 rule is in the law; so, you
have to try to follow it.
Councilor Poydasheff said he didn?t hear a waiver, and would like to have
that for the record.
City Attorney Fay said to the extent that this is confidential income
expense information, once again asked Mr. Mason, if they waived
confidentiality. Mr. Mason said that they did.
Mr. Mason then went into some details, using what he referred to as Work
Sheet Number Three, outlined what he said are the problems.
He said the way the City conducted their audit, this is called inputted alcohol
revenue. He said they have not counted the alcohol sold, but said what they
have done is gone to the wholesalers and looked at the amount of beer and
alcohol that was sold wholesale to the business. He said they then came up with
a mark up percentage and multiplied that by the wholesale and input to the
business that much sales.
He said they don?t dispute the Licensing Division?s figure on the alcohol,
as it is almost within 2% of being correct. He said the mistake that they have
made is in the beer computation. He said the mistake that they made is not
discussing with Mr. Jackson other things that happened in the business that
affect the bottom line alcohol sales.
Mr. Mason said they didn?t discuss anything with his client until they
sent him a letter in March of this year, and told him that he was non-renewed
and to stop selling alcohol.
He said they then came up with a selling price of a domestic beer and said
these figures are wrong, as that is not what they sell a domestic beer for. He
said the selling price for an import beer is wrong, he said the wholesale cost
of a keg of beer is also wrong.
Mayor Peters then asked that we delay this matter for one week, and said
your client won?t be out of business, and allow you to sit down with
Mr. Love and look at the figures.
City Manager Cavezza asked that we hear from the staff, because he doesn?t
think that delaying it one week would make any difference.
Mr. Jackson then responded to questions of the Council. He said they
didn?t allow for any spillage for beer, which they did on alcohol. He said he
is not disputing their methods, but he is disputing the numbers they used to
get their methods.
Mr. Mason said the major problem is listed on Work Sheet Number Two, which
shows $39,568 in beer purchase, which is almost correct; but then they apply a
359% markup to that, and that is how they arrive at their inputted beer sales.
He said this is why that is wrong. He said his client sells less than 2% import
beer, but they have weighed that 33% of his sales.
Councilor Poydasheff said he would like to hear from the staff.
Ms. Love, Director of Finance said the cash register tapes doesn?t
indicate the amount of beer that Mr. Jackson says he sells them for. She said
in the advertised beer prices there is nothing less than $2.50. She said this
is the information that was provided to them.
She said if they wait two weeks or four weeks, the results of their audit
won?t change based on the methods that they used, even though the percentages
of the amounts that he sells may be different, because they used actual cash
register tapes.
Ms. Love then responded to several questions of Mayor Peters and members
of the Council.
After more than one and a half hour of discussion on this matter, with
Ms. Love and members of her staff responding to further questions of members of
the Council, as well as Mr. Jackson and Mr. Mason responding to questions of
the Council, and City Manager Cavezza also responded to some concerns of the
Council; and Mr. Mason continuing his presentation in presenting his client?s
case, Councilor McDaniel then made a motion to grant sixty (60) days to allow
Mr. Mason and his client to get together and work
with the Licensing Division to go over the numbers again to see if they meet
the requirements. Seconded by Councilor Poydasheff, which resulted in an
inconclusive vote of 4 - 6. Voting for the motion was Councilors Henderson,
McDaniel, Poydasheff and Woodson. Voting against the motion was Councilors
Allen, Hunter, Turner Pugh, Smith, Suber and Mayor Pro Tem Rodgers.
Mr. Mason then asked that Council take a vote on whether or not to renew
Mr. Jackson?s license. Mayor Peters then asked what was the pleasure of the
Council in this regard, Councilor Suber then made a motion to uphold the
recommendation of the Finance Director. Seconded by Councilor Smith, which
carried by a vote of 8-2, with Councilors McDaniel and Woodson voting no and
all other eight councilors present voting yes.
-------------------------------------------*** ***
***------------------------------------
CITY MANAGER?S AGENDA CONTINUED:
THE FOLLOWING RESOLUTION WAS SUBMITTED AND EXPLAINED BY CITY MANAGER
CAVEZZA AND ADOPTED BY THE
COUNCIL:
A Resolution (141-02) - Authorizing the City Manager to fund a grant of
$35,500 to Columbus for Kids, Inc., from the Crime Victim surcharge to purchase
an image quest colposcope and two computers to be used in the sane nurse
program to examine children who have been abused and increase the crime victim
witness budget from $258,823 to $294,323. Councilor Poydasheff moved its
adoption. Seconded by Councilor Suber and carried unanimously by those ten
members of Council present for this meeting.
*** *** ***
THE FOLLOWING TWELVE PURCHASING RESOLUTIONS, WITH DETAILED INFORMATION
HAVING BEEN INCLUDED WITH THE CITY MANAGER?S AGENDA PACKET, WERE SUBMITTED AND
EXPLAINED BY CITY MANAGER CAVEZZA AND ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL UPON THE ADOPTION
OF A SINGLE MOTION MADE BY COUNCILOR POYDASHEFF AND SECONDED BY COUNCILOR
SUBER, WHICH CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY BY THOSE TEN MEMBERS OF COUNCIL PRESENT FOR
THIS
MEETING:
A Resolution (142-02) - Authorizing the execution of a construction
contract with Mid-Georgia Contracting, in the amount of $11,500.00.
A Resolution (143-02) - Authorizing the purchase of pool chemicals on an
?as needed basis? from Industrial Chemicals, Inc., for the estimated annual
Contract value of $40,480.00.
A Resolution (144-02) - Authorizing the payment for the annual maintenance
agreement for the digital recording system in the 911 Center from the
Dictaphone Corporation in the amount of $27,824.
A Resolution (145-02) - Authorizing the purchase of a F350 cab and
chassis via Georgia SWC S-000627, from Southlake Ford, in the amount of
$26,036.00.
A Resolution (146-02) - Authorizing the declaration of two fire trucks
(Engine #18 and Engine #19), as surplus equipment in accordance with Section
7-501 of the Charter of the Columbus Consolidated Government.
A Resolution (147-02) - Authorizing the purchase of watershed
fertilization services from Burt Fertilizer for the estimated annual contract
value of $6,607.96.
A Resolution (148-02) - Authorizing the execution of a contract with
Property Inspections Group to provide inspection services for rehabilitative
housing on an ?as needed basis?.
A Resolution (149-02) - Authorizing the purchase of one (1) fixed and
one (1) portable compressed breathing air cascade system from Harless Fire
Equipment.
A Resolution (150-02) - Authorizing the execution of a contract for
Vending Services with Columbus Trophy and Screen Printing.
A Resolution (151-02) - Authorizing payment to Georgia Power Company for
lighting services in the amount of $32,200.00 for the installation of 23
decorative cast aluminum poles around the perimeter of the River Center,
$15,343.75 for parking lot lighting at the Northside Recreation Center and
$17,402.50 for parking lot lighting at the Benning Recreation Center.
A Resolution (152-02) - Authorizing execution of a contract with William
M. Mercer, Inc., to provide consulting services for the City?s employee/Retiree
benefits programs.
A Resolution (153-02) - Authorizing the purchase of a custom software
application from 3X Corporation of Atlanta.
*** *** ***
UPCOMING EVENTS:
City Manager Cavezza highlighted several events that will be going on
throughout the week, as outlined below:
April 3rd ? Public meeting to discuss parking meters, in the Council
Chambers, at 6:00 p,m., at the Government Center.
Environmental Court - City Manager Cavezza said they will be bringing the
proposal to the Council in a few weeks.
April 16th - Mayor?s Prayer Breakfast, 7:30 a.m.
April 17th - 2:00 p.m., Groundbreaking for the Liberty Theater Cultural
Center Annex.
*** *** ***
HOME LOAN PROGRAM:
City Manager Cavezza said we are running low on money on the Home Program.
He said we only have money for a few loans and said we have contacted the
lenders and asked them to call us before they approve a loan.
Mayor Peters said there was a question in the audit report about the Home
Loan Program and then asked City Manager Cavezza to put some information in the
Council?s Agenda Packet, as to what are the thresholds as the guidelines have
changed and said we have been asking what are the new guidelines.
Councilor Suber asked if this is the first year that we have used that
money, because we have had some difficulty in utilizing all the home loans
because some of the homeowners were not coming forward and we were considering
moving it over to some of the business people for apartments.
City Manager Cavezza said we made over 120 loans. Mayor Peters said we
took less money toward the property and shifted it back to the home program
because of all the demand; and then there was the issue of about qualifying for
the $5,000, and the allocation for salaries had changed, and HUD said there
were different guidelines. He said he thinks the mortgage people need a copy of
it.
City Manager Cavezza said he would provide that information to the Mayor
and Council.
-------------------------------------------*** ***
***------------------------------------
CLERK OF COUNCIL?S AGENDA:
THE FOLLOWING ITEMS WERE SUBMITTED BY CLERK OF COUNCIL WASHINGTON AS
INFORMATION FOR THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL:
(1) Memorandum from ACCG, Re: 2002 NACO Annual Meeting - Orleans
County, New Orleans, Louisiana on July 12 - 17, 2002.
(2) Biographical sketch of David Hay, nominee for Susan Anderson?s
at-Large position on the Keep Columbus Beautiful Commission.
*** *** ***
THE FOLLOWING TEMPORARY STREET CLOSING APPLICATION WAS SUBMITTED BY CLERK
OF COUNCIL WASHINGTON AND APPROVED BY THE
COUNCIL:
Application of Rev. J. H. Flakes, Jr. for a temporary street closure for
5th
Street between 2nd Avenue and 3rd Avenue, on April 13, 2002, from 1:30 p.m. to
5:30 p.m. in connection with a ?Church Carnival?.
Councilor Poydasheff moved its approval. Seconded by Mayor Pro Rodgers and
carried unanimously by those ten members of Council present for this meeting.
*** *** ***
KEEP COLUMBUS BEAUTIFUL COMMISSION:
Clerk of Council Washington submitted a letter from Ms. Jenny Collins
resigning from her position on the Keep Columbus Beautiful Commission.
Councilor Poydasheff moved that the letter be received with regrets and thanks
for service. Seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Rodgers and carried unanimously by those
ten members of Council present for this meeting.
*** *** ***
MINUTES OF THE FOLLOWING BOARDS WERE SUBMITTED BY CLERK OF COUNCIL
WASHINGTON AND OFFICIALLY RECEIVED BY THE COUNCIL:
Board of Tax Assessors, Number 10 .
Building Contractors Examining Board, February 7, 2002.
Council Briefing, January 8, 2002.
Department of Family and Children Services, March 20, 2002.
Elections and Registrations, Board of, February 12, 2002.
Health, Board of, February 27, 2002.
Historic and Architectural Review Board, February 11, 2002.
Historic and Architectural Review Board, February 21, 2002.
Housing Authority, Board of, February 20, 2002.
New Horizons Community Service Board, March 11, 2002.
Personnel Review Board, March 20, 2002.
Planning Advisory Commission, December 5, 2001.
Planning Advisory Commission, January 16, 2002.
Planning Advisory Commission, February 6, 2002.
Planning Advisory Commission, March 6, 2002.
Uptown Fa?ade, Board of, February 18, 2002.
Councilor Woodson made a motion that these minutes be received. Seconded
by Councilor Poydasheff and carried unanimously by those ten members of Council
present for this meeting.
*** *** ***
THE FOLLOWING TWO NEW ZONING PETITIONS WERE SUBMITTED BY CLERK OF
COUNCIL WASHINGTON AND AN ORDINANCE WAS CALLED FOR BY MAYOR PRO TEM
RODGERS:
Petition submitted by Aaron Oney to rezone approximately 5.98
total acres of property located at 1741, 1729, 1721, 1715, 1711, 1707 & 1703
Elvan Avenue from an R-2 District to an R-4 District. (Recommended for
conditional approval by both the Planning Division and the Planning Advisory
Commission.) (14-CA-02- Oney)
Petition submitted by the Planning Division to amend the text of the
zoning ordinance to create a new zoning classification. The new Zone, A-2
(Rural Residential) would serve as an intermediary zone between R-1 (Low
Density Residential) and A-1 (Agriculture). (Recommended for conditional
approval by the Planning Advisory Commission and approval by the Planning
Division.) (15-A-02-Planning Div.)
*** *** ***
ANIMAL CONTROL ADVISORY BOARD:
Clerk of Council Washington pointed out that the Chattahoochee Valley
Veterinarian Association is nominating Dr. John Blosie to succeed Dr. Lamar
Parmer on the Animal Control Advisory Board. Councilor Poydasheff made a motion
to confirm Dr. John Blosie. Seconded by Councilor Woodson and carried
unanimously by those ten members of Council present.
*** *** ***
BUILDING AUTHORITY OF COLUMBUS:
Clerk of Council Washington pointed on that Councilor Henderson is
nominating Mr. Donald Gates to succeed Ms. Sally Lassiter on the Building
Authority of Columbus. Councilor Poydasheff made a motion to confirm Mr. Donald
Gates. Seconded by Councilor Allen and carried unanimously by those ten members
of Council present for this meeting.
*** *** ***
CIVIC CENTER ADVISORY BOARD:
Clerk of Council Washington said we still need a nominee for Council
District Five. Mayor Pro Tem Rodgers then nominated Mr. Gene Terry Hattaway.
Councilor McDaniel made a motion that Mr. Hattaway be confirmed. Seconded by
Councilor Poydasheff and carried unanimously by those ten members of Council
present for this meeting.
*** *** ***
C.I.R.C.L.E.:
Clerk of Council Washington pointed out that the terms of office of
Ms. Tonya Douglas, Ms. Ann Henderson and Ms. Stacy Poydasheff on C.I.R.C.L.E.
expired on March 1, 2002 and that all three are eligible to succeed
themselves. Councilor Poydasheff then made a motion that Ms. Douglas and Ms.
Henderson be appointed to succeed themselves for another term of office.
Seconded by Councilor Suber and carried unanimously by those ten members of
Council present for this meeting.
Mayor Peters then renominated Ms. Stacy Poydasheff for another term of
office. She was also confirmed in the motion made earlier by Councilor
Poydasheff. Seconded by Councilor Suber and carried unanimously by those ten
members of Council present for this meeting.
*** *** ***
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COUNCIL:
Clerk of Council Washington pointed out that the terms of office of
Mr. Douglas Bryant, Mr. Timothy Johnson, Mr. Gary Allen Jones,
Ms. Floretta Thornton-Reid, Ms. Gloria Weston-Smart, Ms. Leigh Stewart, Mr.
William Flewellen, Mr. Homer Kuhl, Ms. Mary Crawford, and
Ms. Clementine Stephen on the Community Development Advisory Council expired on
March 27, 2002. She pointed out that Mr. William Flewellen,
Mr. Homer Kuhl, Ms. Mary Crawford and Ms. Clementine Stephens are not eligible
to succeed themselves. She also pointed out that Ms. Gloria Weston-Smart does
not wish to serve again.
Councilor Suber nominated Mr. Douglas Bryant and Mr. Timothy Johnson to
succeed themselves for another term of office. Councilor Smith nominated Ms.
Leticia Towns to succeed Ms. Gloria Weston-Smart. Councilor McDaniel nominated
Ms. Leigh Stewart to succeed herself for another term of office.
Clerk of Council Washington pointed out that the only individuals who are
not eligible to succeed themselves are Mr. William Flewellen, Council District
One, Mr. Homer Kuhl, Council District Five, Ms. Mary Crawford, Council District
Three and Ms. Clementine Stephens, Council District Two. She said these four
councilors would need to nominate someone from their respective Council
Districts. All other individuals who were eligible to serve were re-nominated
by Mayor Pro Tem Rodgers to succeed themselves.
*** *** ***
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD:
Clerk of Council Washington pointed out that the Council still needs to
nominate someone to fill the seat of Mr. David Grindle, who is no longer a
resident of Muscogee County. There was no nomination made.
*** *** ***
HISTORIC & ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD:
Clerk of Council Washington pointed out that Mr. Richard Coss has resigned
from this board and that he served as a historic resident member, and this is a
Council appointment. Councilor Smith nominated Mr. Charles Andrew Hidle for
this seat.
*** *** ***
HOSPITAL AUTHORITY:
Clerk of Council Washington pointed out that the Hospital Authority is
asking for three additional nominees for Glenn Fussell and Charles McDaniel?s
positions. She said they do not wish to be reappointed to this board.
She said that Ms. Nancy Rinn has been nominated for Mr. Charles McDaniel?s
seat. Councilor Suber said there are some individuals who have expressed an
interest in serving on this board. He then nominated Rev. Ralph Huling, Mr.
Douglas Scott and Ms. Karon Greyer for Mr. Glenn Fussell?s position. (It was
later brought to Clerk of Council Washington?s attention that Ms. Greyer is no
longer a resident of Muscogee County; therefore she cannot be nominated).
Clerk of Council Washington said we also need two additional nominees for
Mr. Charles McDaniel?s seat.
*** *** ***
PLANNING ADVISORY COMMISSION:
Clerk of Council Washington pointed out that the term of office of
Ms. Sharon Jamison on the Planning Advisory Commission expired on March 31,
2002 and that she is eligible to succeed herself for another term of office.
Councilor Allen then nominated Ms. Jamison for another term and moved that she
be confirmed. Seconded by Councilor Suber and carried unanimously by those ten
members of Council present for this meeting.
*** *** ***
EMPLOYEES PENSION BOARDS OF TRUSTEES:
Clerk of Council Washington pointed out that the Council has added one new
position to the Employees Pension Boards of Trustees. She said this position
must be filled with someone from the business community and said this is the
Mayor?s appointment. (See below for additional information)
*** *** ***
RECREATION ADVISORY BOARD:
Clerk of Council Washington pointed out that the term of office of
Mr. Michael Barnett on the Recreation Advisory Board expired on February 28,
2002 and that he is not eligible to succeed himself. She said Mr. Barnett
served as Council District 10 At-large representative. There was no nomination
made.
*** *** ***
TAXICAB COMMISSION:
Clerk of Council Washington pointed out that Mr. John Golden?s position on
the Taxicab Commission is vacant, due to Mr. Golden no longer being the owner
of a Taxicab Company, as he has sold his business. Councilor Suber said he and
Councilor Woodson would like to nominate Mr. James Brooks. He said Mr. Brooks
owns Airborne Taxi Company.
*** *** ***
EMPLOYEES PENSION BOARDS OF TRUSTEES:
Referring back to this subject, Mayor Peters said he would like to
nominate Mr. Morton Harris for this new position. Mayor Pro Tem Rodgers then
made a motion that Mr. Harris be confirmed. Seconded by Councilor Poydasheff
and carried unanimously by those nine members of Council present for this
meeting.
*** *** ***
TAXICAB COMMISSION:
Councilor Henderson nominated Ms. Diane Quick for Mr. John Golden?s
position on the Taxicab Commission as well. He said she is part owner of Yellow
Cab.
*** *** ***
BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS:
Clerk of Council Washington pointed out that the term of office of
Mr. Johnny Cargill on the Board of Zoning Appeals will expire on March 31, 2002
and that he is not eligible to succeed himself. She pointed out that Councilor
McDaniel is nominating Mr. Billy Edwards to succeed Mr. Cargill for this
position.
*** *** ***
Mayor Peters asked if there was anyone present in the audience who had an
issue to bring before the Council, they could be heard at this time. There was
no one who wanted to be heard.
*** *** ***
ENVIRONMENTAL COURT:
Councilor Henderson said there was some suggested changes submitted by
Dick McKee, Director of Public Services, and said he doesn?t have any problems
with any of them, but said under Section 5-10 ?, the Leash law, he would
suggest that we change the following wording, which states taken off the owners
property and not confined by fence, change the word ?and? to ?or?. He said as
it is written, they can be running loose on the owner?s property and not be
subject to the Leash law. He said he would like for the City Attorney to look
at changing that wording.
Mayor Peters asked if they should be subject to the Leash Law on their own
property. Councilor Henderson said he doesn?t mean in the yard in the fence,
but said it says in the yard and not confined.
*** *** ***
With there being no other business to come before this Council, Councilor
McDaniel then made a motion for adjournment. Seconded by Councilor Smith and
carried unanimously by those ten members of Council present for this meeting,
with the time being 9:40 P. M.
*** *** ***
Tiny B. Washington, CMC
Clerk of Council
The Council of Columbus, Georgia